Search

Background: Treatment‐related late effects can worsen over time among cancer survivors. Such worsening health states may trigger changes in internal standards, values, or conceptualization of quality‐of‐life (QOL). This "response‐shift" phenomenon can jeopardize the validity of QOL assessment, and misrepresent QOL comparisons over time. This study tested response‐shift effects in reporting future‐health concerns among childhood cancer survivors who experienced progression in chronic health conditions (CHCs). Methods: 2310 adult survivors of childhood cancer from St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study completed a survey and clinical assessment at two or more timepoints. Based on 190 individual CHCs graded for adverse‐event severity, global CHC burden was classified as "progression" or "non‐progression". QOL was assessed using the SF‐36TM eight domains and physical‐ and mental‐component summary scores (PCS, MCS). A single global item measured concerns about future health. Random‐effects models comparing survivors with and without progressive global CHC burden (progressors vs. non‐progressors) evaluated response‐shift effects (recalibration, reprioritization, reconceptualization) in reporting future‐health concerns. Results: Compared with non‐progressors, progressors were more likely to de‐emphasize (or downplay) overall physical and mental health in evaluating future‐health concerns (p‐values<0.05), indicating recalibration response‐shift, and more likely to de‐emphasize physical health earlier rather than later in follow‐up (p‐value<0.05), indicating reprioritization response‐shift. There was evidence for a reconceptualization response‐shift with progressor classification associated with worse‐than‐expected future‐health concerns and physical health, and better‐than‐expected pain and role‐emotional functioning (p‐values<0.05). Conclusion: We identified three types of response‐shift phenomena in reporting concerns about future health among childhood cancer survivors. Survivorship care or research should consider response‐shift effects when interpreting changes in QOL over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The use of information communication technology (ICT)-based tailored health management program can have significant health impacts for cancer patients. Information provision, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and decision conflicts were analyzed for their relationship with need for an ICT-based personalized health management program in Korean cancer survivors.Methods: The health program needs of 625 cancer survivors from two Korean hospitals were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors related to the need for an ICT-based tailored health management system. Association of the highest such need with medical information experience, HRQOL, and decision conflicts was determined. Furthermore, patient intentions and expectations for a web- or smartphone-based tailored health management program were investigated.Results: Cancer survivors indicated high personalized health management program needs. Patients reporting the highest need included those with higher income (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.70; 95% [confidence interval] CI, 1.10-2.63), those who had received enough information regarding helping themselves (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.09-2.66), and those who wished to receive more information (aOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.97-2.61). Participants with cognitive functioning problems (aOR, 2.87; 95%CI, 1.34-6.17) or appetite loss (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-2.93) indicated need for a tailored health care program. Patients who perceived greater support from the decision-making process also showed the highest need for an ICT-based program (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.82).Conclusions: We found that higher income, information provision experience, problematic HRQOL, and decisional conflicts are significantly associated with the need for an ICT-based tailored self-management program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT), which we developed to enable cancer patients to assess their self-management (SM) strategies of health by themselves. Patients and Methods: The development of the questionnaire included four phases: item generation, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. To assess the instrument's sensitivity and validity, we recruited 300 cancer patients from three Korean hospitals who were 18 or more years old and accustomed to using the Internet or email. Using the appropriate and priority criteria for pilot and field testing, we tightened the content and constructed the first version of the SAT. Results: We developed the core strategies with 28 items, preparation strategies with 30 items, and implementation strategies with 33 items. Factor analysis of data from 300 patients resulted in core strategies with four factors, preparation strategies with five factors, and implementation strategies with six factors. All the SAT subscales demonstrated a high reliability with good internal consistency. The total scores of the three SAT sets differentiated participant groups well according to their stage of goal implementation and proportions of action of the 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior. Each factor of the three SAT sets correlated positively with the scores for additional assessment tool. Conclusion: The SAT is a three-set, 16-factor, 91-item tool that assesses the SM strategies of health that patients use to overcome a crisis. Patients can use the SAT to assess their SM strategies of health and obtain feedback from clinicians in the practice setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose We tried to evaluate the association of self-leadership, effective health behaviors, and posttraumatic growth with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods We recruited survivors of cancer from seven hospitals in Korea between 2011 and 2012. The patients completed the Seven Habits Profile (7HP) to evaluate leadership competency, the 10 rules for highly effective health behavior to evaluate health behavior, the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) to evaluate posttraumatic growth, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) to evaluate HRQOL, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate anxiety and depression. We performed multiple logistic regressions to identify significant associations. Results A total of 668 patients with cancer participated in the study. Patients who scored high on the leadership subscales of Be Proactive, Begin with the End in Mind, Put First Things First, Think Win-Win, Synergize, and Sharpen the Saw in 7HP tried to practice and keep their health behaviors more. The Begin with the End in Mind, Put First Things First, Synergize, and Sharpen the Saw subscales of the 7HP were also significantly correlated with subscales on the PTGI. Patients who scored high on the leadership subscales of Life Balance, Be Proactive, Begin with the End in Mind, Think Win-Win, and Sharpen the Saw had higher physical and mental component scale scores on the SF-36 and lower anxiety and depression subscale scores on the HADS. Conclusion Self-leadership, health behaviors, and posttraumatic growth are associated with QOL in survivors of cancer. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]