Search

Background: We explored the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy for the treatment of human epidermal factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR (PAM) pathway after trastuzumab treatment. Methods: For this prospective multicenter clinical study, HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer patients with PAM pathway mutations confirmed by histology or peripheral blood genetic testing were enrolled from July 2021 to September 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to a trial or control group. The patients in the trial group received inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy, while the control group patients received pyrotinib and chemotherapy. The RECIST v1.1 standard was used to evaluate efficacy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the clinicopathological features, and the Kaplan–Meier method was used to generate survival curves. The log‐rank test was used to compare progression‐free survival (PFS) between the two groups. Results: A total of 59 HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of the PAM pathway were included, of which 37 received inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy treatment and 22 received pyrotinib and chemotherapy treatment. The median PFS was 4.64 months in the inetetamab group and 5.69 months in the pyrotinib group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.507). The objective response rates were 27.3% for the inetetamab group and 29.4% for the pyrotinib group. The safety assessment indicated that the adverse event (AE) incidences were 86.1% (31/36) in the inetetamab group and 78.9 (15/19) in the pyrotinib group, with 9 (25%) and four (21.1%) Grade 3/4 AEs in the inetetamab and pyrotinib groups, respectively. Conclusions: For metastatic HER2‐positive breast cancer patients with abnormal PAM pathway activation and previous trastuzumab treatment, the combination of inetetamab with sirolimus and chemotherapy is equivalent to the combination of pyrotinib and chemotherapy. Therefore, this regimen could be a treatment option for PAM pathway‐activated metastatic HER2‐positive breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: HER2 is an infrequently mutated driver gene in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, there has been no comprehensive large‐scale clinical study to establish the optimal first‐line treatment strategy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with HER2‐Mutant. Besides that, the effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib, a pan‐HER inhibitor, in the context of NSCLC are still undergoing investigation. Materials and Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective data collection of HER2‐Mutated advanced LUAD who received first‐line treatment and pyrotinib between May 2014 and June 2023. Patients treated with chemotherapy, chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy + bevacizumab and pyrotinib in first‐line treatment. Furthermore, we collected data on the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in these patients after disease progression. The main endpoint of the study was progression‐free survival (PFS). Results: In the final analysis, 89 patients were included in the first‐line cohort and 30 patients were included in the pyrotinib cohort. In the first‐line treatment cohort, chemotherapy + ICIs, chemotherapy + bevacizumab, and pyrotinib exhibited notable survival benefits compared to chemotherapy (median PFS: 9.87 vs. 7.77 vs. 7.10 vs. 5.40 months, p‐value < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with a first‐line treatment PFS of less than 6 months may potentially benefit from subsequent treatment with pyrotinib (median PFS: 7.467 vs. 3.000, p‐value = 0.0490). Conclusions: In the first‐line treatment of HER2‐Mutant LUAD, regimens involving combinations like chemotherapy + ICIs, chemotherapy + bevacizumab, and pyrotinib may confer enhanced survival advantages compared to chemotherapy. Nevertheless, no significant distinctions were observed among these three treatment strategies, underscoring the imperative to identify biomarkers for the discerning selection of suitable therapeutic modalities. Moreover, patients with suboptimal response to first‐line treatment may potentially derive more benefit from pyrotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The combination of dual‐targeted human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy and chemotherapy is the standard first‐line regimen for recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the toxicity of such combination therapy can lead to some patients being unable to tolerate adverse events or bear treatment costs. As a novel irreversible pan‐ErbB receptor TKI (pyrotinib), can the dual oral administration of pyrotinib plus capetabine (PyroC) provide first‐line survival benefits and serve as a more affordable treatment option? Methods: This real‐world retrospective study included patients diagnosed with HER2‐positive mBC who received PyroC as a first‐line treatment at West China Hospital between May 2018 and July 2023. The survival data and toxicity profiles were reported in this study. Results: A total of 64 patients received PyroC as first‐line therapy. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 19.6 months (95% CI 15.0–27.2), while overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that age (≥60, p = 0.03) and metastasis sites (p = 0.004) were related to poor efficacy of PyroC, while there was no relationship between effectiveness and menstrual status, hormone receptor (HR) status or previous treatment with anti‐HER2 therapy. Furthermore, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 79.7% and 98.4%, respectively. Of the patients, 78.1% reported treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs). The predominant adverse events were diarrhea (n = 46, 71.9%) and hand‐foot syndrome (n = 10, 15.6%). Conclusion: The dual oral administration regimen (PyroC) has a promising ORR or PFS in HER2‐positive mBC patients, with an acceptable safety profile and convenience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: It has been observed that the prognosis of patients with HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer has improved significantly with HER2‐targeted agents. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding first‐line anti‐HER2 treatment options for patients who have received adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab for HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. Besides, there are no reliable markers that can predict the efficacy of anti‐HER2 treatment in these patients. Methods: Patients who have received adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab for HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Pyrotinib plus albumin‐bound paclitaxel were used as first‐line treatment. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The safety profile was also assessed. In order to explore predictive biomarkers using Olink technology, blood samples were collected dynamically. Results: From December 2019 to August 2023, the first stage of the study involved 27 eligible patients. It has not yet reached the median PFS despite the median follow‐up being 17.8 months. Efficacy evaluation showed that the ORR was 92.6%, and the DCR was 100%. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher included diarrhoea (29.6%), leukopenia (11.1%), neutropenia (25.9%), oral mucositis (3.7%), and hand‐foot syndrome (3.7%). Toll‐like receptor 3 (TLR3) and Proto‐oncogene tyrosine‐protein kinase receptor (RET) were proteins with significant relevance to PFS in these patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that pyrotinib plus albumin‐bound paclitaxel as a first‐line treatment regimen shows good efficacy and manageable safety for patients who have received adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant trastuzumab for HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. Besides, a significant association was identified between the expression levels of TLR3 and RET and the PFS in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There remains an unmet need for targeted therapies against advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with HER2 mutations. To improve the antitumor activity of single anti‐HER2 agent, this prospective, single‐arm clinical trial (NCT05016544) examined the safety profile and efficacy of anti‐HER2 antibody inetetamab and pan‐HER TKI pyrotinib in HER2‐posivite advanced NSCLC patients. Enrolled patients received inetetamab every 3 weeks and pyrotinib once per day (pyrotinib, dose‐escalation part, 240 mg, 320 mg; dose‐expansion part, 320 mg). Primary endpoints were dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) dosage and safety. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 48 patients were enrolled. During the dose‐escalation period, no DLT occurred. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported treatment‐related adverse event (TRAE). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in seven patients. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4–8.6 months]. The confirmed ORR and DCR reached 25% (11/44) and 84.1% (37/44), respectively. Responses were shown in patients with distinct HER2 aberrations. In summary, inetetamab in combination with pyrotinib demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity among patients with advanced HER2‐mutant NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti‐HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) therapies significantly increase the overall survival of patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, a large fraction of patients may develop primary or acquired resistance. Further, a multidrug combination used to prevent this in the clinic places a significant burden on patients. To address this issue, this work develops a nanotherapeutic platform that incorporates bimetallic gold‐silver hollow nanoshells (AuAg HNSs) with exceptional near‐infrared (NIR) absorption capability, the small‐molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor pyrotinib (PYR), and Herceptin (HCT). This platform realizes targeted delivery of multiple therapeutic effects, including chemo‐and photothermal activities, oxidative stress, and immune response. In vitro assays reveal that the HCT‐modified nanoparticles exhibit specific recognition ability and effective internalization by cells. The released PYR inhibit cell proliferation by downregulating HER2 and its associated pathways. NIR laser application induces a photothermal effect and tumor cell apoptosis, whereas an intracellular reactive oxygen species burst amplifies oxidative stress and triggers cancer cell ferroptosis. Importantly, this multimodal therapy also promotes the upregulation of genes related to TNF and NF‐κB signaling pathways, enhancing immune activation and immunogenic cell death. In vivo studies confirm a significant reduction in tumor volume after treatment, substantiating the potential effectiveness of these nanocarriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple‐positive breast cancer (TPBC) poorly responds to current standard neoadjuvant therapy (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab and chemotherapy). Our previous MUKDEN 01 study showed a promising total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate of 30.4% with neoadjuvant pyrotinib (pan‐human epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus dalpiciclib (cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) and letrozole, but the efficacy remains suboptimal. This pilot study (NCT05228951) explored adding trastuzumab to this triplet neoadjuvant regimen in patients with stage II–III TPBC. The primary endpoint was tpCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) rate. Between February 2022 and June 2022, 12 patients were enrolled, and seven (58%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7%–84.8%) patients achieved tpCR. The rate of residual cancer burden (RCB) 0–I was 75% (95% CI, 46.8%–91.1%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 92% (95% CI, 64.6%–98.5%). Mean Ki‐67 level was significantly reduced from 45.0% (95% CI, 19.5%–70.5%) at baseline to 17.2% (95% CI, 0.7%–33.7%) after neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.03). The most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (four [33%]) and decreased neutrophil count (three [25%]). No grade 4 adverse events or treatment‐related deaths occurred. This four‐drug neoadjuvant regimen shows promising pathological response with an acceptable safety profile in patients with TPBC. A randomized controlled trial (NCT05638594) of this regimen is being conducted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this multicenter, single‐arm trial (ChiCTR1900022293) was to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and pyrotinib followed by docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pyrotinib (ECPy‐THPy) in the treatment of patients with stage II–III HER2‐positive breast cancer. The present study enrolled patients with stage II–III HER2‐positive breast cancer. Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide were administrated for four 21‐day cycles, followed by four cycles of docetaxel and trastuzumab. Pyrotinib was taken orally once per day throughout the treatment period. The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate in the modified intention‐to‐treat (mITT) population. In total, 175 patients were included. The tpCR rate was 68.6% (95% CI, 60.7–75.8%), while the objective response rate was 89.1%. In the post‐hoc subgroup analysis, no association between clinical characteristics and the tpCR rate was observed. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea (54.3%), followed by white blood cell count decreased (5.1%), and neutrophil count decreased (4.6%). In conclusion, the neoadjuvant regimen with ECPy‐THPy showed promising pathological response and clinical benefits with an acceptable safety profile in patients with stage II–III HER2‐positive breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although some targeted therapies have been shown to be effective in treating HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the survival demands have not yet been met due to the high cost and limited availability. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents, including apatinib, anlotinib, and bevacizumab, in previously treated patients with HER2-altered advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this retrospective real-world study, patients with HER2-altered NSCLC who received pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents as a second- or later-line treatment between November 2015 and January 2022 were reviewed. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles of patients were analyzed. Results: A total of 107 patients were included in the analysis, of which 59 patients (55.1%) had received at least two lines of prior chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Most of them (87.9%) were identified as harboring HER2 exon 20 insertions. At the data cutoff date (May 13, 2022), the ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 19.6% (21/107), 94.4% (101/107), 7.13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.26– 8.01), and 19.50 months (95% CI: 12.83–26.17), respectively. There was no difference in the PFS between patients receiving apatinib or anlotinib/bevacizumab (median PFS, 7.13 vs. 6.27 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.87–2.54, p = 0.15). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was diarrhea (17.6%), followed by hypertension (11.0%) and nausea (3.3%). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion: In this study, pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents demonstrated promising efficacy and were tolerable in HER2-altered NSCLC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan‐ErbB inhibitor, has been approved for treating HER2‐positive advanced breast cancer in China. We conducted a nationwide, prospective observational study to examine the real‐world data of pyrotinib‐based therapy in this population. Patients from 61 sites across China were included. Pyrotinib‐based regimens were prescribed at local physician's discretion. Demographics, treatment patterns, prognosis and safety were evaluated. The primary outcome was real‐world progression‐free survival (rwPFS). Of 1129 patients, pyrotinib‐based therapy was prescribed as first‐, second‐ and third‐ or later‐line treatment in 437 (38.7%), 476 (42.2%) and 216 (19.1%) patients, respectively. Median rwPFS (mrwPFS) was 14.3 (95% CI, 13.3‐15.2) months in the total population, with the longest mrwPFS of 17.8 (95% CI, 15.2‐24.9) months in the first‐line setting, followed by 14.4 (95% CI, 12.9‐15.3) months in the second‐line setting. Patients with third‐ or later‐line treatment also achieved a mrwPFS of 9.3 (95% CI, 8.4‐11.8) months. Patients with trastuzumab‐ or trastuzumab‐pertuzumab‐treated disease achieved a mrwPFS of 14.3 and 13.6 months, respectively. Dual HER2 blockade with pyrotinib plus trastuzumab showed a mrwPFS of 16.2 months in the total population, with data not mature in the first‐line setting. For patients with baseline brain metastases, the mrwPFS was 11.7 months. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (any grade, 73.5%; grade ≥ 3, 15.3%). In real world, pyrotinib‐based therapy shows promising effectiveness in the first‐, as well as second‐ and later‐line treatment, with acceptable tolerability. Further investigations regarding front‐line use or novel combinations of pyrotinib might facilitate to maximize its anti‐tumor potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan‐ErbB small‐molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor) was approved in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer and showed great antitumor activity in preclinical studies of gastric cancer (GC). This study was first designed to prospectively assess pyrotinib in pretreated HER2‐positive GC. Methods: This multicenter, phase I study followed a standard "3 + 3" design and included two parts. In the pyrotinib part, pyrotinib was administered orally, once per day at dose levels of 240, 320, 400, and 480 mg. In the pyrotinib plus docetaxel part, patients received pyrotinib (qd, d1‐21, q3W) combined with docetaxel (60 mg/m2, d1, q3W) at dose levels of 240, 320, and 400 mg. Primary endpoints were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of pyrotinib as monotherapy or coadministered with docetaxel. Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled and received pyrotinib (n = 15) or pyrotinib plus docetaxel (n = 10). One DLT was observed in pyrotinib monotherapy part (Grade 3 uncontrolled diarrhea after supportive care) and pyrotinib plus docetaxel part (Grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia). In the pyrotinib monotherapy part, MTD was not reached. Diarrhea, anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia were the most common treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs). The RP2D for pyrotinib monotherapy was recommended as 400 mg. After combining with docetaxel, the risk of leukopenia and neutropenia was increased. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported for four patients in the monotherapy part and for eight patients in the combination part. Mean t1/2 was approximately 20 h. Pyrotinib exposure was dose‐dependent with a nonlinear relationship versus dose. There were five patients who had confirmed partial response (monotherapy: one each at 240, 400, and 480 mg dose cohort; combination therapy: two at 240 mg dose cohort), resulting in an objective response rate of 21% and 20%, respectively. Conclusions: Pyrotinib alone and combined with docetaxel showed acceptable toxicities in patients with pretreated HER2‐positive GC. Trial Registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02378389. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In this single‐arm, open‐label, multicenter, phase 2 trial patients with HER2‐positive recurrent/metastatic CRC were enrolled and received oral pyrotinib 400 mg once a day plus intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety were assessed as secondary endpoints. From December 2019 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients were enrolled and 18 of them were evaluable for response. All patients were B‐rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) wild type. Four patients achieved partial response, with an ORR of 22.2% (4/18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4–47.6) and DCR of 61.1% (11/18, 95% CI 35.8–82.7), while the ORR and DCR were 33.3% (4/12, 95% CI 13.8–60.9) and 83.3% (10/12, 95% CI 51.6–97.9), respectively, in RAS wild‐type patients. At the time of cut‐off day, median follow‐up was 10.7 months (range 3.8–13.8). The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.8–4.3) in the overall population and 4.3 months (95% CI 3.2–8.5) in the RAS wild‐type group. The most common adverse event of grade ≥3 was diarrhea (13/20, 65.0%). Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with RAS/BRAF wild‐type HER2‐positive advanced CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pyrotinib, a novel irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (EGFR)/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor efficacy with tolerable toxicity in HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in several clinical trials. However, the clinical trials do not usually well reflect the patients in real clinical settings. Despite several small‐sample studies in real world, the data on pyrotinib as first‐line and third‐or‐later‐line treatment and the efficacy comparison of pyrotinib combined with different regimens are still lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib for the HER2‐positive MBC in real world to replenish more comprehensive data. Methods: A total of 172 HER2‐positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib‐based therapy were recruited from multiple centers in nonclinical trial settings from September 2017 to June 2020. Results: The median progression‐free survival (mPFS) of 172 patients was 8.83 months. The patients, receiving first‐line pyrotinib treatment, had the longest mPFS (20.93 months) compared with those receiving second‐line (8.67 months, p = 0.0339) and third‐or‐later‐line (7.13 months, p = 0.0075) treatments, respectively. Prior treatment with lapatinib (p = 0.012) and site of metastasis (visceral vs. nonvisceral) (p = 0.033) were the independent prognostic factors for PFS. The prior treatment with lapatinib compared with lapatinib‐native treatment (5.96 vs. 10.97 months, p = 0.0036) and those with visceral metastasis compared with nonvisceral metastasis (8.40 vs. 23.70 months, p = 0.0138) had worse mPFS. Among 146 patients evaluated for efficacy, 2.1%, 58.9%, and 32.9% showed complete response, partial response, and stable disease, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 92.4% of the patients with 33.3% Grade 3 and higher adverse events and diarrhea (57.0%), anemia (44.8%), and leukopenia (40.7%) as the most frequent ones. Conclusions: Pyrotinib‐containing regimen could effectively treat HER2‐positive MBC with acceptable toxicity, including the patients who progressed after lapatinib treatment and with brain metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene fusion is a rare oncogenic driver gene in multiple tumor types, leading to the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB)‐mediated pathway. Therefore, afatinib, a pan‐ErbB family inhibitor, may be a therapeutic candidate for NRG1 fusion‐driven tumors. In this case, we report a multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma patient harboring the CD74‐NRG1 fusion, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) mutation simultaneously. The patient received afatinib and pyrotinib combination therapy and showed a significant treatment response with a progression‐free survival of 5 months. Our case further supports the use of targeted therapy for NRG1 fusion‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: We aimed to investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pyrotinib and determine the safety of this combination in healthy Chinese volunteers. Methods: Eighteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in this single‐dose and self‐controlled study. Pyrotinib (400 mg per oral) was administered 30 minutes after the standard meal. Omeprazole was administered from day 6 (D6) to D10 (40 mg, per oral). On D10, the subjects took omeprazole under fasting conditions, followed by pyrotinib 30 minutes after the standard meal. Blood samples for PK analyses in each phase were collected for analysing the drug concentration. Safety was assessed via clinical laboratory tests and physical examinations. Results: Compared with a single dose of pyrotinib, pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole showed no significant difference in exposure, elimination, half‐life and apparent clearance rate. The mixed‐effects model revealed that the least‐squares geometric mean ratios of area under the concentration–time curve (AUC)0‐t, AUC0‐∞ and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,90% confidence intervals) of pyrotinib alone and pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole were 0.94 (0.82, 1.08), 0.94 (0.83, 1.08) and 0.91 (0.806, 1.038), respectively, indicating the absence of significant differences in AUC0‐t, AUC0‐∞ and Cmax. During the treatment period, 6 subjects (33.3%) reported 8 adverse events during pyrotinib monotherapy and omeprazole administration, respectively; 10 subjects (55.6%) reported 34 adverse events in the combined administration phase. Conclusion: Omeprazole, a proton‐pump inhibitor, did not significantly impact the PK properties of pyrotinib, and a good safety profile was observed on coadministration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in treating patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancers with brain metastasis. Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study, and the HER2‐positive breast cancer patients with brain metastasis were studied. The enrolled patients were given pyrotinib 400 mg orally once per day for 21 days as one cycle, and evaluated every two cycles. All relevant data were detected for final assessments including medical history, clinical examination, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, radiographic imaging, treatment outcome, and adverse events. Results: Forty‐two female patients in total were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of central nervous system (CNS), were found in 20 of 42 (47.6%) and in 39 of 42 (92.8%), respectively, while for extra‐CNS, the respective ORR and DCR were in 9 of 38 (23.6%) and in 36 of 38 (94.7%), respectively. The compounded ORR and DCR were seen in 17 of 42 (40.4%) and in 39 of 42 (92.8%), respectively. The improvement rate of craniocerebral symptoms after treatment was (19/19) 100% and the median duration was 15 months. The median effective time of brain metastases and other metastases was 43 and 50 days. The median follow‐up time was 22 months (interquartile range, 16.0–24.3 months). The median time for progression in brain metastasis was 16.6 months. The median time to progress for our group patients was 11.1 months. Sixteen patients (36%) with adverse reactions were recorded in the study. Conclusion: Pyrotinib combined with chemotherapy/radiotherapy or alone showed significantly greater local control rates and progression free survival (PFS), with manageable toxicity for patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer with brain metastases, and further follow‐up will provide an overall survival (OS) data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The previous studies had demonstrated the promising effectiveness and acceptable safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to investigate the real‐world data of pyrotinib in complex clinical practice and complement the findings of clinical trials. Two hundred and eighteen patients were included for effectiveness analysis. A total of 62.0% had received two or more lines of systematic therapy, and 95.4% had been exposed to prior anti‐HER2 therapy, with 95.4% receiving trastuzumab, 5.0% receiving pertuzumab, and 40.8% receiving lapatinib. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months and the objective response rate (ORR) was 44.0%. Patients treated with pyrotinib‐based therapy as first, second, or later line had a median PFS of 15.0, 10.3, and 6.8 months, respectively. Patients treated with pyrotinib and trastuzumab received significant benefit in terms of median PFS compared with pyrotinib alone (10.7 (9.1–12.3) vs. 8.8 (8.1–9.5), p = 0.016). Patients pretreated with lapatinib had a median PFS of 6.9 months. The median PFS time was 7.0 months in patients with brain metastasis. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that lines of pyrotinib‐based therapy (1 vs. 2 vs. ≥3), prior treatment with lapatinib, and combination treatments with trastuzumab proved to be independent predictors of PFS. Two hundred and forty‐eight patients were included in the safety analysis, and the results showed that the toxicity of pyrotinib was tolerable, with the most common grade 3/4 adverse event being diarrhea (19.8%). Pyrotinib‐based therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in first‐, second‐, and later‐line treatments and in lapatinib‐treated patients. The combination of pyrotinib and trastuzumab showed advantages in PFS, even for patients resisting trastuzumab. Pyrotinib‐based therapy could be the preferred choice for brain metastasis patients, especially when combined with brain radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pyrotinib is an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this work was to establish a quantification method for the simultaneous determination of pyrotinib and its metabolite pyrotinib‐lactam in rat plasma using UPLC‐MS/MS. After simple protein precipitation with acetonitrile, the analytes and internal standard (neratinib) were separated on an ACQUITY BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) using a mobile phase of water containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile. The detection was performed using selected reaction monitoring mode with precursor‐to‐product ion transitions at m/z 583.2 > 138.1 for pyrotinib, m/z 597.2 > 152.1 for pyrotinib‐lactam, and m/z 557.2 > 112.1 for internal standard. The assay exhibited excellent linearity in the concentration range of 0.5–1000 ng/mL for pyrotinib and pyrotinib‐lactam. The assay met the criteria of the United States Food and Drug Administration–validated bioanalytical methods and was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of pyrotinib and its metabolite for the first time. Our results demonstrated that pyrotinib rapidly converted into pyrotinib‐lactam, whose in vivo exposure was 21% that of pyrotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutation and particularly exon 20 insertion mutations of erb‐b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2/HER2) have been extensively reported in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, the clinical significance of non‐TKD mutations remains unknown. To date, no clinical trials have revealed that tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective in NSCLC patients with non‐TKD ERBB2 mutations. Here we report a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring non‐TKD mutation of ERBB2, S335C, without other actionable alterations benefited from pyrotinib. After first‐line treatment of pyrotinib monotherapy, a pan‐HER inhibitor, the patient achieved a durable partial response with good tolerance. This case powerfully illustrates that pyrotinib might be a promising first‐line treatment strategy for NSCLC patients with non‐TKD mutation of ERBB2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pyrotinib was well tolerated but its efficacy was unsatisfactory in patients with HER2‐positive gastric cancer (GC) (NCT02378389). This study was to optimize the efficacy of pyrotinib. Methods: Human GC cell lines and AVATAR mice were used to explore the refractory mechanisms of pyrotinib. A pyrotinib‐combined strategy was proposed, which was validated in preclinical AVATAR mouse and in clinical patients enrolled in a phase I clinical trial (NCT03480256). Results: Dysregulation of CCND1‐CDK4/6‐Rb axis might be the key to pyrotinib refractory. The strategy of pyrotinib combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor SHR6390 was proposed and validated in preclinical AVATAR mouse, which was successfully verified in clinical patients. For five patients treated with pyrotinib plus SHR6390 who had available response evaluation, the best response was partial response in three patients, stable disease in one patient, and progressive disease in one patient. The progression‐free survival times were 120, 200, 532, 109, and 57 days, respectively. Conclusions: This translational study suggests that pyrotinib combined with SHR6390 may serve as a promising strategy for patients with HER2‐positive GC. Trial registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers are NCT02378389 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02378389, registered in 11 February 2015) and NCT03480256 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03480256, registered in 8 March 2018). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ERBB2 mutations are found in about 2% of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recent study reported that pyrotinib (an irreversible pan ErbB inhibitor) had superior antitumor effect compared to other tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies in patients with ERBB2 mutations. Bone marrow metastasis is rare in lung adenocarcinoma, and has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis. Here, we report the case of a 62‐year‐old female diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma and bone marrow metastasis. ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutation was confirmed by next‐generation sequencing (NGS) of lung tissue as well as bone marrow. The patient achieved stable disease and recovery of pancytopenia after two months of pyrotinib therapy. This is the first report of homogenous mutations of ERBB2 detected in bone marrow, as well as a good response of bone marrow to pyrotinib therapy. Key points: This is the first report of a homogenous mutation of ERBB2 detected in the bone marrow of an NSCLC patient with bone marrow metastasis.Our patient with NSCLC ERBB2 mutation and bone marrow metastasis responded well to pyrotinib therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]