Search

Polyurethane foam was fabricated from polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (pMDI) and soy‐based polyol. Nanoclay Cloisite 30B was incorporated into the foam systems to improve their thermal stabilities and mechanical properties. Neat polyurethane was used as a control. Soy‐based polyurethane foams with 0.5–3 parts per hundred of polyols by weight (php) of nanoclay were prepared. The distribution of nanoclay in the composites was analyzed by X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and the morphology of the composites was analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The thermal properties were evaluated through dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA). Compression and three‐point bending tests were conducted on the composites. The densities of nanoclay soy‐based polyurethane foams were higher than that of the neat soy‐based polyurethane foam. At a loading of 0.5 php nanoclay, the compressive, flexural strength, and modulus of the soy‐based polyurethane foam were increased by 98%, 26%, 22%, and 65%, respectively, as compared to those of the neat soy‐based polyurethane foam. The storage modulus of the soy‐based polyurethane foam was improved by the incorporation of nanoclay. The glass transition temperature of the foam was increased as the nanoclay loading was increased. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A series of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with rigid ladderlike polyphenylsilsesquioxane (PPSQ) were prepared at weight ratios of 100/0, 95/5, 90/10, 85/15, and 80/20 by solution casting and then hot‐pressing. Their rheological properties have been studied under both dynamic shear and uniaxial elongation conditions. Their rheological properties depend on the compositions. The storage modulus, G′, loss modulus, G″, and dynamic shear viscosity, η*, of the PMMA/PPSQ 95/5 blend were slightly lower than those of pure PMMA. However, the values of G′, G″, and η* for the other PMMA/PPSQ blends are higher than those of PMMA. The G′ values increase with an increase in PPSQ content from 5% through 15% PPSQ at low frequencies and then drop as the PPSQ content increases to 20%. Uniaxial elongational viscosity (ηE) data demonstrate that PMMA/PPSQ blends exhibit slightly weaker (5% PPSQ) and much weaker (10% PPSQ) strain‐hardening than PMMA. In contrast, the PMMA/PPSQ 85/15 blend shows strain‐softening. Neither strain‐hardening nor strain‐softening was observed in the 80/20 blend. The special rheological properties for the 95/5 blend is probably due to a decrease in PMMA entanglements brought by the specific PMMA–PPSQ interactions. Rheological properties of PMMA/PPSQ blends with higher PPSQ content (≥10%) are mainly affected by formation of hard PPSQ particles. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 352–359, 2007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]