Search

Aims: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have various motor difficulties, including standing up, gait initiation and freezing of gait. These abnormalities are associated with cortico‐subthalamic dysfunction. We aimed to reveal the characteristics of cortico‐subthalamic activity in PD patients during different motor statuses. Methods: Potentials were recorded in the superior parietal lobule (SPL), the primary motor cortex (M1), premotor cortex (PMC), and the bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) in 18 freely walking patients while sitting, standing, walking, dual‐task walking, and freezing in medication "off" (Moff) and "on" (Mon) states. Different motor status activities were compared in band power, and a machine learning classifier was used to differentiate the motor statuses. Results: SPL beta power was specifically inhibited from standing to walking, and negatively correlated with walking speed; M1 beta power reflected the degree of rigidity and was reversed by medication; XGBoost algorithm classified the five motor statuses with acceptable accuracy (68.77% in Moff, 60.58% in Mon). SPL beta power ranked highest in feature importance in both Moff and Mon states. Conclusion: SPL beta power plays an essential role in walking status classification and could be a physiological biomarker for walking speed, which would aid the development of adaptive DBS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: The efficacy and safety of posterior subthalamic area (PSA) and ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of essential tremor (ET) have not been compared in large‐scale studies. We conducted a secondary analysis to identify the superior target of ET‐DBS treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies before September 2021. The tremor‐suppression efficacy and rate of stimulation‐related complications (SRCR) after PSA‐DBS and VIM‐DBS treating ET were quantitatively compared. Secondary outcomes, including tremor subitem scores and quality of life results, were also analyzed. Subgroup analyses were further conducted to stratify by follow‐up (FU) periods and stimulation lateralities. This study was registered in Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7VJQ8). Results: A total of 23 studies including 122 PSA‐DBS patients and 326 VIM‐DBS patients were analyzed. The average follow‐up time was 12.81 and 14.66 months, respectively. For the percentage improvement of total tremor rating scale (TRS) scores, PSA‐DBS was significantly higher, when compared to VIM‐DBS in the sensitivity analysis (p = 0.030) and main analysis (p = 0.043). The SRCR after VIM‐DBS was higher than that of PSA‐DBS (p = 0.022), and bilateral PSA‐DBS was significantly superior to both bilateral and unilateral VIM‐DBS (p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provided level IIIa evidence that PSA‐DBS was more effective and safer for ET than VIM‐DBS in 12–24 months, although both PSA‐DBS and VIM‐DBS were effective in suppressing tremor in ET patients. Further prospective large‐scale randomized clinical trials are warranted in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim‐DBS) is the preferred surgical therapy for essential tremor (ET). Tolerance and disease progression are considered to be the two main reasons underlying the loss of long‐term efficacy of Vim‐DBS. This study aimed to explore whether Vim‐DBS shows long‐term loss of efficacy and to evaluate the reasons for this diminished efficacy from different aspects. Methods: In a repeated‐measures meta‐analysis of 533 patients from 18 studies, Vim‐DBS efficacy was evaluated at ≤6 months, 7–12 months, 1–3 years, and ≥4 years. The primary outcomes were the score changes in different components of the Fahn‐Tolosa‐Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS; total score, motor score, hand‐function score, and activities of daily living [ADL] score). Secondary outcomes were the long‐term predictive factors. Results: The TRS total, motor, and ADL scores showed significant deterioration with disease progression (p = 0.002, p = 0.047, and p < 0.001, respectively), while the TRS total (p < 0.001), hand‐function (p = 0.036), and ADL (p = 0.004) scores indicated a significant long‐term reduction in DBS efficacy, although the motor subscore indicated no loss of efficacy. Hand‐function (p < 0.001) and ADL (p = 0.028) scores indicated DBS tolerance, while the TRS total and motor scores did not. Stimulation frequency and preoperative score were predictive factors for long‐term results. Conclusion: This study provides level 3a evidence that long‐term Vim‐DBS is effective in controlling motor symptoms without waning benefits. The efficacy reduction for hand function was caused by DBS tolerance, while that for ADL was caused by DBS tolerance and disease progression. More attention should be given to actual functional recovery rather than changes in motor scores in patients with ET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the value of total levodopa response (TLR) and symptom levodopa response (SLR) in predicting postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes. Methods. Studies were split into a training set (147 patients) and a validation set (304 patients). We retrospectively collected data from 147 patients who received the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-) III and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-) 39 evaluation. Patients were classified into tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid-dominant (AR), and mixed (MX) groups. Clinically important difference (CID) was employed to dichotomize DBS effects. For patients in each subtype group from the training set, we used the correlation and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to explore the strength of their relations. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared through the DeLong test. Results developed from the training set were applied into the validation set to predict postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes. Results. In the validation cohort, TLR significantly correlated with postoperative motor (p < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (p < 0.001) improvement in the MX group. The AUC between TLR and UPDRS-III (TU) is 0.800. The AUC between TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) is 0.770. An associated criterion in both TU and TP is around 50%. In the AR group, strong correlation was only found in SLR and PDQ-39 (SP) (p < 0.001). And the AUC of SP is significantly larger than that in TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) (p = 0.034). An associated criterion in SP is around 37%. No significant correlation was found in the TD group. Conclusions. We provide a more accurate judgment for LDCT. TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients. A TLR > 50 % may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from STN-DBS comparing to medication only. SLR can well predict QOL improvement in AR patients. Similarly, a SLR > 37 % may indicate a higher possibility of clinically significant benefits from STN-DBS. LDCT provides limited information for TD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]