Search

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative neoadjuvant everolimus in renal angiomyolipomas (AML) patients with or without Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC). Materials and Methods: This multi‐institutional retrospective study enrolled renal AML patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) or total nephrectomy after receiving at least 1 month of pre‐operative everolimus. Imaging evaluations were collected before and after treatment, along with demographic, surgical, and follow‐up information. The primary outcome was tumor volume reduction of ≥25%, with additional outcomes including recurrence, perioperative outcomes, renal function, and safety. Results: From January 2015 to July 2022, 68 renal AML patients were studied—41 with TSC and 27 without. During everolimus treatment, 61.0% (25/41) of TSC patients and 44.4% (12/27) of non‐TSC patients achieved tumor reduction of ≥25%. Additionally, 41.5% (17/41) of TSC patients and 18.5% (5/27) of non‐TSC patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction. Three TSC patients and 1 non‐TSC patient discontinued treatment due to side‐effects. Most patients (92.7% TSC, 85.2% non‐TSC) underwent PN. After everolimus treatment, the necessary total nephrectomy decreased to 41.2% (7/17) from baseline. Postoperatively, 1 grade 3 and 3 grade 2 complications occurred, with no grade 4 or 5 complications. After a median follow‐up of 24 months, only 1 TSC patient recurred with a diameter >3 cm. Retrospective nature is the major limitation of this study. Conclusion: Everolimus was effective and well‐tolerated in neoadjuvant treatment for renal AML, especially in TSC patients. This neoadjuvant combination strategy of everolimus and PN could effectively controls recurrence and preserves renal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is less reported. Methods: In total, 106 consecutive advanced UTUC patients receiving ICI monotherapy were collected from nine high volume centers. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to multiple parameters (e.g., treatment line, metastatic sites). Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were captured after ICI initiation. Results: With a median follow‐up of 12.0 months, 25 patients in the first‐line group and 15 patients in the second‐line group died of UTUC. We reported a median OS of 18.0 months, a median PFS of 5.0 months, and an ORR of 38.6% for patients in the first‐line group; a median OS of 10.0 months, a median OS of 4.0 months, and an ORR of 27.8% for patients in the second‐line group. Complete response was observed in two patients in the first‐line group and one patient in the second‐line group with a total complete response rate of 2.8%. In the univariate and multivariate analysis, visceral metastasis with a hazard ratio of 2.4 was associate with poor OS. The most common treatment‐related adverse events included fatigue (11.3%), pruritus (10.4%), and diarrhea (6.6%). Conclusions: This real‐world study suggests that ICI monotherapy is active and has acceptable toxic effects for unresectable or metastatic UTUC as first‐line therapy in cisplatin‐ineligible patients or second‐line therapy in platinum‐refractory patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]