Search

Objectives: The objective of this study is to identify and model risk factors for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality among patients with ESRD treated with PCI using DES., Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have poor long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with non-ESRD patients. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding risk factors associated with outcomes of ESRD patients after PCI with drug-eluding stents (DES)., Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes all patients with ESRD who underwent first-time PCI with DES at a single, high-volume hospital between 1/1/2005 and 12/31/2015, with follow-up through 9/1/2019. Primary outcomes were MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization) and all-cause mortality., Results: Five-year MACE was 83.0% and five-year morality was 77.9% in patients with ESRD (n = 285). Among ESRD patients, factors independently associated with MACE were C-reactive peptide level, SYNTAX score, peripheral vascular occlusive disease, hemoglobin, and treatment of a restenotic lesion (c-index = 0.66). Factors independently associated with mortality in ESRD patients were age, SYNTAX score, non-use of statins at baseline, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular occlusive disease, and platelet count (c-index = 0.65)., Conclusions: Despite relatively poor 1-and 5-year outcomes among ESRD patients after PCI, risk of MACE and mortality among this cohort can be successfully modelled, which meaningfully informs clinicians regarding management of ESRD patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Further investigations are necessary to determine whether or not outcomes might be improved through risk profile modification., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: We aimed to study adoption of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention (TR-PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) ("radial first" approach) and its association with door-to-balloon time (D2BT)., Background: TR-PPCI for STEMI is underutilized in the United States due to concerns about prolonging D2BT. Whether operators and hospitals adopting a radial first approach in STEMI incur prolonged D2BT is unknown., Methods: In 1,272 consecutive cases of STEMI with PPCI at our hospital from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016, we studied TR-PPCI adoption and its association with D2BT including a propensity matched analysis of similar risk TR-PPCI and trans-femoral primary PCI (TF-PPCI) patients., Results: With major increases in hospital-level TR-PPCI (hospital TR-PPCI rate: 2.6% in 2011 to 79.4% in 2016, p-trend<.001) and operator-level TR-PPCI (mean operator TR-PPCI rate: 2.9% in 2011 to 81.1% in 2016, p-trend = .005), median hospital level D2BT decreased from 102 min [81, 142] in 2011 to 84 min [60, 105] in 2016 (p-trend<.001). TF crossover (10.3%; n = 57) was not associated with unadjusted D2BT (TR-PPCI success 91 min [72, 112] vs. TF crossover 99 min [70, 115], p = .432) or D2BT adjusted for study year and presenting location (7.2% longer D2BT with TF crossover, 95% CI: -4.0% to +18.5%, p = .208). Among 273 propensity-matched pairs, unadjusted D2BT (TR-PPCI 98 [78, 117] min vs. TF-PPCI 101 [76, 132] min, p = .304), and D2BT adjusted for study year and presenting location (5.0% shorter D2BT with TR-PPCI, 95% CI: -12.4% to +2.4%, p = .188) were similar., Conclusions: TR-PPCI can be successfully implemented without compromising D2BT performance., (© 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aim: To evaluate the impact of antithrombotic regimens during the medical phase of treatment among 13,819 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) treated with an early invasive strategy in the acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy (ACUITY) trial., Methods and Results: Endpoints included composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding, and net adverse clinical events (NACE; MACE or major bleeding). The median (interquartile range) duration of antithrombin use in the medical only treatment phase was 6.5 (1.8-22.5) hours. MACE, major bleeding, and NACE during the medical only phase occurred in 63 (0.5%), 117 (0.9%), and 178 (1.3%) patients, respectively. MACE rates in the medical-treatment-only phase were not significantly different between the four randomized medical regimens used (heparin alone, bivalirudin alone, heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor [GPI], and bivalirudin plus GPI) (Ptrend  = 0.65). The lowest rates of major bleeding and NACE during the medical treatment phase occurred in patients treated with bivalirudin alone (Ptrend  = 0.0006 and Ptrend  = 0.0004, respectively)., Conclusions: In patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy, treatment with bivalirudin alone significantly reduced major bleeding and improved net clinical outcomes during the upstream medical management phase with comparable rates of MACE. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: We aimed to construct a predictive model for one-year mortality in patients undergoing invasive coronary evaluation and to examine the impact of bivalirudin on survival according to the level of baseline risk., Background: Compared to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (HEP/GPI), bivalirudin decreases bleeding complications in a range of clinical presentations. The impact of preprocedural risk assessment on survival and whether this is modified by bivalirudin, has not been investigated in detail., Methods: We examined patient-level data from the REPLACE-2, ACUITY, and HORIZONS-AMI trials (n = 18,819) to construct a risk-adjusted mortality model using baseline clinical variables., Results: One-year mortality occurred in 287 patients (3.1%) assigned to bivalirudin and 336 patients (3.6%) assigned to HEP/GPI (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-1.00; P = 0.048). Using 11 highly significant predictors of mortality, we developed an integer-risk score to classify patients into risk tertiles. High-risk patients had a rate of 1-year mortality over 9-fold greater than low-risk patients. Consequently, the absolute mortality reduction attributed to bivalirudin was more marked in high-risk patients: 3.1% (-0.8% to 7.0%) in the overall cohort, 4.8% (0.5% to 9.2%) in the PCI cohort (P-interaction versus intermediate and low risk categories, 0.09 and P = 0.02, respectively)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing invasive coronary evaluation, 1-year mortality can be predicted using baseline variables. Bivalirudin treatment (versus HEP/GPI) conferred a survival benefit., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To determine the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its impact on mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD)., Background: It's unclear whether PCI provides benefit in patients with CAD outside of acute settings. We sought to determine the role of PCI and its effect on mortality in patients with similar entry criteria to prior RCTs and compare outcomes with medical treatment., Methods: Using institutional diagnostic catheterization database of consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography from 1/2004 to 1/2010, we examined records for patients with a positive stress test and >70% coronary stenosis or symptoms of angina and >80% coronary stenosis. We excluded those with acute coronary syndromes, low ejection fraction (EF), history of CABG, and CABG following index catheterization. We stratified patients by treatment and performed unadjusted and propensity matched analyses. The outcome was all-cause mortality obtained from the social security death index., Results: We identified 3,375 patients using study inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65 ± 11 years and 69% (n = 2,332) were men. Mean EF was 55% ± 8%. In the unadjusted cohort, 1,265 patients received medical management and 2,110 received PCI. The unadjusted analysis revealed significantly better survival in PCI patients (P < 0.0001) (HR: 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-0.63). Propensity matching was performed for 1,580 patients and analysis showed better survival among patients receiving PCI (0 = 0.04) (HR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98). PCI continued to show better survival after excluding patients with malignancy (P = 0.03) and unstable angina (P = 0.007)., Conclusions: This single center registry analysis demonstrated better survival in stable CAD patients undergoing PCI compared to medical management alone. These data suggest there may be a benefit of PCI beyond symptom relief. Future randomized trials are needed to further understand the role of PCI in broader patient populations., (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: We compared the long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) for treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Background: There are no randomized trials or observational studies directly comparing the safety and efficacy of DES versus BMS for treatment of bare-metal ISR., Methods: We examined data on all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR at Cleveland Clinic between 05/1999 and 06/2007. We compared the efficacy and safety of DES to BMS for treating bare-metal ISR. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were individual components of the primary endpoint., Results: Of the 931 patients identified over 8 years, 706 had bare-metal ISR and met our study criteria. Of the 706 patients with bare-metal ISR, 362 were treated with DES and 344 with BMS. There were 230 cumulative events for a median follow-up of 3.2 years. After adjusting for 27 variables, DES were associated with lower primary endpoint compared to BMS for treatment of bare-metal ISR (21% vs. 45%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.95; P = 0.03). The individual secondary endpoint of death (8% vs. 24%, P = 0.005) favored DES, but MI (3% vs. 8%, P = 0.31), and TLR (13% vs. 20%, P = 0.23) failed to reach statistical significance., Conclusions: In our multivariate analysis of patients with bare-metal ISR, DES use was associated with significantly lower death, MI, or TLR when compared to BMS., ((c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a challenging syndrome that affects drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents. However, data comparing the outcomes of drug-eluting versus bare-metal ISR are limited. Our objective was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of drug-eluting versus bare-metal ISR. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at Cleveland Clinic for ISR from 05/1999 to 06/2007 were included. Unadjusted outcomes were tested using Kaplan-Meier curves followed by multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses. Twenty seven variables, including type of stent used to treat ISR and procedural date, were included. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were components of the primary endpoint. Of 931 patients identified, 225 had drug-eluting ISR and 706 had bare-metal ISR. There were 279 cumulative events for a median follow-up of 3.2 years. The primary endpoint was not different between drug eluting and bare-metal ISR (22% versus 33%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.66; P = 0.49). The secondary endpoints of death (8% versus 16%, adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.98; P = 0.88), MI (4% versus 5%, adjusted HR 1.48; 95% CI, 0.54-4.04; P = 0.45), and TLR (15% versus 16%, adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI, 0.81-2.11; P = 0.28) were also not different. This study represents the largest analysis comparing drug-eluting to bare-metal ISR. On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, drug-eluting and bare-metal ISR have similar long term outcomes.

Background: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) are associated with worse outcomes compared with those of native coronary PCI. Little is known concerning the use of direct thrombin inhibition during CABG intervention. The objective of this report is to examine the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin with GPIIb/IIIa blockade inhibition in patients undergoing CABG PCI. GP IIb/IIIa use was provisional in REPLACE-2 and planned in REPLACE-1., Methods and Results: A post hoc analysis of patients undergoing CABG PCI in the REPLACE-1 and -2 trials was performed. In REPLACE-1, patients were randomized to either heparin or bivalirudin, with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use at the operator's discretion. In REPLACE-2, patients were randomized to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition versus bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade. In both studies, randomized treatment groups were well matched. In unadjusted and logistic regression analysis, there were no significant differences in the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or major bleeding when patients were treated with either heparin or bivalirudin. Individual safety and efficacy endpoints were also similar. Minor bleeding was significantly reduced in patients treated with bivalirudin (14.8% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.037). Follow-up data available from the REPLACE-2 trial at 12 months found similar efficacy between groups with a trend towards decreased 12 month mortality in the bivalirudin vs. heparin groups (4.2% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.16)., Conclusion: CABG PCI using bivalirudin with provisional GPIIb/IIIa inhibition appears to provide similar safety and efficacy to heparin with GPIIb/IIIa inhibition.

Pseudoaneurysms in the coronary circulation are an uncommon occurrence that can develop spontaneously in the setting of atherosclerosis or can develop after catheter-based coronary interventions. The natural history, clinical outcome, and optimal therapy for pseudoaneurysms in the coronary circulation are not clearly established. Recent advances in the techniques and technologies used for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms may be applicable to the management of coronary aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. We present a case of spontaneous coronary pseudoaneurysm formation after paclitaxel drug-eluting stent implantation and a case of pseudoaneurysm formation in a saphenous vein graft that were both successfully treated with stent-assisted detachable coil embolization.

The degree to which catheterization and revascularization procedures are utilized in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) during hospitalization has broad implications with respect to initial pharmacotherapeutic decisions (upfront therapies), treatment and hospital transfer protocols, guideline recommendations, and allocation of training, material, and financial resources. Analysis of data from multiple trials and registries of patients with NSTE-ACS has the potential to assess more broadly utilization of invasive and revascularization procedures and provide a wide angle or bird's-eye view of the management of such patients, complementing the data obtained from any one trial or registry. We therefore undertook a systematic overview of all large trials and registries of patients with NSTE-ACS conducted over the last decade that were deemed appropriate to provide information on catheterization and revascularization procedures. Although not unexpectedly the percentage of patients with NSTE-ACS managed with cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting varies in different clinical trials and registries, general findings and trends were still discernable from these studies. During the initial treatment period, the majority of patients were ultimately treated with medical therapy alone (e.g., without revascularization). The percentage of those NSTE-ACS patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization who were then managed with PCI increased over the last decade and now stands at approximately 50%. Of NSTE-ACS patients who undergo revascularization, the percentage of those patients who are revascularized via PCI similarly increased, and PCI is currently the revascularization procedure utilized in approximately three-fourths of patients undergoing revascularization. The percentages of patients undergoing invasive and revascularization procedures were consistently higher in the U.S. cohorts of study subjects when compared to non-U.S. cohorts of study subjects.

The high cost of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has made identification of patients who are at low risk for subsequent revascularization after treatment with bare metal stents (BMSs) highly desirable. Previous reports from randomized trials suffer from biases induced by restricted entry criteria and protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up. Between 1994 and 2001, 5,239 consecutive BMS patients, excluding those with coil stents, technical failure, brachytherapy, staged procedure, or stent thrombosis within 30 days, were prospectively identified from a large single-center tertiary-referral-center prospective registry for long-term follow-up. We sought to identify characteristics of patients with very low (< or = 4%) or low (4-10%) likelihood of coronary revascularization 9 months after BMS. Nine-month clinical follow-up was obtained in 98.2% of patients. Coronary revascularization was required in 13.4% and did not differ significantly by stent type. On the basis of multivariate analysis identifying 11 independent correlates and previous reports, 20 potential low-risk patient and lesion groups (228 +/- 356 patients/groups) were identified (e.g, patients with all of the following: native vessel, de novo, reference diameter > or = 3.5 mm, lesion length < 5 mm, no diabetes, not ostial in location). Actual and model-based outcomes were analyzed. No group had both predicted and observed 9-month revascularization < or = 4% (very low risk). Conversely, 19 of 20 groups had a predicted and observed revascularization rate of 4-10% (low risk). In the real-world setting, the need for intermediate-term revascularization after BMS may be lower than expected, but it may be very difficult to identify patients at very low risk. Conversely, if the benefits of DESs are attenuated in routine practice, many groups of patients treated with BMSs may have nearly comparable results., ((c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

We analyzed vascular access site bleeding from the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials to quantify the decrease in vascular bleeding complications in these three trials, especially those attributable to abciximab. The incidence of combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding in nonabciximab (heparin plus placebo) patients progressively decreased from EPIC (8.2%) to EPILOG (2.9%) to EPISTENT (1.7%; P < 0.001). Combined major and minor vascular access site bleeding in abciximab (heparin plus abciximab) patients decreased from EPIC (20%) to EPILOG (5.8%) to EPISTENT (2.2%; P < 0.001). There were more major vascular access site bleeds with abciximab compared to placebo in EPIC (odds ration 3.2; P < 0.001) but not in EPILOG or EPISTENT. Modified abciximab and heparin dosing and improved vascular access site management strategies have decreased the risk of vascular access bleeding during coronary intervention and have essentially eliminated the excess access site bleeding associated with abciximab., (Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Restenosis is the most common long-term complication after angioplasty. Local delivery of pharmacologic agents at the site of angioplasty holds promise as a means of achieving higher concentrations of drug in the arterial wall than can be obtained by systemic infusion. In this study, a novel local drug delivery catheter system, the InfusaSleeve catheter, was evaluated in a porcine coronary balloon injury model. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of solute transfer to the arterial wall and the influence of varying supporting angioplasty balloon pressure., Methods and Results: Ten pigs (total of 22 arterial segments) underwent overstretch balloon injury (artery/balloon ratio 1:1.29) with a standard angioplasty balloon. In 7 animals (16 arterial segments) horseradish peroxidase (HRP; 10 mg/ml) was administered locally after injury, by tracking the local infusion catheter as a sheath over the angioplasty balloon to the intended site of arterial drug delivery. Supporting angioplasty balloons were inflated to one of the three different pressures. In 3 pigs HRP (10 mg/ml) was administered intravenously. No significant arterial injury caused by the local delivery device was evident on histological examination (disruption of the internal lamina elastica, arterial media, or thrombosis). Radial concentrations of the HRP reaction product in the first 150 microns of the arterial wall were quantified against known standards by measurement of light transmission through tissue sections. Mean HRP concentrations were not significantly different from those obtained by intravenous infusion using a supporting pressure of 1 atm or a supporting pressure of 3 atm of the underlying angioplasty balloon. However, a supporting pressure of 6 atm resulted in a 6-fold greater mean HRP concentration in the arterial wall than that which could be achieved by systemic administration of an equal volume of tracer (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Thus solute can be delivered throughout the coronary media by the InfusaSleeve, with the magnitude of wall uptake related to support pressure. Local delivery at 6 atm support pressure produced substantially greater uptake than did systemic delivery.