Search

Living organisms are multiscale complex systems that have evolved high degrees of multifunctionality and redundancy in the structure–function relationship. A number of factors, only in part determined genetically, affect the jobs of proteins. The overall structural organization confers unique molecular properties that provide the potential to perform a pattern of activities, some of which are co‐opted by specific environments. The variety of multifunctional proteins is expanding, but most cases are handled individually and according to the still dominant 'one structure–one function' approach, which relies on the attribution of canonical names typically referring to the first task identified for a given protein. The present topical review focuses on the multifunctionality of ion channels as a paradigmatic example. Mounting evidence reports the ability of many ion channels (including members of voltage‐dependent, ligand‐gated and transient receptor potential families) to exert biological effects independently of their ion conductivity. 'Functionally based' nomenclature (the practice of naming a protein or family of proteins based on a single purpose) is a conceptual bias for three main reasons: (i) it increases the amount of ambiguity, deceiving our understanding of the multiple contributions of biomolecules that is the heart of the complexity; (ii) it is in stark contrast to protein evolution dynamics, largely based on multidomain arrangement; and (iii) it overlooks the crucial role played by the microenvironment in adjusting the actions of cell structures and in tuning protein isoform diversity to accomplish adaptational requirements. Biological information in protein physiology is distributed among different entwined layers working as the primary 'locus' of natural selection and of evolutionary constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basal forebrain neurons control cerebral blood flow (CBF) by releasing acetylcholine (Ach), which binds to endothelial muscarinic receptors to induce nitric (NO) release and vasodilation in intraparenchymal arterioles. Nevertheless, the mechanism whereby Ach stimulates human brain microvascular endothelial cells to produce NO is still unknown. Herein, we sought to assess whether Ach stimulates NO production in a Ca2+‐dependent manner in hCMEC/D3 cells, a widespread model of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Ach induced a dose‐dependent increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) that was prevented by the genetic blockade of M5 muscarinic receptors (M5‐mAchRs), which was the only mAchR isoform coupled to phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) present in hCMEC/D3 cells. A comprehensive real‐time polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed the expression of the transcripts encoding for type 3 inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptors (InsP3R3), two‐pore channels 1 and 2 (TPC1–2), Stim2, Orai1–3. Pharmacological manipulation showed that the Ca2+ response to Ach was mediated by InsP3R3, TPC1–2, and store‐operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE). Ach‐induced NO release, in turn, was inhibited in cells deficient of M5‐mAchRs. Likewise, Ach failed to increase NO levels in the presence of l‐NAME, a selective NOS inhibitor, or BAPTA, a membrane‐permeant intracellular Ca2+ buffer. Moreover, the pharmacological blockade of the Ca2+ response to Ach also inhibited the accompanying NO production. These data demonstrate for the first time that synaptically released Ach may trigger NO release in human brain microvascular endothelial cells by stimulating a Ca2+ signal via M5‐mAchRs. Acetylcholine induces Ca2+‐dependent nitric oxide release in human brain microvascular endothelial cells by binding to M5 muscarinic receptors. This finding sheds novel light on the mechanism by which acetylcholine triggers neurovascular coupling in the brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The neurotransmitter glutamate increases cerebral blood flow by activating postsynaptic neurons and presynaptic glial cells within the neurovascular unit. Glutamate does so by causing an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in the target cells, which activates the Ca2+/Calmodulin‐dependent nitric oxide (NO) synthase to release NO. It is unclear whether brain endothelial cells also sense glutamate through an elevation in [Ca2+]i and NO production. The current study assessed whether and how glutamate drives Ca2+‐dependent NO release in bEND5 cells, an established model of brain endothelial cells. We found that glutamate induced a dose‐dependent oscillatory increase in [Ca2+]i, which was maximally activated at 200 μM and inhibited by α‐methyl‐4‐carboxyphenylglycine, a selective blocker of Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors. Glutamate‐induced intracellular Ca2+ oscillations were triggered by rhythmic endogenous Ca2+ mobilization and maintained over time by extracellular Ca2+ entry. Pharmacological manipulation revealed that glutamate‐induced endogenous Ca2+ release was mediated by InsP3‐sensitive receptors and nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) gated two‐pore channel 1. Constitutive store‐operated Ca2+ entry mediated Ca2+ entry during ongoing Ca2+ oscillations. Finally, glutamate evoked a robust, although delayed increase in NO levels, which was blocked by pharmacologically inhibition of the accompanying intracellular Ca2+ signals. Of note, glutamate induced Ca2+‐dependent NO release also in hCMEC/D3 cells, an established model of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. This investigation demonstrates for the first time that metabotropic glutamate‐induced intracellular Ca2+ oscillations and NO release have the potential to impact on neurovascular coupling in the brain. Glutamate induces intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells. Glutamate‐induced intracellular Ca2+ oscillations lead to robust, although delayed, nitric oxide release. Brain microvascular endothelial cells could play a crucial role in neurovascular coupling during synaptic activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]