Search

For realizing efficient utilization of liquified natural gas cold energy and high‐temperature flue gas waste heat, herein, a combined cooling, heating, and power system using Peng–Robinson property package in Aspen HYSYS software, which includes a three‐stage parallel Rankine cycle (RC) in series with single‐stage RC and a supercritical CO2 (S‐CO2) Brayton cycle, is proposed. The system performance is evaluated using the first law of thermodynamics, second law of thermodynamics, specific energy costing method, and exergoenvironment analysis method. The influences of the pump 1 outlet pressure, turbine 3 inlet temperature, working fluid R23 mass flow rate, compressor 1 outlet pressure, CO2 liquefaction pressure, and ambient temperature on system performance are investigated. The nondominated sorting whale optimization algorithm and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal situation are applied to optimize the multiobjective system performance, and the payback periods of system before and after optimization are calculated. The analysis indicates that under the initial conditions, the thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, total product unit cost, and sustainability index of the system are 41.68%, 48.50%, 112.293 $ GJ−1, and 1.75, respectively. After optimization, exergy efficiency increases by 2.4% and exergoeconomy decreases by 8.277 $ GJ−1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The large‐scale penetration of renewable energy leads to some imperative issues to the power grid. Energy storage technology is regarded as an effective method to solve these problems. In this paper, a hybrid cogeneration energy system based on compressed air energy storage system with high temperature thermal energy storage and supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle is proposed. A thermodynamic model of the system is established. Energy and exergy analysis are carried out based on a case study. It was found that under the design condition, the round trip efficiency of 58.66%, the energy storage density of 5.45 kWh/m3, and the overall exergy efficiency of 62.00% can be achieved. At the same time, the hot water about 88°C can be supplied. The influences of some key parameters on the performance are analyzed. It was found that the round trip efficiency is most sensitive to the outlet temperature of high temperature thermal energy storage system, isentropic efficiency of compressors and turbines, followed by the intercoolers effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: A reheating process is generally incorporated in a supercritical CO2 (S‐CO2) Brayton cycle to enhance its efficiency. The heat transfer process from the reactor coolant to the working fluid of the power cycle is a key issue encountered when designing reheating power systems for the lead‐based reactor. The traditional reheating system, called RH‐1, utilizes an intermediate coolant circuit. In this paper, a novel reheating system, called RH‐2, is proposed. It eliminates the intermediate coolant circuit and combines the processes of the primary heating and reheating in a single heat exchanger. A thermodynamic analysis of three different systems for the lead‐based reactor integrated with the S‐CO2 power cycle with or without reheating was conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed system. The results confirmed that the performance of RH‐2 was the best of all the three systems. Under the same reactor conditions, the system efficiency of RH‐2 was greater than those of RH‐1 and the recompression (no reheating) system by 1.2% and 1.7%, respectively. RH‐2 could also maintain higher efficiency when the main operating parameters varied. The efficiency of RH‐2 was higher at different core outlet temperatures and split ratios. The maximum efficiency at optimal maximum pressure of RH‐2 was greater than those of the other two systems. RH‐2 was less sensitive to the variations in the isentropic efficiencies of the components than the other two systems, while the turbine isentropic efficiency demonstrated a significantly higher impact on the system efficiency than the two compressors (approximately 3.8 times). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]