Search

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is an optimal recommended treatment for stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy for stage III NSCLC. Methods: This prospective, open‐label, single‐arm, observational cohort study was performed between January 2010 and September 2016. Patients were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy with 60 mg/m2 intravenous cisplatin on day 1 and 50 mg/m2 oral vinorelbine on days 1, 8, and 15; radiotherapy was administered concurrently from day 1 when chemotherapy was initiated. A total dose of 66–70 Gy radiotherapy was delivered in daily fractions of 2 Gy for 6.5–7 consecutive weeks. The tumor response was assessed after completing concomitant treatment. Results: A total of 58 patients were enrolled and analyzed; 31 patients had stage IIIA NSCLC and 27 had stage IIIB NSCLC. After induction CCRT, 31 patients achieved an objective response (complete response in one and partial response in 30; the response rate was 53.4%). The median progression‐free survival was 6.73 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.42–7.91), duration of response was 12.30 months (95% CI, 5.59–19.01), and overall survival was 24.83 months (95% CI, 19.26–30.21). No treatment‐related mortality was observed, and neutropenia was the most common grade 3 and 4 treatment‐related toxicity (11 patients; 18.9%). Conclusions: CCRT with the weekly regimen of oral vinorelbine plus triweekly cisplatin was effective and safe for stage III NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival outcomes compared to chemotherapy for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but treatment efficacy widely varies. The combination of ICIs with chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy over chemotherapy alone; however, whether this strategy is superior to single agent ICIs for the treatment of advanced NSCLC remains unknown. Methods: The records of 109 patients with advanced NSCLC who were administered at least one cycle of ICIs were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of a chemotherapy treatment combination. Efficacy and survival outcomes were analyzed. Result: Sixty‐nine (58.0%) patients received single agent ICIs (ICI group) and 50 (42.0%) received ICIs and chemotherapy (ICC group). The median (3.2 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.025) and one‐year (34.5 vs. 9.6%; P = 0.026) progression‐free survival (PFS) rates were significantly better in the ICC than in the ICI group. The superior efficacy of ICC remained in the propensity score matched pairs (median PFS 3.2 vs. 2.6 months, P = 0.032; 1‐year PFS 35.2 vs. 7.6%; P = 0.035). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22–0.62; P < 0.001) and the ICC group (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34–0.94; P = 0.028) were predictive of PFS. Subgroup‐to‐chemotherapy interaction revealed improved risk reduction for adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutation. Conclusion: Combing chemotherapy with ICIs improved treatment efficacy over ICIs alone. The additional efficacy of chemotherapy may differ between histological subtypes and EGFR mutation status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: VEGF plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis and immunosuppression. VEGF‐blocking has proven beneficial for EGFR mutant and wild‐type nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (nonsq‐NSCLC); however, the number of cycles and treatment line yielding the optimal benefit are unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 115 patients with advanced/metastatic nonsq‐NSCLC administered at least one cycle of bevacizumab. The number of bevacizumab cycles was treated as a time‐dependent covariate. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: Bevacizumab was used as first‐line treatment in 47 (40.9%) patients, with a median of five cycles (range: 1–31). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.68–8.51; P < 0.001), wild‐type EGFR (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.45–4.70; P = 0.001), and bleeding during bevacizumab treatment (HR 3.63, 95% CI 1.77–7.45; P < 0.001) were predictive of poor OS; the number of bevacizumab cycles and first‐line administration were not. In the wild‐type EGFR subgroup, the number of bevacizumab cycles (≥ 5 vs. 1–4) was associated with a significant OS benefit (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08–0.98; P = 0.044); first‐line administration also showed an OS benefit (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20–1.17; P = 0.105). A significant association between the number of cycles and EGFR status was identified (P = 0.046). Conclusion: OS benefit is negatively affected by bleeding events in bevacizumab‐treated patients. Prolonged and early introduction of bevacizumab may provide an OS benefit for patients with wild‐type EGFR nonsq‐NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]