Search

Background and purpose: According to the latest European guidelines, discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene‐related peptide (anti‐CGRP MAb) may be considered after 12–18 months of treatment. However, some patients may worsen after discontinuation. In this study, we assessed the response following treatment resumption. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in 14 Headache Units in Spain. We included patients with response to anti‐CGRP MAb with clinical worsening after withdrawal and resumption of treatment. Numbers of monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly headache days (MHD) were obtained at four time points: before starting anti‐CGRP MAb (T‐baseline); last month of first treatment period (T‐suspension); month of restart due to worsening (T‐worsening); and 3 months after resumption (T‐reintroduction). The response rate to resumption was calculated. Possible differences among periods were analysed according to MMD and MHD. Results: A total of 360 patients, 82% women, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at migraine onset of 18 (12) years. The median (IQR) MHD at T‐baseline was 20 (13) and MMD was 5 (6); at T‐suspension, the median (IQR) MHD was 5 (6) and MMD was 4 (5); at T‐worsening, the median (IQR) MHD was 16 (13) and MMD was 12 (6); and at T‐reintroduction, the median (IQR) MHD was 8 (8) and MHD was 5 (5). In the second period of treatment, a 50% response rate was achieved by 57.4% of patients in MHD and 65.8% in MMD. Multivariate models showed significant differences in MHD between the third month after reintroduction and last month before suspension of first treatment period (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results suggest that anti‐CGRP MAb therapy is effective after reintroduction. However, 3 months after resumption, one third of the sample reached the same improvement as after the first treatment period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: First‐line treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is limited to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, and in refractory cases, alternatives are scarce. Lacosamide has been suggested as a valid option. In this study, we describe a series of patients who received oral lacosamide as treatment for TN after first‐line drug failure. Methods: In this retrospective descriptive cohort study, we included patients with refractory TN who attended a tertiary center between 2015 and 2021 and were prescribed oral lacosamide after first‐line treatment failure. The primary endpoints were pain relief and adverse effects. We secondarily analyzed clinical outcomes and compared responders versus nonresponders in the search for potential predictors of response. Results: Eighty‐six patients were included (mean age: 62 [SD 15.6] years; 54/86 [63%] female). The TN etiology was secondary in 16/86 (19%) patients. Concomitant continuous pain was present in 29/86 (34%) patients. The mean number of previous treatments was 2.7 [SD 1.5]. Pain relief was achieved in 57/86 (66%) cases, with 28/86 (33%) patients presenting adverse effects, all of which were mild. No statistically significant differences were observed between responders and nonresponders, but subtle clinical differences suggested potential predictors of response. Conclusion: Lacosamide may be an effective and relatively safe treatment for refractory pain in TN patients after first‐line treatment failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in patients with nonepileptiform EEG patterns remains a challenge., Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) and its quantification (QtSPECT) in the diagnosis of NCSE., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients admitted with clinical suspicion of NCSE who underwent an HMPAO-SPECT simultaneously with scalp EEG showing nonepileptiform patterns, in a 5-year period. After a complete diagnostic workup, treatment, and clinical evolution, disregarding the SPECT results, patients were classified into confirmed NCSE (n = 11) and non-NCSE (n = 8). Then, we compared the EEG and SPECT results in both groups., Results: Lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA) was predominant in the NCSE group (45.4%, p = .045), while lateralized irregular slowing was observed equally in both groups. Patients with NCSE showed significant hyperperfusion compared with non-NCSE patients (p = .026). QtSPECT correctly classified 91% of patients in NCSE and 75% patients with non-NCSE (p = .006)., Conclusions: Regional cerebral blood flow measured with SPECT could be useful in the diagnosis of NCSE in cases of an EEG pattern with lateralized slow activity and high clinical suspicion., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)