Search

Summary: New immunotherapeutic interventions have revolutionized cancer treatment. The immune responsiveness of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was first demonstrated by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In addition, milder immunotherapeutic approaches are exploited. However, the long‐term efficacy of these therapies is hampered by various immune resistance and editing mechanisms. In this regard, co‐inhibitory signalling pathways have been shown to play a crucial role. Via up‐regulation of inhibitory checkpoints, tumour‐reactive T cell and Natural Killer cell responses can be strongly impeded. Accordingly, the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA‐4 (CTLA4) and PD‐1 (PDCD1, CD279)/PD‐L1 (CD274, PDCD1LG1) accomplished a breakthrough in cancer treatment, with impressive clinical responses. Numerous new co‐inhibitory players and novel combination therapies are currently investigated for their potential to boost anti‐tumour immunity and improve survival of cancer patients. Although the challenge here remains to avoid severe systemic toxicity. This review addresses the involvement of co‐inhibitory signalling in AML immune evasion and discusses the opportunities for checkpoint blockers in AML treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The use of fresh red blood cells (RBCs) is recommended for critically ill patients and patients undergoing surgery, although there is no conclusive evidence that this is beneficial. In this follow-up study, the short-term and the long-term recovery of irradiated, leukoreduced RBCs transfused after either a short storage (SS) or a long storage (LS) period were compared. By consecutive transfusion of RBCs with a SS and LS period, a direct comparison of their survival within the same patient was possible. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten transfusion-requiring patients each received a SS RCCs (stored 0-10 days) and a LS RCCs (stored 25-35 days) consecutively. Short-term and long-term survival of the transfused RBCs was followed by flow cytometry using natural differences in RBC antigens between donors and patients. Posttransfusion recovery (PTR) was measured at several time points after transfusion. RESULTS: The mean 24-hour PTR of SS RBCs is 86.4 ± 17.8 percent and that of LS RBCs 73.5 ± 13.7 percent. After the first 24 hours, the mean times to reach a PTR of 50 percent of the 24-hour PTR (T50) and mean potential life spans (mPLs) of the surviving SS and LS RBCs (41 and 116 days and 41 and 114 days, respectively) do not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The mean 24-hour PTR of both SS and LS RBCs complies with the guidelines, even in a compromised patient population. The 24-hour PTR of SS RBCs, however, is significantly higher than that of LS RBCs. The remaining population of SS and LS RBCs has a nearly identical long-term survival. Therefore, depletion of the removal-prone RBCs before transfusion may be an efficient approach for product improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]