Search

Background: Informed consent is a process that needs time and effort to satisfy patients' desires. Patient dissatisfaction on preoperative informed consent process may be caused by multiple factors of clinical practice. This study aimed to assess patients' satisfaction and associated factors of informed consent process among elective surgical patients., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 404 postoperative patients who signed the informed consent for elective surgery. A systematic sampling technique was applied to select the study participants. Modified Leiden perioperative patient satisfaction tool was adapted to assess patients' satisfaction with preoperative informed consent process. Data were entered in to Epi-data version 4.20 and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was computed to identify independent variables associated with patient satisfaction towards preoperative informed consent process. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to declare the statistical significance., Results: The overall satisfaction of patients with preoperative informed consent process was 70.3%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that, being male (AOR: 4.75, 95% CI: 2.47-9.16), primary school (AOR: 8.42, 95% CI: 4.74-7.55), secondary school (AOR: 2.17, 95% CI: 5.74-8.62), rural residence (AOR: 1.8, 95% CI: 2.1-3.9) and received general anesthesia (AOR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.62-5.26) were significantly associated with patients' satisfaction with the informed consent process., Conclusion: The overall patients' satisfaction on preoperative informed consent process was relatively low. Being male, low level of education, living in rural area, and receiving general anesthesia were significantly associated with patients' satisfaction on informed consent process. Surgeons and anesthesia professionals need to work more to improving the satisfaction of patients with preoperative informed consent process. Researchers are expected to do periodic assessment of patients' level of satisfaction and factors affecting satisfaction., Competing Interests: The authors declared that there is no conflict of interests., (© 2022 The Authors.) more...

Background: Midline laparotomy is associated with severe postoperative pain. Literature showed controversial results regarding the efficacy of the rectus sheath block., Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that recruits 30 patients in the rectus sheath block (RSB) group and 30 patients in the multimodal analgesia (MMA) group who underwent emergency midline laparotomy. The RSB was performed by an experienced anesthetist using a land-mark technique. Independent t -test and Mann-Whitney-U test were used for numeric data while Chi-Square or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant., Results: The numeric rating scale score at the recovery was significantly reduced in an RSB group with a p-value of 0.039. Postoperative numeric rating scale scores at 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours were statistically significantly lower in the RSB group. Postoperative tramadol consumption in 24 h was significantly lower with a p-value of 0.0001 for the rectus sheath group., Conclusions: For midline laparotomy, adding a bilateral rectus sheath block at the end of the operation might be an effective postoperative analgesia option., Competing Interests: Nothing to declare., (© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.) more...

Introduction: PDPH is a headache that develops after dural puncture which worsens in an upright position, and improves with lying down. It could affect maternal satisfaction and health care quality. The prevalence and factors of PDPH vary based on different literature and there is no previous meta-analysis done., Methods: This study was done by searching studies from databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Google scholar, and google. Data were extracted by three reviewers independently by using Microsoft Excel and then exported to STATA™ 16 version statistical software for analysis. Heterogeneity assessed using the I 2 statistic. With a random model meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of post-dural puncture headache and its associated factors (POR) with a 95% confidence interval was estimated., Result: Eight studies with a total of 175, 652 study participants were included to estimate the pooled prevalence of PDPH following cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The pooled prevalence of PDPH in this meta-analysis was found to be 23.47% with 95% CI (10.53, 36.42). Having normal BMI, multiple attempts of spinal injection and spinal injection with a needle size of less than or equal to 22 gauge were positively associated with the PDPH with AOR and 95% CI of 1.22 (1.09, 1.35), 3.50 (1.55, 5.44) and 7.36 (4.93, 9.80) respectively., Conclusion: The pooled prevalence of PDPH among parturients who gave birth with the cesarean section under spinal anesthesia is estimated to be 23.47%. Having normal BMI, multiple attempts of spinal injection, and spinal injection with a needle size of less than or equal to 22 gauge were positively associated with the PDPH., Competing Interests: There is no conflict of interest among the participants of the review article., (© 2021 The Author(s).) more...

Background: Cesarean delivery (CD) is a commonly performed obstetric surgical procedure and causes moderate to severe postoperative pain. Wound site infiltration (WSI) is becoming a technique to provide postoperative analgesia in a limited-resource setting in regardless of controversy on its effectiveness. The current study is to assess its effectiveness as a part of postoperative analgesia for parturients undergoing elective Cesarean section., Methods: A Hospital-based prospective cohort study was employed on 58 parturients that underwent elective Cesarean section. Study participants were allocated into the Wound site infiltration and Control group based on planned postoperative pain management. A student t-test was used for normally distributed data while non-normally distributed data were analyzed by Mann Whitney U test. Pearson Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test were used to analyzing categorical data as appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 considered as statistically significant., Results: The median time to request the first analgesia was significantly prolonged within Wound site infiltration 314.31 ± 47.71 in minutes compared to control group 216.9 ± 43.18 with a P-value of <0.001. The postoperative verbal NRS score was significantly reduced in Wound site infiltration compared to the control group at 4th and 6th hours with p values of <0.001 and 0.04 respectively., Conclusion: Wound site infiltration performed following elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia significantly prolonged time to request the first analgesia, decreases verbal NRS score, and total analgesic consumption within 24 h in postoperative period compared to control group., Competing Interests: Nothing to declare., (© 2021 The Authors.) more...

Background: Post-dural puncture headache is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for women who undergo cesarean delivery. Intravenous (IV) dexamethasone has been used to reduce the incidence and severity of PDPH with controversial results. This Systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of IV dexamethasone on PDPH., Methods: This study is reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of PDPH. The secondary outcome variables were the postoperative total analgesic requirement and incidence of nausea and/or vomiting. Twelve randomized controlled trials with a total of 1548 women were included., Results: Intravenous (IV) dexamethasone had no effect on the incidence of PDPH (OR = 0.64; CI, 0.39 to 1.05; I 2  = 71%, P = 0.08). Intravenous dexamethasone did not show a significant difference in the incidence of PDPH at 24 h at 48 h, and within one week postoperatively with p-values of less than 0.05. In a random-effect model, a pooled analysis showed that IV dexamethasone had no effect on the severity of PDPH in VAS (MD = 0.78; CI, -2.27 to 0.71; I 2  = 98%, P = 0.30)., Conclusion: Intravenous dexamethasone failed to decrease the incidence and severity of PDPH in women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.) more...

Background: Caudal block is a common regional technique performed for infra umbilical surgery in pediatrics. Its limited duration of analgesia remains a gap in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the analgesic effectiveness of caudal block with rectal diclofenac or rectal paracetamol among pediatric patients who underwent infra umbilical surgery., Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged 1-10 years that underwent elective infra umbilical surgery. Patients were allocated into the Caudal block with rectal Diclofenac, Caudal block with rectal Paracetamol, and Caudal block alone groups based on a postoperative pain management plan. Analysis of variance was used for normally distributed data and the Kruskal Wallis H test was used for non-normally distributed. The Tukey for post hoc test was used to compare the difference between groups one with the others. Categorical data were analyzed by using Pearson Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 considered as statistically significant., Results: The postoperative median pain score was lower in CD compared to CP and CA group (p-value < 0.001) at the 4th and 8th hour. Time to first analgesic request was significantly longer within CD 735 (540-1200 min) compared to CP 445 (240-840 min p = 0.029) and CA 315 (240-720 min p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The pain score and total postoperative analgesic consumption were significantly reduced in addition to prolonged-time to request the first analgesia in the CD group compared to CA and CP group., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.) more...