Search

Stress granules (SGs) are membrane-less dynamic structures consisting of mRNA and protein aggregates that form rapidly in response to a wide range of environmental cellular stresses and viral infections. They act as storage sites for translationally silenced mRNAs under stress conditions. During viral infection, SG formation results in the modulation of innate antiviral immune responses, and several viruses have the ability to either promote or prevent SG assembly. Here, we show that rabies virus (RABV) induces SG formation in infected cells, as revealed by the detection of SG-marker proteins Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 (G3BP1), T-cell intracellular antigen 1 (TIA-1) and poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) in the RNA granules formed during viral infection. As shown by live cell imaging, RABV-induced SGs are highly dynamic structures that increase in number, grow in size by fusion events, and undergo assembly/disassembly cycles. Some SGs localize in close proximity to cytoplasmic viral factories, known as Negri bodies (NBs). Three dimensional reconstructions reveal that both structures remain distinct even when they are in close contact. In addition, viral mRNAs synthesized in NBs accumulate in the SGs during viral infection, revealing material exchange between both compartments. Although RABV-induced SG formation is not affected in MEFs lacking TIA-1, TIA-1 depletion promotes viral translation which results in an increase of viral replication indicating that TIA-1 has an antiviral effect. Inhibition of PKR expression significantly prevents RABV-SG formation and favors viral replication by increasing viral translation. This is correlated with a drastic inhibition of IFN-B gene expression indicating that SGs likely mediate an antiviral response which is however not sufficient to fully counteract RABV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Induction of Type I Interferon (IFN) genes constitutes an essential step leading to innate immune responses during virus infection. Sendai virus (SeV) infection of B lymphoid Namalwa cells transiently induces the transcriptional expression of multiple IFN-A genes. Although transcriptional activation of IFN-A genes has been extensively studied, the mechanism responsible for the attenuation of their expression remains to be determined. Principal Findings: In this study, we demonstrate that virus infection of Namalwa cells induces transient recruitment of HDAC3 (histone deacetylase 3) to IFN-A promoters. Analysis of chromatin-protein association by Chip-QPCR demonstrated that recruitment of interferon regulatory factor (IRF)3 and IRF7, as well as TBP correlated with enhanced histone H3K9 and H3K14 acetylation, whereas recruitment of HDAC3 correlated with inhibition of histone H3K9/K14 acetylation, removal of IRF7 and TATA-binding protein (TBP) from IFN-A promoters and inhibition of virus-induced IFN-A gene transcription. Additionally, HDAC3 overexpression reduced, and HDAC3 depletion by siRNA enhanced IFN-A gene expression. Furthermore, activation of IRF7 enhanced histone H3K9/K14 acetylation and IFN-A gene expression, whereas activation of both IRF7 and IRF3 led to recruitment of HDAC3 to the IFN-A gene promoters, resulting in impaired histone H3K9 acetylation and attenuation of IFN-A gene transcription. Conclusion: Altogether these data indicate that reversal of histone H3K9/K14 acetylation by HDAC3 is required for attenuation of IFN-A gene transcription during viral infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The therapeutic efficacy of anticancer chemotherapies may depend on dendritic cells (DCs), which present antigens from dying cancer cells to prime tumor-specific interferon-γ (IFN-γ)–producing T lymphocytes. Here we show that dying tumor cells release ATP, which then acts on P2X7 purinergic receptors from DCs and triggers the NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing-3 protein (NLRP3)-dependent caspase-1 activation complex ('inflammasome'), allowing for the secretion of interleukin-1β (IL-1β). The priming of IFN-γ–producing CD8+ T cells by dying tumor cells fails in the absence of a functional IL-1 receptor 1 and in Nlpr3-deficient (Nlrp3−/−) or caspase-1–deficient (Casp-1−/−) mice unless exogenous IL-1β is provided. Accordingly, anticancer chemotherapy turned out to be inefficient against tumors established in purinergic receptor P2rx7−/− or Nlrp3−/− or Casp1−/− hosts. Anthracycline-treated individuals with breast cancer carrying a loss-of-function allele of P2RX7 developed metastatic disease more rapidly than individuals bearing the normal allele. These results indicate that the NLRP3 inflammasome links the innate and adaptive immune responses against dying tumor cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Virus-induced expression of interferon (IFN)-A genes is regulated by two members of the IFN regulatory factor (IRF) family, IRF-3 and IRF-7, which are activated by phosphorylation during viral infection by the IKK-related serine/threonine kinases TBK1 and IκB kinase ϵ (IKKϵ). In this study, we demonstrate that three IRF-binding sites located in the virus-responsive element mediate the transcriptional activation of the IFN-A4 promoter by IRF-3. The precise arrangement of these IRF elements is required for synergistic activation of the IFN-A4 promoter following Newcastle disease virus infection or activation by TBK1 or IKKϵ. The ordered assembly of IRF-3 multimers on the promoter also determines cooperative recruitment of IRF-3 and CREB-binding protein and differential virus-induced expression of IFN-A4 gene promoter compared with IFN-A11. Naturally occurring nucleotide substitutions disrupt two of the IRF elements in the IFN-A11 gene promoter, leading to a dramatic decrease in IRF-3 and CREB-binding protein recruitment and in IRF-3-dependent transcription. Transcription of the IFN-A4 promoter by IRF-7 is mediated by two IRF elements; promoter mutants that carry a reversed IRF element retain the ability to respond to IKKϵ or TBK1 expression in the presence of IRF-7 but lose the capacity to respond to virus or kinase-induced IRF-3. Interestingly, IKKϵ or TBK1 stimulates the IRF-7-mediated transcription of IFN-A11, although at a lesser extent compared with IFN-A4. Our data indicate that virus-induced expression of IFN-A genes is dictated by the organization of IRF elements within the IFN-A promoters and that the differential IFN-A gene expression, based on the IRF-3 responsiveness, is partially compensated in the presence of IRF-7 when both factors are activated by IKKϵ or TBK1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcriptional regulation is a consequence of the combination of both activation and repression for establishing specific patterns of eukaryotic gene expression. The regulation of the expression of type I interferon (IFN-A and -B) multigene family is controlled primarily at the transcriptional level and has been widely studied as a model to understand the mechanisms of stable repression, transient expression and postinduction repression of genes. The positive and negative regulatory elements required for this on/off switch have been defined within a complex 5′ upstream region of their transcription start site. The differential expression pattern of IFN-A genes is thought to involve both substitutions in the virus responsive element (VRE-A) and presence or absence of the distal negative regulatory element (DNRE) which is delimited upstream of the VRE-A. The interferon regulatory factors (IRF)-3 and -7 binding to the VRE-A and interacting as homodimers or heterodimers participate in the virus-induced transcriptional activation of IFN-A family. This data and the presence of homeodomain protein pituitary homeobox 1 (Pitx1) binding to the distal DNRE, negatively regulating the IRF-3 and IRF-7 activities and interacting physically with IRF-3 and IRF-7 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation and repression of the IFN-A genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Different members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family are early activated by viral infection of eukaryotic cells. The IRFs participate in the virus-induced transcriptional regulation of different genes, including the multigenic interferon-A (IFN-A) family, members of which are involved in the establishment of an antiviral state, cell growth inhibition or apoptosis. This study presents the recent progress in the field of virus-induced transactivation and repression of IFN-A gene promoters. Data presented on the modular organization of IFN-A gene promoters and their transactivation dependent on IRF-3 and IRF-7 provide a new insight on the cooperativity mechanisms among the different IRF family members. Data on the transcriptional repression of virus-induced interferon-A promoters by the homeodomain protein Pitx1 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation, repression and antirepression of the IFN-A genes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Mouse interferon-β (Mu-lFN-β) induced in C-243 cells with Newcastle disease virus was purified in four steps including ammonium sulfate fractionation, DEAE-cellulose, monoclonal Mu-IFN-β antibody affinity and Mono- S cation-exchange chromatographies. Specific activity of the purified Mu-IFN-β ranged over 1.1–1.4 × 109 NIH units/mg protein. This preparation was submitted to pronase digestion and gel filtration on Fractogel TSK HW- 40. The permethylated and acetylated glycopeptide fraction was analyzed by chemical-ionization (ammonia) mass spectrometry. The major glycopeptide is composed of Gal, Man, OlcNAc and NeuAc with a molar ratio of 2.0:3.6:3.4:0.5. The GLC pattern of methyl derivatives obtained by methanolysis and acetylation of fully methylated glycopeptide identified 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methylgalactose; 3,4,6-tri-O-methyl-mannose; 2,3,4- and 2,4,6- tri-O-methyl galactose; 2,4,di-O-methyl mannose and 3,6-di-O-methylglucosamine. These results wizen compared with data on N-glycans suggest the following structure for the carbohydrate moiety of Mu-IFN-β: [This symbol cannot be presented in ASCII format] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Differential expression of the human interferon A (IFN-A) gene cluster is modulated following paramyxovirus infection by the relative amounts of active interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) and IRF-7. IRF-3 expression activates predominantly IFN-A1 and IFN-B, while IRF-7 expression induces multiple IFN-A genes. IFN-A1 gene expression is dependent on three promoter proximal IRF elements (B, C, and D modules, located at positions -98 to -45 relative to the mRNA start site). IRF-3 binds the C module of IFN-A1, while other IFN-A gene promoters are responsive to the binding of IRF-7 to the B and D modules. Maximal expression of IFN-A1 is observed with complete occupancy of the three modules in the presence of IRF-7. Nucleotide substitutions in the C modules of other IFN-A genes disrupt IRF-3-mediated transcription, whereas a G/A substitution in the D modules enhances IRF7-mediated expression. IRF-3 exerts dual effects on IFN-A gene expression, as follows: a synergistic effect with IRF-7 on IFN-A1 expression and an inhibitory effect on other IFN-A gene promoters. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that transient binding of both IRF-3 and IRF-7, accompanied by CBP/p300 recruitment to the endogenous IFN-A gene promoters, is associated with transcriptional activation, whereas a biphasic recruitment of IRF-3 and CBP/p300 represses IFN-A gene expression. This regulatory mechanism contributes to differential expression of IFN-A genes and may be critical for alpha interferon production in different cell types by RIG-I-dependent signals, leading to innate antiviral immune responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Viral and microbial pathogens contain specific motifs or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are recognized by cell surface- and endosome-associated Toll-like receptors (TLRs). RNA virus infection is also detected through TLR-independent mechanisms. Early viral replicative intermediates are detected by two recently characterized cystolic viral RNA receptors—RIG-I and MDA-5. Both are DExDH/box RNA helicases, and RIG-I specifically recognizes 5′-triphosphate containing viral RNA and transmits signals that induce type I interferon-mediated host immunity against virus infection. In this review, we will focus on RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) signal transduction and the regulatory mechanisms – ubiquitination, deubiquitination, ISGylation – underlying this important host response. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Two members of the signal transducer and activator of transcription family, STAT1 and STAT2, form, together with interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF-9), the ISGF3 complex that activates the expression of the interferon-stimulated genes (ISG). The ISGF3 complex also participates in the virus-induced alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) gene amplification cascade by up-regulating IRF-7 gene expression. Here, we show that treatment of cells with trichostatin A (TSA), a deacetylase inhibitor, inhibits the virus-induced activation of IFN-α/β promoters and dramatically reduces the ability of different ISG promoters to respond to IFN stimulation. Impairment of IFN-α/β and ISG expression by TSA in infected cells is due to the blockage of interferon-stimulated ISGF3 complex formation, which leads to the abolition of IRF-7 gene expression. We also show that the TSA-dependent inhibition of ISGF3 is related to impaired nuclear accumulation of STAT2. Our data suggest that an acetylation/deacetylation mechanism participates in the regulation of cellular distribution and function of STAT2 in IFN-α/β signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcription of the murine interferon-A4 (IFN-A4) gene is mediated by a virus responsive element (VRE-A4) located in the promoter proximal [−120 to −43] region. VRE-A4 contains four DNA modules (A to D) which cooperate for maximal IFN-A4 activation following virus infection. The differential expression between the highly expressed IFN-A4 and the weakly inducible IFN-A11 gene promoters is essentially due to point mutations within the C and D modules of the virus-responsive element VRE-A11. We now demonstrate that in murine L929 and human 293 cells, transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7, which are potent activators of virus-induced type I IFN transcription, differentially affect IFN-A4 and IFN-A11 promoter activities. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting data, our studies demonstrate that the AB modules correspond to a preferential site for IRF-7, whereas the C module is preferentially recognized by IRF-3. Furthermore, transfection of reporter constructs driven by four copies of different GAAANN hexameric motifs found within VRE-A4 indicates that the NN residues of these hexameric sequences define the preferential binding sites for IRF-3 or IRF-7. Together, these experiments clarify the molecular basis for differential expression of IFN-A genes following virus infection by delineating the sequence requirements for IRF association with the virus responsive elements of the IFN-A genes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]