Search

Purpose: To evaluate subjective and objective outcomes after combined implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) and a combined technology multifocal lens (CT-IOL)., Setting: 2 clinical practices (Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Center For Sight) in the United States., Design: Prospective, unmasked, multicenter, nonrandomized bilateral eye study., Methods: Patients interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were implanted with an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a CT-IOL in the nondominant eye. Refractive and visual acuity (VA) data at various distances (4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm) were collected 3 months postsurgery, along with the distance-corrected binocular defocus curve and responses to questionnaires related to spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and overall visual function., Results: Data from 37 participants were analyzed. The distance-corrected binocular defocus curve showed a mean VA better than 0.1 logMAR (20/25) at all vergences from +1.00 to -2.50 diopters (D). 36 participants (97%) had an uncorrected binocular VA of 0.3 logMAR or better, at all test distances. 70% of participants (26/37) reported never wearing spectacles at any distance, and 84% (31/37) were "completely" or "mostly" satisfied with their overall vision after surgery. Halos were the disturbance reported most frequently and reported as most bothersome, with difficulty driving at night the most common visual function issue. Difficulty reading was the next most reported issue. Overall eyesight was rated as "excellent" or "good" by 92% (34/37) of participants., Conclusions: This combined EDOF/CT-IOL approach was well-tolerated by participants and provided some potential benefits relative to bilateral implantation of either lens., (Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To evaluate vision, satisfaction, and spectacle independence of the AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens when the nondominant eye is targeted for slight myopia., Setting: 1 clinical practice in the United States., Design: Prospective unmasked nonrandomized clinical trial., Methods: Patients presenting for cataract surgery interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were enrolled, with the dominant eye targeted for emmetropia and the nondominant eye targeted for slight monovision (-0.50 diopters [D]). Visual disturbances, satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated. Visual acuity (VA) was tested at distance (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) at 3 months postoperatively when uncorrected, with both eyes corrected to emmetropia and with 1 eye adjusted for monovision. 2 binocular defocus curves were also collected under the latter 2 conditions., Results: Data from 31 patients were analyzed. The mean refractive spherical equivalent was 0.45 D more myopic in the nondominant eye, resulting in worse uncorrected VA at distance but better uncorrected VA at near. The binocular defocus curve with monovision showed significantly better VA from -2.0 to -3.0 D, and patients reported less need for spectacles (and better vision) at near than reported with binocular emmetropia. Glare, blurred vision, and starbursts were the most reported visual disturbances. Although not correlated with the difference in refraction, glare and blurred vision were significantly correlated with overall satisfaction., Conclusions: Implanting this IOL with a target of slight myopia in the nondominant eye appears to be a viable way to improve near vision, although with an increased potential for visual disturbances., (Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To objectively determine which formula/keratometry combination was best for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) sphere power in eyes with a history of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)., Setting: One practice in the United States., Design: Retrospective, unmasked, nonrandomized chart review., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery after previous myopic LASIK were included. Eyes had to have a postoperative refraction at least 3 weeks postoperatively. IOL power was calculated with the ASCRS online postrefractive IOL calculator using anterior keratometry and recalculated using total corneal power (TK). The accuracy of treatment was calculated and compared between different formulas and keratometry methods including intraoperative aberrometry (IA)., Results: Data from 101 eyes, 44 of which had TK available, were analyzed. Using TK, the Wang-Koch-Maloney formula had the highest percentages of eyes with expected spherical equivalent refractive errors within 0.50 diopter (D) and 1.00 D of plano (57% and 87%, respectively). With anterior keratometry, the Barrett True-K formula had the highest percentages (64% and 92%, respectively) but was not significantly better than the Wang-Koch-Maloney formula, with expected errors within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D (P > .2, McNemar test). Expected sphere results based on IA were not significantly different than for Barrett True-K within ±0.50 D or within ±1.00 D (P > .2, McNemar test)., Conclusions: Using TK in existing post-LASIK formulas did not seem beneficial. The formulas might have to be optimized for use with TK. The best expected results were obtained with the Barrett True-K and Haigis-L formulas using anterior keratometry. IA did not seem to materially improve results., (Copyright © 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To retrospectively review toric intraocular lens (IOL) outcomes and compare actual results to those expected from preoperative calculations and intraoperative aberrometry (IA) in normal eyes., Setting: Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, USA., Design: Retrospective data review of earlier clinical trial data., Methods: Toric IOL planning data and results were obtained from two previous clinical studies of normal eyes receiving toric IOL implants. Back-calculation techniques were used to estimate expected residual refractive sphere and cylinder for preoperative and IA calculations., Results: Toric IOL planning data and clinical outcomes for 132 eyes receiving two different toric IOLs were analyzed. The mean spherical equivalent refractions expected with preoperative planning and IA were not statistically significantly different (P = .44), but a higher percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D of the intended spherical refraction was expected with preoperative calculations (P = .05). The mean expected residual refractive astigmatism based on preoperative calculations was significantly lower than for IA (P < .001), with more eyes expected to have 0.50 D or less of residual refractive astigmatism., Conclusion: The use of current-generation formulas for sphere power and toric IOL planning in normal eyes seems sufficient to produce clinical outcomes with toric IOLs that are as good or better than those achieved using IA., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes with a diffractive toric extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) when both eyes are targeted for emmetropia and the nondominant eye is targeted for slight myopia., Setting: Three clinical practices, United States., Design: Prospective case series., Methods: Patients having routine cataract surgery with bilateral Tecnis Symfony toric EDOF IOL implantation were assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In 1 group, the nondominant eye was targeted for -0.50 diopter (D) (mini-monovision). Assessments included uncorrected monocular and binocular visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at distance (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) and the postoperative residual refractive error., Results: Forty patients were enrolled in each group, with 1 dropout. The mean postoperative residual refractive astigmatism was 0.25 D in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. The mean residual refractive astigmatism was 0.50 D or lower in 92% of eyes (72/78) in the mini-monovision group and 95% of eyes (74/78) in the emmetropia group 3 months postoperatively. The mini-monovision group had slightly worse uncorrected visual acuity at 4 m than the emmetropia group (0.16 versus 0.09; P = .002) but better uncorrected acuity at 40 cm (0.25 versus 0.34; P < .001). Binocular uncorrected acuity was not statistically significantly different between groups at 4 m (-0.03 versus -0.01; P = .33) or 66 cm (0.06 versus 0.04; P = .34) but was statistically significant at 40 cm (0.25 versus 0.19; P = .03)., Conclusions: The EDOF toric IOL provided functional distance, intermediate, and near vision. A slight monovision approach appears to improve near visual acuity., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of the combination of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer with the surgeon's standard of care in correcting astigmatism using toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or corneal incisions., Setting: Single site in United States., Design: Prospective case series., Methods: Contralateral eyes of patients having uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery and astigmatism correction were randomly assigned to Group A or Group B. Group A received the surgeon's preferred standard of care. Group B had preoperative planning using an image-guidance system (VERION), intraoperative aberrometry (ORA System with VerifEye+), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The primary endpoint was the residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months., Results: Thirty-eight eyes were treated with toric IOLs and 40 eyes with corneal astigmatic incisions. On average, toric IOLs resulted in almost 0.25 diopter (D) less cylinder than corneal astigmatic incisions (P < .01), with no difference between groups (P = .41). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean spherical equivalent refraction by group (P = .51). At 3 months, the IOL in 4 eyes (11%) (2 in Group A and Group B each) was more than 10 degrees of absolute orientation from the intended orientation. The mean keratometry was 0.16 D higher with the image-guided system compared with optical biometry (Lenstar). The vector difference between the 2 measurements was 0.5 D or lower in all eyes., Conclusions: The combined use of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer did not significantly improve outcomes compared with the surgeon's standard of care. Based on keratometry, there was good agreement in corneal astigmatism measurements between the image-guided system and the optical biometer., (Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) articles published between 2008 and 2015 that contain clinical outcomes data were reviewed and graded for quality, impression, and potential bias. All 97 relevant articles (representing 67 893 eyes) provided a positive or neutral impression of LASIK. Industry bias was not evident. The aggregate loss of 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity was 0.61% (359/58 653). The overall percentage of eyes with uncorrected distance visual acuity better than 20/40 was 99.5% (59 503/59 825). The spherical equivalent refraction was within ±1.0 diopter (D) of the target refraction in 98.6% (59 476/60 329) of eyes, with 90.9% (59 954/65 974) within ±0.5 D. In studies reporting patient satisfaction, 1.2% (129/9726) of patients were dissatisfied with LASIK. Aggregate outcomes appear better than those reported in summaries of the safety and effectiveness of earlier laser refractive surgery systems approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Modern results support the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction of the procedure., Financial Disclosure: Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references., (Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine and compare the incidence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy after implantation of 3 intraocular lens types (IOLs)., Setting: Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: This retrospective chart review comprised eyes having uneventful phacoemulsification and implantation of 1 of 3 AcrySof IOLs: ReSTOR SN60D3 (multifocal spherical group), Natural SN60AT (monofocal spherical group), or IQ SN60WF (monofocal aspheric group). Eyes were matched by age, sex, and follow-up. The PCO rate, Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate, time from surgery to PCO diagnosis, and time from surgery to Nd:YAG capsulotomy were assessed., Results: Charts of 225 eyes (75 in each group) with a mean follow-up of 15.9 months +/- 6.5 (SD) were evaluated. The PCO rate was 42.7% in the multifocal spherical group, 28.0% in the monofocal spherical group, and 14.7% in the monofocal aspheric group. The Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate was 25.3%, 17.3%, and 4.0%, respectively. The difference in the Nd:YAG rate was statistically significantly higher in the multifocal and monofocal spherical groups than in the monofocal aspheric group (P<.001 and P<.008, respectively) but was not significantly different between the 2 spherical IOL groups (P = .232). The time from surgery to PCO documentation was not significantly different between the 3 groups., Conclusions: Intraocular lens configuration may have contributed to the difference in the PCO rate between the 2 spherical IOLs and the aspheric IOL. Based on the Nd:YAG rate as an indicator for visual significance, PCO may be less visually significant in eyes with the aspheric IOL than in eyes with 1 of the spherical IOLs.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of a superior or nasal hinge location on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: This prospective randomized masked study included 47 patients having bilateral myopic LASIK surgery. The first eye was randomly assigned to have a nasal or superior hinge flap; the fellow eye had the alternate location. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, corneal sensation, basic secretion test, tear film breakup time, conjunctival and corneal staining, and a subjective questionnaire were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and paired t test were used for comparison., Results: Dry eye occurred with the same frequency in both groups. However, eyes with the nasal hinge had significantly better nasal sensation than those with the superior hinge (P<.05) at 1 month., Conclusion: Better nasal corneal sensation was found at 1 month in the nasal hinge group but there was no difference in any other parameters measured.

To determine the refractive surgery (RS) preferences of ophthalmologists worldwide, questionnaires were sent to 8897 members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. A total of 1053 questionnaires were returned by the deadline. The practice distribution included 29.5% cataract surgeons, 48.8% comprehensive ophthalmologists, 11.6% RS specialists, 5.1% cornea and external disease specialists, 1.9% glaucoma specialists, 1.1% retina specialists, and <1.0% oculoplastics/pediatrics/researchers/retired. Results were compared with those in the 2003 survey and demonstrate that refractive surgery continues to develop and change.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and analgesic efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic solution in postoperative photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) patients., Setting: Fifteen clinical sites in the eastern and southern United States., Methods: This pooled analysis of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group studies comprised 313 patients having unilateral PRK. After surgery, patients were treated with 1 drop of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic solution (Acular(R) LS) (n = 156) or vehicle (n = 157) 4 times daily for up to 4 days. Pain intensity, pain relief, use of escape medication, and severity of ocular symptoms were assessed. Adverse events, epithelial healing, and visual acuity were recorded., Results: There was significantly less pain intensity experienced by patients in the ketorolac group (P<.001). During the first 12 hours post PRK, 50% fewer patients in the ketorolac group than in the vehicle group had severe to intolerable pain (41.6% [64/154] and 84.5% [131/155], respectively). The median time to no pain was 30 hours in the ketorolac group and 54 hours in the vehicle group (P<.001, survival analysis). Ketorolac patients reported significantly greater pain relief than vehicle patients throughout the study (P<.001). Ketorolac patients used significantly less escape medication than vehicle patients for 48 hours post PRK (P< or =.008). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 2.6% (4/156) of ketorolac patients and 6.4% (10/157) of vehicle patients., Conclusion: Ketorolac 0.4% ophthalmic solution is safe and effective in reducing ocular pain when used 4 times daily for up to 4 days post PRK.

To determine the refractive surgery preferences of ophthalmologists worldwide, questionnaires were sent to 8920 members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. A total of 1174 questionnaires was returned by the deadline. The practice distribution included 30.0% cataract surgeons, 47.3% comprehensive ophthalmologists, 14.4% refractive surgery (RS) specialists, 4.5% corneal/external disease specialists, 1.9% glaucoma specialists, and < 1% retinal/oculoplastics/pediatrics/neurophthalmologists/researchers/retired. Responses were compared with those in the 2001 and 2002 surveys and demonstrate that RS practice patterns continue to evolve.

Purpose: To determine the flap thickness accuracy of 6 microkeratome models and determine factors that might affect flap thickness., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: This multicenter prospective study involved 18 surgeons. Six microkeratomes were evaluated: AMO Amadeus, Bausch & Lomb Hansatome, Moria Carriazo-Barraquer, Moria M2, Nidek MK2000, and Alcon Summit Krumeich-Barraquer. Eyes of 1061 consecutive patients who had laser in situ keratomileusis were included. Age, sex, surgical order (first or second cut), keratometry (flattest, steepest, and mean), white-to-white measurement, laser used, plate thickness, head serial number, blade lot number, and occurrence of epithelial defects were recorded. Intraoperative pachymetry was obtained just before the microkeratome was placed on the eye. Residual bed pachymetry was measured after the microkeratome cut had been created and the flap lifted. The estimated flap thickness was determined by subtraction (ie, mean preoperative pachymetry measurement minus mean residual bed pachymetry)., Results: A total of 1634 eyes were reviewed. Sex distribution was 54.3% women and 45.7% men, and the mean age was 39.4 years +/- 10.6 (SD). In addition, 54.5% of the procedures were in first eyes and 45.5%, in second eyes. The mean preoperative pachymetry measurement was 547 +/- 34 microm. The mean keratometry was 43.6 +/- 1.6 diopters (D) in the flattest axis and 44.6 +/-1.5 D in the steepest axis. The mean white-to-white measurement was 11.7 +/- 0.4 mm. The mean flap thickness created by the devices varied between head designs, and microkeratome heads had significant differences (P<.05). Factors that explained 78.4% of the variability included microkeratome model, plate thickness, mean preoperative pachymetry, Kmin, surgery order, head serial number, blade lot number, and surgeon. Factors such as age, sex, Kmax, Kaverage, white to white, and laser had no significant correlation to flap thickness., Conclusions: The results demonstrated variability between the 6 microkeratome models. Device labeling did not necessarily represent the mean flap thickness obtained, nor was it uniform or consistent. Thinner corneas were associated with thinner flaps and thicker corneas with thicker flaps. In addition, first cuts were generally associated with thicker flaps when compared to second cuts in bilateral procedures.

Purpose: To investigate corneal endothelial cell loss in fresh phakic human autopsy cadaver eyes after phacoemulsification (PE) with a conventional handpiece or a new oscillatory handpiece., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: Twenty fresh phakic human autopsy globes were randomized to PE with a conventional handpiece (n = 10) or an oscillatory handpiece (n = 10). The main parameters evaluated were age, nucleus density, amount of ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) used, and mean PE time and ultrasound (US) power. After surgery, the corneas were excised and the endothelia were vitally stained with trypan blue and alizarin red. Light microscopy was used to assess the endothelial cell loss., Results: The mean age, density of the nucleus, OVD used, and US power were similar between the groups. The mean PE time was less with the NeoSoniX handpiece (0.71 minutes +/- 0.39 [SD]) than with the conventional handpiece (1.05 +/- 0.53 minutes). The mean number of dead endothelial cells was significantly lower in the oscillatory handpiece group (31.3 +/- 24.2 cells/mm(2)) than in the conventional handpiece group (60.4 +/- 46.8 cells/mm(2)) (P<.001, Mann-Whitney rank sum test)., Conclusions: Less corneal endothelial cell loss occurred after PE with an oscillatory handpiece than with a conventional handpiece. Further randomized clinical trials are recommended to validate this study.

Purpose: To investigate preoperative and postoperative prophylactic treatment with different pharmacological agents before flap cutting and exposure to a diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) causative agent., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: The study comprised 48 eyes of 24 Dutch-belted rabbits. Three days before a corneal flap was cut and the corneal interface was exposed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide endotoxin, a DLK causative agent, the eyes were randomly assigned to treatment with a mast-cell stabilizer, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), or a corticosteroid or left without treatment as controls. The treatment was maintained throughout the 1-week follow-up. Slitlamp examinations and photographs were performed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days; DLK was graded by a masked observer from 0 (no DLK) to IV. Corneal interface scrapings were performed in selected eyes on day 7., Results: At the end of the follow-up, 36 eyes were available for evaluation. At 1 week, 100% of the control eyes and the eyes treated with the mast-cell stabilizer developed DLK; in the NSAID-treated and corticosteroid-treated eyes, the DLK rate was 86% and 70%, respectively. At 1 day, the severity of DLK was significantly lower in eyes treated with the mast-cell stabilizer (0.44) and at 7 days, it was significantly lower in corticosteroid-treated eyes (0.3) than in the control group (1.5 and 1.4, respectively) (P<.05, Wilcoxon test). Corneal interface scraping from an eye with grade III DLK showed numerous inflammatory cells., Conclusions: Preoperative and postoperative treatment with corticosteroids significantly reduced the severity of DLK compared to the untreated control eyes in this animal model. Treatment with a mast-cell stabilizer and an NSAID had less effect on the postoperative course of DLK.

Purpose: To determine whether residual cleaner could be detected in the rinse solution of surgical instruments after a standard cleaning protocol., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: The wavelength for maximum absorbance of 5 cleaners (Endozime) [The Ruhof Corp.], Enzol/Cidezyme [Advanced Sterilization Products], and Klenzyme [Steris Co.] enzymatic detergents; Palmolive Ultra dishwashing liquid [Colgate-Palmolive Co.]; and Universal concentrated surgical instrument cleaner and lubricant [B. Graczyk, Inc.]) was determined. Identically designed stainless-steel and titanium instruments were cleaned using a standardized protocol. Water temperatures of 25 degrees C (room temperature) or 40 degrees C (warm temperature) were used to rinse the instruments. The amount of residual cleaner in each rinse solution and remaining on each instrument at the completion of the cleaning procedure as a percentage of the total cleaner was determined., Results: Residues of all cleaners were detected using a standard protocol involving rinse solutions at 25 degrees C. Increasing the temperature of the rinse solutions significantly reduced the cleaner residues (P<.05, Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance on ranks test and Student-Newman-Keuls test) regardless of the instrument material. No significant difference was detected in the residual cleaners on stainless-steel and titanium instruments., Conclusions: Lower levels of cleaner residue were found on surgical instruments after a standard cleaning protocol using warm rinse water. Because cleaner residue has been reported to cause inflammation (eg, diffuse lamellar keratitis) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), it is advisable to use cleaners and cleaning protocols that result in acceptable cleaning without detectable levels of cleaner residue to avoid potentially harmful effects to the cornea after LASIK.

We report the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in a 51-year-old woman with subsequent mycobacterial keratitis diagnosed by staining with acid-fast and fluorochrome methods, a technique known to have good sensitivity and specificity for mycobacteria. A rapid diagnosis was made without waiting for cultures, and treatment was instituted, including tapering of topical steroids and appropriate antibiotic therapy. The result was preservation of the LASIK flap and a favorable visual outcome at 6 months.

Purpose: To induce diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) and investigate a prophylactic treatment with pharmacological agents., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: In 100 eyes of 50 Dutch Belted rabbits, a nasal corneal flap was cut and the interface inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (n = 50) or Palmolive Ultra soap (n = 50). The eyes were randomly assigned to treatment with a mast-cell stabilizer, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), a fluoroquinolone antibiotic agent, a corticosteroid, or left without treatment as a control. Slitlamp examinations and photographs were performed 1, 3, 5, and 7 days postoperatively, and DLK was graded by a masked observer from 0 (no DLK) to stage 4., Results: At the end of the study, 80 eyes were available for evaluation. Ninety-four percent of the untreated eyes developed DLK compared to 56% of eyes treated with NSAIDs and 63% of eyes treated with steroids (P<.05, Fisher exact test). The DLK rates with the mast-cell stabilizer and fluoroquinolone antibiotic agent were 86% and 76%, respectively. The DLK incidence in the latter 2 groups was not significantly different from that in the control eyes (P>.05, Fisher exact test)., Conclusions: Postoperative prophylactic treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids led to a statistically significantly lower incidence of postoperative DLK. The study demonstrated that corticosteroids and NSAIDs can be used to treat DLK after LASIK. While steroids are a generally accepted treatment for DLK, NSAIDS may offer an additional potent modality.

Purpose: To report the outcome, learning curve, and complication rates of an experimental animal model for corneal flaps in refractive surgery., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: Corneal flaps with a nasal or a temporal hinge were created in 190 eyes of 95 Dutch Belted rabbits using the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical). Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) was induced by inoculating the corneal interfaces with 1 of 7 substances. Postoperatively, the eyes were examined with a slitlamp. Special emphasis was placed on corneal flap complications and the relationship between slipped flaps and hinge position and/or inoculation agent., Results: A good corneal flap was achieved in 174 eyes (92%). The eyes with a nasal hinge had a lower incidence of slipped flaps (14%) than eyes with a temporal hinge (37%) (P =.02)., Conclusion: With the animal model described, corneal flaps were created in a precise and reproducible way in more than 90% of eyes. Nasal hinged flaps showed less postoperative displacements than temporal hinged flaps and are adequate for further study.

Purpose: To induce diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) and investigate the potential causative agents in an animal model., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: In 70 eyes of 35 Dutch Belted rabbits, a corneal flap was cut and the interface randomly exposed to 1 of 7 substances: Pseudomonas aeruginosa endotoxin, 1 of 2 Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins, meibomian gland secretion, povidone-iodine 10%, Palmolive Ultra soap, and Klenzyme soap. Slitlamp examinations were performed 1, 3, 5, and 7 days postoperatively. The DLK was staged from 1 to 4. On day 7, the rabbits were killed and the eyes enucleated and processed for histopathologic examination., Results: At the end of the study, 54 eyes (46 exposed, 8 control) were available for evaluation. The 8 eyes studied concurrently in the control group remained clear and did not show interface inflammation. Thirty-one of 46 eyes (67%) treated with the various test substances developed DLK. The highest DLK rates were found with the cleaning soap Palmolive Ultra (100%; P =.022) and P. aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (90%; P =.026)., Conclusions: Interface inflammation was consistently induced in the animal model. All 7 agents caused DLK in at least some eyes. The histopathologic evaluation showed the morphologic profile of the marked inflammatory cellular reaction that occurred in almost all the specimens.

In February 2001, a questionnaire on the practice of refractive surgery was sent worldwide to all 8196 members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery; 1511 responses (18.4%) were received. Although laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was the most common refractive procedure reported, phakic intraocular lenses, clear lens extraction, and photorefractive keratectomy were also widespread. Nineteen percent of the respondents said they had had refractive surgery, and that group reported performing significantly more procedures than those who had not had a refractive procedure (P < .0001). The most common complication of LASIK was dry eyes, occurring in more than half of the cases in one fourth of the practices; however, only 30% of surgeons said they perform a Schirmer test before surgery. High-volume surgeons reported seeing fewer cases of flap striae (P = .002) and slipped flaps (P = .02) than low-volume surgeons. Seventy-seven percent said that wavefront LASIK ablation will increase the quality of vision and of those already performing wavefront ablation, 92% stated they believe it will improve outcomes.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of a topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent (ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5%) and a topical steroid (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5%) in controlling inflammation after cataract surgery., Setting: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA., Methods: Sixty patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to receive topical treatment with ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% or loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% starting the day after routine phacoemulsification for cataract extraction. Both patient and investigator were masked to treatment. All patients had uneventful small-incision phacoemulsification with placement of a foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL). Patients used 1 of the 2 antiinflammatory agents 4 times a day starting 24 hours after surgery. Signs and symptoms of inflammation as documented by external slitlamp examination, intraocular pressure (IOP), and Kowa cell and flare measurements were evaluated on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, and 30., Results: There was no statistically significant difference in any measurement of postoperative inflammation between the 2 groups. There was no difference in objective or subjective cell and flare measurements or in IOP between groups. No patient in either group was removed from the study for lack of treatment efficiency., Conclusions: Ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% was as effective as loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% in reducing inflammation after routine phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. These results suggest that ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% is a safe and effective antiinflammatory alternative to steroids after cataract extraction.