Search

Acrylates are esters of acrylic acid, which are potent sensitizers that can cause occupational allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in dental personnel. More recently, an increasing number of cases of both occupational and non-occupational ACD in beauty industry are observed. Here we present three cases of ACD to acrylate and its derivatives in both nail beauticians and do-it-yourself gel nail users due to exposure to nail cosmetics presenting with chronic hand eczema with severe pulpitis and even nail dystrophy with patch-test-confirmed diagnosis. Chemical analysis of commercial nail cosmetic products has been done in one of the patients and successfully identified 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate as the contact allergen. Keywords: Acrylic acid, Acrylate, Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), Methacrylate, Nail cosmetic products

Background/Objective: Since 2005, there has been a significant increase in contact allergy to methylisothiazolinon (MI)/methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) incidences in European countries, but there has been no documented large-scale studies of such incidences in Taiwan. Methods: From 1987 to 2015, a total of 2590 patients received patch testing in our Contact Dermatitis Clinic. Analyzed were patients with positive reactions to MI/MCI (Kathon CG) in patch testing and with suspected allergy to MI/MCI. Results: Among the total 2590 patients, 2388 received patch testing during 1987–2005, while 202 received patch testing during 2006–2015. Because Kathon CG was not routinely patch tested for all patients from 1987 to 2005, the incidence of contact allergy to MI/MCI was thus corrected to 3/145 (2.1%) for this time period. After 2005, there were 11 patients (11/202, 5.4%) who showed positive reactions to MI/MCI. Amongst the 14 patients who showed positive reactions to MI/MCI, 12 of them were females (85.7%). The majority of the lesions was located on the hands (10 patients, 71.4%), along with the face (3 patients, 21.4%). Interestingly, 6 patients (42.9%) who showed positive reactions to MI/MCI were associated with contact allergy to essential oils, and five of them were aromatherapists. Conclusion: According to our study, the incidence of MI/MCI contact allergy in a referral center in Taiwan was 5.4%. A trend of increasing incidence of contact allergy to MI/MCI was noted after 2005, which is consistent with the findings in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis to MI/MCI should be suspected in patients who have eczema on the hands and face, especially those who are aromatherapists.

Background/objective: Contact dermatitis to topical medicaments is commonly encountered in daily practice of dermatologists. The incidence and ranking of common allergens in topical medicaments may vary depending on local prescription and self-medication behavior. The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical features and common allergens of contact dermatitis to topical medicaments in Taiwan. Methods: From 1978 to 2005, a total of 3717 patients had been patch tested in our Contact Dermatitis Clinic. Any case with suspected contact allergy to topical medicaments receiving patch testing was included in this study. Results: During this period, a total of 608 patients were included and 603 of them completed the patch tests. Of the 603 patch-tested patients, 397 (66%) were positive for at least one antigen, and all patch tests were negative in 206 (34%). Patients with positive patch testing were characterized by younger age and location on the limbs and skin folds, while sex and atopy were not different among the two groups. A total of 1076 positive reactions to identifiable medicaments or main ingredients were recorded in 397 patients with positive patch testing. Among these positive reactions, 701/1076 counts (65%) were read as relevant. Traditional herbal medicaments (50%), antiseptics (21%), vehicle ingredients (9%), antibiotics (8%), corticosteroids (2%), anesthetics (2%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (1%) were the most common sensitizers in this study, and the common concomitant allergens were fragrance (52%) and metal (20%). Conclusion: The results emphasized the special cultural consideration in Taiwanese patients with contact dermatitis to topical medicaments.