Background: In opaque orthographies, such as English, children with low reading skills tend to rely more on semantic information due to their inadequate acquisition of sub‐lexical knowledge. This tendency has also been reported for kanji, a non‐alphabetic and opaque Japanese orthography. However, previous studies on this phenomenon have had methodological limitations, such as a small number of stimuli in reading tests and insufficient investigation of a consistency effect. This study addressed these limitations and aimed to clarify whether Japanese children with low reading accuracy are characterised by a stronger reliance on semantic information and a smaller contribution to the reading process based on character‐to‐sound correspondences to the kanji word‐reading performance than children with high reading accuracy in reading kanji words. Methods: A total of 129 Japanese students in the fifth and sixth grades participated in this study, and 11 of them had been previously diagnosed with developmental dyslexia. They read an experimenter‐created list of kanji words. We tested how frequency, imageability and consistency of character‐to‐sound correspondences affected children's reading accuracy and error types and how the effects of these variables were modulated by reading accuracy level. Results: For children with lower reading accuracy, the frequency and consistency effects on reading accuracy decreased, whereas the imageability effect was stronger. Children with low reading accuracy frequently did not respond, whereas children with high reading accuracy made word substitution and legitimate alternative reading of component (LARC) errors frequently. Conclusions: The reading processing of children with low reading accuracy is characterised by a stronger reliance on semantic information and a smaller contribution of a reading process based on character‐to‐sound correspondences to reading performance than that of children with high reading accuracy. Reading characteristics of children with low reading accuracy might be due to their inadequate lexical and sub‐word knowledge. Highlights: What is already known about this topicJapanese children with developmental dyslexia show a larger imageability effect than children without reading deficits, thus suggesting a heavier reliance on semantic information when reading kanji words (Akashi et al., 2013).Compared with Japanese children without reading deficits, Japanese children with developmental dyslexia frequently make two types of errors: word substitution errors (i.e. reading a target word as another word) and no response (Akashi et al., 2013).The percentage of legitimate alternative reading of component (LARC) errors in Japanese children with developmental dyslexia was lower compared with their peers without reading deficits, which suggests a lack of sub‐word knowledge, that is, character‐to‐sound correspondences (Akashi et al., 2013). What this paper addsIn addition to a larger imageability effect and fewer LARC errors, the reading performance of children with low reading scores was characterised by smaller effects of frequency and consistency on reading accuracy compared with children with high reading scores.In addition to LARC errors, children with high reading scores made word substitution errors more frequently than those with low reading scores, which is inconsistent with Akashi et al. (2013).This study showed that a process using semantic information and one based on character‐to‐sound correspondences could affect reading accuracy in Japanese children. Implications for theory, policy or practiceThis study elucidated the kanji word‐reading characteristics of children with low reading scores. The results will enable teachers to identify children who have difficulty reading kanji words based on their reading characteristics.Our findings suggest that we should develop kanji word‐reading interventions to improve sub‐word and lexical reading skills in Japanese children with low reading accuracy because their reading characteristics are mostly affected by a lack of orthography–phonology correspondences at the word and sub‐word levels. To improve sub‐word reading skills, teachers can teach multiple pronunciations of each character and which pronunciation of a character is the most frequent among compound words with the character. To improve lexical reading skills, focusing on orthography–phonology and orthography–semantics associations at the word level by looking at a printed word, pronouncing it and saying its meaning multiple times may be helpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]