Search

Aim: The aim of the present study was to survey the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy and combined medication use across 15 Asian countries and areas in 2016. Methods: By using the results from the fourth survey of Research on Asian Prescription Patterns on antipsychotics, the rates of polypharmacy and combined medication use in each country were analyzed. Daily medications prescribed for the treatment of inpatients or outpatients with schizophrenia, including antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antiparkinson agents, were collected. Fifteen countries from Asia participated in this study. Results: A total of 3744 patients’ prescription forms were examined. The prescription patterns differed across these Asian countries, with the highest rate of polypharmacy noted in Vietnam (59.1%) and the lowest in Myanmar (22.0%). Furthermore, the combined use of other medications, expressed as highest and lowest rate, respectively, was as follows: mood stabilizers, China (35.0%) and Bangladesh (1.0%); antidepressants, South Korea (36.6%) and Bangladesh (0%); anxiolytics, Pakistan (55.7%) and Myanmar (8.5%); hypnotics, Japan (61.1%) and, equally, Myanmar (0%) and Sri Lanka (0%); and antiparkinson agents, Bangladesh (87.9%) and Vietnam (10.9%). The average psychotropic drug loading of all patients was 2.01 ± 1.64, with the highest and lowest loadings noted in Japan (4.13 ± 3.13) and Indonesia (1.16 ± 0.68), respectively. Conclusion: Differences in psychiatrist training as well as the civil culture and health insurance system of each country may have contributed to the differences in these rates. The concept of drug loading can be applied to other medical fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to examine the use of high doses of antipsychotic medications (≥ 600 mg/day chlorpromazine equivalent) in older Asian patients with schizophrenia and its demographic and clinical correlates. Method: Information on hospitalized patients with schizophrenia aged ≥ 50 years was extracted from the database of the Research on Asian Psychotropic Prescription Patterns study (2001-2009).Data on 2203 patients in six Asian countries and territories, including China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan, were analyzed. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and antipsychotic prescriptions were recorded. Results: The frequency for high-dose antipsychotic medications was 36.0% overall, with 38.4% in 2001, 33.3% in 2004 and 36.0% in 2009. Multiple logistic regression analysis of the whole sample showed that compared to patients receiving low-medium antipsychotic doses, those on high doses had a longer illness duration (odds ratio (OR): 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.2-3.3, p = 0.008), were more likely in the 50-59-year group (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94-0.97, p<0.001), more often had current positive (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-1.8, p<0.001) or negative symptoms (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.03-1.6, p = 0.03), and more commonly received antipsychotic polypharmacy (OR: 5.3, 95% CI: 4.1-6.7, p<0.001). Extrapyramidal symptoms (p = 0.25) and tardive dyskinesia (p = 0.92) were not more frequent in the high-dose group. Conclusions: High doses of antipsychotic medications were used in more than one third of older Asian patients with schizophrenia. The reasons for the frequent use of high antipsychotic doses in older Asian patients warrant further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • High-dose antipsychotic use in schizophrenia has been a topic of continuous debate since the introduction of the first antipsychotic in the 1950s. • There are reasons arguing for (such as pharmacokinetic reasons for the possible use of high antipsychotic doses in those with genetic polymorphisms associated with unusually high metabolic rates and the presence of inducers such as co-prescriptions of other medications and smoking) and against high-dose antipsychotic use (such as the pharmacokinetic understanding that Asians may need lower antipsychotic doses, the association of high antipsychotic doses with more frequent adverse effects, and receptor occupancy data from neuroimaging studies). • There is increasing awareness of the need for more practice-based research in order to highlight discrepancies between the empirical data and clinical practice. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • There was an overall significant decrease in the frequency of high-dose antipsychotic use from 17.9% in 2001 to 6.5% in 2004 within East Asia. • The association of high antipsychotic doses with demographic, psychopathological and treatment variables identified the clinical profile of schizophrenia patients who are at risk of receiving high antipsychotic doses. • These findings provide information and impetus for clinicians to constantly monitor the drug regimes and to foster rational, evidence-based prescribing practices. AIMS We aimed to examine the frequency of high-dose (defined as mean chlorpromazine mg equivalent doses above 1000) antipsychotic prescriptions in schizophrenia and their clinical correlates in the context of a comparison between studies in 2001 and 2004 within six East Asian countries and territories. METHODS Prescriptions of high-dose antipsychotic for a sample of 2136 patients with schizophrenia from six countries and territories (mainland China, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore) were evaluated in 2004 and compared with data obtained for 2399 patients in 2001. RESULTS Overall, the comparison between 2001 and 2004 showed a significant decrease in high-dose antipsychotic use from 17.9 to 6.5% [odds ratio (OR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26, 0.39, P < 0.001]. Patients who received high-dose antipsychotics were significantly more likely to have multiple admissions (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.16, 3.33, P = 0.009), more positive psychotic symptoms such as delusions (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.38, 3.05, P < 0.001) and hallucinations (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.30, 2.64, P = 0.001), but less likely to have negative symptoms (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40, 0.82, P = 0.002). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that prescription of high-dose antipsychotics was also predicted by younger age ( P < 0.001), time period of study (2001; P < 0.001), use of first-generation antipsychotic ( P < 0.001) and depot antipsychotics ( P < 0.001) as well as antipsychotic polytherapy ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We identified the clinical profile and treatment characteristics of patients who are at risk of receiving high antipsychotic doses. These findings should provide impetus for clinicians to constantly monitor the drug regimes and to foster rational, evidence-based prescribing practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Antidepressant use in East Asia is poorly documented. We compared patients given newer and older antidepressants to test the hypothesis, suggested in the literature, that use of newer antidepressants is associated with treatment settings rather than specific diagnostic categories. Methods We compared rates of use of older (pre1990) vs. newer antidepressants among 1898 patients identified as antidepressant treated at 21 centres in five East Asian countries (China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan) in 2003. Demographics, treatment setting and clinical factors associated with preferential use of newer drugs were tested in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Newer antidepressants were included in the treatment regimens of 67.5% ( N = 1282/1898) of study subjects. Prescription for newer antidepressants was significantly associated with younger age (z = −4.55, d.f. = 1888, P < 0.001), hospitalization [odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07, 1.64, P < 0.01] and treatment within psychiatric hospitals (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.27, 2.00, P < 0.001). On multivariate analyses, treatment with newer antidepressants was independently associated with younger age ( P < 0.001), country ( P < 0.001) and treatment within private hospitals ( P < 0.001), but not with sex or diagnosis of affective or anxiety disorders (all P > 0.1). Conclusion Demographic factors and treatment settings appear to influence antidepressant choice more than clinical factors such as diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Few studies have examined the use of depot antipsychotics in East Asian patients with schizophrenia. This study examined the prevalence of depot antipsychotic use and its clinical correlates. Methods Across six East Asian countries and territories, 2399 patients with schizophrenia were surveyed using a standardized protocol. Results Depot antipsychotic medications were prescribed in 15.3% (n =368) of the patients, being the most common in Singapore, followed by Taiwan, Japan and China. Being on depot antipsychotic drugs was significantly associated with male gender (particularly in Taiwan and Japan), delusions in Japan, aggression, higher daily CPZ equivalent dose and co-prescription of anticholinergic drugs but less likely with disorganized speech (particularly in China) and negative symptoms (particularly in Japan and Singapore). On multivariate analysis, the significant associated factors were treatment setting, younger age, longer duration of illness, aggression and the lack of use of an oral, atypical antipsychotic. Conclusion There was a wide variation in the prevalence of depot antipsychotic prescription, suggesting that it may not be guided by any recognizable principles and is more likely determined by local traditions and prescription culture. There is a need to re-examine the risk–benefit profile of each patient before deciding on the initiation or continuation of depot antipsychotic medication. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]