Search

Introduction: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin E cup cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) liners compared with standard polyethylene (PE) liners in total hip arthroplasty., Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases was conducted. The evaluated outcomes were radiological parameters, functional scores (Harris Hip Score, Numeric Rating Scale, and Activity Scale from the University of California), and adverse events. Odds ratios and mean differences (MD) were calculated for the dichotomous and continuous variables. Meta-analysis was done using Review Manager., Results: Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 990) were included. VEPE liners showed markedly lower penetration at the last follow-up (MD, -0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.18 to -0.11) and penetration rate at last follow-up (MD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.00) than standard PE liners. However, no notable differences were observed in cup migration, inclination, anteversion, or patient-reported outcomes. The complication rate was not markedly different between the groups (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.73)., Discussion: This meta-analysis found that while VEPE demonstrated decreased penetration rates in total hip arthroplasty, no differences were observed in patient outcomes or complications compared with standard PE. However, the clinical relevance of penetration rate reduction remains uncertain, given the short follow-up period., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Introduction: There are a variety of baseplate options when performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal glenoid baseplate. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of lateralized baseplates would improve patient-determined outcomes and postoperative range of motion after RTSA compared with standard baseplates without increasing the risk of complications., Methods: Patients undergoing RTSA were stratified into a standard baseplate group (SBG) and a lateralized baseplate group (LBG). The LBG included 3 mm lateralization, 6 mm lateralization, and full-wedge augmentation (8 mm lateralization). The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were recorded at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years. Range of motion was recorded at baseline and 1 year. Differences in complications between groups were recorded., Results: The LBG included 187 patients, and the SBG included 51 patients. No difference was observed in any patient-determined outcome score at 1-year follow-up. At 2 years, there were greater Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (84 ± 16 versus 74 ± 19; P = 0.01), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (81 ± 15 versus 70 ± 20; P = 0.001), SST (8.0 ± 2.4 versus 6.6 ± 2.6; P = 0.007), and SANE (82 ± 17 versus 68 ± 25; P = 0.0005). The improvement in SST (5.0 ± 2.7 versus 3.3 ± 3.6; P = 0.02) and SANE (54 ± 26 versus 37 ± 30; P = 0.004) at 2 years compared with baseline was greater in the LBG compared with the SBG. No difference was observed in any range-of-motion metric between groups. Total complications were similar between groups ( P = 0.91). Scapular notching was more prevalent in the SBG (7.8% versus 1.6%; P = 0.01)., Conclusion: The LBG had better patient-determined outcome scores compared with the SBG at 2-year follow-up with a similar rate of overall complications but a lower rate of scapular notching. Range of motion was not improved by the use of a lateralized baseplate compared with a standard baseplate., Competing Interests: Keith Baumgarten has disclosures that may be considered as a potential conflict of interest (Stryker/Wright Medical, Miach). Neither Carson Max nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

To perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) successfully, a surgeon must be able to place the implants in a position that will restore and duplicate the patient's baseline anatomy and soft-tissue tension. One of the critical factors is the restoration of femoral offset. It is the goal of this review to precisely define measurement of offset in THA, describe its role in hip joint biomechanics, outline alterations that can be performed intraoperatively, and explain how it can create potential pathologic states. If there is a lack of offset restoration, it can result in a host of complications, including bony impingement with pain, edge loading or prosthetic joint instability, and alterations in the muscle length-tension relationship leading to reduced motor performance. Excessive femoral offset can increase hip abductor muscle and iliotibial band tension resulting in greater trochanteric pain regardless of the surgical approach. The purpose of this review was to analyze intraoperative surgical factors, choice of prosthetic implant type and position that are required to maximize stability, and dynamic motor performance after THA., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Published reports on the functional benefits of esthetic prosthesis are based on either anecdotal evidence or simplified, nonstandard forms of hand function evaluation performed by the researcher. It is not clear whether and how patients actually make functional use of their prosthesis on a daily basis. We report a case of a patient with a partial hand amputation who was initially ambivalent about fitting an esthetic prosthesis, but went on to make functional use of her prosthesis for activities of daily living, work, and social life at 3 years after injury. We present the patient's own assessment and video recordings, made without influence from rehabilitation personnel that demonstrates this functional use. From this case, we discuss the important factors of a favorable residual limb type, together with targeted modifications made to the prosthesis to optimize function., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Osseointegration (OI) is an emerging technique that allows a direct connection between the bone and a titanium metal implant, allowing the direct attachment of bone-anchored prostheses (BAP) to address the problems associated with socket prostheses. This review article aims to compare the biomechanical features of gait when using a transfemoral BAP in comparison to healthy gait, and in comparison to the gait of traditional transfemoral socket prosthesis users., Methods: A computer-based literature search of electronic databases since inception (ranging from 1967 to 2004 depending on the database) to June 14, 2022, identified peer-reviewed articles focusing on the temporal-spatial, kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography data related to transfemoral BAP gait. Eight articles were included that focused on these biomechanical features of gait in adults with BAP and were compared with socket prosthesis users or healthy gait., Results: Compared with healthy participants, prosthesis users after OI surgery have slower speed and cadence, lower symmetry, longer duration of swing phase, increased pelvic and trunk motion, more hip extension, larger moments on the intact limb, and lower forces on the prosthetic side. Compared with transfemoral socket prosthesis gait, BAP gait shows faster cadence and longer duration of support phase. There are limited and inconsistent data on changes in trunk, pelvic, and hip motion with OI., Conclusion: Based on this review, transfemoral BAP improve spatial-temporal parameters closer to normal gait when compared to socket gait, but there are persisting deficits compared with healthy gait. Additional studies are needed to confirm the changes in kinematics and kinetics when walking with a BAP., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE conflict of interest forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the public and can be viewed upon request.

Background: A limitation of tether lanyards is that fastening and unfastening the tether from the liner, which needs to be performed to clean or replace the liner, is difficult for some users., Objective: The purpose of this research was to create a quick connect that allows users to easily attach and detach the tether from the liner., Study Design: Mechanical testing and pilot study., Methods: A slide-and-lock mechanism was used. To operate the quick connect, the prosthesis user turns open the lock, slides it onto a short pin extending from the liner, and releases the mechanism, causing it to spring back to the locked position., Results: Mechanical tests demonstrated that the system well-tolerated tensile loads of 25,000 cycles at 100 N and single cycles at 350 N. Five transtibial users trialed the system and took between 2 and 30 s to fasten and unfasten the quick connect. They found the quick connect intuitive to use, secure, relatively quiet, and stable. However, they preferred their traditional pin lock over the quick connect system, mainly because the quick connect required a multistep procedure (twist-align-slide) that they considered more complex than operating the locking pin to which they were accustomed., Conclusions: In its current form, the quick connect is likely to be used by limited community ambulators who struggle with the pin lock donning procedure. It also has potential use with powered tethers that use a motor to adjust tether length., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Periprosthetic femur fracture is a known complication after THA. The associated risk of cementless femoral component design for periprosthetic femur fracture in a registry population of patients older than 65 years has yet to be clearly identified., Questions/purposes: (1) Is femoral stem geometry associated with the risk of periprosthetic femur fracture after cementless THA? (2) Is the presence or absence of a collar on cementless femoral implant designs associated with the risk of periprosthetic femur fracture after THA?, Methods: We analyzed American Joint Replacement Registry data from 2012 to March 2020. Unique to this registry is the high use of cementless femoral stems in patients 65 years and older. We identified 266,040 primary cementless THAs during the study period in patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and surgeries linked to supplemental Centers for Medicare and Medicaid data where available. Patient demographics, procedure dates, and reoperation for periprosthetic femur fracture with revision or open reduction and internal fixation were recorded. The main analysis was performed comparing the Kheir and Chen classification: 42% (112,231 of 266,040) were single-wedge, 22% (57,758 of 266,040) were double-wedge, and 24% (62,983 of 266,040) were gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling cementless femoral components, which yielded a total of 232,972 primary cementless THAs. An additional analysis compared cementless stems with collars (20% [47,376 of 232,972]) with those with collarless designs (80% [185,596 of 232,972]). A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with the competing risk of death was used to evaluate the association of design and fracture risk while adjusting for potential confounders., Results: After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of age, sex, geographic region, osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnosis, hospital volume, and the competing risk of death, we found that compared with gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling stems, single-wedge designs were associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic femur fracture (HR 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 3.9]; p < 0. 001). Compared with gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling stems, double-wedge designs showed an increased risk of periprosthetic femur fracture (HR 3.0 [95% CI 2.2 to 4.0]; p < 0. 001). Collarless stems showed an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture compared with collared stems (HR 7.8 [95% CI 4.1 to 15]; p < 0. 001)., Conclusion: If cementless femoral fixation is used for THA in patients 65 years or older, surgeons should consider using gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling and collared stem designs because they are associated with a lower risk of periprosthetic femur fracture. Future investigations should compare gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling and collared cementless designs with cemented fixation in this population., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Stem fixation in reconstruction after resection of femoral tumors is debated. Cemented stems offer immediate stability but risk aseptic loosening, while press-fit stems allow bone ingrowth but risk stress shielding and subsidence. Our retrospective review aimed to determine implant failure rates and their associated factors, as well as the rates of infection, debridement, and mortality for both fixation groups (cemented or press-fit stems) used in patients undergoing resection of femoral tumor disease and subsequent arthroplasty., Methods: We retrospectively studied 252 patients who underwent resection of femoral tumors and subsequent arthroplasty using cemented (n = 173; 69%) or press-fit (noncemented) (n = 79; 31%) stems between 1999 and 2020. Implant failure was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including rates of implant infection, debridement, and mortality. Multivariable regression was done to assess risk factors for implant failures., Results: The study found implant failure rates of 11% and 18% for cemented stems and press-fit stems, respectively. Lower stem to diaphyseal ratios ( P = 0.024) and younger patients ( P = 0.008) were associated with a higher risk of implant failure in cemented stems. The infection rates were 14% and 10% for cemented and press-fit stems, respectively. Debridement rates were 16% and 13% for cemented and press-fit stems, respectively, while the 1-year mortality rate was 16% for cemented stems and 1.5% for press-fit stems., Conclusions: This study is the largest of its kind, providing patient characteristics and outcomes in both cemented and press-fit stems in the setting of reconstruction for femoral tumors. Both methods can be effective, with outcomes dependent on patient-specific factors, such as life expectancy, activity level, and body habitus, as well as proper implant fit. Additional studies of both implants and longer follow-up are required to elucidate the optimal fixation method for each individual patient., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective noncomparative study., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

» The demographic profile of candidates for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is shifting toward younger and more active individuals.» While cemented fixation remains the gold standard in TKA, the interest is growing in exploring cementless fixation as a potentially more durable alternative.» Advances in manufacturing technologies are enhancing the prospects for superior long-term biological fixation.» Current research indicates that intermediate to long-term outcomes of modern cementless TKA designs are comparable with traditional cemented designs.» The selection of appropriate patients is critical to the success of cementless fixation techniques in TKA.» There is a need for high-quality research to better understand the potential differences and relative benefits of cemented vs. cementless TKA systems., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B116)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Pseudotumor formation is a well-known complication in metal-on-metal (MoM) THA. Pseudotumors combined with elevated serum ion levels and complaints from patients can lead to high revision rates. Long-term (> 10 years) results obtained from randomized trials comparing large-head MoM THA and conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA are lacking regarding revision and survival rates, pseudotumor formation, functional outcomes, and serum ion levels., Questions/purposes: At 10 years of follow-up, (1) what is the difference in survival and revision rates between large-head (38 to 60 mm) MoM THA and conventional 28-mm MoP THA? (2) What is the difference in pseudotumor formation between large-head MoM THA and MoP THA? (3) Is there a difference in functional outcome between large-head MoM THA and MoP THA? (4) What is the difference in serum ion levels between large-head MoM THA and MoP THA?, Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2008, 104 patients were randomized to receive either cementless MoM THA (50 patients) or cementless MoP THA (54 patients). In all, 78% (81 of 104) of patients completed the 10-year postoperative follow-up: 36 patients with MoM THA (72%; six patients lost to follow-up) and 45 with MoP THA (83%; four lost to follow-up). In the MoM group, 47% (17) were men, and the patients had a mean ± SD age of 60 ± 5 years. In the MoP group, 38% (17) were men, and the patients had a mean age of 61 ± 5 years. All baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. At 10 years of follow-up, all patient records were screened for revision surgery or complications, and the primary endpoint was survivorship free from revision for any cause at the 10-year follow-up interval, which we analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. All patients had a CT scan to determine the pseudotumor classification, which was reviewed by an independent radiologist. Functional outcome was measured using the patient-reported Oxford Hip Score and Harris Hip Score; the latter was assessed by a blinded nurse practitioner. Finally, serum ion cobalt and chrome concentrations were measured at 10 years postoperatively. Because the a priori sample size calculation for this randomized controlled trial was based on a different endpoint, a post hoc power analysis was performed for this long-term follow-up study, with survival as the primary outcome. It showed that considering the number of included patients, this study would have sufficient power (one-sided testing, alpha 0.05, power 80%) to discern a difference of 20% in the survival rate between the MoP and MoM groups (95% versus 75%)., Results: With the numbers available, there was no difference in survivorship free from revision for any cause between the MoP group and MoM group at 10 years (95% [95% CI 85% to 98%] versus 92% [95% CI 82% to 98%]; p = 0.6). A higher percentage of patients in the MoM group had pseudotumors on CT than those in the MoP group did, but pseudotumors were observed in both groups (56% [20 of 36] in the MoM group versus 22% [10 of 45] in the MoP group, relative risk 1.8 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.6]; p = 0.002). A higher proportion of elevated cobalt and chrome levels was found in the MoM group (19% and 14%, respectively) than in the MoP group (0% for both cobalt and chrome) (cobalt: RR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.5]; p = 0.002; chrome: RR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.3]; p = 0.01). In 25% of the patients with pseudotumors (5 of 20 patients), there were elevated serum cobalt levels. None of the 23 patients without pseudotumors had elevated cobalt levels (RR 1.3 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.7]; p = 0.01). There was no difference in functional outcome between study groups, nor a difference between patients with a pseudotumor and those without., Conclusion: This study showed that the survival of patients with large-head MoM THA was high and comparable to that of those with MoP THA, which contrasts with the high revision rates reported by others. Although some patients with MoP THAs experienced pseudotumors, the risk of a pseudotumor was much greater in MoM hips, and serum ion levels were higher in patients who received an MoM THA. For these reasons and unknown future complications, continued surveillance of patients with MoM THAs seems important., Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

There is renewed interest in cemented femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the United States, and to fully appreciate the evolution of cemented femoral stem designs, an understanding of their history and design rationale is essential. To adequately study the outcomes of modern-day designs, a comprehensive classification system is also necessary. The biomechanical principles, failure mechanisms, and clinical outcomes associated with various cemented femoral stems are described in this comprehensive review. In addition, an updated version of an existing classification system is described that incorporates the primary design characteristics which differentiate implants currently in use. In this classification, implants are categorized as taper-slip (Type I), which are subdivided by Anatomic (IA), Double-Taper (IB), and Triple-Taper (IC) with subclassification for Traditional and Line-to-Line implants. Composite beam (Type II) implants are similarly divided into Anatomic (IIA), Straight (IIB), and Wedge (IIC) with subclassification for Polished, Satin, or Roughened finish. This classification system provides a basis for comparing cemented femoral stems, thereby improving our understanding of the effect of design characteristics on survivorship to guide future advancements and improve clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Case: A patient underwent revision of a total knee replacement to a cementless rotating-hinge prosthesis. The femoral component became loose, but due to the patient's frailty and cognitive decline, revision was not performed. Subsequently, the yoke failed, dissociating the femoral and tibial components, necessitating a single-stage revision., Conclusion: This case underlines the need for robust fixation of components of rotating-hinge knee replacements to avoid mechanical failures. It contributes valuable insights to the limited literature on yoke failure in total knee arthroplasty, emphasizing the importance of implant design, patient selection, and surgical technique to prevent such complications., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C368)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: This study evaluates trends of cemented versus press-fit total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that press-fit TKA is more common in younger and obese patients. There may also be racial, geographic, and institutional variation., Methods: The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to conduct a retrospective review of primary TKA procedures for osteoarthritis in the United States between January 2019 and March 2022. The objective was to identify differences in incidence, demographics, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and institutional teaching status (teaching vs. non-teaching) between press-fit and cemented TKAs., Results: Two hundred ninety-seven thousand four hundred two patients (61% female, average age 68 years, 88.3% White) underwent cemented TKA versus 50,880 patients (52% female, average age 65 years, 89% White) underwent press-fit TKA. Overall, 20.8% of press-fit versus 19.9% of cemented TKA had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 and 15.2% of press-fit versus 12.5% of cemented TKA had BMI >40 ( P < 0.001). Patients undergoing press-fit TKA were less likely Black (OR = 0.727; P < 0.0001), Asian (OR = 0.651, P < 0.0001), and Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR = 0.705, P < 0.02) with White as the reference group. Northeastern and Southern United States were more likely to use press-fit TKA than the Midwest (OR = 1.89 and OR = 1.87, P < 0.0001) and West (OR = 1.67; and OR = 1.65; P < 0.0001). Press-fit TKA incidence in 2019 was 9.9% versus 20.6% in 2022 ( P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Press-fit TKA is increasingly more common in Northeastern and Southern United States, and patients are older than expected. Patients with BMI >35 had a slightly higher rate of undergoing press-fit than cemented TKA. Notable racial differences also exist. Additional research addressing racial disparities and evaluating longevity of press-fit designs is needed., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Women living with limb loss (amputees) have unique needs that increase during pregnancy. Comfort, pain, and activity are exponentially compromised. Changes in mass and altered center of gravity increase the likelihood of falls and compromise safety for the mother and unborn baby. Subjective and physical functional performance measures data was collected through 2 separate pregnancies on a 36-year-old woman with a right transfemoral amputation. Physiological changes during pregnancy effected comfort, pain, and functional performance. Clinical practice guidelines for prosthetic management should be established to include protocols such as adjustment schedules, specialized socket design, and necessary component changes throughout the course of pregnancy., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Prosthesis rejection is a significant barrier to rehabilitation of persons with upper limb difference. Many individual factors can affect device rejection, including a person's sex or gender. The objective of this narrative review was to explore the reported differences between the sexes and genders in upper limb prosthesis rejection. This review considered peer-reviewed, published research studies in which the study population were adults (aged 18 and older) who had unilateral or bilateral limb difference (any level) of any etiology with current, past, or no history of prosthetic device usage. Using identified keywords, index terms, and a peer-reviewed search filter, the literature was searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo. The reasons for rejection, disuse, or abandonment of prosthetic devices were extracted, with the focus on reported differences between sex and genders. After searching, 29 articles were selected for full-text review and 15 were included. Only 5 of 15 articles examined differences between the sexes. Women tend to reject upper extremity prostheses more than men both before and after being fit with a device; device characteristics, such as weight and cosmesis, do not appear to be appropriately designed for women; and there may not be adequate consideration of the goals for women with limb difference(s). There is inadequate reporting of sex and gender in the literature on prosthesis rejection; future studies should report and explore these factors to determine whether the needs of the full population with limb loss are being met., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Among the components of lower limb prostheses, a perfectly adapted prosthetic socket is crucial to a successful rehabilitation process. Thus, developing a more comfortable socket could improve the quality of life for transfemoral (TF) amputees. The objective of this case report was to compare 2 TF sockets by evaluating the relationship between socket stiffness and user comfort and their influence on functionality to improve the quality of life of TF amputees. The participant received 2 different sockets: (A) flexible Flixt® socket; (B) conventional socket. He used each socket for 90 days, and after that was submitted to an evaluation at the Gait Laboratory (kinematic and dynamic analyses), completed the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, and performed Timed Up and Go test, 6-Minute March Test (6MWT), 10-Meter Walk Test, and Amputee Mobility Predictor test. After results were analyzed, the socket that obtained the best degree of satisfaction was assigned to the amputee participant. Combined measures showed that socket B does not considerably change the kinematic parameters neither dynamics parameters namely at stance phase. At Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire results, socket A had a better rating than socket B. The results of the Timed Up and Go test, 6MWT, 10-Meter Walk Test, and Amputee Mobility Predictor test obtained identical values, except for the 6MWT. This case report shows evidence of participant satisfaction improvement when using the flexible socket. The study also demonstrates that both sockets are quite effective., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Prosthetic alignment is a highly subjective process that is still based on clinical judgments. Thus, researchers have aimed their effort to quantify prosthetic alignment by providing an objective method that can assist and guide prosthetists in achieving transtibial (TT) prosthetic alignment. This systematic review aimed to examine the current literature on TT prosthetic alignment to scope the qualitative and quantitative methods designed to guide prosthetists throughout the TT prosthetic alignment process as well as evaluate the reported instruments and devices that are used to align TT prostheses and their clinical feasibility. A literature search, completed in June 2022, was performed using the following databases: Web of Science (Clarivate), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Pub Med (Medline) with searching terms focusing on TT, prosthesis, prosthetist, prosthetic alignment, and questionnaires, resulting in 2790 studies being screened. Twenty-four studies have used quantitative methodologies, where sensor technologies were found to be the most frequently proposed technology combined with gait analysis tools and/or subjective assessments. A qualitative method that assists prosthetists throughout the alignment process was not found. In this systematic review, we presented diverse methods for guiding and assisting clinical decision-making regarding TT prosthetic alignment. However, most of these methods considered varied parameters, and there is a need for elaboration toward standardized methods, which would improve the prosthetic alignment clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Acetabular bone loss continues to be one of the most complex and challenging scenarios facing the orthopaedic surgeon. Preoperative planning and classification systems essentially have remained the same, with the Paprosky classification still being the most commonly used. Careful radiological assessment with well-defined criteria can accurately diagnose acetabular bone loss patterns with an associated chronic pelvic discontinuity before surgery. The use of cemented reconstruction techniques has declined, and contemporary practice trends have involved the increasing use of highly porous hemispherical shells in conjunction with modular porous metal augments, which can successfully treat most acetabular revisions. Noncemented treatment options for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision include conventional porous/modular highly porous hemispherical implants, nonmodular highly porous implants with cementable acetabular liners, cup-cage reconstruction, oblong cups, and triflange reconstruction. These options can be combined with modular porous metal augments, structural allografts, impaction grafting, or reconstruction cages. Acetabular distraction is a newer technique for chronic pelvic discontinuity, which is used in conjunction with off-the-shelf revision acetabular shells and modular porous metal augments. This review is an update over the past decade, highlighting studies with mid to long-term follow-up, and presents the advantages, disadvantages, and principles associated with each of the most commonly used reconstructive techniques., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Among the different factors affecting socket comfort, the pressure applied on residual limb tissues is a crucial parameter for the success or failure of any prosthetic device. However, only a few incomplete data are available on people with transfemoral amputation, in this regard. This work aims at filling this gap in the literature., Methods: Ten people with transfemoral amputation wearing 3 different socket designs were recruited in this study: 2 ischial containment sockets featured by proximal trim lines that contain the ischial tuberosity and ramus and greater trochanter, 2 subischial sockets with proximal trim lines under the ischium level, and 6 quadrilateral sockets with proximal trim lines that contain the greater trochanter and create a horizontal seat for the ischial tuberosity. The pressure values at the anterior, lateral, posterior, and medial areas of the socket interface were recorded during 5 locomotion tasks (ie, horizontal, ascent, and descent walking, upstairs and downstairs) by using an F-Socket System (Tekscan Inc., Boston, MA). Gait segmentation was performed by exploiting plantar pressure, which was acquired by an additional sensor under the foot. Mean and standard deviation of minimum and maximum values were calculated for each interface area, locomotion task, and socket design. The mean pressure patterns during different locomotion tasks were reported, as well., Results: Considering all subjects irrespective of socket design, the mean pressure range resulted 45.3 (posterior)-106.7 (posterior) kPa in horizontal walking; 48.3 (posterior)-113.8 (posterior) kPa in ascent walking; 50.8 (posterior)-105.7 (posterior) kPa in descent walking; 47.9 (posterior)-102.9 (lateral) kPa during upstairs; and 41.8 (posterior)-84.5 (anterior) kPa during downstairs. Qualitative differences in socket designs have been found., Conclusions: These data allow for a comprehensive analysis of pressures acting at the tissue-socket interface in people with transfemoral amputation, thus offering essential information for the design of novel solutions or to improve existing ones, in this field., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer incorporated on behalf of The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Relative movement between the socket and residual limb can impair function in prosthesis users. It is plausible that, in addition to its mechanical effect, the integrity of the socket-residuum interface influences the ability of an individual to sense tactile cues through the prosthesis. Vacuum-assisted suspension (VAS) has been shown to reduce relative movement at this interface, providing a means to test this premise. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the effects of altering socket-residuum interface integrity through the VAS pressure level on the thresholds of perception of an externally applied vibration stimulus., Methods: Seven unilateral transtibial prosthesis users participated. Socket-residual limb integrity was altered using the VAS subatmospheric (vacuum) pressure level. Vibration perception tests were conducted at low, mid, and high vacuum levels, targeting 0, 8, and 19 in Hg respectively, and performed in partially loaded and fully loaded conditions. Vibration intensity was increased using a dial until participants delivered a verbal signal indicating it was perceptible, and the nominal intensity was recorded., Results: Intensity thresholds decreased (ie, sensitivity increased) from low to high vacuum settings when fully loaded ( P = 0.008). Differences when partially loaded were nonsignificant and variable across participants., Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that altering the integrity between the socket and residual limb by modifying the vacuum level affects sensation related to the external environment experienced through the prosthesis, although translation of these findings to real-world stimuli remains to be tested., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Although dual mobility total hip arthroplasty has become increasingly common in recent years, limited remains known on dual mobility in surgical oncology. This university-based investigation compared dislocation and revision rates of DMs, conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA), and hemiarthroplasties (HAs) for oncological hip reconstruction., Methods: An institutional tumor registry was used to identify 221 patients undergoing 45 DMs, 67 conventional THAs, and 109 HAs, performed for 17 primary hip tumors and 204 hip metastases between 2010 and 2020. The median age at surgery was 65 years, and 52% were female. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves and log-rank tests were done to compare dislocation and revision rates among all 221 patients, after a one-to-one propensity match, based on age, sex, tumor type (metastasis, primary tumor), and tumor localization (femur, acetabulum)., Results: The 5-year survivorship free of dislocation was 98% in DMs, 66% in conventional THAs ( P = 0.03; all P values compared with DMs), and 97% among HAs ( P = 0.48). The 5-year survivorship free of revision was 69% in DMs, 62% in conventional THAs ( P = 0.68), and 92% in HAs ( P = 0.06). After propensity matching, the 5-year survivorship free of dislocation was 42% in 45 conventional THAs ( P = 0.027; compared with all 45 DMs) and 89% in 16 matched HAs ( P = 0.19; compared with 16 DMs with femoral involvement only). The 5-year survivorship free of revision was 40% in matched conventional THAs ( P = 0.91) and 100% in matched HAs ( P = 0.19)., Conclusions: DMs showed markedly lower rates of dislocation than conventional THAs, with overall revision rates remaining comparable among different designs. DMs should be considered the option of choice for oncological hip reconstruction if compared with conventional THAs. HAs are a feasible alternative when encountering femoral disease involvement only., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Massive modular endoprostheses have become a primary means of reconstruction after oncologic resection of a lower extremity tumor. These implants are commonly made with cobalt-chromium alloys that can undergo wear and corrosion, releasing cobalt and chromium ions into the surrounding tissue and blood. However, there are few studies about the blood metal levels in these patients., Question/purpose: What is the whole blood cobalt and chromium ion level in patients with massive modular endoprostheses?, Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of our total joints registry to identify patients with a history of an endoprosthetic reconstruction performed at our institution. Patients who were alive at the time of our review in addition to those undergoing an endoprosthetic reconstruction after an oncologic resection were included. Whole blood samples were obtained from 27 (14 male and 13 female) patients with a history of a lower extremity oncologic endoprosthesis. The median time from surgery to blood collection was 8 years (range 6 months to 32 years). Blood samples were collected and stored in metal-free ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes. Samples were analyzed on an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer in an International Organization for Standardization seven-class clean room using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated instruments to reduce the risk of metal contamination. The analytical measuring range was 1 to 200 ng/mL for chromium and cobalt. Cobalt and chromium levels were considered elevated when the blood level was ≥ 1 ppb., Results: Cobalt levels were elevated in 59% (16 of 27) of patients, and chromium levels were elevated in 26% (seven of 27). In patients with elevated metal ion values, 15 of 17 patients had a reconstruction using a Stryker/Howmedica Global Modular Replacement System implant., Conclusion: Blood metal levels were elevated in patients who received reconstructions using modular oncology endoprostheses Future work is needed to establish appropriate follow-up routines and determine whether and when systemic complications occur because of elevated metal levels and how to potentially address these elevated levels when complications occur. Prospective and retrospective collaboration between multiple centers and specialty societies will be necessary to address these unknown questions in this potentially vulnerable patient group., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval nearly two decades ago, the indications for and utilization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded considerably. Stemless RSA designs have been used in Europe since 2005, but have only recently been introduced in domestic Investigational Device Exemption trials. Potential advantages of stemless RSA are similar to those of stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, which may include fewer shaft-related complications, avoidance of stress shielding, bone preservation, and easier revision surgery. European data support similar outcomes between certain stemless RSA prostheses compared with that of stemmed RSA implants at early and mid-term follow-up. However, long-term outcomes remain to be seen and differences exist between the stemless RSA designs used in Europe and those being studied in domestic clinical trials. An understanding of the potential advantages and disadvantages of stemless RSA, differences between existing designs, and reported clinical outcomes is prudent for the safe and meaningful implementation of this new technology in the United States., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Background: There is growing interest to use digital technology (DT) for manufacturing lower-limb prosthetic sockets to improve efficiency and clinical outcomes. However, little is known about how lower-limb prosthesis users perceive DTs, such as 3D scanning and 3D printing., Objectives: This study aimed to provide an understanding of perceptions and experiences with DT for prosthetic socket manufacturing from the perspective of prosthesis users., Study Design: A qualitative descriptive research study., Methods: Nine lower-limb prosthesis users (mean age 56; 5 female; 4 male) participated in one-on-one semistructured telephone interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify a codebook and emerging themes from the interview transcripts., Results: Two major themes were identified: (1) expectations and prioritization of 3D printed socket usability and (2) facilitators and barriers to uptake of DT among patients., Conclusion: DT methods were found to be acceptable and feasible from a patient perspective, although technological advancements are still required, and real-time communication about the process may be vital for ensuring patient engagement. Consideration of these findings may improve patient satisfaction to emerging prosthesis treatment plans and ultimately support widespread adoption of DT as an additional tool for fabricating prosthetic sockets., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: In the ongoing development of bioresorbable implants, there has been a particular focus on magnesium (Mg)-based alloys. Several Mg alloys have shown promising properties, including a lean, bioresorbable magnesium-zinc-calcium (Mg-Zn-Ca) alloy designated as ZX00. To our knowledge, this is the first clinically tested Mg-based alloy free from rare-earth elements or other elements. Its use in medial malleolar fractures has allowed for bone healing without requiring surgical removal. It is thus of interest to assess the resorption behavior of this novel bioresorbable implant., Questions/purposes: (1) What is the behavior of implanted Mg-alloy (ZX00) screws in terms of resorption (implant volume, implant surface, and gas volume) and bone response (histologic evaluation) in a sheep model after 13 months and 25 months? (2) What are the radiographic changes and clinical outcomes, including patient-reported outcome measures, at a mean of 2.5 years after Mg-alloy (ZX00) screw fixation in patients with medial malleolar fractures?, Methods: A sheep model was used to assess 18 Mg-alloy (ZX00) different-length screws (29 mm, 24 mm, and 16 mm) implanted in the tibiae and compared with six titanium-alloy screws. Micro-CT was performed at 13 and 25 months to quantify the implant volume, implant surface, and gas volume at the implant sites, as well as histology at both timepoints. Between July 2018 and October 2019, we treated 20 patients with ZX00 screws for medial malleolar fractures in a first-in-humans study. We considered isolated, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar fractures potentially eligible. Thus, 20 patients were eligible for follow-up. However, 5% (one patient) of patients were excluded from the analysis because of an unplanned surgery for a pre-existing osteochondral lesion of the talus performed 17 months after ZX00 implantation. Additionally, another 5% (one patient) of patients were lost before reaching the minimum study follow-up period. Our required minimum follow-up period was 18 months to ensure sufficient time to observe the outcomes of interest. At this timepoint, 10% (two patients) of patients were either missing or lost to follow-up. The follow-up time was a mean of 2.5 ± 0.6 years and a median of 2.4 years (range 18 to 43 months)., Results: In this sheep model, after 13 months, the 29-mm screws (initial volume: 198 ± 1 mm 3 ) degraded by 41% (116 ± 6 mm 3 , mean difference 82 [95% CI 71 to 92]; p < 0.001), and after 25 months by 65% (69 ± 7 mm 3 , mean difference 130 [95% CI 117 to 142]; p < 0.001). After 13 months, the 24-mm screws (initial volume: 174 ± 0.2 mm 3 ) degraded by 51% (86 ± 21 mm 3 , mean difference 88 [95% CI 52 to 123]; p = 0.004), and after 25 months by 72% (49 ± 25 mm 3 , mean difference 125 [95% CI 83 to 167]; p = 0.003). After 13 months, the 16-mm screws (initial volume: 112 ± 5 mm 3 ) degraded by 57% (49 ± 8 mm 3 , mean difference 63 [95% CI 50 to 76]; p < 0.001), and after 25 months by 61% (45 ± 10 mm 3 , mean difference 67 [95% CI 52 to 82]; p < 0.001). Histologic evaluation qualitatively showed ongoing resorption with new bone formation closely connected to the resorbing screw without an inflammatory reaction. In patients treated with Mg-alloy screws after a mean of 2.5 years, the implants were radiographically not visible in 17 of 18 patients and the bone had homogenous texture in 15 of 18 patients. No clinical or patient-reported complications were observed., Conclusion: In this sheep model, Mg-alloy (ZX00) screws showed a resorption to one-third of the original volume after 25 months, without eliciting adverse immunologic reactions, supporting biocompatibility during this period. Mg-alloy (ZX00) implants were not detectable on radiographs after a mean of 2.5 years, suggesting full resorption, but further studies are needed to assess environmental changes regarding bone quality at the implantation site after implant resorption., Clinical Relevance: The study demonstrated successful healing of medial malleolar fractures using bioresorbable Mg-alloy screws without clinical complications or revision surgery, resulting in pain-free ankle function after 2.5 years. Future prospective studies with larger samples and extended follow-up periods are necessary to comprehensively assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of ZX00 screws, including an exploration of limitations when there is altered bone integrity, such as in those with osteoporosis. Additional use of advanced imaging techniques, such as high-resolution CT, can enhance evaluation accuracy., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10328 standards are used to verify the safety of lower limb prosthetic devices. However, the ISO 10328 tests are performed in sterile laboratory settings and do not account for environmental or sociocultural factors associated with prosthetic use. Most locally manufactured prosthetic feet from low-income and middle-income countries, which are safely used for years, do not meet these standards. In this study, we investigate the modes of wear patterns of naturally worn prosthetic feet from Sri Lanka., Objective: To characterize wear patterns of locally manufactured prosthetic feet from low-income and middle-income countries., Methods: Sixty-six replaced prosthetic feet from the Jaffna Jaipur Center of Disability and Rehabilitation were analyzed. Delamination between the keel and rest of the foot could not be detected with ultrasound. Sole wear pattern was quantified by photographing soles and dividing them into 200 rectangles and scoring the rectangle's wear from 1 to 9 (no to extreme wear). Homologous scores were averaged to create a contour map of prosthetic foot wear., Results: The highest levels of wear occurred at the heel, end of the keel, and the perimeter of the prosthetic foot. All regions of the prosthetic feet had significantly different wear scores ( p < 0.005)., Conclusions: Locally manufactured solid ankle cushion heel feet display high levels of wear in localized areas of the sole of prosthetic feet, which can limit their life span. High levels of wear occur at the end of the keel, which would not be detectable in the ISO 10328 tests., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Case: There is an increasing emphasis on adverse reactions to metal debris around prosthetic hip implants. We present a case report of a patient with increasing pain around a previous total hip arthroplasty and magnetic resonance imaging findings consistent with a pseudotumor. Serum metal ion levels were not elevated and initial biopsy findings inconclusive. The patient was diagnosed with an extraskeletal chondrosarcoma after revision total hip arthroplasty and subsequently underwent external hemipelvectomy with negative margins., Conclusion: This report highlights the importance of remaining vigilant for malignant sarcomas presenting as pseudotumors around hip replacements, particularly in the absence of abnormal metal ion levels or definitive biopsy results., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C262)., (Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: There are no standards for reliably measuring the quality of prosthetic fit and alignment which is important for evaluation and improvement of clinical care for patients with transtibial amputation., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to quantitatively assess prosthetic fit and alignment in patients with transtibial amputation., Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Methods: The fit and alignment assessment (ProFit) included 39 items for assessments of skin quality, stance and gait, and radiographic characteristics that could be feasibly captured in clinic using photographs, video, and radiographs. Data were collected on adults aged 18-60 years treated with transtibial amputation and followed up for 18 months at 1 of 27 US hospitals. One hundred thirteen assessments were conducted by 6 prosthetists using an online platform. Items demonstrating reliability and face validity were included in the ProFit score for subsequent validation testing. Validation measures included 18-month patient-reported function (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment ), tests of physical performance, patient-reported pain (Brief Pain Inventory ), satisfaction with prosthesis (Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey), prosthesis use, and walking activity., Results: The ProFit score included 10 of 39 items that demonstrated high inter-rater reliability and face validity. A higher ProFit score correlated with worse function on all domains of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment except arm and hand and with worse performance on the 4-Square Step Test, Shuttle Run, and Illinois Agility Test. ProFit scores did not correlate with the Brief Pain Inventory, Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey, prosthesis use, or walking activity., Conclusions: The ProFit score can be used by researchers and clinicians to measure the quality of socket fit and prosthetic alignment. Future prospective validation is necessary to verify the promising results observed in ProFit development and establish clinical utility., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: The advantages of distal femoral replacement prostheses for reconstructions after tumors are well known; one such implant, the Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS), has been widely used since 2003. Although implant breakage has been reported, the frequency of this event has varied across different studies., Questions/purposes: (1) What percentage of patients who underwent distal femur resection and replacement using the GMRS for primary bone tumors at one center experienced stem breakage? (2) At what timepoints did these breakages occur, and what factors were common among the stems that broke?, Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent distal femur resection and replacement using the GMRS for a diagnosis of primary bone sarcoma by the Queensland Bone and Soft-tissue Tumor service from 2003 to 2020 who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Standard follow-up for primary bone sarcoma involves radiographic imaging of the femur at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. From a chart review, we identified patients with femoral stem breakage. Patient and implant details were recorded and analyzed. A total of 116 patients had undergone a distal femoral replacement with the GMRS prosthesis for primary bone sarcoma; however, 6.9% (eight of 116 patients) died before completing the 2-year follow-up period and were excluded. Of the remaining 108 patients, 15% (16 patients) had died at the time of this review; however, given that they completed the 2-year follow-up period and did not experience stem breakage, they were included. Furthermore, 15% (16 patients) were considered lost to follow-up and excluded because they have not been seen in the past 5 years but were not known to have died or experienced stem breakage. This left 92 patients for analysis., Results: Stem breakages were identified in 5.4% (five of 92) of patients. All stem breakages occurred in stem diameters 11 mm or less with a porous body construct; the percentage of patients with breakage in this group was 16% (five of 31). All patients with stem fracture demonstrated minimal ongrowth to the porous coated body. The median time to stem fracture was 10 years (range 2 to 12 years); however, two of the five stems broke within 3 years., Conclusion: We recommend the use of a larger-diameter GMRS cemented stem (> 11 mm), and either the line-to-line cementing method or an uncemented stem from an alternative company should be considered in order to achieve this larger stem in smaller canals. If a stem less than 12 mm in diameter must be used or there is evidence of minimal ongrowth, then close follow-up and prompt investigation of new symptoms should occur., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Proximal femur replacements (PFRs) are an effective surgical option to treat primary and metastatic tumors causing large bony defects in the proximal femur. Given the relative rarity of these indications, current studies on PFR for oncologic indications are generally limited by patient volume or relatively short-term follow-up. Because recent advances in systemic therapy have improved the prognosis of patients who undergo limb salvage surgery for musculoskeletal tumors, data on the long-term durability of endoprosthetic reconstructions have become increasingly important., Questions/purposes: (1) How does the long-term survival of cemented bipolar PFRs compare with patient survival in patients who underwent PFR for benign, aggressive, and metastatic tumors? (2) What are common reasons for revisions of primary PFRs? (3) Which factors are associated with survival of primary PFRs? (4) What is the survivorship free from conversion of bipolar PFRs to THA?, Methods: Between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2020, we treated 812 patients with an endoprosthetic reconstruction for an oncologic indication. All patients who underwent a primary PFR for an oncologic indication were included in this study. The study cohort consisted of 122 patients receiving a primary PFR. Eighteen patients did not reach a censored endpoint such as death, revision, or amputation within 2 years. Thirty-three patients died within 2 years of their surgery. Of the 122 patients with primary PFRs, 39 did not reach a censored endpoint and have not been seen within the past 5 years. However, the mean follow-up time for these patients was longer than 10 years. The Social Security Death Index was queried to identify any patients who may have died but might not have been captured by our database To allow for adequate follow-up, endoprosthetic reconstructions performed after December 31, 2020 were excluded. The mean age at the time of the index surgery was 48 ± 22 years. The mean follow-up time of surviving patients was 7 ± 8 years. All PFRs were performed using a bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a cemented stem, and all implants were considered comparable. Demographic, oncologic, procedural, and outcome data including prosthesis survival, patient survival, complication rates, and rates of conversion to THA were analyzed. Patient, prosthesis, and limb salvage survival rates were generated, with implant revision as the endpoint and death as a competing risk. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05., Results: Generally, patients with benign or low-grade (Stage I) disease outlived their implants (100% patient survival through 30 years; p = 0.02), whereas the opposite was true in patients with high-grade, localized Stage II disease (64% patient survival at 5 years [95% CI 49% to 76%]; p = 0.001) or widespread Stage III metastatic disease (6.2% patient survival at 5 years [95% CI 0.5% to 24%]; p < 0.001). Primary PFR implant survival at 5, 10, 20, and 30 years was 97% (95% CI 90% to 99%), 81% (95% CI 67% to 90%), 69% (95% CI 46% to 84%), and 51% (95% CI 24% to 73%), respectively. Eight percent (10 of 122) of primary PFRs were revised for any reason. The most common causes of revision were aseptic loosening (3% [four of 122]), infection (3% [three of 122]), breakage of the implant (2% [two of 122]), and tumor progression (1% [one of 122]). Follow-up time was the only factor that was associated with revision of primary PFRs. Neither segment length nor stem length were associated with revision of primary. Six percent (seven of 122) of PFRs were converted to THA at a mean 15 ± 8 years from the index procedure. Survivorship free from conversion to THA (accounting for death as a competing risk) was 94% (95% CI 85% to 99%), 86% (95% CI 68% to 94%). and 77% (95% CI 51% to 91%) at 10, 20, and 30 years, respectively., Conclusion: Cemented bipolar PFRs for an oncologic indication are a relatively durable reconstruction technique. Given the relative longevity and efficacy of PFRs demonstrated in our study, especially in patients with high-grade or metastatic disease where implant survival until all-cause revision was longer than patient survival, surgeons should continue to seriously consider PFRs in appropriate patients. The relative rarity of these reconstructions limits the number of patients in this study as well as in current research; thus, further multi-institutional collaborations are needed to provide the most accurate prognostic data for our patients., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Background: Dislocation is a major complication of revision THA after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The likelihood of dislocation can be particularly high if megaprosthetic proximal femoral replacement (PFR) has been performed during a second-stage reimplantation. Dual-mobility acetabular components are an established way of reducing the instability risk in revision THA; however, the likelihood of dislocation for dual-mobility reconstructions in the setting of a two-stage PFR has not been studied systematically, although patients with these reconstructions might be at an increased risk., Questions/purposes: (1) What is the risk of dislocation and revision for dislocation in patients who underwent PFR with a dual-mobility acetabular component as part of two-stage exchange for hip PJI? (2) What is the risk of all-cause implant revision and what other procedures were performed (apart from revision for a dislocation) in these patients? (3) What potential patient-related and procedure-related factors are associated with dislocation?, Methods: This was a retrospective study from a single academic center including procedures performed between 2010 and 2017. During the study period, 220 patients underwent two-stage revision for chronic hip PJI. Two-stage revision was the approach of choice for chronic infections, and we did not perform single-stage revisions for this indication during the study period. Thirty-three percent (73 of 220) of patients underwent second-stage reconstruction with a single-design, modular, megaprosthetic PFR because of femoral bone loss, using a cemented stem. A cemented dual-mobility cup was the approach of choice for acetabular reconstruction in the presence of a PFR; however, 4% (three of 73) were reconstructed with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty to salvage an infected saddle prosthesis, leaving 70 patients with a dual-mobility acetabular component and a PFR (84% [59 of 70]) or total femoral replacement (16% [11 of 70]). We used two similar designs of an unconstrained cemented dual-mobility cup during the study period. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 73 years (63 to 79 years), and 60% (42 of 70) of patients were women. The mean follow-up period was 50 ± 25 months with a minimum follow-up of 24 months for patients who did not undergo revision surgery or died (during the study period, 10% [seven of 70] died before 2 years). We recorded patient-related and surgery-related details from the electronic patient records and investigated all revision procedures performed until December 2021. Patients who underwent closed reduction for dislocation were included. Radiographic measurements of cup positioning were performed using supine AP radiographs obtained within the first 2 weeks after surgery using an established digital method. We calculated the risk for revision and dislocation using a competing-risk analysis with death as a competing event, providing 95% confidence intervals. Differences in dislocation and revision risks were assessed with Fine and Gray models providing subhazard ratios. All p values were two sided and the p value for significance was set at 0.05., Results: The risk of dislocation (using a competing-risks survivorship estimator) was 17% (95% CI 9% to 32%) at 5 years, and the risk of revision for dislocation was 12% (95% CI 5% to 24%) at 5 years among patients treated with dual-mobility acetabular components as part of a two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. The risk of all-cause implant revision (using a competing-risk estimator, except for dislocation) was 20% (95% CI 12% to 33%) after 5 years. Twenty-three percent (16 of 70) of patients underwent revision surgery for reinfection and 3% (two of 70) of patients underwent stem exchange for a traumatic periprosthetic fracture. No patients underwent revision for aseptic loosening. We found no differences in patient-related and procedure-related factors or acetabular component positioning for patients with dislocation with the numbers available; however, patients with total femoral replacements had a higher likelihood of dislocation (subhazard ratio 3.9 [95% CI 1.1 to 13.3]; p = 0.03) and revision for a dislocation (subhazard ratio 4.4 [95% CI 1 to 18.5]; p = 0.04) than those who received PFR., Conclusion: Although dual-mobility bearings might be an intuitive potential choice to reduce the dislocation risk in revision THA, there is a considerable dislocation risk for PFR after two-stage surgery for PJI, particularly in patients with total femoral replacements. Although the use of an additional constraint might appear tempting, published results vary tremendously, and future studies should compare the performance of tripolar constrained implants to that of unconstrained dual-mobility cups in patients with PFR to reduce the risk of instability., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: The Exeter® stem is used worldwide, often in older patients, and it is the second most commonly used cemented stem design in Sweden. Previous studies have shown that for cemented stems with a composite beam, the smallest sizes result in an increased risk of revision for mechanical failure. However, little is known about whether the survivorship of the polished Exeter stem, which generally has been shown to be good, might be associated with design parameters such as stem dimensions or offset at extreme implant sizes., Question/purpose: Are differences in (1) stem size or (2) offset of the standard Exeter V40 150-mm stem associated with differences in the risk of stem revision for aseptic loosening?, Methods: Between 2001 and 2020, 47,161 Exeter stems were reported to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register, with very high coverage and completeness documented during the period studied. In this cohort, we included patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent surgery with a standard Exeter stem length of 150 mm and V40 cone with any type of cemented cups that had had at least 1000 reported insertions. This selection resulted in a study cohort representing 79% (37,619 of 47,161) of the total number of Exeter stems in the registry during that time. The primary study outcome was stem revision for aseptic indications such as loosening, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, and implant fracture. A Cox regression was performed, with adjustment for age, gender, surgical approach, year of surgery, use of highly crosslinked polyethylene cups, and femoral head size and length dictated by the shape of the head trunnion. Adjusted hazard ratios are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Two separate analyses were performed. The first analysis excluded stems with the highest offsets (50 mm and 56 mm, which were not available for stem size 0). The second analysis excluded stem size 0 to include all offsets. Because stem survival was not proportional over time, we divided the analyses into two insertion periods, 0 to 8 years and beyond 8 years., Results: Stem size 0 (compared to size 1) was associated with an increased risk of revision up to 8 years when all stem sizes were included (first analysis 0 to 8 years, HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.3]; p = 0.002). Forty-four percent (63 of 144) of revisions of size 0 stems were for periprosthetic fracture. There was no consistent association between stem size and risk of aseptic stem revision when size 0 was excluded in the second analysis beyond 8 years. The most common offset (44 mm) was associated with an increased risk of revision (compared with 37.5 mm) up to 8 years when all sizes were included (first analysis, HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; p = 0.01). In the second analysis (beyond 8 years, all offsets included), offset of 44 mm was compared with offset of 37.5 mm; compared with the first period, this offset was associated with a reduced risk (HR 0.6 [95% CI 0.4 to 0.9]; p = 0.005)., Conclusion: We found overall high survival of the Exeter stem, with generally little or no influence of stem variations on the risk of aseptic revision. However, stem size 0 was associated with an increased risk of revision mainly for periprosthetic fractures. If the femoral anatomy offers a choice between sizes 0 and 1 in patients with poor bone quality who are at risk of periprosthetic fracture, our data speak in favor of choosing the larger stem if the surgeon believes it is safe to insert the larger size, or, if available, another stem design that has a documented lower risk of this complication. For patients with good cortical bone quality but very narrow canals, a cementless stem may also be a good alternative., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Competing Interests: The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has generally shown higher revision rates than TKA, and this is particularly true for the femoral component. A twin-peg femoral component (Oxford Partial) has replaced the single-peg version (Oxford Phase III) of the widely used Oxford medial UKA, with the aim of improving femoral component fixation. The introduction of the Oxford Partial Knee also included a fully uncemented option. However, there has been relatively little evidence regarding the effect of these changes on implant survival and revision diagnoses from groups not associated with the implant design., Questions/purposes: Using data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, we asked: (1) Has the 5-year implant survival (free from revision for any cause) improved with the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee after the introduction of new designs? (2) Did the causes of revision change between the old and new designs? (3) Is there a difference in risk for specific revision causes between the uncemented and cemented versions of the new design?, Methods: We performed a registry-based observational study using data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, a nationwide, mandatory and governmental registry with a high reporting rate. Between 2012 and 2021, 7549 Oxford UKAs were performed, and 105 were excluded due to combinations of the three designs, lateral compartment replacement, or hybrid fixation, leaving 908 cemented Oxford Phase III single-peg (used from 2012 to 2017), 4715 cemented Oxford Partial twin-peg (used from 2012 to 2021), and 1821 uncemented Oxford Partial twin-peg (used from 2014 to 2021), UKAs available for the analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression multivariate analysis were used to find the 5-year implant survival and the risk of revision (hazard ratio), when adjusting for age, gender, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and time period. The risk of revision for any cause and the risk of revision for specific causes were compared, first for the older with the two new designs, and second for the cemented with the uncemented version of the new design. Revision was defined as any operation exchanging or removing implant parts., Results: The 5-year Kaplan-Meier overall implant survival (free from revision for any cause) for the medial Oxford Partial unicompartmental knee did not improve over the study period. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival was different (p = 0.03) between the groups: it was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90% to 94%) for the cemented Oxford III, 94% (95% CI 93% to 95%) for the cemented Oxford Partial, and 94% (95% CI 92% to 95%) for the uncemented Oxford Partial. However, the overall risk of revision during the first 5 years was not different between the groups (Cox regression HR 0.8 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.0]; p = 0.09 and 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.4]; p = 0.89 for the cemented Oxford Partial and the uncemented Oxford Partial, respectively, compared with cemented Oxford III [HR 1]). The uncemented Oxford Partial had a higher risk of revision for infection (HR 3.6 [95% CI 1.2 to 10.5]; p = 0.02) compared with the cemented Oxford III. The uncemented Oxford Partial had a lower risk of revision for pain (HR 0.5 [95% CI 0.2 to 1.0]; p = 0.045) and instability (HR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.03) compared with the cemented Oxford III. The cemented Oxford Partial had a lower risk of revision for aseptic femoral loosening (HR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 1.0]; p = 0.04) compared with the cemented Oxford III. When comparing the uncemented and cemented versions of the new design, the uncemented Oxford Partial had a higher risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture (HR 15 [95% CI 4 to 54]; p = 0.001) and infection within the first year (HR 3.0 [95% CI 1.5 to 5.7]; p = 0.001) than the cemented Oxford Partial., Conclusion: Considering that we found no difference in overall risk of revision during the first 5 years but we found a higher risk of revision for infection, periprosthetic fracture, and higher per implant cost, we currently would recommend against the use of uncemented Oxford Partial over the cemented Oxford Partial or the cemented Oxford III., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Cobalt chromium (CoCr) is the most commonly used material in TKA; however, the use of oxidized zirconium (OxZr) implants has increased. The advantages to this material demonstrated in basic science studies have not been borne out in clinical studies to date., Question/purpose: In the setting of the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), how do revision rates differ between CoCr and OxZr after primary TKA?, Methods: The AJRR was accessed for all primary TKAs performed between 2012 and 2020 for osteoarthritis, resulting in 441,605 procedures (68,506 with OxZr and 373,099 with CoCr). The AJRR is the largest joint replacement registry worldwide and collects procedure-specific details, making it ideal for large-scale comparisons of implant materials in the United States. Competing risk survival analyses were used to evaluate the all-cause revision rates of primary TKAs, comparing CoCr and OxZr implants. Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims from 2012 to 2017 were also cross-referenced to capture additional revisions from other institutions. Revision rates were tabulated and subclassified by indication. Multivariate Cox regression was used to account for confounding variables such as age, gender, region, and hospital size., Results: After controlling for confounding variables, there were no differences between the OxZr and CoCr groups in terms of the rate of all-cause revision at a mean follow-up of 46 ± 23 months and 44 ± 24 months for CoCr and OxZr implants, respectively (hazard ratio 1.055 [95% confidence interval 0.979 to 1.137]; p = 0.16) The univariate analysis demonstrated increased rates of revisions for pain and instability in the OxZr group (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively)., Conclusion: These findings suggest there is no difference in all-cause revision between OxZr and CoCr implants in the short-term to mid-term. However, further long-term in vivo studies are needed to monitor the safety and all-cause revision rate of OxZr implants compared with those of CoCr implants. OxZr implants may be favorable in patients who have sensitivity to metal. Despite similar short-term to mid-term all-cause revision rates to CoCr implants, because of the limitations of this study, definitive recommendations for or against the use of OxZr cannot be made., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: People with lower-limb amputation (LLA) are routinely prescribed a socket prosthesis; however, many socket prosthesis users experience severe complications with the fit of their prosthesis including residual limb wounds and pain. Osseointegration is a procedure that creates a direct connection between the bone and prosthetic limb through a bone-anchored prosthesis, eliminating the need for a socket interface. It is offered as a secondary procedure to people with LLA who experience significant complications with socket prostheses., Objectives: To evaluate change in disability and function 1 year postosseointegration compared with preosseointegration in people with LLA., Study Design: Single group, pretest, and post-test., Methods: Twelve participants (9 transfemoral and 3 transtibial amputations, age: 44 ± 10 years, 7 female participants, 14 ± 12 years since amputation) with unilateral LLA underwent osseointegration with press-fit implants. Disability was measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, and function was measured with both Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale. Questionnaires were administered preosseointegration and 1 year postosseointegration. Paired t tests assessed change in outcomes between time points., Results: Postosseointegration, participants demonstrated reduced disability measured with World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (%Δ = -52.6, p = 0.01), improved mobility measured with Prosthetic Limb Users Mobility Survey (%Δ = 21.8, P < 0.01), and improved balance confidence measured with the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (%Δ = 28.4, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Participants report less disability and greater function in their prosthesis postosseointegration. Osseointegration is a novel procedure for people experiencing complications with their socket prosthesis, and this study is the first to show improvements in disability postosseointegration., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

People with a limb loss at the level of the hip or pelvis have the most difficulty returning to walking compared with those with a lower amputation. This is because their prosthesis must replace the hip, knee, and ankle joints. An adjustable hip-disarticulation/hemipelvectomy prosthesis simulator that allows able-bodied individuals to wear and assess a prosthesis can help researchers and manufacturers when designing new prosthetic components (ie, hip joints). SolidWorks computer-aided design software was used to design and simulate an adapter that can connect prosthetic components to an off-the-shelf hip abduction orthosis. The adapter was made of 1020 stainless steel and aluminium 6061-T3 with a yield strength of 276 MPa. To confirm that this adapter is strong and safe for ambulation, mechanical testing was performed using an INSTRON machine. The maximum loads generated in any activity were chosen according to the International Organization for Standardization 15032:2000 standard for hip disarticulation external prostheses. The designed adapter allowed frontal, lateral, or distal mounting of different prosthetic hip joints. Mechanical testing confirmed that the new adapter can withstand forces and moments experienced during ambulation. The hip disarticulation/hemipelvectomy prosthesis simulator is easy to use and adjustable based on each person's height and pelvic width. Furthermore, this simulator would assist rehabilitation practitioners in experiencing the use of hip-level prostheses and give them a better understanding of people using such technologies. The next step in this project is to evaluate able-bodied participant gait while using this hip simulator prosthesis with different hip joints., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Lower-limb loss is an ongoing cause of disability throughout the world. Despite advancements in prosthetic technologies, there are numerous underserved populations in need of effective low-cost prosthetic foot options., Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of several low-cost prosthetic feet, using a combination of instrumented gait analysis and mechanical stiffness testing., Study Design: Randomized crossover with additional case study., Methods: We compared the solid-ankle-cushioned-heel (SACH), Jaipur, and Niagara feet with carbon fiber feet. Mechanical stiffness was evaluated using a cantilever-style bending test at 2 angles that was designed to mimic late stance gait loading. Eight below-knee amputees participated in the gait analysis, which focused on foot and ankle motion and energetics., Results: Metric analysis showed significant differences among feet in ankle motion and power as well as distal-to-shank power, with SACH showing reduced ankle motion and positive work compared with the other feet. Waveform analysis additionally revealed a compensatory knee flexion moment in SACH and a knee extension moment in Niagara and Jaipur during midstance. In mechanical stiffness testing, SACH had the highest stiffness, with Niagara and carbon fiber roughly similar, and Jaipur the most compliant with the greatest hysteresis., Conclusions: There may be an optimal stiffness range for future prosthesis designs that maximizes propulsive energy. This may be achieved by combining some characteristics of Jaipur and Niagara feet in new designs. Ultimately, optimizing stiffness and energetics for gait biomimicry while maintaining cost, availability, and versatility across cultures will alleviate the effects of limb loss among underserved populations., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Most outcome studies of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) do not discriminate by arthritis etiology. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the complications of TAA between posttraumatic fracture osteoarthritis (fracture PTOA) and primary osteoarthritis (POA)., Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent TAA were retrospectively evaluated with a mean follow-up of 3.2 years (range 2 to 7.6 years). 44 patients (44%) had a diagnosis of POA while 55 patients (56%) had a diagnosis of fracture PTOA (40 malleolar fractures [73%], 14 pilon fractures[26%], and 1 talar fracture [1%]). Patient demographics, preoperative coronal plane alignment, postoperative complications, and revision surgery data were collected. Categorical variables were compared with chi square and Fisher exact tests and means with the Student t -test. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses., Results: A higher overall complication rate was associated with fracture PTOA (53%) compared with POA (30%) ( P = 0.04). No difference was observed in rates of any specific complication by etiology. Survival, defined as revision surgery with TAA prosthesis retention, was comparable between POA (91%) and fracture PTOA (87%) ( P = 0.54). When defined as failure requiring prosthesis explant, POA demonstrated significantly greater survival (100%) as compared with fracture PTOA (89%) ( P = 0.03). A higher rate of talar implant subsidence and loosening was noted in TAA with prior pilon (29%) as compared to malleolar fractures (8%) that was not statistically significant ( P = 0.07). Fracture PTOA was associated with preoperative valgus deformity ( P = 0.04). Compared with varus and normal alignment, preoperative valgus deformity was associated with the need for any revision surgery ( P = 0.01) and prosthesis explant ( P = 0.02)., Conclusions: Compared with POA, fracture PTOA was associated with a markedly higher complication rate after TAA and was at higher risk of failure requiring prosthesis explant. Fracture PTOA was markedly associated with preoperative valgus malalignment, an identified risk factor in this series for revision surgery and prosthesis explant. Pilon fractures may represent a group at risk of complications related to talar implant subsidence and loosening compared with malleolar fractures and thus warrants additional investigation., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: The most frequently occurring adverse events in individuals with a transfemoral amputation treated with a bone-anchored prosthesis are soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications. These soft tissue complications are believed to be influenced by surgical technique and implant design, but little is known about the effect of changes to treatment on these events., Questions/purposes: (1) What is the result of surgical technique and implant modifications on the incidence of soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications in transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis users, depending on whether they had a conventional stoma and a cobalt-chrome-molybdenum (CoCrMo) osseointegration implant (treatment period 2009 to 2013) or a shallower stoma and titanium osseointegration implant (2015 to 2018)? (2) What is the incidence of serious complications, such as bone or implant infection, aseptic loosening, intramedullary stem breakage, and periprosthetic fracture?, Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, we performed osseointegration implant surgery using a conventional surgical technique and a CoCrMo implant in 42 individuals who had a lower extremity amputation experiencing socket-related problems that resulted in limited prosthesis use. We considered all individuals treated with two-stage surgery with a standard press-fit transfemoral osseointegration implant as potentially eligible for inclusion. Based on this, 100% (42) were eligible, and 5% (two of 42) were excluded because they did not provide informed consent, leaving 95% (40 of 42) for analysis. Between 2015 and 2018, we treated 79 individuals with similar indications with osseointegration implant surgery, now also treating individuals with dysvascular amputations. We used an adapted surgical technique resulting in a shallower stoma combined with a titanium implant. Using the same eligibility criteria as for the first group, 51% (40 of 79) were eligible; 49% (39 of 79) were excluded because they were treated with transtibial amputation, a patient-specific implant, or single-stage surgery and 1% (one of 79) were lost before the 2-year follow-up interval, leaving 49% (39 of 79) for analysis. The period of 2013 to 2015 was a transitional period and was excluded from analysis in this study to keep groups reasonably comparable and to compare a historical approach with the present approach. Hence, we presented a comparative study of two study groups (defined by surgical technique and implant design) with standardized 2-year follow-up. The risk factors for adverse events were similar between groups, although individuals treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant potentially possessed an increased risk because of the inclusion of individuals with dysvascular amputation and the discontinuation of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Outcomes studied were soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications (hypergranulation or keloid formation as well as stoma redundant tissue) and bone or implant infection, aseptic loosening, implant stem breakage, periprosthetic fracture, and death., Results: Patients treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant experienced fewer soft tissue infections (13 versus 76 events, absolute risk 0.17 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.30] versus 0.93 [95% CI 0.60 to 1.45]; p < 0.01), which were treated with less invasive measures, and fewer stoma redundant tissue events (0 versus five events, absolute risk 0 versus 0.06 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.14]) than patients treated with the conventional stoma surgical technique and CoCrMo implant. This was contrasted by an increased incidence of surgical site infections occurring between surgical stages 1 and 2, when no stoma was yet created, after the implementation of treatment changes (conventional surgery and CoCrMo implant versus shallow stoma surgery and titanium implant: one versus 11 events, absolute risk 0.01 [95% CI 0.00 to 0.08] versus 0.14 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.25]; p = 0.02). Patients treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant did not experience serious complications, although bone infections occurred (six events in 8% [three of 40] of patients) in the conventional surgery and CoCrMo implant group, all of which were successfully treated with implant retention., Conclusion: Adaptations to surgical technique and newer implant designs, as well as learning curve and experience, have resulted in a reduced incidence and severity of soft tissue infections and stoma redundant tissue, contrasted by an increase in surgical site infections before stoma creation. Serious complications such as deep implant infection were infrequent in this 2-year follow-up period. We believe the benefits of these treatment modifications outweigh the disadvantages and currently advise surgeons to create a shallower stoma with a stable soft tissue envelope, combined with a titanium implant., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)