Search

There are no established treatments for patients with acute, severe neurological deficits caused by multiple sclerosis or other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system who fail to recover after treatment with high-dose corticosteroids. We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, double-masked study of plasma exchange without concomitant immunosuppressive treatment in patients with recently acquired, severe neurological deficits resulting from attacks of inflammatory demyelinating disease, who failed to recover after treatment with intravenous corticosteroids. Patients who did not achieve moderate or greater improvement after the first treatment phase crossed over to the opposite treatment. Moderate or greater improvement in neurological disability occurred during 8 of 19 (42.1%) courses of active treatment compared with 1 of 17 (5.9%) courses of sham treatment. The primary analysis was positive. Improvement occurred early in the course of treatment, and was sustained on follow-up. However, 4 of the patients who responded to the active treatment experienced new attacks of demyelinating disease during 6 months of follow-up. Moderate or greater improvement occurred during follow-up in only 2 of 13 patients who failed to improve during the treatment phase. Plasma exchange leads to functionally important neurological recovery in an important proportion of severely disabled patients with acute attacks of idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disease.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical rating scales are used to classify the degree of neurological dysfunction and to plan treatment measures. In clinical trials, rating scales are used to monitor clinical course and response to experimental therapies. Selection of the appropriate clinical rating scale is determined by the nature of the research question (e.g., disability, impairment, handicap). The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS, an impairment scale) has been the most widely used clinical rating method in natural history studies and clinical trials. The EDSS has the advantage of familiarity, yet is difficult to use consistently between evaluators. In the mid and higher ranges, the EDSS is relatively insensitive to clinical changes that do not impair gait. Evaluator unblinding may invalidate the clinical assessment of response to treatment. Additional work is needed to develop clinical and laboratory (imaging) measures of MS disease activity that will be objective, reliable, sensitive, responsive, and valid. Recent comparative studies have demonstrated that serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are 7- to 10-fold more sensitive than clinical methods in detecting subclinical evidence of apparent MS disease activity. Widespread acceptance of MRI as a primary trial outcome measure awaits the results of studies designed to determine whether MRI findings accurately reflect irreversible pathological changes and predict future disability.

Twenty-nine mildly disabled patients with multiple sclerosis underwent serial clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations (pre- and postgadolinium cranial and spinal cord MRI) on at least 3 occasions at 13-week intervals and during periods of suspected relapse. Using clinical judgment of the presence of recent active disease as the gold standard, combined MRI studies confirmed the clinical impression of active disease in 93% of follow-up visits (sensitivity) and the absence of active MS in 63% of follow-up visits (specificity). None of the cranial and spinal MRI-detected abnormalities disappeared. Gadolinium administration particularly increased the yield of spinal MRI. Cranial MRI alone detected 80% of the MRI-active visits. Clinical and MRI concordance was significantly better for the presence of recent disease activity than for the anatomical localization of the presumed site of activity. MRI evidence of apparent ongoing disease activity was seen more frequently in patients believed to have active multiple sclerosis in the preceding year (13 of 21) than in patients who had been in clinical remission for at least the 2 preceding years (2 of 8). Although clinical evidence of new disease activity was much less common in patients with active, chronic-progressive disease (1 of 8) than in patients with active, relapsing disease (9 of 13), the proportion of patients with either infrequent relapses, frequent relapses, or slow chronic-progressive disease in the preceding year in whom MRI activity developed and the pattern of this new MRI activity was similar between these types of active patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A central nervous system illness closely resembling multiple sclerosis has been described in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. From these reports, the estimated prevalence of this syndrome could be similar to that of multiple sclerosis in a high-frequency area. We evaluated 192 consecutive patients in our multiple sclerosis clinic to determine if such cases had gone unrecognized. We did not find any patients with clinical or serological evidence of primary Sjögren's syndrome. We conclude that it is rare for neurological manifestations of Sjögren's syndrome to mimic multiple sclerosis in our population.

An 18-year-old man with acne fulminans developed an acute inflammatory myositis, an association not previously reported. The condition resolved with treatment using systemic corticosteroids.