Search

We combined field mapping, structural and microstructural analyses, stable‐clumped isotope geochemistry, and U‐Pb dating of calcite veins and syn‐tectonic slickenfibres, to assess the regional scale fault‐related fluid flow during the evolution of the External Hellenides fold‐and‐thrust belt. We show that fluid circulation during forebulge uplift was characterized by cold meteoric water‐derived fluids, from which calcite precipitated and sealed bed‐perpendicular joints. Fluid circulation during foreland flexuring and early layer‐parallel shortening was characterized by warm fluids buffered by the carbonate host rock, which circulated through normal faults and bed‐parallel veins. Mixing with meteoric‐derived fluids also occurred at this stage of tectonic evolution. Fluid circulation during the late stage of thrust wedge accretion and post‐orogenic extension at 1.6 ± 1 Ma was characterized by increasing dominance of cold meteoric water circulating in strike‐slip and normal faults. The ingress of meteoric‐derived fluids was controlled by throughgoing fault conduits, while host rock‐buffered fluids were confined in isolated structures such as minor faults and veins. We developed a conceptual model of fault‐related fluid circulation, which invokes a transition from an open fluid system during forebulge uplift, to a semi‐closed fluid system during foreland flexuring and early layer‐parallel shortening, and to an open system during late thrust wedge accretion and post‐orogenic extension. This type of fluid circulation may have impacted fluid migration/leakage, including hydrocarbons, into or outside potential reservoirs in the highly prospective Hellenides‐Albanides fold‐and‐thrust belt, a renovated frontier for hydrocarbon exploration in the Mediterranean area. Key Points: Throughgoing faults are fluid conduits for external, meteoric‐derived fluids, minor faults and veins host rock‐buffered warm fluidsBed‐perpendicular joints sealed during forebulge uplift, rock‐buffered fluids circulated during foreland flexure and wedge accretionMeteoric water moved through strike‐slip faults during late wedge accretion and through post‐orogenic (at 1.6 Ma) normal faults [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We discuss techniques to represent groundwater flow in carbonate aquifers using the three existing modeling approaches: equivalent porous medium, conduit network, and discrete fracture network. Fractures in faulted stratigraphic successions are characterized by dominant sets of sub‐vertical joints. Grid rotation is recommended using the equivalent porous medium to match higher hydraulic conductivity with the dominant orientation of the joints. Modeling carbonate faults with throws greater than approximately 100 m is more challenging. Such faults are characterized by combined conduit‐barrier behavior. The barrier behavior can be modeled using the Horizontal Flow Barrier Package with a low‐permeability vertical barrier inserted to represent the impediment of horizontal flow in faults characterized by sharp drops of the piezometric surface. Cavities can occur parallel to the strike of normal faults generating channels for the groundwater. In this case, flow models need to account for turbulence using a conduit network approach. Channels need to be embedded in an equivalent porous medium due to cavities a few centimeters large, which are present in carbonate aquifers even in areas characterized by low hydraulic gradients. Discrete fracture network modeling enables representation of individual rock discontinuities in three dimensions. This approach is used in non‐heavily karstified aquifers at industrial sites and was recently combined with the equivalent porous medium to simulate diffusivity in the matrix. Following this review, we recommend that the future research combines three practiced modeling approaches: equivalent porous medium, discrete fracture network, and conduit network, in order to capture structural and flow aspects in the modeling of groundwater in carbonate rocks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The inner Apennines (Italy) are characterized by scattered outcrops of continent‐derived orogenic metamorphic units exposed along the Tyrrhenian coast from northern to southern Apennines. At least since the 1970s, some peculiar rocks exposed on Zannone Island (central Italy) have been described as the only Paleozoic‐Triassic metamorphic complex linking those exposed in the northern—with those in the southern Apennines. Assessing the protolith nature, thermobaric conditions, and structural features of what is accepted to be the metamorphic unit of Zannone is, therefore, crucial to elucidate the early paleotectonic evolution of the Apennines‐Tyrrhenian orogenic system. To that end, we interpreted seismic reflection profiles offshore Zannone, we carried out mesoscale and microscale structural investigations of representative outcrops on the island, performed X‐ray diffraction analysis, and K‐Ar and U‐Pb geochronology of representative clay gouge and syntectonic carbonate veins. Results show that the metamorphic rocks of Zannone can actually be reinterpreted as belonging to nonmetamorphic siliciclastic turbidites, likely deposited in foredeep settings, and coeval to the Oligocene‐Miocene Macigno Fm. of the northern Apennines. The turbiditic sequence was overthrust by Triassic dolostone in the early Miocene (~22 Ma), weakly deformed at <200°C, and downfaulted by postorogenic extensional faults starting ~7 Ma ago. Hence, Zannone represents a unique geological location in central Italy where to study the innermost (i.e. oldest) thrust sheet of the central‐northern Apennines, thereby shedding new light onto the early tectonics of the Apennines. Based on this evidence, a new evolutionary scheme for the early stage of the Apennines tectonic evolution is proposed. Key Points: Discovery of a hitherto unknown early thrust in the ApenninesNew radiometric dating of Apennine tectonic phasesReinterpreting and overturning of a long‐held assumption in the Apennines [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Mt. Massico ridge (central southern Apennines, Italy) is characterized by a ~150‐m‐thick tectonic mélange located at the base of a Tortonian‐lower Messinian heterogeneous clastic succession consisting of layered sandstones, limestones, marls, and claystones with intercalated mass wasting deposits and isolated olistoliths, which deposited above Meso‐Cenozoic limestones. Geological mapping and structural analyses, integrated with illite‐smectite paleothermal indicators and U‐Pb dating of syntectonic calcite veins and slickenfibers, allowed us to unravel (1) the tectonic evolution of the Mt. Massico ridge and (2) the development of the intrawedge tectonic mélange in the framework of the Apennine accretionary wedge evolution. Results show that after thrusting and folding of Meso‐Cenozoic limestones during late Tortonian times (7.0 ± 1.6 Ma), late Messinian‐early Pliocene out‐of‐sequence thrusting (5.1 ± 3.7 Ma) juxtaposed ~3,300‐m‐thick, imbricate thrust sheets above the Tortonian‐lower Messinian clastic succession. During out‐of‐sequence thrusting, the base of the weak clastic deposits acted as a décollement horizon due to the rheological contrast and mechanical buttress with the underlying competent Mesozoic‐Cenozoic limestones. Heterogeneous deformation along the base of the clastic succession was accommodated by ductile pressure solution of claystones and marls, by brittle stratal disruption and fracturing/veining of competent olistoliths and primary foliation (i.e., sandstones and limestones strata), thus leading to the development of a tectonic mélange. The compressional phase was followed by extensional tectonics after the late Pliocene (minimum age 2.9 ± 0.5 Ma). We conclude that out‐of‐sequence thrusting, buttressing, and intraformational rheological contrast can be fundamental factors for the development of intrawedge tectonic mélange. Key Points: Neogene tectonic evolution of the central southern Apennines accretionary wedge reconstructed by U‐Pb dating of syntectonic calciteIntrawedge tectonic mélange generated by out‐of‐sequence thrusting, rheological contrast, and buttressingTortonian (~10‐7 Ma) in sequence to Pliocene (~5 Ma) out‐of‐sequence thrusting were followed by Pleistocene (~2.8 Ma) postorogenic extension [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]