Search

The range of commercially available array platforms and analysis software packages is expanding and their utility is improving, making reliable detection of copy-number variants (CNVs) relatively straightforward. Reliable interpretation of CNV data, however, is often difficult and requires expertise. With our knowledge of the human genome growing rapidly, applications for array testing continuously broadening, and the resolution of CNV detection increasing, this leads to great complexity in interpreting what can be daunting data. Correct CNV interpretation and optimal use of the genotype information provided by single-nucleotide polymorphism probes on an array depends largely on knowledge present in various resources. In addition to the availability of host laboratories' own datasets and national registries, there are several public databases and Internet resources with genotype and phenotype information that can be used for array data interpretation. With so many resources now available, it is important to know which are fit-for-purpose in a diagnostic setting. We summarize the characteristics of the most commonly used Internet databases and resources, and propose a general data interpretation strategy that can be used for comparative hybridization, comparative intensity, and genotype-based array data., Competing Interests: Statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

It was shown that Lynch syndrome can be caused by germline hypermethylation of the MLH1 and MSH2 promoters. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated very recently that germline deletions of the 3' region of EPCAM cause transcriptional read-through which results in silencing of MSH2 by hypermethylation. We wanted to determine the prevalence of germline MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and of germline and somatic MSH2 promoter hypermethylation in a large group of Lynch syndrome-suspected patients. From a group of 331 Lynch Syndrome-suspected patients we selected cases, who had no germline MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 mutation and whose tumors showed loss of MLH1 or MSH2, or, if staining was unavailable, had a tumor with microsatellite instability. Methylation assays were performed to test these patients for germline MLH1 and/or MSH2 promoter hypermethylation. Two patients with germline MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and no patients with germline MSH2 promoter hypermethylation were identified. In the subgroup screened for germline MSH2 promoter hypermethylation, we identified 3 patients with somatic MSH2 promoter hypermethylation in their tumors, which was caused by a germline EPCAM deletion. In the group of 331 Lynch Syndrome-suspected patients, the frequencies of germline MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and somatic MSH2 promoter hypermethylation caused by germline EPCAM deletions are 0.6 and 0.9%, respectively. These mutations, therefore, seem to be rather infrequent. However, the contribution of germline MLH1 hypermethylation and EPCAM deletions to the genetically proven Lynch syndrome cases in this cohort is very high. Previously 27 pathogenic mutations were identified; the newly identified mutations now represent 16% of all mutations.

Chromosomal instability in colon tumors implies the presence of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations and is further characterized by the absence of microsatellite instability and the occurrence of KRAS and/or TP53 mutations. In a previous screening of 194 colon tumors for both microsatellite instability and TP53 mutation, we found 25 microsatellite-unstable tumors, in 9 (36%) of which, presumed to be chromosomally stable, there were TP53 mutations. This prompted us to investigate whether a TP53 mutation in these microsatellite-unstable tumors would be an indicator of chromosomal instability, that is, whether this would be a category of tumors showing both microsatellite and chromosomal instability. For chromosomal instability assessment, we performed array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis of tumor and control DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded stage III colon tumor specimens. The array consisted of 435 subtelomere-specific BACs. We compared all but one (whose DNA was of bad quality) of the microsatellite-unstable TP53 mutation-containing tumors (8) with a similarly sized group of microsatellite-unstable tumors without TP53 mutation (11). Microsatellite-unstable tumors with a TP53 mutation showed on average 0.9 aberrations (range 0-3) when assessed with this array system. Those without a TP53 mutation showed on average 0.7 aberrations (range 0-2). Thus, microsatellite-unstable tumors showed few chromosomal abnormalities regardless of TP53 mutation status. Because, in our study, the microsatellite-stable tumors had on average 3.4chromosomal abnormalities (range 0-7), a clear difference exists between microsatellite-unstable and -stable tumors. Because a substantial proportion of microsatellite-unstable colon tumors carry a TP53 mutation while showing relativelyfewchromosomal aberrations, a TP53 mutation in these tumors cannot be considered to be an indicator of chromosomal instability., (Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Two sisters affected with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an extremely rare finding, and may indicate a hereditary pattern or the presence of other predisposing factors. We describe here 2 sisters presenting with clear cell renal cell cancer. Examination for von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-related features and tuberous sclerosis (M. Bourneville) was negative and both had a normal constitutional karyotype. Cytogenetic analysis of the tumor tissue of both patients showed a translocation involving chromosomes 3 and 5, resulting in loss of 3p sequences and gain of part of 5q. The 5q breakpoints were similar, but the breakpoints at 3p appeared to differ. Allelic imbalance analysis supported our observations. Microsatellite analysis revealed that both sisters inherited different chromosome 3 parental alleles. For chromosome 5, 3 different haplotypes could be deduced, but the chromosome 5 alleles overrepresented in the different tumor tissues were from different parental origin. The development of the 2 RCCs in these 2 sisters thus cannot be explained by the inheritance of a mutated VHL gene located at 3p25, nor by the inheritance of other gene defects at chromosomes 3p or 5q. Although the chance that 2 sisters develop sporadic RCC is very low, in the presented case it is probably coincidental or related to another genetic predisposition.

Renal oncocytomas reveal a considerable (cyto)genetic heterogeneity. At least 2 genetic subsets are currently recognized, characterized by (1) translocations involving breakpoint 11q13 and (2) the combined loss of chromosomes 1 and X/Y. We present a case of oncocytoma revealing a 3-way translocation involving breakpoint 11q13, a der(1)t(1;8) and an add(19). The der(1) resulted in loss of chromosome 1 sequences. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, the 11q13 breakpoint of the present case proved to be slightly different from the one observed previously in 3 cases of renal oncocytoma. Whether the 11q13 breakpoint observed in our case resides in or near another gene remains to be elucidated.

The most important prognostic factor in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is tumor grade. Since most grading methods are subject to the interpretation of the individual pathologist, there is a need for objective criteria such as DNA ploidy and karyotype, which are of prognostic value in several types of malignancy. We have analyzed the relationships among tumor grade, DNA ploidy, cytogenetic abnormalities and the clinical outcome of 44 previously untreated patients with 12 different histological types of primary STS. The tumors were graded according to the method of Coindre, which resulted in 9 grade I (20%), 18 grade II (41%) and 17 grade III (39%) STS. DNA flow cytometry and chromosomal analysis were performed using standard techniques. After a median follow-up time of 39 (range, 2-124) months, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Significant differences in 5-year overall survival were found between patients with grade I or II and grade III STS (p < 0.05). Seventeen STS were aneuploid and 26 were euploid. In 21 of 39 successfully cultured STS an abnormal karyotype was found. There were no significant differences in survival in relation to DNA ploidy or the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. Our results show that grading had higher prognostic value than DNA ploidy or the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities in this heterogeneous group of STS.

Multiple renal cell tumours from three unrelated patients have been analysed for loss of heterozygosity of 3p, mutation of VHL, and chromosome 7 and 17 imbalances. Loss of 3p alleles is characteristic for clear cell type tumours and the combination of +7, +17 for chromophilic cell type tumours. Thus, we could classify adenomas and carcinomas of the three patients according to the genomic patterns of the tumours. Adenomas appeared to be mostly of the chromophilic cell type. In some adenomas, however, allelic losses of chromosome 3 were detected, pointing to a clear cell phenotype. Irrespective of showing loss or retention of the 3p25 region, none of the adenomas had a VHL mutation. Therefore, inactivation of VHL does not seem to be an early event in the development of renal cell tumours. Results of an analysis of regions of loss and retention of alleles of 3p markers in multiple tumours of the individual patients suggest that losses at either 3p25 or 3p12-p14 are associated with adenomas. Additional loss at 3p21 is most likely required to lead to development of a more malignant clear cell carcinoma.

Renal-cell cancer comprises a heterogeneous group of tumors, which currently can be sub-divided into morphologically distinct entities, each characterized by a specific combination of genetic changes. Sarcomatoid transformation might occur in any of the sub-types, resulting in tumors consisting of both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. The specific diagnosis of these neoplasms, as to tumor sub-type, is usually made on the histologic properties of the carcinomatous tissue present. However, this might not reflect the true nature of the sarcomatous component. Since the genetic changes associated with the development of the different sub-types of renal-cell cancer are well established, this knowledge might serve as a tool in diagnosing sarcomatoid tumors. Assessing the genetic constitution of the latter may lead to correct diagnosis. It may also provide valuable information about the genetic changes associated with sarcomatoid transformation. Hence we performed a genetic characterization of a case of sarcomatoid renal-cell cancer, histologically diagnosed as being of the chromophilic type. The observed genetic changes included loss of 3p, 6q, 8p, 9, 13, 14 and 17p, and gain of 5, 12 and 20, as well as a mutation in the coding region of the p53 gene. This combination of genetic changes points to clear-cell rather than chromophilic origin of the sarcomatoid tumor investigated, indicating that the genetic constitution of sarcomatoid tumors may be a more reliable indicator of tumor sub-type than histologic appearance.

The chromosomal pattern of 31 specimens of chromophilic renal-cell cancer (RCC), selected according to the criteria mentioned in the classification of Thoenes and Störkel, is presented. A high male preponderance was found (8.7:1). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a typical pattern of numeric alterations specific for this sub-type in the majority of cases (i.e., --Y,+7, +12, +16, +17, and/or +20), which is different from the chromosomal patterns found in other sub-types of RCC. Gain of chromosome 20, as well as loss of the extra copy of chromosome 17 or loss of 17p, was found to be related to the higher-grade chromophilic carcinomas. None of the 14 cases examined by SSCP analysis revealed mutations of the p53 gene, indicating that other genes at 17(p) might be important in the progression of this sub-type of RCC.

Several human renal cell carcinomas with X;autosome translocations have been reported in recent years. The t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) appears to be a specific primary anomaly, suggesting that tumors with this translocation form a distinct subgroup of RCC. Here we report two new cases, one with a t(X;10)(p11.2;q23), the other with a t(X;1)(p11.2;p34). The common breakpoint in Xp11.2 suggests that they belong to the above-mentioned subset of RCC. Using FISH in conjunction with X-specific YAC clones, we demonstrate that the two new cases exhibited distinct breakpoints within Xp11.2.

A malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of bone arising in the fibula of a 21-year-old woman is described. Clinical, radiologic, and histologic findings demonstrated rapid tumor progression. Chromosomal analysis of the biopsy specimen showed great karyotypic heterogeneity, whereas the resection specimen four weeks later displayed a rather homogeneous karyotype. Both revealed a clonal t(14;22)(q11;p12). Several other clonal and non-clonal chromosomal aberrations were observed. Some of these were previously described in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and may correlate with aggressive behavior, e.g., aberrations involving 8p11, 19q13, and 20q13. The change from karyotypic heterogeneity to relative homogeneity may be related to tumor progression. The chromosomal findings further suggest that the giant cell type of MFH of bone may be related to malignant GCTB.

Renal-cell carcinomas (RCC) are clinically, histologically and cytogenetically very heterogeneous. The present histological WHO classification shows no clear correlation between histologic subtypes and specific chromosomal abnormalities. In 1986, a new classification was proposed by Thoenes and Störkel based on the cell type from which the tumor arises. They distinguish 5 cell types: clear-cell, chromophilic, chromophobic, ductus Bellini and oncocytic. Results of 105 primary tumors show that, in this new classification, there is a correlation between different subtypes of renal-cell tumor and specific chromosomal abnormalities at a microscopic and/or molecular level. The clear-cell compact type shows structural aberrations of chromosomes I, 3, 4, 5q, 6, 10q, 11q and 12q, together with polysomy of chromosomes X, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21 and 22, monosomy of chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 13, 14, and loss of Y. The main characteristics of the chromophilic tubulo-papillary type are trisomies 7 and 17, and loss of the Y-chromosome. Chromophobic carcinoma seems to be correlated with, inter alia, polysomy 7, trisomies 12, 16, 18, 19, structural abnormalities of 11q, and telomeric associations. Oncocytomas do not reveal any specific chromosomal anomaly, except for trisomy 7. Loss of heterozygosity on 3p is only found in the clear-cell compact type. Some specific chromosomal abnormalities correlate with a particular grade of the tumor. These correlations support the hypothesis that specific chromosomal abnormalities play a role in the histogenesis and oncogenesis of RCC. They may be important for tumor diagnosis and clinical prognosis.

A majority of renal-cell tumours retain heterozygosity at the short arm of chromosome 3. To investigate possible histopathological differences between tumours with and without such losses, we compared loss of heterozygosity data from 51 tumours with I histological and 2 different cytological classifications of renal-cell tumour. Using the cytological classification of Thoenes et al., we only found tumours with loss of heterozygosity in these authors' clear-cell category. Possibly, only these tumours arise by a mechanism of double loss of a tumour-suppressor gene on 3p, non-clear-cell renal tumours having a different genetic background. Alternatively, deletions may occur in all subtypes, in which case those subtypes in which no LOH is found may also contain deletions too small to be detected with the set of 3p probes we used. A cytogenetic analysis was carried out on 30 of the tumours. Results of molecular and microscopic cytogenetic analyses did not seem to be in agreement in 12 cases. In 6 of these we found allelic losses in tumours showing morphologically normal copies of chromosome 3. Mitotic recombination or loss of one chromosome 3 homologue followed by duplication of the remaining homologue is a likely explanation. The other 6 cases showed microscopic abnormalities of chromosome 3 which were not reflected, or only partly reflected, as allelic losses. These discrepancies are caused either by the limitations of microscopic analysis in exactly determining a breakpoint or tracing a translocated part of a chromosome, or by the failure of molecular analysis to demonstrate LOH if this occurs in only a minority of cells.