Search

Ziel des Beitrags ist, am Beispiel der Geschichte des Mobilitätsdiskurses das Gendering industrieller Massenprodukte im Fahrzeugbereich sowie dessen historische und gesellschaftliche Ausprägungen exemplarisch nachvollziehbar zu machen. Ausgangspunkt ist eine Definition von Design, die dessen diskursive Funktion fokussiert: Design selbst produziert Bedeutung und transportiert diese nicht nur. Vor diesem Hintergrund erfolgt ein diskursanalytischer Blick auf ‚Gendered Mobility‘ – vom historischen Geschlechterkampf ums Fahrrad bis zu Entwürfen von ‚Frauenautos‘ in der jüngeren Vergangenheit. Mittels einer solchen Analyse des gegenderten Mobilitätsdiskurses wird gezeigt, wie Design sowohl auf der Seite der Gestaltenden als auch auf der Seite der Konsumierenden an der performativen Herstellung von Geschlechtsidentität(en) und damit auch an der (Re-)Produktion der bestehenden, hierarchischen Geschlechterverhältnisse in der gegenwärtigen Wachstumsökonomie beteiligt ist – ein Vorgehen, das nicht auf Gender begrenzt ist, sondern auf weitere Diversitätsdimensionen und deren Intersektionen ausgeweitet werden kann.

Copyright of GENDER: Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Rechtsmedizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Between 1895 and 1904, over 1,800 separate businesses merged into approximately 150 ‘trusts’, most of them simple horizontal combinations. Less than a third succeeded. One of the more spectacular failures was the American Bicycle Company. Formed by combining 45 bicycle and cycle-parts makers, it lasted less than three years. Various theories have been advanced to explain this abysmal performance, but there appears to have been no single deterministic cause. The firm was inadequate in size and scope, poorly organised, and lacking a clear goal. Its participating owners had disparate, often contradictory, objectives. Its demise left the American industry with a decentralised structure fragmented into competing sub-industries for cycle parts, bicycle fabrication and assembly, and the distribution and marketing of completed cycles. This structure led to market dominance by component firms, minimal profits and high failure rates for cycle makers, and a low overall level of innovation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of Der Unfallchirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Langenbecks Archiv fuer Chirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)