Search

Purpose: General anesthetics can induce apoptotic neurodegeneration and subsequent maladaptive behaviors in animals. Retrospective human studies suggest associations between early anesthetic exposure and subsequent adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. The relevance of animal data to clinical practice is unclear and to our knowledge the causality underlying observed associations in humans is unknown. We reviewed newly postulated neurodevelopmental risks of pediatric anesthesia and discuss implications for the surgical care of children., Materials and Methods: We queried the MEDLINE®/PubMed® and EMBASE® databases for citations in English on pediatric anesthetic neurotoxicity with the focus on references from the last decade., Results: Animal studies in rodents and primates demonstrate apoptotic neuropathology and subsequent maladaptive behaviors after exposure to all currently available general anesthetics with the possible exception of α2-adrenergic agonists. Similar adverse pathological and clinical effects occur after untreated pain. Anesthetic neurotoxicity in animals develops only after exposure above threshold doses and durations during a critical neurodevelopmental window of maximal synaptogenesis in the absence of concomitant painful stimuli. Anesthetic exposure outside this window or below threshold doses and durations shows no apparent neurotoxicity, while exposure in the context of concomitant painful stimuli is neuroprotective. Retrospective human studies suggest associations between early anesthetic exposure and subsequent adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, particularly after multiple exposures. The causality underlying the associations is unknown. Ongoing investigations may clarify the risks associated with current practice., Conclusions: Surgical care of all patients mandates appropriate anesthesia. Neurotoxic doses and the duration of anesthetic exposure in animals may have little relevance to clinical practice, particularly surgical anesthesia for perioperative pain. The causality underlying the observed associations between early anesthetic exposure and subsequent adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes is unknown. Anesthetic exposure may be a marker of increased risk. Especially in young children, procedures requiring general anesthesia should be performed only as necessary and general anesthesia duration should be minimized. Alternatives to general anesthesia and the deferral of elective procedures beyond the first few years of life should be considered, as appropriate. Participation in ongoing efforts should be encouraged to generate further data., (Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Clinical practices are increasingly proposing health related quality of life measures for informed treatment decisions. Dismembered pyeloplasty is an accepted standard therapy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. This study evaluates health related quality of life in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction undergoing pyeloplasty. Patients have perceived it helpful in communicating health care needs to physicians. We believe this is the first study to use child self and parent reports prospectively in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The goals of the study were to document baseline preoperative health related quality of life assessments, differences between parent and child assessments at given intervals, differences in preoperative and postoperative assessments, and overall clinical outcomes., Materials and Methods: Patients younger than 18 years (mean 9.1 years) with ureteropelvic junction obstruction were included in the study. Demographic survey and validated health related quality of life questionnaire (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0) were used preoperatively and postoperatively. The questionnaire documented subjective health related quality of life (physical, social, emotional and school functioning, and psychosocial health). Clinical outcomes were generated following the office visit. Questionnaire subscales were scored with algorithms provided. Paired t test evaluated differences in parent and child scores of less than 0.05 were statistically significant. Tests were 2-tailed., Results: Response rate was 100%. Preoperatively emotional functioning (81.8) and psychosocial health (80.9) child scores were significantly higher than parent scores (70.7 and 73.9, respectively). Overall child score of the study population (80.9) was similar to that of healthy children (85). However, parent scores of physical functioning (78.3), psychosocial health (73.9), emotional functioning (70.7) and school functioning (65.5) were significantly lower than the general population. At postoperative week 6 child emotional functioning (91.7) and physical functioning (90.3) showed significant improvement (p <0.05). Parent scores of physical functioning (88.4), psychosocial health (82.2) and emotional functioning (80.8) were also significantly higher than preoperative scores. Longer followup demonstrated that child scores of physical functioning (96.9), psychosocial health (96.5), emotional functioning (95.4) and social functioning (97.1) were significantly higher than preoperatively. Postoperatively parents reported significantly higher health related quality of life scores compared to preoperative scores. There was no significant difference at 6 months between parent and child scores. Clinically all patients did well following pyeloplasty., Conclusions: Preoperatively children recorded higher health related quality of life than parents/guardians. At postoperative week 6 children and parents recorded higher health related quality of life compared to preoperative scores. At 6 months overall child health related quality of life was significantly higher than preoperative reports, and no significant difference was seen between parent and child scores. Health related quality of life evaluations enabled us to monitor patient recovery and progress postoperatively. Prospective evaluations at regular intervals helped us to document improvement in overall quality of life in these children.

Purpose: Spina bifida, the most frequent permanently debilitating birth defect, results in major urological problems of voluntary bladder control and bowel function, which may impair quality of life. We prospectively assessed quality of life in patients with spina bifida using child and parent reports simultaneously. This study had 3 goals, that is to 1) document baseline health related quality of life in patients with spina bifida preoperatively, 2) study health related quality of life, reporting differences between parents and children, and 3) study changes in health related quality of life prospectively at preoperative and postoperative intervals., Materials and Methods: Patients with spina bifida who were 2 to 18 years old and required reconstructive urological surgery in 2004 were included in the study. Demographic survey and the validated PedsQL 4.0 health related quality of life questionnaire were used preoperatively and postoperatively. A clinical outcomes data set was completed after the clinician saw the patient. PedsQL 4.0 subscales were scored using the algorithms provided., Results: The response rate was 100%. Mean participant age was 10.3 years. Preoperatively child physical and psychosocial health and school functioning were significantly higher than parent reports (p <0.001). Overall health related quality of life in patients with spina bifida was lower than in healthy children (62.4 vs 85, p <0.001). Six weeks postoperatively significant differences in health related quality of life reporting between parents and children had lowered. Six months postoperatively child emotional and social functioning scores were higher than parent scores (p <0.001). No correlation was found between health related quality of life, and clinical and demographic factors due to insufficient sample size., Conclusions: Children with spina bifida recorded higher health related quality of life scores than parents/guardians. This health related quality of life study addresses concerns that impact daily quality of life in patients with spina bifida. Future health related quality of life studies in patients with spina bifida should use child self-reports.