Search

Purpose Previous studies have revealed lower prostate specific antigen concentrations in men with type 2 diabetes, paralleling the reported lower prevalence of prostate cancer in diabetic men. Data are lacking on prostate specific antigen in men with type 1 diabetes whose insulin and obesity profiles differ from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this study we examined the relationship between long-term glycemic control and prostate specific antigen in men with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Materials and Methods Total prostate specific antigen was measured at one time in 639 men in the EDIC, the observational followup of participants in the DCCT. The relationship between DCCT/EDIC weighted mean hemoglobin A1c and log prostate specific antigen was assessed using linear regression modeling after adjusting for age, body mass index, total testosterone, statin and thiazide medication use, diabetes duration, and DCCT randomization arm and cohort. Results Median subject age was 52 years, body mass index was 28.4 kg/m 2 and DCCT/EDIC time-weighted hemoglobin A1c was 7.9%. Median prostate specific antigen was 0.64 ng/ml (IQR 0.43, 1.05). Prostate specific antigen increased significantly with age (p <0.0001) and with lower time-weighted hemoglobin A1c (p <0.0001). Each 10% increase in hemoglobin A1c was accompanied by an 11% reduction in prostate specific antigen (p=0.0001). Conclusions Prostate specific antigen decreases as hemoglobin A1c increases in men with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This relationship is independent of age, body mass index, androgen levels, medication use and measures of diabetes severity, which suggests that factors related to glycemia may directly affect prostate specific antigen levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We compared the prevalence, level of bother and effect on daily activities of urinary incontinence among women with type 1 diabetes enrolled in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study to a population based sample of women with normal glucose. Materials and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of women with type 1 diabetes and normal glucose tolerance using 2 study populations. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial cohort followup, Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications, began in 1994. In 2004 women participants (550) completed a self-administered questionnaire on urinary incontinence. Our primary outcome was weekly or greater incontinence, overall and by type. Prevalence of urinary incontinence was compared to a subgroup of women with normal glucose in the 2001 to 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results: Overall 65% of women with type 1 diabetes reported any urinary incontinence (17% reported weekly incontinence). Nearly 40% of these women were greatly bothered by their incontinence and 9% believed it affected their day-to-day activities. Women with type 1 diabetes had a nearly 2-fold greater prevalence of weekly urge incontinence compared to those without diabetes in the NHANES cohort (8.8% vs 4.5%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Urinary incontinence is common in women with type 1 diabetes and the prevalence of weekly urge incontinence is far greater compared to that in women with normal glucose levels. Moreover, the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women with type 1 diabetes was greater than that of neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy. These findings highlight the importance of screening for urinary incontinence among women with type 1 diabetes. Studies examining factors associated with urinary incontinence in women with type 1 diabetes are warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]