Search

Results of epidemiologic studies of physical activity and ovarian cancer risk are inconsistent. Few have attempted to measure physical activity over the lifetime or in specific age windows, which may better capture etiologically relevant exposures. We examined participation in moderate-to-vigorous recreational physical activity (MVPA) in relation to ovarian cancer risk. In a population-based case-control study conducted in Montreal, Canada from 2011 to 2016 (485 cases and 887 controls), information was collected on lifetime participation in various recreational physical activities, which was used to estimate MVPA for each participant. MVPA was represented as average energy expenditure over the lifetime and in specific age-periods in units of metabolic equivalents (METs)-hours per week. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the relation between average MVPA and ovarian cancer risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models. Confounding was assessed using directed acyclic graphs combined with a change-in-estimate approach. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for each 28.5 MET-hr/week increment of lifetime recreational MVPA was 1.11 (0.99-1.24) for ovarian cancer overall. ORs for individual age-periods were weaker. When examined by menopausal status, the OR (95% CI) for lifetime MVPA was 1.21 (1.00-1.45) for those diagnosed before menopause and 1.04 (0.89-1.21) for those diagnosed postmenopausally. The suggestive positive associations were stronger for invasive ovarian cancers and more specifically for high-grade serous carcinomas. These results do not support a reduced ovarian cancer risk associated with MVPA., (© 2019 UICC.)

Cancer cells require large amounts of micronutrients, particularly iron, for their rapid growth and frequent divisions. Cellular iron uptake is regulated by the transferrin receptor and the hemochromatosis protein (HFE) system. Two frequent mutations in the HFE gene, H63D and C282Y, are associated with hemochromatosis type I, an inherited iron overload disease and, possibly, with cancer. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of the H63D and C282Y mutations in a cohort of 677 consecutive cases of woman with gynecological pathologies. Cases included 80 women with tumor-free pathologies normal ovary (NOV), 124 with benign ovarian tumors (BOV), 96 with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tumors of low malignant potential (LPM), 264 with invasive tumors of the ovary (TOV) and 113 with endometrial cancer. We found that the C282Y allele frequency in EOC patients was higher than that in the control NOV group (5.8% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001) and was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 4.88; 95% CI 1.15-20.61; p = 0.018). The effect of the two HFE mutations on patient survival was also analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analyses did not find any significant association between the H63D allele and patient survival. However, EOC patients with at least one C282Y allele had a decreased overall survival compared to those with no C282Y allele (p = 0.001). These results indicate that the C282Y mutation may increase the risk of developing ovarian cancer and may be further associated with poor outcomes., (Copyright © 2010 UICC.)

The genetic analysis of nontumorigenic radiation hybrids generated by transfer of chromosome 3 fragments into the tumorigenic OV-90 ovarian cancer cell line identified the 3p12.3-pcen region as a candidate tumor suppressor gene (TSG) locus. In the present study, polymorphic microsatellite repeat analysis of the hybrids further defined the 3p12.3-pcen interval to a 16.1 Mb common region containing 12 known or hypothetical genes: 3ptel-ROBO2-ROBO1-GBE1-CADM2-VGLL3-CHMP2B-POU1F1-HTR1F-CGGBP1-ZNF654-C3orf38-EPHA3-3pcen. Seven of these genes, ROBO1, GBE1, VGLL3, CHMP2B, CGGBP1, ZNF654, and C3orf38, exhibited gene expression in the hybrids, placing them as top TSG candidates for further analysis. The expression of all but one (VGLL3) of these genes was also detected in the parental OV-90 cell line. Mutations were not identified in a comparative sequence analysis of the predicted protein coding regions of these candidates in OV-90 and donor normal chromosome 3 contig. However, the nondeleterious sequence variants identified in the transcribed regions distinguished parent of origin alleles for ROBO1, VGLL3, CHMP2B, and CGGBP1 and cDNA sequencing of the hybrids revealed biallelic expression of these genes. Interestingly, underexpression of VGLL3 and ZNF654 were observed in malignant ovarian tumor samples as compared with primary cultures of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells or benign ovarian tumors, and this occurred regardless of allelic content of 3p12.3-pcen. The results taken together suggest that dysregulation of VGLL3 and/or ZNF654 expression may have affected pathways important in ovarian tumorigenesis which was offset by the transfer of chromosome 3 fragments in OV-90, a cell line hemizygous for 3p.

Tumor suppression as a consequence of the transfer of chromosome 3p fragments was previously observed in a novel epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) OV-90 cell line model harboring loss of 3p. Microarray analysis revealed that tumor suppression was associated with a modified transcriptome. To investigate the relevance of the altered transcriptome, the differentially expressed genes identified by Affymetrix analysis in the 3p transfer studies, were integrated with a comparative microarray analysis of normal ovarian surface epithelial (NOSE) cells and malignant ovarian (TOV) cancers. Data from 219 significantly differentially expressed genes exhibited patterns in the direction predicted by the analysis of 3p transfer study. The 30 genes with the highest statistically significant differences (P < 1 x 10(-8)) in expression were found consistently differentially expressed between NOSE and TOV samples. The investigation of these genes in benign serous ovarian tumors and EOC cell lines also exhibited predictable expression patterns. Within the group of differentially expressed genes were SPARC, DAB2, CP, EVI1, ELF3, and EHD2, known to play a role in ovarian cancer, genes implicated in other cancers, such as GREM1 and GLIPR1, as well as genes not previously reported in a cancer context such as AKAP2 and ATAD4. A number of the differentially expressed genes are implicated in the TGF-beta signaling pathway. These findings suggest that the reprogramming of the transcriptome that occurred as a consequence of the chromosome 3 transfer and tumor suppression affected molecular networks that are characteristic of ovarian carcinogenesis thus validating our novel ovarian cancer cell line model.

Cytogenetic, molecular genetic and functional analyses have implicated chromosome 3 genes in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). To further characterize their contribution to EOC, the Affymetrix U133A GeneChip(R) was used to perform transcriptome analyses of chromosome 3 genes in primary cultures of normal ovarian surface epithelial (NOSE) cells (n = 14), malignant serous epithelial ovarian tumors (TOV) (n = 17), and four EOC cell lines (TOV-81D, TOV-112D, TOV-21G, and OV-90). A two-way comparative analysis of 735 known genes and expressed sequences identified 278 differentially expressed genes, where 43 genes were differentially expressed in at least 50% of the TOV samples. Three genes, RIS1 (at 3p21.31), GBE1 (at 3p12.2), and HEG1 (at 3q21.2), were similarly underexpressed in all TOV samples. Deregulation of the expression of these genes was not associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the genetic loci harboring them. LOH analysis of the RIS1, GBE1, and HEG1 loci was observed at frequencies of 14.3%, 13.7%, and 9.2%, respectively, in a series of 66 malignant TOV samples of the serous subtype. Reduced expression levels of RIS1, GBE1, and HEG1 were observed only in the tumorigenic EOC cell lines (TOV-21G, TOV-112D, and OV-90) and did not correlate with LOH. These results combined suggest that RIS1, GBE1, and HEG1, unlike classical tumor suppressor genes, are not likely to be primary targets of inactivation. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of chromosome 3 gene expression in NOSE and in EOC samples and identifies chromosome 3 gene candidates for further study., ((c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cell lines are useful tools for the molecular and biological characterization of ovarian cancer. The use of an in vitro multidimensional (3-D) culture model recapitulates some of the growth conditions encountered by tumor cells in vivo. Here we describe a molecular comparison of spheroid based 3D EOC models versus monolayer cultures and xenografts using cell lines from malignant ovarian tumors (TOV-21G and TOV-112D) and ascites (OV-90) previously established and characterized in our laboratory. Gene expression analyses of the three models were performed using the Affymetrix HG-U133A high density DNA array. Cluster analysis identified a set of genes that stratified expression profiles from the EOC cell lines grown as spheroids and xenografts from that of monolayer cultures. The gene expression analysis results were validated by Q-PCR analyses on an independent set of RNAs. Differential expression observed for the S100A6 gene between the monolayer, spheroid cultures and xenografts was confirmed at the protein level by immunohistochemistry. The analysis was extended to various ovarian tumor tissues using an EOC tissue array. This result represents an example of a gene that, if studied in vitro, is more representative of the in vivo disease in a 3D model rather than the monolayer culture. Identification of genes in spheroid models that mimic the in vivo tumor gene expression patterns may allow a better understanding of the community effect observed in human disease that is determined by direct or indirect interactions of cells with their environment or other surrounding cells., (2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc)

With low cure rates but increasing diverse treatment options that provide variable remission times, ovarian cancer is increasingly being recognized as a chronic disease. This reality indicates the need for a better understanding of factors influencing disease progression. In a previous global analysis of gene expression, we identified genes differentially expressed when comparing serous epithelial ovarian tumors of low and high malignant potential (grade 0 vs grade 3). In this analysis, 4 out of 5 members of the SET complex, SET, APE1, NM23 and HMGB2, were highly expressed in invasive grade 3 tumors. To further investigate the expression of these genes and the fifth member of the SET complex (pp32), we performed immunohistochemistry, on a tissue array composed of 235 serous tumors of different grades and disease stages. A significant correlation between expression of all SET complex proteins and the tumor differentiation was observed (p < 0.05). When combining all tumors, overexpression of Nm23 (p = 0.04), Set (p = 0.004) and Ape1 (p = 0.004) was associated with the clinical stage of the disease. No marker by itself was associated with prognosis. The combination of a high level of Nm23 in the context of a low level of Set compared to all other combinations of these markers did confer a better prognosis (p = 0.03). When combined, high expression of Hmgb2 and low expression of Ape1 was also associated with patient prognosis (p = 0.05). These findings suggest that a strategy that sums the activities of different partners within a pathway may be more appropriate in designing nomograms for patient stratification.

Molecular profiling is a powerful approach to identify potential clinical markers for diagnosis and prognosis as well as providing a better understanding of the biology of epithelial ovarian cancer. On the basis of the analysis of HuFL expression data, we have previously identified genes that distinguish low malignant potential and invasive serous epithelial ovarian tumors. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry to monitor a subset of differently expressed candidates (Ahr, Paep, Madh3, Ran, Met, Mek1, Ccne1, Ccd20, Cks1 and Cas). A tissue array composed of 244 serous tumors of different grades (0-3) and stages (I-IV) was used in this analysis. All markers assayed presented differential protein expression between serous tumors of low and high grade. Significant differences in Ccne1 and Ran expression were observed in a comparison of low malignant potential and grade 1 tumor samples (p<0.01). In addition, irrespective of the grade, Ccne1, Ran, Cdc20 and Cks1 showed significant differences of expression in association with the clinical stage of disease. While high level of Ccne1 have previously been associated with poor outcomes, here we found that high level of either Ran or Cdc20 appear to be more tightly associated with a poor prognosis (p<0.001, 0.03, respectively). The application of these biomarkers in both the initial diagnosis and prognostic attributes of patients with epithelial ovarian tumors should prove to be useful in patient management., (Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

We used an oligonucleotide-based DNA microarray to identify potential markers in 39 primary cultures of ovarian cancer specimens compared with 11 primary cultures of normal ovarian epithelia. Differential gene expression of IL-18 and FGF-2 was validated on a subset of samples by quantitative PCR and by IHC, using an independent tissue array of 90 cores of 20 normal ovarian surface epithelia and 70 EOCs representing different grades and pathologies of ovarian disease. We further compared, by ELISA, these two markers with CA125 in sera from 25 cancer-free and 47 ovarian cancer patients. IL-18 and FGF-2 proteins were significantly elevated in tumor tissues (p<0.04) and sera (p<0.05) from patients with ovarian cancer. In combination, the three markers (IL-18, FGF-2, and CA125) showed similar sensitivity in scoring for ovarian cancer (35/45 patients) compared to that of CA125 alone (37/45) and significantly improved the specificity of detection (20/25 patients) compared to each marker individually (15/25 for CA125; 18/25 FGF-2; 16/25 for IL-18). In conclusion we show that a combination of the three serum markers (IL-18, FGF-2 and CA125) is associated with EOC, with higher specificity than CA125 alone. Prospective studies with a large cohort of susceptible ovarian cancer patients will be required to expand these findings.

Abnormal FHIT gene expression has been reported in a variety of epithelial tumors shown to harbor deletions of chromosome 3p14, the chromosomal assignment of this gene. Recently, we described loss of heterozygosity of 3p in a subset of epithelial ovarian cancers. To investigate a potential role of the FHIT gene in ovarian cancer, we examined primary cell cultures derived from normal ovarian surface epithelium, ovarian tumors, and the cellular fraction of malignant ascites to determine the expression of FHIT by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Included in this analysis were four spontaneously immortalized cell lines: three derived from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (TOV21G, TOV112D, and TOV81D) and one from malignant ovarian ascites (OV90). OV90 was previously shown to harbor a deletion of the whole p arm of chromosome 3. The FHIT transcript was not detectable in two of 11 primary cultures derived from normal ovarian surface epithelium or in a primary culture derived from malignant ovarian ascites, whereas the remaining samples (34 malignant, eight borderline, and three benign specimens), exhibited identical expression patterns. In each case, this pattern was consistent with the co-expression of a normal FHIT transcript and a smaller transcript. DNA sequencing revealed that the abnormal-sized message lacked exons 4-7 (inclusive), which were deleted at their exact intron-exon splice sites. The aberrant-sized transcript was detectable by Northern blot analysis. There was no concordance between FHIT expression and loss of heterozygosity at the FHIT locus. Northern blot analysis also revealed that FHIT was differentially expressed, and the spontaneously immortalized cell lines TOV21G and TOV112D showed the highest level of expression. Because the same reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction expression pattern was observed in both normal and tumor-derived primary cell cultures, these results argue against a significant role for FHIT in epithelial ovarian tumorigenesis.