Search

Background: The Movement Disorder Society revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS) was designed to be more sensitive to mild motor severity than the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Objective: To test whether MDS‐UPDRS Part III items provide increased sensitivity to mild motor severity when compared to the same items of the UPDRS in de novo PD patients. Method: Using a sample of 129 de novo PD patients assessed at one time point simultaneously with both scales, we compared the scale's scores on the 17 items measuring the same motor function. The scaling anchors for the MDS‐UPDRS were Slight, Mild, Moderate and Severe, and for the UPDRS were Mild, Moderate, Severe and Marked. Using Classical Test Theory (CTT) we compared the distributions of the scaling anchors from the individual items. Using Item Response Theory (IRT), we examined the sensitivity of the scaling anchors from each scale to the latent‐trait measurement of overall parkinsonian motor severity. Results: There was 2193 observations of individual scaling anchors from the 17 items in both scales. The CTT approach revealed frequent floor effects with only the item assessing Gait demonstrating a significance difference in the scaling distribution between the scales (P = 0.005). The IRT analyses revealed similar levels of sensitivity to the latent trait of PD motor function. Conclusion: These results do not support increased sensitivity of MDS‐UPDRS over the UPDRS for assessing mild motor severity in de novo PD patients, with significant difference in the scaling only for the item assessing gait. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This article reports on the findings of the effect of two structured exercise interventions on secondary cognitive outcomes that were gathered as part of the Progressive Resistance Exercise Training in Parkinson's disease (PD) randomized, controlled trial.Methods: This study was a prospective, parallel-group, single-center trial. Fifty-one nondemented patients with mild-to-moderate PD were randomly assigned either to modified Fitness Counts (mFC) or to Progressive Resistance Exercise Training (PRET) and were followed for 24 months. Cognitive outcomes were the Digit Span, Stroop, and Brief Test of Attention (BTA).Results: Eighteen patients in mFC and 20 patients in PRET completed the trial. At 12 and at 24 months, no differences between groups were observed. At 12 months, relative to baseline, mFC improved on the Digit Span (estimated change: 0.3; interquartile range: 0, 0.7; P = 0.04) and Stroop (0.3; 0, 0.6; P = 0.04), and PRET improved only on the Digit Span (0.7; 0.3, 1; P < 0.01). At 24 months, relative to baseline, mFC improved on the Digit Span (0.7; 0.3, 1.7; P < 0.01) and Stroop (0.3; 0.1, 0.5; P = 0.03), whereas PRET improved on the Digit Span (0.5; 0.2, 0.8; P < 0.01), Stroop (0.2; -0.1, 0.6; P = 0.048), and BTA (0.3; 0, 0.8; P = 0.048). No neurological or cognitive adverse events were observed.Conclusions: This study provides class IV level of evidence that 24 months of PRET or mFC may improve attention and working memory in nondemented patients with mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT The effects of progressive resistance exercise (PRE) on the motor signs of Parkinson's disease have not been studied in controlled trials. The objective of the current trial was to compare 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month outcomes of patients with Parkinson's disease who received PRE with a stretching, balance, and strengthening exercise program. The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial between September 2007 and July 2011. Pairs of patients matched by sex and off-medication scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, motor subscale (UPDRS-III), were randomly assigned to the interventions with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The PRE group performed a weight-lifting program. The modified fitness counts (mFC) group performed a stretching, balance, and strengthening exercise program. Patients exercised 2 days per week for 24 months at a gym. A personal trainer directed both weekly sessions for the first 6 months and 1 weekly session after 6 months. The primary outcome was the off-medication UPDRS-III score. Patients were followed for 24 months at 6-month intervals. Of 51 patients, 20 in the PRE group and 18 in the mFC group completed the trial. At 24 months, the mean off-medication UPDRS-III score decreased more with PRE than with mFC (mean difference, −7.3 points; 95% confidence interval, −11.3 to −3.6; P<0.001). The PRE group had 10 adverse events, and the mFC group had 7 adverse events. PRE demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant reduction in UPDRS-III scores compared with mFC and is recommended as a useful adjunct therapy to improve Parkinsonian motor signs. © 2013 Movement Disorder Society [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several measures of isometric contractions reflect motor impairments in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD), including long relaxation times and greater power in the 5 to 15 Hz electromyographic (EMG) bandwidth during the holding phase of contractions compared to those measures in healthy subjects. We sought to determine whether the impairments observed in subjects with PD in the performance of isometric contractions reflect disease severity. Twenty-eight subjects with PD performed isometric contractions at a torque level equal to 50% of the torque generated during a maximum voluntary contraction while off medication. Subjects were instructed to reach the target torque as fast as possible upon hearing the auditory "go" signal and to relax their muscles when a second auditory cue signaled the end of the hold phase. There was a significant positive correlation between torque relaxation time and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-Motor score. A significant positive correlation was also observed between the proportion of power in the 5 to 15 Hz frequency bin of the agonist EMG signal and UPDRS-Motor score, and a significant negative correlation between the proportion of power in the 15 to 30 Hz frequency bin and UPDRS-Motor score. These measures provide objective quantification of the severity of motor impairment that can be used to investigate the efficacy of different interventions in individuals with PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]