Search

Transplantation Centers using human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) antigenemia-based preemptive therapy will need to replace in the near future the antigenemia assay with a more standardized and automatable assay, such as a molecular assay quantifying HCMV DNA in blood (DNAemia). Thus, in view of replacing antigenemia with clinically safe cutoff values, DNAemia levels corresponding to antigenemia cutoffs guiding HCMV preemptive therapy were determined retrospectively in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTR) using an "in-house" quantitative PCR (QPCR) method. Since preemptive therapy had prevented appearance of HCMV disease in all patients tested, DNA cutoffs determined retrospectively had to be considered as safe clinically as antigenemia cutoffs used prospectively. However, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), initiating preemptive therapy upon an antigenemia cutoff of 100 pp65-positive leukocytes, a DNAemia cutoff of 300,000 copies/ml blood had positive and negative predictive values of >90%, indicating that a DNAemia cutoff could achieve, in terms of prevention of HCMV disease, the same clinical results as the antigenemia cutoff. In HSCTR, initiating preemptive therapy upon first antigenemia positivity, a DNAemia cutoff of 10,000 copies/ml blood had a positive predictive value of >90%, indicating that the great majority of patients treated under the antigenemia guidance would have been treated also using this DNA cutoff. On the other hand, the negative predictive value of 28.6% indicated that two out of three HSCTR had been treated under the antigenemia guidance having the same levels of viral DNA as the untreated patients. The data suggest that a quantitative cutoff could be adopted as a guiding criterion for preemptive therapy also in HSCTR. Regression analysis allowed to determine the DNAemia (corresponding to QPCR) cutoff values for two commercial assays tested both in solid organ and HSCTR. Retrospective DNAemia cutoff values will be verified for safety in prospective trials., (Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

The pattern of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and protease mutations conferring resistance to antiretroviral drugs was studied in five treatment-naive patients and five HIV-infected patients receiving HAART [two reverse transcriptase inhibitors + one protease inhibitor] for > or = 1 year. Direct sequencing was performed on plasma HIV RNA, HIV DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and RNA from viral isolates. In addition, reverse transcriptase and protease PCR products from PBMCs HIV DNA, plasma HIV RNA, and viral isolate RNA were cloned in a plasmid to study the quasispecies distribution of drug-resistance associated mutations. Direct sequencing of HIV DNA from PBMCs and HIV RNA from plasma and viral isolates did not show the presence of drug resistance associated mutations in both reverse transcriptase and protease of HIV from all five treatment-naive patients. On the contrary, mutation analysis obtained by cloning plasma HIV RNA and PBMCs DNA showed the presence of drug-resistance related mutations at a low frequency in both HIV enzymes of four out of five treatment-naive patients. On the other hand, direct sequencing of plasma HIV RNA showed the presence of several reverse transcriptase and protease mutations in all five treated patients. Mutation analysis performed by cloning PBMCs HIV DNA, and HIV RNA from plasma and viral isolates, revealed additional reverse transcriptase and protease changes compared to direct sequencing of the relevant biological samples. All the additional changes were observed in a minority of clones. In conclusion, the data suggest that less frequent drug-resistant viral variants not detected by direct sequencing of PBMCs, plasma samples, or viral isolates are present in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced HIV patients. These findings may have important implications in the understanding of the selection process of drug-resistant variants under drug pressure., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)