Search

Introduction: We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab compared with those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNF) and the general population., Methods: In this Swedish cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from nationwide health registers. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospital admission., Results: During 1,376 treatment episodes in Crohn's disease, the rate of serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) was 5.18 (95% CI = 3.98-6.63) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95% CI = 2.50-4.85) with anti-TNF; HR = 1.72 (95% CI = 1.12-2.65), partly explained by more gastrointestinal infections. Compared with the rate of 0.75/100 PY (95% CI = 0.59-0.92) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab demonstrated higher risk (HR = 7.00; 95% CI = 5.04-9.72). During 1,294 treatment episodes in ulcerative colitis, the corresponding rates were 3.74/100 PY (95% CI = 2.66-5.11) with vedolizumab vs 3.42/100 PY (95% CI = 2.31-4.89) with anti-TNF; HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.36) during the initial 1.1 years and HR = 2.03 (95% CI = 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (truncated due to nonproportional hazards). Pneumonia accounted for 40% of all infections among anti-TNF, whereas no case was observed among vedolizumab episodes. Compared with the rate of 0.69/100 PYs (95% CI = 0.53-0.87) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab showed an HR of 5.45 (95% CI = 3.67-8.11)., Discussion: Vedolizumab was associated with increased risks of serious infections compared with anti-TNF in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, the panorama of serious infections seemed to differ between the drugs. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical awareness of infections and the safety profile of the 2 therapies., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Pregnancy outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with quiescent disease are similar to those in the general population. Data from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry have demonstrated the safety of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents and thiopurines in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to provide information from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry on maternal and fetal outcomes in patients exposed to the newer biologics ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ)., Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational study, we included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Questionnaires were administered to women at study intake, each subsequent trimester, delivery, and 4, 9, and 12 months after birth. Bivariate analyses were used to determine the independent effects of specific drug classes on outcomes. The exposure cohorts were VDZ, UST, anti-TNF, immunomodulators, and combination with anti-TNF and immunomodulators. All were compared with no exposure and with biologics/immunomodulators., Results: There were 1,669 completed pregnancies with 1,610 live births. The maternal mean age was 32.1 (SD 4.6) years at delivery with 66 VDZ exposed and 47 UST exposed. Women on UST were more likely to have Crohn's disease. There was no increased risk of spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit stay, congenital malformations, or intrauterine growth restriction with in utero VDZ or UST exposure. The rate of preterm birth was lower (0.0%) for the UST-exposed cohort when compared with other cohorts including VDZ (13.8%), anti-TNF (8.2%), combination therapy (14.2%), immunomodulators (12.3%), and unexposed (9.7%) ( P = 0.03). Rates of serious infections at birth, 4 months, and within the first 12 months of life were comparable among all cohorts. Nonserious infections were lower at 12 months in UST-exposed pregnancies. There was no increased risk signal for placental complications in the VDZ cohort. UST infant concentrations at birth were increased whereas VDZ concentrations were overall decreased compared with maternal serum drug concentration., Discussion: This analysis of UST and VDZ exposure during pregnancy suggests no increase in complications compared with TNF, immunomodulators, and combination TNF/immunomodulators. No signal was found for increased placental events with either therapy. Continuation of UST and VDZ throughout pregnancy is recommended., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: We hypothesized that variants within clinically relevant pharmacogenes could be identified using a whole exome sequencing data set derived from a cohort of more than 1,000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Methods: Pediatric patients diagnosed with IBD underwent whole exome sequencing. We selected 18 genes with supporting literature where specific exonic variants would influence clinical care., Results: We identified actionable pharmacogenomic variants in 63% of patients. Importantly, 5% of patients with IBD were at risk for serious adverse effects from anesthesia and 3% were at increased risk for thrombosis., Discussion: We identified exonic variants in most of our patients with IBD that directly impact clinical care.

Introduction: Previous, small studies have suggested that ondansetron has beneficial effects in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daily 12 mg RHB-102, an investigational bimodal release ondansetron tablet, in IBS-D., Methods: Men and women with IBS-D by the Rome III criteria, Bristol Stool Scale ≥6 on 2 or more days weekly, and average daily worst pain intensity ≥3/10 were randomized 60:40 to RHB-102 or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was overall stool consistency response for at least 4 of 8 weeks. Secondary end points included overall worst abdominal pain and overall composite response, defined as response on both abdominal pain and stool consistency end points., Results: Overall stool consistency response rates were 56.0% and 35.3% (RHB-102 vs placebo, P = 0.036) and similar among male and female patients. Overall pain response (50.7% vs 39.2%) and composite response rates (40.0% vs 25.5%) favored RHB-102, although these differences were not statistically significant. Stool consistency response rates were enhanced in patients with baseline C-reactive protein above the median (2.09 mg/L), 59.5%, vs 23.1% (P = 0.009). Overall rates of adverse events were similar, with a higher rate of constipation in RHB-102 patients (13.3% vs 3.9%) that resolved rapidly on withholding treatment., Discussion: RHB-102 was effective and safe in the treatment of men and women with IBS-D. Baseline C-reactive protein seemed to be predictive of response.

Introduction: There are no real-life studies comparing the efficacy and safety of the different antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drugs available in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). To verify the effectiveness and tolerability of different anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab [IFX] originator, biosimilar CTP13, and adalimumab [ADA]) in patients with moderate-to-severe CD and UC., Methods: Retrospectively, patients with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease who completed induction with either ADA, IFX originator, or biosimilar from 2015 to 2017 were included. Patients were evaluated after induction at 30 and 52 weeks. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis to evaluate clinical response and remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and endoscopy response according to different time points. At every time point, the need for dose escalation and occurrence of adverse events have been reported., Results: Eighty-nine patients with UC (31 ADA, 30 IFX originator, and 28 IFX biosimilar) and 90 patients with CD (30 for each drug groups) were enrolled. After induction at week 30 and 52, clinical response was obtained by the following: 84.3%, 86.5%, and 82% of UC and 93.3%, 88.9%, and 80% of CD. Clinical steroid-free remission rates were significantly higher in the CD group compared with the UC group at every time point (P < 0.05). At week 52, 31.1% of ADA, 16.7% of IFX originator, and 36.2% of biosimilar patients needed treatment optimization. At week 52, 13 patients had suspended therapy because of severe adverse events, including 3 cases of malignant disease., Discussion: Anti-TNF-α treatment was more effective in patients with CD compared to patients with UC, independently of the drug used.

Half of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are men, yet less attention has been focused on their sexual issues despite higher rates of sexual dysfunction and infertility than the general population. Depression and IBD disease activity are the most consistently reported risk factor for sexual dysfunction among men with IBD. Methotrexate and sulfasalazine have been rarely associated with impotence. Sulfasalazine reversibly reduces male fertility. No other medications used in IBD significantly affect fertility in humans. There is no increase in adverse fetal outcomes among offspring of fathers with IBD. Patients with IBD seem to be at a higher risk for prostate cancer; therefore, screening as recommended for high-risk patients should be considered.

Objectives: Despite encouraging data gathered in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients, Vedolizumabs' (VDZ) safety profile in pregnancy is not established., Design: Data of 330 consecutive pregnancies with IBD was prospectively collected., Results: Women with IBD were treated with: VDZ (n = 24), anti-tumor necrosis factors (n = 82) or conventional therapy (n = 224). Gravidity and parity were similar among the 3 groups. The VDZ group was comprised mostly of Crohn's disease patients who were all not naïve to biological treatment. They had significantly higher conception rates during active disease (P < 0.05), with fewer flares during pregnancy., Discussion: Although further study is needed, VDZ appears of low risk during pregnancy.

Objectives: We described pregnancy outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) patients enrolled in the TREAT Registry who received infliximab before, or during pregnancy and those not treated with infliximab or any biologic agent., Methods: In the TREAT Registry (1999-2012), pregnancy outcomes were analyzed from maternal and paternal patients exposed to infliximab ≤365 days (gestational exposure), >365 days (pre-gestational exposure) of pregnancy outcome or without infliximab exposure (non-biologic exposed). "Healthy infants" were defined as those with no congenital abnormalities, neonatal complications (e.g., jaundice, prematurity, heart murmur, cortical vision/fine motor delay, cardiac failure, hemophilia, or torticollis), prolonged hospitalization, or those who received no special treatment. Disease activity and concomitant medications were also evaluated., Results: Overall, 92.3% (324/351) of pregnancies had known outcomes. The majority of both maternal pregnancies (92.6, 91.2, and 87.8%) and partner outcomes (92.7, 93.8, and 91.7%) resulted in live births of healthy infants across gestational, pre-gestational, and non-biologic exposure groups, respectively. Among these, rates of neonatal complications were low for both maternal (6.2, 7.0, and 8.5%), and partner outcomes (4.9, 0, and 0%) in gestational, pre-gestational, and non-biologic exposure groups, respectively. Among maternal pregnancies, numerically higher rates of spontaneous abortions were observed for the gestational exposure group than for the pre-gestational or non-biologic exposed groups., Conclusions: The clinical condition of infants born to women with gestational infliximab exposure was similar to those without exposure. Although a lower live birth rate was reported among infliximab-exposed women, these patients had more severe CD and were more likely to have been exposed to immunosuppressives.

Objectives: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) need long-term treatment, which can influence pregnancies in young women. Uncontrolled IBD is associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Despite the labeling of Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies (anti-TNFα) which indicates that their use is not recommended during pregnancy, anti-TNFα are increasingly being used during pregnancy and may expose women and their fetuses to treatment-related complications. Existing recommendations on the timing of treatment during pregnancy are inconsistent. We aimed to assess the safety of anti-TNFα treatment in pregnant women with IBD, and up to the first year of life for their children., Methods: An exposed/non exposed retrospective cohort was conducted on the French national health system database SNIIRAM (Système National d'Information Inter-Régimes de l'Assurance Maladie). All IBD women who became pregnant between 2011 and 2014 were included. Women with concomitant diseases potentially treated with anti-TNFα were excluded. Anti-TNFα exposure (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab or certolizumab pegol) during pregnancy was retrieved from the exhaustive prescription database in SNIIRAM. The main judgment criterion was a composite outcome of disease-, treatment- and pregnancy-related complications during pregnancy for the mother, and infections during the first year of life for children., Results: We analyzed data from 11,275 pregnancies (8726 women with IBD), among which 1457 (12.9%) pregnancies were exposed to anti-TNFα, mainly infliximab or adalimumab, with 1313/7722 (17.0%) suffering from Crohn's disease and 144/3553 (4.1%) from ulcerative colitis. After adjusting for disease severity, steroid use, age, IBD type, and duration and concomitant 6-mercaptopurine use, anti-TNFα treatment was associated with a higher risk of overall maternal complications (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.67) and infections (aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.16-1.47). Maintaining anti-TNFα after 24 weeks did not increase the risk of maternal complication, but interrupting the anti-TNFα increased relapse risk. No increased risk for infection was found in children (aOR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.76-1.05) born to mother exposed to anti-TNFα during pregnancy., Conclusions: Anti-TNFα treatment during pregnancy increased the risk of maternal complications compared to unexposed; however, discontinuation before week 24 increased the risk of disease flare. There was no increased risk for children exposed to anti-TNFα up to 1 year of life.

Background: Prokinetics have been shown to improve intestinal bacterial overgrowth and dysmotility in cirrhotic patients. Antibiotics are suggested for high risk patients for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). However, limited studies have investigated the association of SBP and these medications. We examined the association of prokinetics or antibiotics use and the first episode of SBP development in patients with cirrhosis., Methods: We conducted a case-crossover study using the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database from 2001 to 2010. A total of 129 cirrhotic patients with SBP were identified (defined as International Classification of Disease-Ninth Revision-CM codes: 571.xx for cirrhosis; 567.2, 567.8, and 567.9 for ascites; 789.5 for SBP). We investigated the short term (defined as 14-day period) effect of prokinetic agents or antibiotics use on SBP development using conditional logistic regressions with the adjustment of potential confounders., Results: The results suggested that prokinetic agents or antibiotics use during the 14 days before SBP were associated with an increased risk of SBP [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-10.04 for prokinetic agents; and adjusted OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.05-5.23 for antibiotics]. In dose analysis, the use of prokinetic agents more than 0.5 defined daily dose was more commonly found in the case period without a statistical difference (adjusted OR = 3.637; 95% CI: 0.69-19.13)., Conclusion: The results demonstrated an increased risk of primary SBP development among cirrhotic patients with prokinetic agents or antibiotics use. It is important to closely monitor those patients for the occurrence of SBP., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)

Objectives: Two identical, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of plecanatide in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C)., Methods: Adults meeting Rome III criteria for IBS-C were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo or plecanatide (3 or 6 mg) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of overall responders (patients reporting ≥30% reduction from baseline in worst abdominal pain plus an increase of ≥1 complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM)/week from baseline in the same week for ≥6 of 12 treatment weeks). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs)., Results: Overall, 2189 individuals were randomized across the two studies and 1879 completed the studies. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups and between studies. The percentage of overall responders in Study 1 was 30.2% and 29.5% for plecanatide 3 and 6 mg, respectively, vs. 17.8% placebo (P < 0.001 for each dose vs. placebo), and in Study 2 was 21.5% (P = 0.009) and 24.0% (P < 0.001) for plecanatide 3 and 6 mg, respectively, compared to 14.2% for placebo. The percentage of sustained efficacy responders (overall responders plus weekly responders for ≥2 of last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment period) was significantly greater for both doses of plecanatide vs. placebo across both studies. All secondary end points (stool frequency/consistency, straining, abdominal symptoms) showed statistically significant improvements compared with placebo. The most common AE was diarrhea (3 mg, 4.3%; 6 mg, 4.0%; placebo, 1.0%). Discontinuation due to diarrhea was infrequent (3 mg, 1.2%; 6 mg, 1.4%; placebo, 0)., Conclusions: Plecanatide significantly improved both abdominal pain and constipation symptoms of IBS-C with minimal associated side effects and high levels of tolerability.

Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is often managed with over-the-counter therapies such as loperamide, though with limited success. This analysis evaluated the efficacy of eluxadoline in patients previously treated with loperamide in two phase 3 studies., Methods: Adults with IBS-D (Rome III criteria) were enrolled and randomized to placebo or eluxadoline (75 or 100 mg) twice daily for 26 (IBS-3002) or 52 (IBS-3001) weeks. Patients reported loperamide use over the previous year and recorded their rescue loperamide use during the studies. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with a composite response of simultaneous improvement in abdominal pain and reduction in diarrhea., Results: A total of 2,428 patients were enrolled; 36.0% reported prior loperamide use, of whom 61.8% reported prior inadequate IBS-D symptom control with loperamide. Among patients with prior loperamide use, a greater proportion treated with eluxadoline (75 and 100 mg) were composite responders vs. those treated with placebo with inadequate prior symptom control, over weeks 1-12 (26.3% (P=0.001) and 27.0% (P<0.001) vs. 12.7%, respectively); similar results were observed over weeks 1-26. When daily rescue loperamide use was imputed as a nonresponse day, the composite responder rate was still higher in patients receiving eluxadoline (75 and 100 mg) vs. placebo over weeks 1-12 (P<0.001) and weeks 1-26 (P<0.001). Adverse events included nausea and abdominal pain., Conclusions: Eluxadoline effectively and safely treats IBS-D symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea in patients who self-report either adequate or inadequate control of their symptoms with prior loperamide treatment, with comparable efficacy and safety irrespective of the use of loperamide as a rescue medication during eluxadoline treatment.

Objectives: Tenapanor is a first-in-class, small-molecule inhibitor of the gastrointestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger NHE3. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C)., Methods: In this phase 2, double-blind study, patients with IBS-C (Rome III criteria) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive tenapanor 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg b.i.d., or placebo b.i.d. for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) responder rate, defined as the proportion of patients reporting an increase from baseline of ≥1 CSBM/week for ≥6/12 treatment weeks. Secondary end points included abdominal symptom responder rates (≥30% score improvement from baseline for ≥6/12 weeks) and a composite responder rate (CSBM and abdominal pain response in the same week for ≥6/12 weeks)., Results: Overall, 356 patients were randomized (mean age: 45.7 years; 86.8% women) and 304 completed the study. The CSBM responder rate was significantly higher in the tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. group than in the placebo group (60.7 vs. 33.7%; P<0.001), as was the composite responder rate (50.0 vs. 23.6%; P<0.001). Responder rates for abdominal symptoms (pain, discomfort, bloating, cramping, and fullness) were significantly higher in the tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. group than in the placebo group (all P<0.05). Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event (tenapanor b.i.d.: 20 mg, 12.4%; 50 mg, 11.2%)., Conclusions: Tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. significantly increased stool frequency and reduced abdominal symptoms in patients with IBS-C. Further research into tenapanor as a potential treatment for these patients is justified.

Objectives: Eluxadoline is a mixed μ-opioid receptor (OR) and κ-OR agonist and δ-OR antagonist, approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). This analysis evaluated the safety and tolerability of eluxadoline 75 and 100 mg twice daily (BID) in one Phase 2 (IBS-2001) and two Phase 3 (IBS-3001 and IBS-3002) studies., Methods: Adults with IBS-D (Rome III criteria) were randomized to placebo or eluxadoline (75 or 100 mg) BID for 12 (IBS-2001), 26 (IBS-3002), or 52 (IBS-3001) weeks. Safety data were pooled. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed, with special focus on opioid-related AEs, including suspected sphincter of Oddi spasm (SOS) events., Results: 2,776 patients were included in the enrolled set; the safety set comprised 2,814 patients, based on actual treatments received. The most frequent AEs in the placebo and eluxadoline 75 and 100 mg groups were constipation (2.5, 7.4, and 8.1%, respectively) and nausea (5.0, 8.1, and 7.1%, respectively); discontinuation due to constipation was uncommon (0.3, 1.1, and 1.5%, respectively). Ten SOS events (10/1,839; 0.5%) occurred in eluxadoline-treated patients, manifesting as acute abdominal pain with elevated aminotransferases or lipase, or pancreatitis; all occurred in patients without a gallbladder. Eight of these events occurred with the higher dose of eluxadoline, within 1 week of initiation of therapy, and all resolved with eluxadoline discontinuation. There were five events independently adjudicated as pancreatitis not associated with SOS, three of which were associated with heavy alcohol use., Conclusions: Eluxadoline was well tolerated in Phase 2 and 3 trials, with constipation and nausea the most common AEs. Consistent with the known adverse effects of opioid agonists, clinically apparent SOS events were observed in eluxadoline-treated patients. All occurred in patients without a gallbladder and the majority were observed in patients on the higher dose of eluxadoline, suggesting a possible association.

Objectives: Biomarkers, endoscopy and imaging tests can identify patients at increased risk for early recurrence of symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, patients may be unwilling to accept additional medical therapy risks related to therapy escalation to avoid a future disease relapse. We sought to quantify IBD patients' willingness to accept medication risk to avoid future disease relapse., Methods: We conducted a discrete-choice experiment among 202 patients with IBD who were offered choices of therapies with varying risks of lymphoma and infection, and varying time to next IBD relapse. Random parameters logit was used to estimate patients' willingness to accept tradeoffs among treatment features in selecting medication therapy to avoid future disease relapse., Results: To avoid a disease relapse over the next 5 years, IBD patients were willing to accept an average of a 28% chance of a serious infection; and an average of 1.8% chance of developing lymphoma. These results did not significantly change when patients were offered 10 years until their next disease relapse, but were lower (11 and 0.7%, respectively) when offered 1.5 years until the next disease relapse. Patients with active disease symptoms were significantly less willing to accept medication risk for time in remission., Conclusions: IBD patients are willing to accept high levels of lymphoma and serious infection risk to maintain disease remission. These preferences are congruent with the treatment paradigms emphasizing mucosal healing and early aggressive therapy and highlight patients' strong preferences for therapies resulting in durable remission of at least 5 years.

Pharmacoepidemiologic analyses, in which observational data is interrogated to evaluate relationships between patterns of drug use and both beneficial and adverse outcomes, are being increasingly used in the study of inflammatory bowel disease. However, the results of many of these analyses may be corrupted by the presence of immortal person-time bias, an analytic error which can result in an overestimation of the benefits of medical therapy. In this report, we will describe immortal person-time bias, explain the mechanism through which it confers a false benefit, and guide the reader in how to identify this source of bias in the medical literature.

Background and Objectives: Kidney disease as a complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), has been the subject of case reports. However, no cases series examining IBD and kidney disease has been published to date. This study aimed to evaluate a large series of kidney biopsy specimens from patients with IBD to better define the spectrum and relative frequencies of IBD-associated kidney pathology., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: A retrospective review of native kidney biopsy specimens obtained from March 2001 to June 2012 identified 83 patients with IBD. Standard processing of all biopsy specimens included light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy., Results: There were 45 cases of CD and 38 cases of UC represented. The most common indication for kidney biopsy was acute or chronic kidney failure (63% [52 of 83]) and nephrotic-range proteinuria (16% [13 of 83]). IgA nephropathy was the most common diagnosis (24% [20 of 83]), followed by interstitial nephritis (19% [16 of 83]), arterionephrosclerosis (12% [10 of 83]), acute tubular injury (8% [7 of 83]), proliferative GN (7% [6 of 83]), and minimal-change disease (5% [4 of 83]). When compared, the frequency of IgA nephropathy in IBD was significantly higher than in all other native renal biopsy specimens from the same time period (24% [20 of 83] versus 8% [2734 of 33,630]; P<0.001). Of the 16 cases of interstitial nephritis, 9 (56%) had current or recent past exposure to aminosalicylates, including all cases of granulomatous interstitial nephritis., Conclusions: IBD is associated with a spectrum of kidney diseases most commonly affecting the glomerular and tubulointerstitial compartments. IgA nephropathy is the most frequent kidney biopsy diagnosis in IBD and has a significantly higher diagnostic prevalence compared with all non-IBD kidney biopsy specimens. This may reflect a common pathogenic mechanism. Although many cases of tubulointerstitial nephritis are related to aminosalicylate exposure, the possibility of a direct relationship with IBD cannot be ruled out.

Objectives: We assessed potential associations between malignancy and antitumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), as this relationship is currently poorly defined., Methods: Utilizing data from the Crohn's Therapy, Resource, Evaluation, and Assessment Tool (TREAT™) Registry, a prospective cohort study examining long-term outcomes of CD treatments in community and academic settings, influences of baseline patient/disease characteristics and medications were assessed by survival analysis and multivariate models. Standardized incidence ratios and exact 95 % confidence intervals were determined as the ratio of events observed (TREAT) vs. expected (general population of USA)., Results: As of 23 February 2010, 6,273 CD patients (infliximab during registry=3,420 (during or within 1 year before registry=3,764); other-treatments-only: 2,509), were enrolled and, on average, had been followed for 5.2/7.6 years, respectively, for all/currently active patients. Crude cancer incidences were similar between infliximab- and other-treatments-only-exposed patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that baseline age (hazard ratio (HR)=1.59/10 years; P<0.001), disease duration (HR=1.64/10 years; P=0.012), and smoking (HR=1.38; P=0.045) but neither immunosuppressive therapy alone (HR=1.43; P=0.11), infliximab therapy alone (HR=0.59; P=0.16), nor their combination (HR=1.22, P=0.34) were independently associated with the risk of malignancy. When compared with the general population, no significant increase in incidence was observed in any malignancy category. In an exposure-based analysis, use of immunosuppressants alone (odds ratio=4.19) or in combination with infliximab (3.33) seemed to be associated with a numerically, but not significantly, greater risk of malignancy than did treatment with infliximab alone (1.96) relative to treatment with neither., Conclusions: In the TREAT Registry, age, disease duration, and smoking were independently associated with increased risk of malignancy. Although results for immunosuppressant use were equivocal, no significant association between malignancy and infliximab was observed.

Objectives: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk for infections. We aimed to determine the pneumonia risk in IBD and how specific medications affect this risk., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort and a nested case-control study using administrative data from IMS Health Inc., LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database. Limitations to this data set include lack of clinical details to validate exposures and outcomes. In the cohort, IBD patients were matched to four individuals without IBD. Pneumonia risk was evaluated by incidence rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratio (HR)). In the nested case-control, 4,856 IBD patients with pneumonia were matched to four IBD patients without pneumonia by incidence density sampling. We used conditional logistic regression to determine the associations between medications and pneumonia., Results: The cohort included 50,932 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 56,403 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 1,269 with unspecified IBD; matched to 434,416 individuals without IBD. Median follow-up within the cohort was 24 months. The IBD cohort had an increased pneumonia risk when compared with non-IBD (IRR 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75-1.88). In adjusted Cox analysis, pneumonia risk remained increased for the IBD vs. non-IBD cohort (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.49-1.60), with increased risk in both CD (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.62-1.80) and UC (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.48). In the nested case-control analysis, use of biologic medications (odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-1.57), corticosteroids (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.72-2.12), thiopurines (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27), proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26), or narcotics (2.28, 95% CI 2.09-2.48) was independently associated with pneumonia., Conclusions: Patients with IBD are at increased risk for pneumonia. Medications such as corticosteroids and narcotics are particularly associated with pneumonia in this population. An emphasis upon primary prevention of pneumonia through vaccination and reduction of risk factors is warranted.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to contribute long-term safety data for infliximab and other therapies in Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: We prospectively evaluated CD patients enrolled in the large, observational Crohn's Therapy, Resource, Evaluation, and Assessment Tool registry, established to compare infliximab safety with conventional nonbiological medications in CD., Results: A total of 6,273 patients were enrolled and evaluated on or before 23 February 2010; 3,420 received infliximab (17,712 patient-years; 89.9% received ≥ 2 infusions) and 2,853 received other-treatments-only (13,251 patient-years). Mean length of patient follow-up was 5.2 years. More infliximab- than other-treatments-only-treated patients had moderate-to-severe (30.6% vs. 10.7%) or severe-to-fulminant (2.5% vs. 0.6%) disease severity (P < 0.001). In the year before enrollment, more infliximab- than other-treatments-only-treated patients required surgical intervention (17.4% vs. 13.6%), medical hospitalization (14.2% vs. 8.8%), prednisone (47.8% vs. 31.4%), immunomodulators (52.0% vs. 32.1%), and narcotic analgesics (17.3% vs. 9.1%). Patient mortality was similar for infliximab- and other-treatments-only-treated patients (0.58 vs. 0.59/100 patient-years). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, treatment with prednisone (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55, 2.95; P < 0.001) or narcotic analgesics (HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.29, 2.48; P < 0.001) and age (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.07, 1.09; P < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality risk. Neither infliximab nor immunomodulator treatment was associated with increased mortality risk. Factors independently associated with serious infections included moderate-to-severe disease activity (HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.57, 3.19; P < 0.001), narcotic analgesic treatment (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.44, 2.73; P < 0.001), prednisone therapy (HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.17, 2.10; P = 0.002), and infliximab treatment (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.84; P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Mortality was similar between infliximab- and other-treatments-only-treated CD patients. An increased risk of serious infection with infliximab was observed, although CD severity and use of prednisone or narcotic analgesics carried higher risks.

Objectives: A3309 is a minimally absorbed ileal bile acid (BA) transporter (IBAT) inhibitor. We conducted an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, phase IIb study, which evaluated A3309 in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC)., Methods: Patients with CIC (modified Rome III criteria and <3 complete (CSBM) spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week during the 2-week baseline) were randomized to 5, 10, or 15 mg A3309 or placebo once daily. The primary end point was change in SBM number during week 1 compared with baseline. Other bowel and abdominal symptoms were assessed as secondary end points. Serum 7αC4 and lipids were evaluated as biomarkers of BA synthesis/loss., Results: In all, 190 patients (mean 48 years, 90% female) were randomized. Mean increase (95% confidence interval) in SBM for week 1 were 1.7 (0.7-2.8) for placebo vs. 2.5 (1.5-3.5), 4.0 (2.9-5.0), and 5.4 (4.4-6.4) for 5 mg, 10 mg (P<0.002), and 15 mg (P<0.001) A3309, respectively. Increased stool frequency was maintained over 8 weeks. Time to first SBM and CSBM were significantly reduced in the 10- and 15-mg A3309 groups compared with placebo. Straining and bloating decreased with A3309 compared with placebo (P<0.05). Increased 7αC4 and reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with A3309 suggested increased BA synthesis and BA loss. The most common adverse events (AEs) were abdominal pain and diarrhea, which occurred most commonly in the 15-mg A3309 group. No drug-related serious AEs were observed., Conclusions: A3309 increased stool frequency and improved constipation-related symptoms in CIC; effects were maintained over 8 weeks of treatment.

Objectives: Chronic constipation is a common gastrointestinal disorder with limited treatment options. Oral administration of linaclotide, a novel peptide agonist of guanylate cyclase-C receptors, has been shown in animal studies to stimulate intestinal fluid secretion and transit. In Phase 1 studies in healthy human volunteers, linaclotide was well-tolerated, increased bowel movement frequency, and loosened stool consistency., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of oral linaclotide in 42 patients with chronic constipation. Patients were randomized to linaclotide (100, 300, or 1,000 microg) or placebo once daily for 2 weeks. Bowel habits (stool frequency, consistency, straining, completeness of evacuation) and degree of abdominal discomfort were monitored daily using an interactive voice response system. Patient-reported outcomes of severity of constipation and overall relief were evaluated weekly., Results: Linaclotide treatment produced dose-dependent increases from the pretreatment baseline values in weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement frequency (range: 2.2-3.2), stool consistency scores (range: 1.1-2.6, 7-point scale), and straining scores (range: 0.4-1.5, 7-point scale); corresponding placebo increases were 1.3, 0.4, 0.4, respectively. Clinical improvements were also demonstrated in abdominal discomfort, severity of constipation, and overall relief. Compared to placebo, linaclotide 100 microg/day significantly increased spontaneous bowel movement frequency, and linaclotide 1,000 microg/day significantly improved stool consistency (P<0.05). Adverse events were primarily gastrointestinal, with diarrhea being the most common., Conclusions: In this pilot study, linaclotide treatment improved bowel habits and symptoms of patients with chronic constipation. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Objectives: Though the greatest proportion of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients report a mixed bowel pattern (IBS-Mixed), no available therapies have been rigorously evaluated in this subgroup. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 5-HT(4) agonist tegaserod in women with IBS-Mixed and IBS with constipation (IBS-C)., Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in 100 centers in North America, South America, and Europe. Women with IBS-Mixed or IBS-C received tegaserod 6 mg or placebo twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the patient's assessment of satisfactory relief over the 4-wk treatment period. The proportion of patients reporting satisfactory relief for >/=3 of 4 treatment weeks (75% rule) and individual IBS symptoms were assessed., Results: In total, 661 women were randomized (IBS-Mixed 324, IBS-C 337). Baseline symptom assessments identified clear differences between the two cohorts. Tegaserod provided significant improvement in satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms over 4 wk (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.35-2.25, P < 0.001) in both IBS-Mixed and IBS-C patients. Using the 75% rule, 52.3% of tegaserod-receiving IBS-M patients and 43.3% of IBS-C patients were responders (vs 36.3, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.16-3.04, P < 0.010; and 28.9, OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.19-3.05, P < 0.008 for placebo, respectively). The most frequent adverse events leading to study discontinuation in tegaserod-treated patients were diarrhea (1.5%) and abdominal pain (0.9%). Overall 7% of IBS-C patients reported diarrhea compared to 12% of IBS-Mixed (placebo 2.4%, 1.8%, respectively)., Conclusions: Tegaserod is effective in treating overall IBS symptoms in patients with IBS-Mixed and IBS-C.

Several high-profile drug withdrawals for safety issues have brought into focus the FDA's process for approving drugs and monitoring adverse experiences with those agents after marketing has begun. Gastroenterologists and their patients have been affected adversely by removal from the marketplace of two licensed agents for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): alosetron and tegaserod. The criteria used by the FDA for assessment of the risks and benefits of drugs used for functional bowel problems seem to be different than those used for the treatment of other conditions and have resulted in drastic limitation of access to these drugs rather than just warnings about risks as they are discovered. Decisions that affect the availability of drugs for patients with functional bowel disease should be discussed with clinicians who take care of those patients before going into effect. The absence of this sort of consultation leaves physicians with serious limitations on their abilities to take care of patients.

Objective: Alosetron is indicated for women with chronic, severe diarrhea-predominant IBS (d-IBS) who have not responded adequately to conventional therapy. Constipation is the most common adverse event with alosetron treatment. Multiple dosing regimens were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (S3B30040) to determine efficacy, tolerability, and evaluate constipation rate., Methods: 705 women with severe d-IBS were randomized to placebo, alosetron 0.5 mg once daily, 1 mg once daily, or 1 mg twice daily for 12 wk. The primary end point was the proportion of week 12 responders (patients with moderate or substantial improvement in IBS symptoms) on the 7-point Likert Global Improvement Scale (GIS). Secondary end points were average rate of adequate relief of IBS pain and discomfort, and bowel symptom improvements., Results: The proportion of GIS responders at week 12 (primary time point) was significantly greater in all alosetron groups compared with placebo (54/176 [30.7%], 90/177 [50.8%], 84/175 [48%], and 76/177 [42.9%] for placebo, 0.5, 1 mg once daily, and 1 mg twice daily alosetron groups, respectively; P< or = 0.02). Results were similar for the average adequate relief rate (treatment effects > or =12%, P< or = 0.038). Bowel symptoms were improved in all alosetron groups. Constipation was the most common adverse event (9%, 16%, and 19% patients in the 0.5 mg, 1 mg once daily, and 1 mg twice daily groups, respectively). One event of intestinal obstruction and one of ischemic colitis occurred in the 0.5 mg group, and one event of fecal impaction occurred in the 1 mg twice-daily group. All were self-limited and resolved without sequelae., Conclusion: Alosetron 0.5 mg and 1 mg once daily as well as 1 mg twice daily are effective in providing global improvement in IBS symptoms, adequate relief of IBS pain and discomfort, and improvement in bowel symptoms in women with severe d-IBS. Lower dosing regimens resulted in a decreased constipation rate.

Objective: To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with chronic constipation (CC)., Methods: This 13-month, uncontrolled extension study enrolled CC patients who completed a 12-wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled core study. Patients receiving tegaserod 6 or 2 mg b.i.d. during the core study continued on the same dose; those receiving placebo were switched to tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d (placebo-to-tegaserod). Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Symptom evaluations included patient satisfaction with bowel habit and bothersomeness of constipation, abdominal distension/bloating, and abdominal discomfort/pain., Results: A total of 842 patients entered the extension study; 451 (54%) completed. AEs typically occurred within the first month of tegaserod treatment. Long-term treatment neither increased AE incidence nor revealed new safety risks. Headache (11.3%, 14.5%, and 16.1% in the tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d., 2 mg b.i.d., and placebo-to-tegaserod groups, respectively) and abdominal pain (8.8%, 8.8%, 10.9%) were the most common AEs. Diarrhea, the most common drug-related AE (4.9%, 2.5%, 8.0%), rarely led to discontinuation (0.7%, 0.0%, 2.2%). Diarrhea was transient, resolved without treatment interruption or rescue medication, and had no clinically significant consequences. Of 27 serious AEs, none were considered treatment related. No deaths or reports of ischemic colitis occurred in tegaserod-treated patients. No clinically relevant changes occurred in other safety parameters. Safety findings were similar in patients switched from placebo to tegaserod and those maintained on tegaserod., Conclusions: Tegaserod has a favorable safety profile and is well tolerated during continuous long-term treatment in patients with CC.

Objective: Theoretical concern exists that rapid luminal healing in Crohn's disease (CD) with therapies like infliximab increases the risk of intestinal stenosis, stricture, or obstruction (SSOs)., Methods: Data were analyzed from the ongoing observational TREAT (the Crohn's Therapy, Resource, Evaluation, and Assessment Tool) Registry and ACCENT I (A Crohn's Disease Clinical Trial Evaluating Infliximab in a New Long-Term Treatment Regimen) study. Investigators reported SSOs as adverse events or serious adverse events., Results: In TREAT, SSOs occurred at a significantly higher rate in patients treated with infliximab compared with patients who received other treatments only (1.95 events/100 patient-years vs 0.99 events/100 patient-years; p < 0.001). Using multivariable analyses, however, infliximab therapy was not associated with SSO development. CD severity at the time of event onset (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35, 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.35-4.09); CD duration (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04); ileal disease (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.36); and new corticosteroid use (HR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.23-6.57) were associated with SSOs. In ACCENT I, no increase in SSOs was reported in patients who received infliximab maintenance therapy compared with those who received episodic therapy, despite higher median cumulative infliximab exposure. Additionally, there was no increase in SSO development with rapid mucosal healing (healing at week 10)., Conclusions: Although unadjusted analyses suggested that patients who received infliximab were twice as likely to develop SSOs, multivariable analysis adjusting for other factors demonstrated that only disease duration, disease severity, ileal disease, and new corticosteroid use were significantly associated with SSO development.

Background: Ischemic colitis and serious complications of constipation have been reported in association with the use of alosetron, which is approved for women with severe diarrhea-predominant IBS who have failed conventional therapies. This systematic review calculated the incidence of these adverse events in alosetron-using patients in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance., Methods: A panel of experts in epidemiology and functional bowel disorders reviewed clinical trial report forms and FDA MedWatch forms of each reported case of ischemic colitis or serious complications of constipation. Experts were blinded about whether patients used alosetron or placebo. Using pre-specified criteria, experts rated the likelihood of an accurate diagnosis and an association between medication use and adverse events. Cases that were not consistent with the reported diagnosis or not possibly associated with medication use were eliminated from calculation of incidence rates of adverse events., Results: Pooled data from clinical trials indicate an increased rate of ischemic colitis among alosetron-using patients compared to placebo-using patients (0.15%vs 0.0%, respectively, p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in the rate of serious complications of constipation. All (19/19) alosetron-using patients with ischemic colitis had reversible colitis without long-term sequelae. Based on post-marketing surveillance data, the post-adjudication rate of ischemic colitis is 1.1 per 1,000 patient-years of alosetron use and the rate of serious complications of constipation is 0.66 per 1,000 patient-years of alosetron use., Conclusion: The incidence of ischemic colitis and serious complications of constipation is very low and is rarely associated with long-term sequelae or serious morbidity.

Background: The management of Helicobacter pylori negative patients with dyspepsia in primary care has not been studied in placebo-controlled studies., Methods: H. pylori negative patients with dyspepsia symptoms of at least moderate severity (> or =4 on a seven-point Likert scale) were recruited from 35 centers. Patients were randomized to a 4-wk treatment of omeprazole 20 mg od, ranitidine 150 mg bid, cisapride 20 mg bid, or placebo, followed by on-demand therapy for an additional 5 months. Treatment success was defined as no or minimal symptoms (score < or = 2 out of 7), and was assessed after 4 wk and at 6 months., Results: Five hundred and twelve patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. At 4 wk, success rates (95% CI) were: omeprazole 51% (69/135; 43-60%), ranitidine 36% (50/139, 28-44%), cisapride 31% (32/105, 22-39%), and placebo 23% (31/133, 16-31%). Omeprazole was significantly better than all other treatments (p < 0.05). The proportion of patients who were responders at 4 wk and at 6 months was significantly greater for those receiving omeprazole 31% (42/135, 23-39%) compared with cisapride 13% (14/105, 7-20%), and placebo 14% (18/133, 8-20%) (p= 0.001), but not ranitidine 21% (29/139, 14-27%) (p= 0.053). The mean number of on-demand study tablets consumed and rescue antacid used was comparable across groups. Economic analysis showed a trade-off between superior efficacy and increased cost between omeprazole and ranitidine., Conclusion: Treatment with omeprazole provides superior symptom relief compared to ranitidine, cisapride, and placebo in the treatment of H. pylori negative primary care dyspepsia patients.

Objectives: Chronic constipation is a common, persistent disorder with limited effective treatment options. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tegaserod in the treatment of chronic constipation., Methods: After a 2-wk baseline period, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment of 12 wk with tegaserod (2 or 6 mg b.i.d.) or placebo. Response during weeks 1-4 (primary variable) was defined as an increase in complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM)/wk. Secondary variables included response during weeks 1-12, patient evaluation of individual symptoms, and global assessment of bowel habits and constipation., Results: One thousand two hundred and sixty-four patients were randomized to tegaserod or placebo. Responder rates for the primary efficacy variable were 35.6% for tegaserod 2 mg b.i.d. (p= 0.0059 vs placebo), 40.2% for 6 mg b.i.d. (p < 0.0001 vs placebo) and 26.7% for placebo. The number needed to treat was 7.3 for the 6 mg b.i.d. dose compared with 11.1 for tegaserod 2 mg b.i.d. Tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. reduced straining, abdominal bloating/distension, and abdominal pain/discomfort during the 12-wk treatment period compared with placebo (p < 0.05 for all symptoms). Significant improvements were also seen in stool form and in global assessment of bowel habits and constipation. The most common adverse events, headache and abdominal pain, were more frequent with placebo than with tegaserod., Conclusions: Tegaserod was efficacious in relieving symptoms of chronic constipation and was well tolerated.

Background: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study was conducted to assess the efficacy of alosetron in men with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)., Methods: Six hundred and sixty-two men were randomized to treatment with alosetron 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 mg, or placebo twice daily for 12 wk, followed by a 4-wk posttreatment period. Adequate relief of IBS pain and discomfort during week 5-12 of the treatment phase was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included bowel urgency, stool frequency, and consistency, incomplete evacuation, bloating, and abdominal pain or discomfort., Results: Subjects ranked urgency and abdominal pain as their most bothersome IBS symptoms. The average rate of adequate relief during week 5-12 was significantly higher in the alosetron 1.0 mg twice-daily group compared to placebo (53%vs 40%, p= 0.04), and all doses of alosetron significantly reduced stool consistency scores (p < 0.001) indicating firmer stools. No significant effects of alosetron were seen with regard to urgency, number of bowel movements, bloating, and incomplete evacuation. Constipation was the most common adverse event and occurred in a dose-related manner among subjects receiving alosetron, 9% (0.5 mg twice daily), 15% (1.0 mg twice daily), 11% (2.0 mg twice daily), and 21% (4.0 mg twice daily). No serious adverse events of constipation were reported. One subject in the 0.5 mg twice-daily group had an episode of rectal bleeding suggestive of a possible diagnosis of ischemic colitis., Conclusions: Alosetron 1 mg twice daily provided adequate relief of IBS pain and discomfort, and improved stool consistency in men with diarrhea-predominant IBS.

Objectives: Infliximab is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn's disease (CD). We report the first large series of pregnancy outcomes in women with RA and CD exposed to infliximab., Methods: The infliximab safety database was queried for all reports of pregnancy. Data were extracted regarding the indication for infliximab, timing of infliximab relative to conception, pregnancy course, and pregnancy outcome. The proportion of live births, miscarriages, and therapeutic terminations for women directly exposed to infliximab before or during confirmed pregnancy were compared to those expected for the general U.S. population of pregnant women and pregnant women with CD not exposed to infliximab., Results: Of the 146 identified pregnancies, 131 involved women exposed directly to infliximab and outcome data were available for 96 of these women. Live births occurred in 67% (64/96), miscarriages in 15% (14/96), and therapeutic termination in 19% (18/96) of the pregnancies directly exposed to infliximab with available outcome data. These results are similar to those expected for the general U.S. population of pregnant women or pregnant women with CD not exposed to infliximab., Conclusion: Data from the infliximab safety database suggest that infliximab exposure during pregnancy results in outcomes that do not differ from those in the U.S. population of pregnant women and pregnant women with CD not exposed to infliximab. No increased risk of adverse outcome was detected, however, follow-up of larger numbers of pregnant women exposed to infliximab will be necessary to definitively exclude any fetal risk.

Objectives: To assess long-term safety and efficacy of alosetron in women with severe, chronic diarrhea-predominant IBS and in a subset having more frequent urgency (i.e., bowel urgency at least 10 of 14 days during screening)., Methods: Randomized patients received either alosetron 1 mg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 363) twice daily during a 48-wk, double-blind study. The primary endpoint was the 48-wk average rate of adequate relief of IBS pain and discomfort. Secondary endpoints included 48-wk average satisfactory control rates of urgency, stool frequency, stool consistency, and bloating. Other efficacy endpoints were average monthly adequate relief and urgency control rates and impact of provided rescue medication., Results: Alosetron-treated patients had significantly greater 48-wk average adequate relief (p= 0.01) and urgency control (p < 0.001) rates, regardless of rescue medication use, compared with placebo. Results in subjects with more frequent urgency were more robust than those in the overall population (p= 0.005). In weeks without rescue medication use, satisfactory control rates for stool frequency and stool consistency were significantly greater in alosetron-treated patients than placebo. Alosetron-treated patients had significantly greater adequate relief than placebo-treated patients (p < 0.05) in 9 of 12 months and significantly greater urgency control (p < 0.001) in all months. Adequate relief and urgency control were maintained throughout the treatment. Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between treatment groups, except for constipation. Neither ischemic colitis nor serious events related to bowel motor dysfunction was reported., Conclusions: Long-term use of alosetron is effective and well-tolerated in women with chronic, diarrhea-predominant IBS, including those with more frequent urgency.