Search

Purpose: To determine the association of primary angle-closure disease (PACD) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) at a tertiary eye care center in North India. Methods: It is a cross-sectional, observational study. Sixty consecutive patients with retinal vein occlusion within a period of one year from a single tertiary eye care center were enrolled. Detailed history, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, intraocular pressure measurement by applanation tonometry, gonioscopy and fundus examination were done. Anterior chamber depth and axial length were also measured. Results: Among the 60 patients, 29 were males (48.3%) and 31 females (51.6%). Twenty-seven (45%) of them had central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 33 (55%) had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Forty percent of patients with RVO had PACD. Relative risk of PACD was 1.71 times in patients with CRVO as compared to BRVO. Risk of glaucoma was 49% more in CRVO than BRVO. Probability of PACD was more in patients of RVO who had diabetes and CAD as comorbidity. Conclusion: The association between PACD and RVO is less known. PACD can be one of the risk factors for the development of RVO. A comprehensive examination and detailed angle evaluation of both of the eyes should be done in all cases of RVO, in addition to investigating for systemic risk factors. However, larger population-based studies would be required to prove it as an independent risk factor.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure (IOP) as an additive in peribulbar injections in glaucoma surgeries. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment interventional study was conducted for patients undergoing glaucoma surgeries at a tertiary eye care hospital in North India. Patients were randomized to two groups, Dexmed group and Placebo group. In the Dexmed group, dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg body weight) was given as an additive along with peribulbar block. The primary outcome was change in IOP pre- and postperibulbar injections (IOP before the block, and after 5 and 15 min of the block). Secondary outcome measures were onset of block, adverse effects (bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, and level 4 sedation), and surgeon satisfaction. Results: A total of 104 patients were randomized, 52 each in the Dexmed group and Placebo group. The percentage decrease in IOP was significantly more in the Dexmed group than in the Placebo group both at 5 and 15 min' post block (P < 0.05). At 5 min, the mean percent decrease in IOP in Dexmed group was -10.48, whereas it was 2.85 in the Placebo group. At 15 min, the mean percent decrease in IOP was -22.59 and -9.42 in the Dexmed and Placebo group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the onset of block and adverse effects. Surgeon satisfaction was significantly greater in the Dexmed group than the Placebo group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine lowers IOP significantly in patients undergoing glaucoma surgeries with safe hemodynamic changes and sedative effect.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to study the association between Nocturnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) related Peak recorded by a Contact Lens Sensor (CLS) and glaucoma progression in treated glaucomatous eyes. Methods: Institutional study in which forty glaucoma patients were recruited from glaucoma clinic. A total of 19 patients were labeled as progressors on current anti-glaucoma treatment despite controlled day time IOP whereas twenty one patients were clinically stable showing no progression. Worse eye of each patient was selected for placement of CLS. The timing of the highest signal (IOP related peak) was noted in 24 hour CLS graph and if it fell within the time frame of 11 pm to 5 am, it was labeled as 'nocturnal IOP related peak'. Results: Progressors were found to be significantly more prone to night spike than Non Progressors (χ2 = 6.812; n = 40; P = 0.009), thus, showing a definite association between the two. Association between Nocturnal IOP related peak and various other variables like age, gender, mean daytime IOP and systemic illness was studied. A positive correlation was established between female gender and Nocturnal IOP related spike with a significantly higher proportion of females showing night spike than their male counterparts (χ2 = 5.763; n = 40; P = 0.016). Other parameters did not show any significant relationship with Nocturnal IOP related spike. Conclusion: Dynamic 24 hour recording by CLS is beneficial in detecting nocturnal IOP-related peak, and thus, can potentially improve the clinical care of glaucoma patients, especially those showing progression.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine which parameter of Cirrus and RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the highest ability to discriminate between early, moderate, and advanced glaucoma. Simultaneously, to compare the performance of the two OCT devices in terms of their ability to differentiate the three stages of glaucoma. Further, to analyze the macular parameters of both devices and compare them with the conventional retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters. Methods: One hundred and twenty eyes (30 healthy and 90 glaucomatous [30 mild, 30 moderate, and 30 advanced glaucoma]) of 65 participants (15 healthy, 50 glaucomatous [15 mild, 15 moderate, and 20 advanced glaucoma]) underwent Cirrus and RTVue OCT scanning on a single visit. Results: Average RNFL thickness and superior RNFL thickness of both the devices and inferior (ganglion cell complex [GCC] of RTVue device best differentiated normals from all stage glaucomatous eyes (P > 0.05). Cirrus average RNFL thickness and superior RNFL thickness performed better than other parameters (P < 0.05) in differentiating early glaucoma from moderate and advanced. In differentiating advanced from early and moderate glaucoma, RTVue average, superior, and inferior RNFL thickness and inferior GCC parameters had the highest discriminating ability (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, average RNFL thickness had the highest ability to distinguish different stages of the disease. No significant difference was found between RTVue and Cirrus OCT device in different severity levels. No significant difference was observed between RNFL and macular parameters in different stages of glaucoma.