1. HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis services, provision, and delivery in the European treatment network of HIV, hepatitis and global emerging infectious diseases (NEAT ID).
- Author
-
Liegeon, Geoffroy, Duffy, Annie, Brooks, Caroline, Honour, Hannah, Pozniak, Anton, and Molina, Jean Michel
- Subjects
HIV prevention ,PREVENTION of communicable diseases ,DISCLOSURE ,SCIENTIFIC observation ,CROSS-sectional method ,CLINICAL medicine research ,WORLD health ,SEX work ,QUANTITATIVE research ,PRE-exposure prophylaxis ,SURVEYS ,HUMAN services programs ,HEALTH literacy ,SEXUAL orientation identity ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,MEN who have sex with men ,TASK shifting - Abstract
Objectives: We conducted a survey to evaluate HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) practices in a European clinical research network on HIV, hepatitis, and global infectious diseases (NEAT ID). Methods: An online survey comprising 22 questions was sent via a secure electronic tool to the investigating physician of each of the 342 NEAT ID study centres across 15 European countries in November 2020. Results: In total, 50 sites from 12 countries responded (15% response rate). Most sites were in Western Europe, two were in Poland, and one was in Hungary. Of the responding sites, 45 provided PrEP services for a total of 27 416 PrEP users, with 1361 new PrEP initiators each month. These centres supplied PrEP for men who have sex with men (100%), people who inject drugs (84%), sex workers (84%), women (62%), and transgender women (31%). PrEP persistence after 1 year was >90%, 75%–90%, and 40%–75% in 17, 24, and 4 centres, respectively. In total, 32/45 (71%) centres reported strong community‐based organization commitment at their site, and 15/45 (33%) centres developed task‐shifting processes to deliver PrEP through nurses (11/15), pharmacists (5/15), and key‐population peers (2/15). The biggest barriers to implementation of PrEP were low awareness of and knowledge about PrEP (47%), unwillingness to disclose sexual identity or at‐risk behaviour (36%), and lack of administrative support (29%). Of the 45 centres, 32 (71%) have already been involved in PrEP research and 43 (96%) were interested in participating in such studies. Conclusions: The few NEAT ID centres that responded to the survey showed disparities in PrEP deployment and practices despite a common interest in participating in research in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF