Search

Expression of blood group-related carbohydrate antigens was examined in frozen sections from a series of ovarian carcinomas of different histological types using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique. Antigenic specificities belonging to the O(H) and Lewis blood group families (H-1, H-2, Le(a), sLe(a), Le(x), sLe(x), Le(b) and Le(y)) or the mucin-core family (Tn, sTn and TF) were studied. A distinct difference in antigen expression between mucinous and other ovarian carcinomas (serous and endometrioid) was observed. Specifically, mucinous tumors tended to express sTn, Le(a) and sLe(a) strongly and homogeneously, whereas serous and endometrioid tumors rarely expressed these specificities and, in contrast, expressed Le(y) and H type 2 antigen strongly. When expressed in serous tumors, sTn was usually distributed in a heterogeneous pattern, whereas sTn expression in mucinous tumors was much more homogeneous. The distribution of Le(y) in serous tumors was noticeably homogeneous. H-1, Le(x), sLe(x), Le(b), TF and Tn specificities were rarely expressed in any type of ovarian carcinoma. Our results provide further support for the different histogenesis of mucinous and non-mucinous tumors and indicate alternative differentiation pathways for the 3 pathological subtypes of ovarian tumor. They also provide the basis for the choice of carbohydrate antigens for active and passive immunotherapy of ovarian carcinomas.

Background: Cell-surface peptidases are ectoenzymes which regulate the access of bioactive peptides to their receptors on cell membranes. Abnormalities in their expression and function result in altered peptide activity which contribute to neoplastic transformation and/or progression., Methods: Expression of aminopeptidase A (APA), aminopeptidase N (APN, CD13), and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV, CD26) was immunohistochemically examined in 20 benign and 33 malignant prostate tissues (19 primaries and 14 metastases)., Results: Benign prostatic stroma exhibited no APA, APN, or DPP IV immunoreactivity. Stromal cells surrounding prostatic carcinoma cells demonstrated increased APA expression in 24/33 (73%) of tumors. Benign prostatic epithelial cells strongly expressed APN and DPP IV but not APA. In contrast, APN was expressed in > 80% of tumor cells in 5/33 (15%) of specimens, heterogeneously expressed (20-80% of cells positive) in 4/33 (12%) of specimens, and minimally expressed or absent in 24/33 (73%) of tumor specimens, with a similar pattern of expression in primary and metastatic tumors. DPP IV was expressed by > 80% of tumor cells in 18/19 (95%) of primary prostate cancer specimens, but in only 7/14 (50%) of metastases., Conclusions: These data show that cell-surface peptidases are differentially expressed by normal prostatic stromal and epithelial cells, with increased expression of APA in the stroma surrounding prostate cancer cells, absent APN expression in most tumor cells, and a decreased frequency of DPP IV expression in metastatic tumors. Further studies will elucidate the biological effects of the presence or loss of cell-surface peptidases in the benign and malignant prostate.

Mucins, including MUC-1, are generally considered to be products of epithelial tissues and of their tumors. To examine the possible expression of MUC-1 in other cell types, a panel of human epithelial and non-epithelial tumor cell lines was studied by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Northern blot analysis, immunocytology and radioimmunoprecipitation. Using the highly sensitive RT-PCR method, products corresponding to the non-repetitive 5' and 3' MUC-1 sequences were detected in all the cell lines examined. Amplified products lacking the tandem repeat region of MUC-1, including a new short form (designated MUC-1/Z) different from the previously reported MUC-1/Y protein, were also detected in most cell lines tested. Northern blot analysis, using a probe to the variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) region, confirmed the presence of MUC-1 mRNA in the astrocytoma, melanoma and neuroblastoma cell lines studied. MUC-1 protein was detected by immunocytology in these cell lines using monoclonal antibody (MAb) 139H2. Immunoprecipitation analysis with [3H]-glucosamine-labeled cell lysates and MAb 139H2 or an antibody to the cytoplasmic domain, CT-1, detected MUC-1 protein in 2 epithelial cell lines, an astrocytoma cell line (SK-MG-4) but not in the melanoma and neuroblastoma cell lines studied. Northern blot analysis using a probe to the 3' end of MUC-1 mRNA, confirmed the presence of MUC-1 mucin and also identified short products corresponding to the size of the short variant forms. Protein products corresponding to the MUC-1/Y and MUC-1/Z variant forms were not observed using either [3H]-glucosamine-labeled OVCAR-3 cells or [3H]-amino acid-labeled MCF-7 cells and either CT-1 antibody or MAb 232A1, detecting an epitope to the C-terminal region. Thus, depending on the sensitivity of the assay used, varying amounts of MUC-1 mRNA and protein could be detected in non-epithelial tumor cell lines. Although the amounts of MUC-1 in these cell lines are much lower than in carcinomas, it is possible that MUC-1 mucin serves a similar function in non-epithelial as in epithelial cells. The possible role of MUC-1/Y and MUC-1/Z variant forms in these cell lines is not understood.

The expression of Ley blood group antigen in epithelial ovarian cancer tissues and cell lines has been studied using a Ley-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb 3S193). In ovarian cancer specimens, Ley was expressed in 75% of the 140 tumor specimens examined, with strong or moderate expression being observed in 56% of the samples. Seven of the 11 ovarian cancer cell lines studied were Ley-positive. Using immunochemical approaches, Ley epitopes were found to be expressed on 4 types of carrier molecules: CA125 ovarian cancer antigen, MUC-1 mucins, lower m.w. glycoproteins and glycolipids. In cell lines, Ley was more commonly expressed on MUC-1 mucin than on CA125, whereas in tumor specimens Ley was commonly found on both CA125 and MUC-1. The biochemical nature of the smaller Ley glycoproteins was not determined, but it was shown that they were not CEA and LAMP-1, known Ley carriers in some other tumor types. Glycolipids carrying Ley epitopes were detected in both ovarian cancer cell lines and tumor specimens. The presence of Ley epitopes on a number of different molecular carriers, including 2 major ovarian cancer antigens (CA125 and MUC-1), explains the high incidence of Ley in ovarian cancer. The high expression of Ley in ovarian cancer and the availability of specific murine and humanized MAbs make Ley an attractive candidate target for clinical studies.