Search

Objective: This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the bleaching efficacy of two different at-home bleaching systems on teeth of different shades and their color stability after a 6-month follow-up., Materials and Methods: Ninety-two patients (777 teeth) were randomly divided into three groups: (a) negative control, (b) patients treated with a custom-made tray containing 10% carbamide peroxide (10% CP/PF) (Opalescence PF), and (c) patients treated with a pre-loaded tray containing 6% hydrogen peroxide (6% HP/Go) (Opalescence Go). Teeth in all groups were divided into three sub-groups according to the VITA Classic Shade Guide: light (A1-C1), medium dark (C2-B3), and dark (A3.5-C4). Bleaching systems were performed in accordance with manufacturers' instructions for 14 days. The color values were measured at the baseline, 10 days and 14 days of bleaching, 2 weeks, and 6 months after bleaching. Three-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05)., Results: Irrespective of original shade, both bleaching groups showed significantly higher ΔE* values than the control groups, and the ΔE* values were significantly higher in the 10% CP/PF groups than those in the 6% HP/Go groups (p < 0.05). In both bleaching systems, the dark teeth showed higher ΔE* values than the light teeth (p < 0.05). The ΔE* values decreased significantly only in the 10% CP/PF groups after 6 months (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Both bleaching agents produced a bleaching effect, but 10% CP/PF was more effective., Clinical Significance: A pre-loaded tray system may be used for dental bleaching, but it is still less effective than conventional a 10% carbamide peroxide system, irrespective of the initial shade. (J Esthet Restor Dent 29:325-338, 2017)., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate color longevity after a year of in-office bleaching with gel (6% hydrogen peroxide HP, LED blue/laser infrared activation system) compared to a 35% control concentration in a split-mouth study model., Materials and Methods: Thirty-one patients were initially treated. The bleaching procedure with 6% or 35% gel HP was performed randomly in the upper half arcade of each patient. The color was measured at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year using the spectrophotometer Vita Easyshade, Vita Bleached, and Vita classical Shade guide organized by value. During the 1-year recall, the color was assessed before and after dental prophylaxis., Results: Only 27 patients were assessed in the 1-year recall. There was a significant difference in the ΔE between the two groups at all times assessed (P < .011). The ΔL, Δa, and Δb showed significant difference between both groups at all assessed times (P < .038). There was no significant difference between the ΔSGU at all times (P > .05) except for the Vita bleachedguide postprophylaxis comparison (P < .05)., Conclusion: The two compounds remained effective at 1 year. When objectively evaluated, color difference between groups was found, not seen when subjectively determined., Clinical Significance: A low concentration hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent can reach good clinical results at 1 year of follow-up., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate in vitro the fluorescence properties of extracted human teeth whitened with 40% hydrogen peroxide., Materials and Methods: A total of 28 extracted human teeth were pumiced for 1 minute using a low-speed dental handpiece and a disposable rubber cup. Pre-whitening fluorescence measurements (T0), maximum excitation (Ex max ), maximum emission (Em max ), and maximum intensity (I max 10 8 ), were performed using a spectrofluorometer. After T0 measurements, the teeth were whitened using the in-office method with 40% hydrogen peroxide, three times for 20 minutes. The fluorescence parameters were measured under the same conditions 7 and 14 days after bleaching (T1 and T2, respectively)., Results: Ex max exhibited a broader range 7 days after whitening and decreased after 14 days. The Em max and I max 10 8 displayed a narrower range after whitening. The mean Ex max differed significantly between the time points (F = 20.09. P < .001). The corresponding analysis for the mean Em max differed significantly between the time points (F = 16.69, P < .001). The same was true for the mean I max 10 8 (F = 9.69, P < .001)., Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, whitening provoked statistically significant changes in fluorescence of the intact teeth in vitro., Clinical Significance: The appearance of human teeth and dental materials and their changes upon aging and exposure to different agents (staining, whitening) is a topic of great relevance to esthetic dentistry. While some appearance parameters, such as color, translucency, and gloss, have been thoroughly studied, fluorescence and its influence on overall tooth appearance is still not well understood, yet it has influenced the development of fluorescence emitting restorative materials., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine (CHX) with an antidiscoloration system (ADS) on stain, plaque accumulation, and gingivitis., Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 26 students. After a preparatory period, the students were randomly assigned to either group P (placebo), group T1 (0.12% CHX without an ADS), or group T2 (0.12% CHX with an ADS). During the 3-week experimental period, all mechanical oral hygiene was abolished. Rinsing with 10 mL mouthwash or placebo was performed twice daily under supervision. The parameters assessed on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 included the Discoloration Index (DI), Plaque Index (PII), and Gingival Index (GI)., Results: There were no significant mean differences in the DI, PII, or GI between groups T2 and P. Significant mean differences existed in the DI between groups T2 and T1 on days 14 and 21. Significant mean differences existed in the PI between groups T2 and T1 on days 7, 14, and 21. Likewise, significant mean differences existed in the GI between groups T2 and T1 on days 14 and 21., Conclusions: CHX with an ADS did not prevent plaque or gingivitis development. In fact, the CHX mouthwash with an ADS showed no superior effect over placebo on oral hygiene or the prevention of gingivitis., (© 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of an experimental toothbrush with a slow-release system of chlorhexidine (CHX) and determine its ability to inhibit plaque, bleeding, staining and oral tissue abnormalities during 6 weeks of use., Material and Methods: One hundred and fifty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the Test Brush group with a template slow-delivery system of CHX (Ttb), the Control Brush group without CHX (Ctb) and the Control Brush group without CHX but rinsing post-brushing with a 0.2% CHX mouthrinse (Ctb+R). At baseline as well as at 3 and 6 weeks, all clinical parameters were assessed. Following the baseline assessment, a supragingival prophylaxis was provided., Results: One hundred and forty subjects completed the study. The Ctb+R group had lower plaque and bleeding scores than the Ttb and the Ctb group and significantly (p=0.0001) higher stain scores. There were no significant differences in plaque, bleeding and stain scores between the Ttb and the Ctb group. No differences were detected in oral tissue changes, except for discoloration of the tongue., Conclusions: In the present study, no beneficial effect could be demonstrated for the experimental CHX-releasing toothbrush. The use of a 0.2% CHX mouthrinse (in combination with brushing) remains the gold standard for additional chemical plaque control.

Unlabelled: The use of chlorhexidine (CHX) has been recommended for a number of clinical applications including plaque control in the post-operative period. However, the use of CHX is burdened by some side effects that could affect the compliance of the patient. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the side effects, the staining in particular, the patient acceptance, and the efficacy of a 0.2% CHX mouthwash containing an anti discoloration system (ADS) compared with a 0.2% CHX alone, after periodontal flap surgery., Material and Methods: This single-centre, cross-over, triple-blind randomized clinical trial was carried out on 48 consecutive patients. After periodontal flap surgery, the patients were prescribed to rinse two times per day for 1 min for 1 week with 10 ml of test or control CHX, contained in anonymous bottles coded K or M and assigned randomly. No brushing and interdental cleaning of the surgical area was allowed. At week 1, after suture removal, patients received full-mouth prophylaxis and were given a second anonymous bottle, reversing the products, with the same instructions as at baseline. Patients resumed tooth-brushing but not interdental cleaning. At the end of week 2, prophylaxis was repeated, mouth rinsing was discontinued and patients resumed normal oral hygiene. At weeks 1 and 2, the following variables were recorded: presence of pigmentation, gingival parameters at the surgically treated sites (gingival inflammation, tissue inflammation around the sutures, gingival swelling and presence of granulation tissue), patient perception and acceptance of the 2 mouthwashes., Results: Forty-seven patients completed the study. The difference between treatments related to gingival variables was not statistically significant. The test CHX caused consistently less pigmentations than the control CHX in all the evaluated areas of the dental surfaces (odds ratio (OR)=0.083 p<0.0001 in the incisal area, OR=0.036 p<0.0001 in the approximal area and OR=0.065 p<0.0001 in the gingival area). The CHX ADS was found to be more tolerated by patients than the control mouthwash and to cause less food alteration, less alterations to the perception of salt and to be less irritant for the oral tissues., Conclusions: (1) CHX ADS caused less pigmentation, was burdened by less side effects and was more agreeable than the control CHX; (2) CHX ADS was as effective as CHX without ADS in reducing gingival signs of inflammation in the post-surgical early healing phase; (3) the use of CHX ADS could be of value in treatment protocols in which the patient compliance with a CHX mouthwash prescription is relevant.

Objectives: Plaque scoring usually employs subjective indices. The aim was to compare plaque inhibition of three toothpastes using two objective and one subjective measures of plaque., Material and Methods: Formulations were: (1) an experimental anti-plaque paste (test); (2) an experimental paste (minus active or negative control); and (3) a proprietary anti-plaque toothpaste product (positive control). The study was a blind, randomised crossover design using a 4-day, no tooth brushing, plaque regrowth model and involving 22 healthy subjects. After baseline plaque removal, subjects rinsed twice a day with slurries of the allocated paste. On day 5, plaque was scored by index, wet weight and optical density of extracted disclosing solution from the plaque (stain intensity)., Results: All data showed the same pattern. There were highly significant subject and treatment effects but not period effects. The positive control was highly significantly more effective in plaque control than the test and minus active experimental formulations, which in turn were not significantly different from each other. There were strong and significant correlations between pairs of scoring methods particularly wet weight and stain intensity., Conclusion: The use of objective methods of plaque alongside conventional subjective indices provided convincing evidence for increased discriminatory power in a study comparing plaque inhibition by toothpastes.

Aims: A single centre, randomised single-blind, three-way crossover study was performed, to compare the effect of an experimental test toothpaste with a commercially available whitening toothpaste and water control at inhibiting extrinsic stain promoted by repeated chlorhexidine/tea rinses., Methods: This study used 23 subjects. During the week before the study the subjects received a prophylaxis to remove all staining, plaque and calculus deposits. On the Monday of the following week subjects returned to the clinic to receive their rinses and to check their dentition was stain free. Under direct supervision at both 09:00 and 13:00 hours they rinsed with either a toothpaste slurry or water control that was repeated daily up to and including the following Thursday. Additionally from the Monday to the Thursday each subject rinsed with a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse, immediately followed by a rinse with a warm black tea solution. This cycle was repeated hourly eight times throughout the day and on the following days until the Friday. Throughout this period volunteers omitted all other forms of oral hygiene except rinsing with the chlorhexidine mouthwash. On the Friday the level of stain on the teeth and dorsum of tongue was assessed using the Lobene stain index for both stain area and intensity. At the end of each trial period each subject received a thorough prophylaxis to remove all plaque, calculus and staining before starting the second and third period of the study., Results: As expected appreciable amounts of extrinsic stain accumulated on the teeth over each study period. The amount of stain following use of the toothpastes and water control was least with the experimental toothpaste, followed by water control and lastly the commercial whitening paste. For all sites combined there was evidence that the experimental paste was significantly superior to both the commercial paste and water control at reducing stain area (p<0.001), a product of stain area and intensity (p<0.001 and 0.05, respectively) but not stain intensity (p>0.05)., Conclusions: In this stain-prevention model the use of an experimental paste showed a significant reduction in stain accumulation on the teeth compared with a (placebo) negative water control and a commercially available whitening paste. As such the experimental paste would be expected to be of benefit in controlling extrinsic dental staining.

Background: The interaction of chlorhexidine with dietary chromogens to cause extrinsic dental staining has been exploited in vitro and in vivo to study tooth discoloration and its control. These studies in vitro investigated factors that might enhance stain formation, and evaluated formulations to inhibit the stain with the primary aim of devising a protocol for use in vivo., Method: The standard method cycled acrylic specimens through saliva, 0.2% chlorhexidine and tea on the hour 8 times per day and stain was measured using a spectrophotometer. Test interventions were 3 "whitening" toothpastes (A, P, R), a fluoride toothpaste (C) and water. In studies 1 and 3 interventions were at 09:00 and 16:00, and in studies 2 and 4 at 09:00 and 13:00. Between cycles, specimens remained dry in studies 1 and 2 and were maintained in water day and night in studies 3 and 4. Studies 5-7 determined the influence of tea temperature, exposure time and concentration, and chlorhexidine temperature and exposure time on stain development. Studies 8-10 modified the standard procedure using tea at triple strength and 50 degrees C, and assessed stain inhibition by toothpastes and water using optical density, colorimetric and visual assessment recordings., Results: In studies 1-4, there were highly significant differences between interventions. Overall, the experimental whitening paste (P) produced the most stain inhibition, and water or the proprietary whitening paste (R), produced the least stain inhibition. More stain inhibition was seen with interventions at 09:00 and 16:00. Both tea concentration and temperature significantly influenced staining. Chlorhexidine temperature did not influence staining. Exposure time to tea and chlorhexidine had a small effect on staining. In studies 8 and 9, interventions at 09:00 and 16:00 were more effective; the most stain inhibition was with paste P and the least with water, paste R being intermediate. In study 10, P was the most effective and R the least effective interventions., Conclusions: These studies in vitro suggest that the chlorhexidine tea stain model can be manipulated to enhance stain and thereby should improve discrimination between stain inhibition formulations. The timing of interventions in the model appears to be important. These studies in vitro were used to plan a clinical protocol.

Background: Extrinsic staining of teeth is considered to be unsightly and a number of 'whitening' toothpastes have been formulated to inhibit or remove such tooth discoloration. The aim of this study was to compare the stain prevention of two toothpastes., Method: The study was a single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover design, balanced for residual effects involving 24 healthy dentate volunteers. The treatments were as follows: (1) a whitening toothpaste product, (2) an experimental toothpaste formulation and (3) water. For each 4-day rinse period, subjects were rendered stain free on the teeth and tongue. Approximately on the hour from 09:00 to 16:00 hours, subjects rinsed with chlorhexidine mouth rinse for 1 min followed by warm black tea for 1 min. The treatment interventions were at 09:00 and 16:00 hours and before the chlorhexidine rinse. The toothpastes were rinsed as 3 g/10 ml water slurries and water as a 10 ml rinse each for 2 min. On day 5, subjects were scored for tooth and tongue stain intensity and area, and the product of these was calculated. The washout period was at least 9 days., Results: Treatment differences for the teeth were highly significant but not for the tongue. Paired contrasts for tooth stain intensity, area and product were mostly all significantly in favour of reduced staining by the experimental formulation compared with water and the whitening product. There were no significant differences between water and the whitening product., Conclusions: Using a forced dietary staining method, the data support a tooth stain-inhibitory/-removal action for the experimental formulation, but not the whitening product.

Background: Resistance to staining is desirable to maintain the esthetic appearance of a provisional material. A resin sealant may improve stain resistance., Purpose: Color changes of a resin composite provisional material were measured by reflection spectrophotometry after storage in three staining solutions and water to determine stain resistance when treated with three methacrylate or urethane dimethacrylate resin surface sealants and when left untreated., Materials and Methods: Specimens of a resin composite provisional material received one of three resin sealants (Fortify Plus, Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL; Jet Seal, Lang Dental Manfacturing, Wheeling, IL; Triad LC, Dentsply International, York, PA, USA) or no surface sealer and then were stored for 72 hours in one of four staining solutions (water [control], black coffee, cranberry juice, red wine). Color was measured by CIE L*a*b* on a reflection spectrophotometer (Color-Eye 7000, Macbeth Division, Kollmorgen Instruments, Newburgh, NY, USA) at baseline and after storage. Color change (deltaE*) was calculated and analyzed statistically by two-factor analysis of variance, with four solutions and four surface treatments as independent variables., Results: deltaE* ranged from 0.7 to 1.7 in water, from 1.1 to 5.5 in cranberry juice, from 1.1 to 6.5 in black coffee, and from 1.5 to 3.9 in red wine. Statistically significant differences were observed (p < .05), with Fortify Plus showing increased staining (deltaE* > 3.3) and Jet Seal and Triad LC showing decreased staining (deltaE* < 2.0) in cranberry juice and coffee compared with staining of the unsealed specimens. Only Jet Seal provided resistance to staining in red wine., Conclusions: Specimens without a surface sealer had statistically higher (p < .05) and perceptible or nearly perceptible color changes in cranberry juice, black coffee, and red wine than in water. Specimens coated with Jet Seal had statistically lower (p < .05) color changes than uncoated specimens in cranberry juice, black coffee, and red wine. When coated, the color changes of the stained specimens were not perceptible. Specimens coated with Triad LC had statistically lower (p < .05) color changes than unsealed specimens in cranberry juice and black coffee. When sealed, the color changes of the specimens stained with cranberry juice and black coffee were not perceptible. Both unsealed and sealed specimens stained with red wine were nearly perceptible. Specimens coated with Fortify Plus had statistically higher (p < .05) color changes than uncoated specimens in cranberry juice and black coffee but statistically the same (p < .05) color change as uncoated specimens in red wine. These specimens had perceptible color changes in cranberry juice, black coffee, and red wine., Clinical Significance: Surface of methacrylate or dimethacrylate resins can improve resistance of a resin composite provisional material to staining caused by cranberry juice, black coffee, and red wine.

Background: Previous studies have shown that polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) added to a chlorhexidine rinse reduced extrinsic dental stain but at the expense of a reduction in plaque inhibitory activity. This effect appeared due to a reduction in the effective chlorhexidine dose to levels where dose response studies show plaque inhibition falls off rapidly. The aim of these 2 clinical studies was to determine if PVP could be added to chlorhexidine rinses to maintain efficacy and reduce staining., Method: Study 1 involved 42 healthy dentate volunteers and was a blind, randomised, 7 treatment, crossover design balanced for residual effects. The rinses were: 1. 0.09% chlorhexidine to which was added, 2. 1% PVP, 3. 3% PVP, 4. 5% PVP, 5. 7% PVP, 6. Placebo, 7. Essential oil product. Rinses were used 2x on day one of each period after a prophylaxis. Subjects suspended tooth cleaning for 24 h and were then scored for plaque area. Study 2 used the experimental gingivitis model, involved 24 healthy dentate subjects and was a blind, randomised, 3 treatment, crossover design balanced for residual effects. The rinses were 1. 0.2% chlorhexidine, 2. 0.2% chlorhexidine/10% PVP, 3. Placebo. At baseline and the end of each study period subjects were rendered plaque, stain and calculus free, suspended oral hygiene and rinsed 2x per day. Plaque, gingivitis and stain were scored at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 weeks. Calculus was scored at baseline and 3 weeks., Results: Study 1: Buccal plaque scores were significantly lower with all rinses compared to placebo. Also all buccal plaque scores were significantly lower with chlorhexidine and chlorhexidine/PVP rinses compared to the essential oil/phenolic rinse. There were no significant differences between the chlorhexidine rinse and the chlorhexidine/PVP rinses. Analyses for buccal and lingual plaque combined produced, with one exception, the same results for rinse comparisons as for buccal plaque alone. Thus the essential oil/phenolic rinse just failed to reach significance compared to placebo. Study 2: Plaque and gingivitis scores were significantly lower with positive control and test rinses compared to placebo but with no difference between these rinses. Tooth and tongue stain was significantly higher with the positive control and test rinses compared to placebo but not significantly different between these 2 rinses. Calculus scores were not significantly different between the three study rinses., Conclusion: Taken with previous data, the balance of evidence does not support PVP as an inhibitor of staining associated with chlorhexidine. These data are further evidence that chlorhexidine oral hygiene products, which, do not or claim not to cause staining, are most probably lacking efficacy.

Background, Aims: Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) was shown in vitro to reduce chlorhexidine induced, dietary staining without affecting the uptake of the antiseptic to the test substrate. The aim of these studies in vivo was to determine whether PVP affected plaque and dietary staining by a low concentration chlorhexidine rinse., Methods: The plaque and stain studies used a double blind, randomised 6, treatment crossover design involving healthy subjects with a high standard of oral hygiene and gingival health. The rinse formulations under test were: (A) aqueous alcohol (placebo control), (B) 0.03% chlorhexidine, (C) 0.06% chlorhexidine, (D) 0.06% chlorhexidine+1.2% PVP, (E) 0.06% chlorhexidine+5% PVP, (F) 0.06% chlorhexidine+10% PVP. In the plaque study, on day 1 of each period, subjects were rendered plaque free and then rinsed with 15 ml of the test rinse for 60 s. No further tooth cleaning was performed and subjects returned 24 h later for plaque scoring by area. In the stain study, on day 1 of each period, the tongue and teeth of each subject were rendered stain free. Subjects then rinsed under supervision for 60 s with 15 ml of the allocated rinse 8 x a day between 09:00 h and 17:00 h for 3 days. Immediately after each rinse with the test formulation, subjects rinsed for 120 s with 15 ml of warm black tea. Subjects were requested to also drink at least 5 cups of tea or coffee per day. On day 4, stain was scored by area and intensity from designated teeth and dorsum of the tongue. Washout periods were at least 7 days in both studies., Results: Plaque areas were greatest with placebo and least with 0.06% chlorhexidine. Plaque scores increased with increasing concentrations of PVP in the 0.06% chlorhexidine rinse and were significantly higher than 0.06% chlorhexidine without PVP rinse. Tooth stain areas were comparable for placebo, 0.03% and 0.06% chlorhexidine rinses, but significantly reduced with the PVP/chlorhexidine rinses compared to the 0.06% chlorhexidine rinse. Tooth stain intensity was significantly increased with 0.06% chlorhexidine rinses compared to placebo and chlorhexidine/PVP rinses. Tongue stain area and intensity were significantly reduced with 5% and 10% PVP/chlorhexidine rinses compared to 0.06% chlorhexidine rinse., Conclusion: PVP, at the concentrations tested, reduced the stain propensity of a 0.06% chlorhexidine rinse but at the expense of some loss of plaque inhibition.

Background: Previous studies have shown that using an oxidising agent in addition to chlorhexidine reduces staining., Aim: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether, compared to chlorhexidine alone, the use of an oxidising mouthrinse as an adjunct to chlorhexidine is efficacious in reducing stain, plaque and gingivitis., Method: This study had a single-blind, 2-group parallel design, including a 14-day experimental non-brushing period during which 1 group (n= 14) used chlorhexidine alone (CHX) (chlorhexidine mouthrinse, 0.12% Oral-B laboratories, Ireland), and the other (n= 14) used chlorhexidine in combination with an oxidising agent (sodiumperborate-monohydrate-Bocasan, Oral-B laboratories, Ireland). Patients were randomly assigned to either group. All participants received a scaling and polishing before the start of the trial. No oral hygiene instructions were given. Since, at the start of the experiment, all stain and plaque were removed, only the gingival condition was evaluated at baseline by means of bleeding on marginal probing. The examination after 14 days of rinsing included the evaluation of plaque, bleeding on marginal probing and stain (GMSI: gingival modification of the stain index)., Results: The results showed at day 14, a significant difference between the 2 groups for plaque (CHX: 0.18, CHX+PER: 0.08, p=0.03) and gingival bleeding (CHX: 0.38, CHX+PER: 0.21, p<0.001). The proportion of stained surfaces was less in the CHX+PER group (28%), than in the chlorhexidine group (48%) (p=0.04)., Conclusions: In conclusion, the adjunctive use of an oxidising agent peroxyborate to chlorhexidine, proved to be superior to chlorhexidine alone with regard to the inhibition of plaque and development of gingivitis. In addition, the proportion of stained surfaces was significantly less when adding the oxidising mouthrinse to chlorhexidine.

This presentation provides an overview of the technologies available for the chemical control of plaque. It is generally accepted that the formation of dental plaque at the interfaces of tooth/gingiva is one of the major causes of gingival inflammation and dental caries. Several therapeutic approaches have been used to control dental plaque and supragingival infections. These include fluoride preparations such as stannous fluoride, oxygenating agents, anti-attachment agents, and cationic and non-cationic antibacterial agents. Among the fluoride preparations, stable stannous fluoride pastes and gels have been shown to reduce supragingival plaque, gingivitis, hypersensitivity and caries. The effect of the oxygenating agents on the supragingival plaque has been equivocal, but recent data indicate that a stable agent which provides sustained active oxygen release is effective in controlling plaque. A polymer, PVPA, which reduced attachment of bacteria to teeth was shown to significantly reduce plaque formation in humans. A new generation of antibacterials includes non-ionics such as triclosan, which in combination with a special polymer delivery system, has been shown to reduce plaque, gingivitis, supragingival calculus and dental caries in long-term studies conducted around the world. Unlike the first generation of agents, the triclosan/copolymer/sodium fluoride system is effective in long-term clinicals and does not cause staining of teeth, increase in calculus, or disturbance in the oral microbial ecology.

Chlorhexidine is a well-established agent used for the control of supragingival plaque but is not without disadvantages, such as tooth staining, which limits its clinical applications to short-term use. This clinical trial studied the clinical effectiveness and stain-forming potential of chlorhexidine in a chewing gum base. Subjects (151) were screened for baseline plaque and gingival indices before receiving a dental prophylaxis and randomized into 3 treatment groups: group 1 chewed 2 pieces of chlorhexidine diacetate gum for 10 min 2x a day (total daily chlorhexidine = 20 mg), group 2 chewed 2 pieces of placebo gum for 10 min 2x a day and group 3 rinsed with 10 ml of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 1 min 2x per day (total daily chlorhexidine = 40 mg). Plaque, gingivitis and stain evaluations were made at 4 and 8 weeks. Plaque and bleeding scores were significantly lower at 4 and 8 weeks in the chlorhexidine gum group compared to the placebo gum group and similar at 8 weeks to the rinse group. Stain intensity at week 8 was significantly less for the chlorhexidine gum than rinse. The staining measured by extent was also less with the chlorhexidine gum than the rinse, but the difference was not significant at week 4. At week 8, stain extent was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine gum group than chlorhexidine rinse. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that this chlorhexidine chewing gum used with normal tooth cleaning provides similar adjunctive benefits to oral hygiene and gingival health as a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse.

The anti-adherent agent M239,144 has been shown to reduce the adhesion of S. sanguis strains to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite by 27-94%. The purpose of this study was to determine any antibacterial properties of M239,144 which might inhibit replication of the organisms which do adhere and to determine whether M239,144 interferes with the antibacterial properties of the antiseptic agent chlorhexidine. Maximum inhibitory dilutions (MIDs) were calculated using both broth and agar methods. 0.1% M239,144 displayed no antibacterial activity against S. oralis NCTC 7864 or S. sanguis NCTC 7863 using the broth dilution method and had no antibacterial activity against a range of plaque-forming organisms using the agar dilution method. The anti-bacterial activity of chlorhexidine against four of five oral plaque-forming species was reduced by 0.1% M239,144. The effect of a novel anti-adherent agent, MK239,144, on chlorhexidine staining was assessed in an in vitro model. 1% M239,144 completely prevented chlorhexidine staining at concentrations from 0.0002% to 0.2%. M239,144/chlorhexidine formulations show potential for a non-staining anti-plaque mouthwash.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of a pre-brushing mouthwash Plax reduced extrinsic tooth-staining in vivo and in vitro. Firstly, in a double-blind placebo controlled cross-over study, 20 subjects with tooth staining used Plax or a placebo for 14-day periods separated by a 1-month wash-out period. The area of stain was assessed before and after each mouthwash had been used from clinical photographs. Secondly, extracted 3rd molar teeth were stained with tea and chlorhexidine. After exposure to either Plax or placebo, the teeth were brushed in a standardized manner. The area and intensity of stain were assessed before and after rinsing and brushing. Results of the study in vivo showed that the mean % stained area for any of the surfaces studied changed very little throughout the study. No statistically significant changes were detected (Student t-test, p > 0.05). Results of the study in vitro showed that the mean area of stain fell by 19% after exposure to Plax and by 17% after exposure to placebo. No statistically significant changes were detected (Student t-test, p > 0.05). There were also no significant changes in intensity (Wilcoxon signed rank sum test p > 0.1).

The purpose of this study was to determine if the extrinsic dental staining associated with the use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) mouthrinse could be prevented or controlled by the patient with the use of toothpicks. 25 subjects received a prophylaxis to establish a stain-free baseline and were then randomly assigned a control and experimental side of the mouth. The rinsing regimen was 1/2 oz of 0.12% CHX mouthrinse 2x a day for 3 months. Subjects self-examined daily for the appearance of stain. Where stain was visible, a toothpick was used to 'rub it away' on the distolabial, labial and mesiolabial surfaces of the experimental side only. The rubbing action was similar to the use of an eraser to remove a pencil mark from paper. The amount and intensity of stain was photographed and graded by a blinded examiner after 2 weeks, 1, 2 and 3 months. Subjects kept calendars to encourage and document compliance. When analyzed across time, teeth and surfaces, there was a statistically significant difference in stain between the control and experimental sides for stain amount, intensity, and for a composite of amount/intensity. Clinical differences were slight. The study indicates that the use of a simple toothpicking technique can affect chlorhexidine stain.

Discolouration of the teeth, tongue and dental restorative materials associated with the use of cationic antiseptics is still the limiting factor in long-term usage of antiplaque agents such as chlorhexidine. Oxidising agents have been used successfully to remove dental stain in animals, but products and regimens have not been evaluated in humans. These pilot studies in vitro and in vivo assessed a long-established oxidising mouthwash, based on peroxyborate, for stain removal from teeth and acrylic. The laboratory studies measured chlorhexidine tea stain removal from tooth and acrylic specimens. The oxidising agent markedly reduced staining on specimens. In a short-term clinical experiment, dental staining was forced over a 2 1/2-day period by reciprocal chlorhexidine and tea rinsing. 5 rinses with the oxidising mouthwash during the next 1 1/2 days dramatically reduced staining compared with water after rinses. Additionally, a single rinse with peroxyborate following the 5 water after rinses, again considerably reduced the residual staining. Effects on tongue staining were less impressive. Both experimental models produced findings consistent with those from the animal model. The results suggest proprietary oxidising mouthwashes could have a place in the control of dental stain associated with the use of chlorhexidine. Further studies to evaluate such products in a more conventional chlorhexidine regimen are indicated.

We compared the effects of four oral hygiene methods (manual tooth-brushing, power toothbrushing, manual toothbrushing plus irrigation, and power toothbrushing plus irrigation) on plaque and periodontal disease. These methods were tested both when used alone and when used in conjunction with professional mechanical oral hygiene. 108 subjects were clinically assessed for plaque, stain, gingival inflammation, bleeding to probing, probing depth and attachment loss, and randomly assigned to one of the 4 oral hygiene groups. Subjects were carefully instructed in the use of their assigned method and asked to discontinue all other forms of oral hygiene. After 3-months, subjects returned for re-examination and full-month professional mechanical oral hygiene care. 3 months later, subjects returned for a final oral examination. All subjects kept a diary of use of their assigned method and were called every 2 weeks to monitor discomfort, provide reinforcement and answer questions. Results showed that all the oral hygiene methods were equally effective in reducing plaque and stain accumulation, gingival bleeding, bleeding to probing ratio and the % of pockets 4 mm or deeper. None of the oral hygiene methods was associated with injury to soft or hard tissues.

The majority of tooth discolorations are extrinsic in nature and appear as brown integuments. Various clinical indices and photometric techniques have been used for the evaluation of extrinsic discolorations. Smoking, tea or coffee consumption and increasing age are promoting factors and such discolorations are frequently seen in connection with oral use of antibacterial plaque-inhibiting mouthrinses. Chemical alteration of the acquired pellicle appears to be the major reason for these brown integuments.

The aim of this 4 times cross-over double-blind clinical trial was to test the plaque-inhibiting effect of 2 fluoride-containing toothpastes. One toothpaste contained 0.8% chlorhexidine together with amine fluoride (0.1% F degrees) and a suitable abrasive agent. The other contained 1.7 U/g glucose oxidase and 8.0 U/g amyloglucosidase, added to an amine fluoride (0.1% F degrees) toothpaste. 1% Hibitane dental gel was used as a positive and a conventional fluoride toothpaste (Vademecum MFP Fluor) as a negative control. 9 dental students, in a randomized sequence, applied the 4 dentifrices twice daily from Monday afternoon to Friday morning with cap splints, designed to cover the teeth and about 2 mm of gingiva. No other oral hygiene measures were allowed during the 4 test periods. On Fridays, the teeth were cleaned professionally and good oral hygiene was maintained during the week-ends. At the beginning and at the end of each test period, per student plaque thickness was recorded using the plaque index, the visible plaque index, and plaque fresh weight as parameters, and the area of plaque as related to the area of the tooth surface was recorded planimetrically and according to the PLQ index. The best plaque growth-inhibiting effect was recorded for the positive control (CHX) with the test chlorhexidine toothpaste (TX) as next best. The enzyme-containing toothpaste (TE) did not differ significantly from the negative control (C). All the significant differences in anti-plaque effect between the 4 toothpastes were obtained by recordings of plaque thickness and none on the basis of area of plaque.