Search

Background Diffusion MRI estimates of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) have been shown to be useful in predicting treatment response in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), with ADC elevations indicating tumor cell death. We aimed to investigate whether the ADC values measured before and after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the changes in these ADC values could predict overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent IDH wild-type GBM. Methods Forty-four patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective study: (i) diagnosed with recurrent IDH wild-type GBM and treated with either pembrolizumab or nivolumab and (ii) availability of diffusion data on pre- and post-ICI MRI. Tumor volume and the median relative ADC (rADC) with respect to the normal-appearing white matter within the enhancing tumor were calculated. Results Median OS among all patients was 8.1 months (range, 1.0–22.5 months). Log-rank test revealed that higher post-treatment rADC was associated with a significantly longer OS (median, 10.3 months for rADC ≥ 1.63 versus 6.1 months for rADC < 1.63; P = .02), whereas tumor volume, pretreatment rADC, and changes in rADC after treatment were not significantly associated with OS. Cox regression analysis revealed that post-treatment rADC significantly influenced OS (P = .02, univariate analysis), even after controlling for age and sex (P =.01, multivariate analysis), and additionally controlling for surgery after ICI treatment (P = .045, multivariate analysis). Conclusions Elevated post-treatment rADC may be an early imaging biomarker for OS benefits in GBM patients receiving ICI treatment.

PurposeThe objective of the current study was to explore the efficacy of using pH-weighted amine CEST-EPI as a potential non-invasive imaging biomarker for treatment response and/or failure in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab.MethodA total of 11 patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab were included in this prospective study. CEST-EPI, perfusion MRI, and standardized anatomic MRI were obtained in patients before and after bevacizumab administration. CEST-EPI measures of magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) at 3ppm were used for pH-weighted imaging contrast. Multiple measures were examined for their association with progression-free survival (PFS).ResultTumor acidity, measured with MTRasym at 3ppm, was significantly reduced in both contrast enhancing and non-enhancing tumor after bevacizumab (p = 0.0002 and p

Background Evidence from single and multicenter phase II trials have suggested diffusion MRI is a predictive imaging biomarker for survival benefit in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with anti-VEGF therapy. The current study confirms these findings in a large, randomized phase III clinical trial. Methods Patients with rGBM were enrolled in a phase III randomized (1:1), controlled trial (NCT02511405) to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) versus BV in combination with ofranergene obadenovec (BV+VB-111), an anti-cancer viral therapy. In 170 patients with diffusion MRI available, pretreatment enhancing tumor volume and ADC histogram analysis were used to phenotype patients as having high (>1.24 µm2/ms) or low ( Results Baseline tumor volume (P = .3460) and ADCL (P = .2143) did not differ between treatment arms. Univariate analysis showed patients with high ADCL had a significant survival advantage in all patients (P = .0006), as well as BV (P = .0159) and BV+VB-111 individually (P = .0262). Multivariable Cox regression accounting for treatment arm, age, baseline tumor volume, and ADCL identified continuous measures of tumor volume (P < .0001; HR = 1.0212) and ADCL phenotypes (P = .0012; HR = 0.5574) as independent predictors of OS. Conclusion Baseline diffusion MRI and tumor volume are independent imaging biomarkers of OS in rGBM treated with BV or BV+VB-111.

BACKGROUND Evidence from independent single center as well as multicenter phase II trials have suggested diffusion MRI is a strong predictive imaging biomarker for survival benefit in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy, but not systemic chemotherapies or combination therapies with anti-VEGF agents. The current study builds on this body of evidence by evaluating these diffusion MR phenotypes in a large randomized phase III clinical trial. METHODS Patients with rGBM were enrolled in a phase III randomized (1:1), controlled trial (NCT02511405) to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) versus bevacizumab in combination with ofranergene obadenovec (BV+VB-111), an anti-cancer viral therapy. In 170 patients with diffusion MRI available, pre-treatment enhancing tumor volume and ADC histogram analysis were used to phenotype patients as having high (>1.24 um2/ms) or low (< 1.24 um2/ms) ADCL, the mean value of the lower peak in a double Gaussian model of the ADC histogram within the contrast enhancing tumor. RESULTS Baseline tumor volume (P=0.3460) and ADCL (P=0.2143) did not differ between treatment arms. Univariate analysis showed that patients with high ADCL had a significant survival advantage when pooling all patients (P=0.0006), as well as when examining the BV (P=0.0159) and BV+VB-111 individually (P=0.0262). Multivariable Cox regression accounting for treatment arm, age, baseline tumor volume and ADCL identified continuous measures of tumor volume (P< 0.0001; HR=1.0212) and ADCL phenotypes (P=0.0012; HR=0.5574) as independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSION Baseline diffusion MRI and tumor volume are independent imaging biomarkers of OS in rGBM treated with BV or BV+VB-111. Since ADCL was predictive of OS in combination BV+VB-111, results support the working hypothesis that co-administration of VB-111 with BV may block any VB-111 anti-tumor effect, whereas VB-111 monotherapy or priming may result in higher efficacy of VB-111.

BackgroundDiffusion magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics are a predictive imaging biomarker for survival benefit in recurrent glioblastoma treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy; however, its use in large volume recurrence has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo determine if diffusion MR characteristics can predict survival outcomes in patients with large volume recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab or repeat resection.MethodsA total of 32 patients with large volume (>20 cc or > 3.4 cm diameter) recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab and 35 patients treated with repeat surgery were included. Pretreatment tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis were used to phenotype patients as having high (>1.24 μm2/ms) or low (

PurposeTo examine whether the rate of change in maximum 18F-FDOPA PET uptake and the rate of change in non-enhancing tumor volume could predict malignant transformation and residual overall survival (OS) in low grade glioma (LGG) patients who received serial 18F-FDOPA PET and MRI scans.Methods27 LGG patients with ≥ 2 18F-FDOPA PET and MRI scans between 2003 and 2016 were included. The rate of change in FLAIR volume (uL/day) and maximum normalized 18F-FDOPA specific uptake value (nSUVmax/month), were compared between histological and molecular subtypes. General linear models (GLMs) were used to integrate clinical information with MR-PET measurements to predict malignant transformation. Cox univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify imaging and clinical risk factors related to OS.ResultsA GLM using patient age, treatment, the rate of change in FLAIR and 18F-FDOPA nSUVmax could predict malignant transformation with > 67% sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.7556, P = 0.0248). A significant association was observed between OS and continuous rates of change in PET uptake (HR = 1.0212, P = 0.0034). Cox multivariable analysis confirmed that continuous measures of the rate of change in PET uptake was an independent predictor of OS (HR = 1.0242, P = 0.0033); however, stratification of patients based on increasing or decreasing rate of change in FLAIR (HR = 2.220, P = 0.025), PET uptake (HR = 2.148, P = 0.0311), or both FLAIR and PET (HR = 2.354, P = 0.0135) predicted OS.ConclusionsThe change in maximum normalized 18F-FDOPA PET uptake, with or without clinical information and rate of change in tumor volume, may be useful for predicting the risk of malignant transformation and estimating residual survival in patients with LGG.

2521 Background: Despite concerns of immunotherapy-induced inflammatory response during PD1 inhibition, questions remain as to the true incidence of inflammatory response and potential clinical implications. The goals of the project were to use GBM patients pooled from academic centers to estimate radiographic PFS and OS, as well as determine the incidence of immunotherapy-induced inflammatory response. Methods: 152 patients with newly diagnosed (N = 57) or recurrent (N = 95) GBM treated with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab from Dana-Farber (N = 88), UCLA (N = 35) or UCSF (N = 29) were included in this study. Radiographic progression was defined by a 25% increase in bidirectional measurements according to RANO. Results: Median PFS and OS for newly diagnosed patients was 162 and 520 days, respectively, while median PFS and OS for recurrent patients was 72 and 225 days, respectively. No difference in OS was observed in recurrent patients treated with nivolumab vs. pembrolizumab (P = 0.58), but recurrent patients treated with nivolumab trended toward a longer PFS (P = 0.097). Of the recurrent patients with OS and PFS data available and radiographic progression, 95% of them progressed within 6 mos of starting treatment. Median post-progression survival (PPS) in recurrent patients with PFS < 6 mos was 151 days, while PPS for patients with PFS > 6 mos was 178 days (P = 0.51). In the 77 recurrent patients who progressed within 6 mos, 36.4% had an OS that was > 9 mos, while 63.6% had an OS < 9 mos, suggesting the majority of patients with “early progression” also died early and a minority of patients had what could be considered “immune-related inflammation”. Of the 81 recurrent patients with documented progression, only 2.5% showed stabilization within 3 mos of first progression, 30.9% died before the 3-month confirmation scan could be obtained, 24.7% showed continued tumor growth by 3 months, and 48.1% had no follow-up confirmatory imaging exams. Of the 70 patients who progressed within 6 mos and had documented death, 2.9% had disease stabilization, 31.4% died before the 3-month confirmation, and 75.7% had either documented tumor growth or had no follow-up confirmatory imaging exams. Conclusions: This study suggests immunotherapy-induced inflammation followed by a favorable PPS is uncommon in GBM. While patients treated with other types of immunotherapy may exhibit different imaging characteristics, these data provide an important basis to refine the iRANO criteria.

VB-111 is a non-replicating adenovirus carrying a pro-apoptotic transgene for TNFR1/Fas under the control of a modified murine promoter to pre-proendothelin 1. The transgene is expressed only in angiogenic endothelial cells, and therefore VB-111 results in targeted apoptosis of neovascular vessels. The current study characterizes the quantitative radiographic results and impact on OS in phase 2 and 3 trials of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated with VB-111 with or without bevacizumab (BV) or BV monotherapy. MRI data from a phase 2 (NCT01260506) and randomized, double arm, controlled phase 3 (GLOBE; NCT02511405) trial of VB-111 in recurrent GBM were used in current study: Arm A) VB-111 monotherapy until progression followed by combination VB-111 and bevacizumab (BV) (“Primed Combination”; Phase 2; N=24); Arm B) VB-111 in combination with BV (“Unprimed Combination”; Phase 3; N=124); Arm C) BV monotherapy (“Control”; Phase 3; N=120). Contrast enhanced T1-weighted digital subtraction was used to quantify tumor volume at all time points. Baseline tumor volume was prognostic for OS in all treatment groups when controlling for therapy and age (Cox, P< 0.001, HR=1.02). In patients with smaller tumors (< 25mL), the “primed combination” cohort (Arm A) from the phase 2 trial had a significant OS advantage compared to both upfront combination of VB-111 and BV (Arm B; P=0.0094, HR=0.53; median OS = 7 vs. 15mo) as well as BV alone (Arm C; P=0.025, HR=0.58; median OS=8.5 vs. 15mo). Patients with a radiographic response (>65% reduction) had a significant survival difference from non-responders when controlling for age, baseline tumor volume, and treatment arm (P=0.0014, HR=0.58). Responders to VB-111 monotherapy or combination therapy after priming with VB-111 exhibited characteristic, expansive areas of necrosis in areas of initial disease.

2018 Background: VB-111 is a non-replicating adenovirus carrying a pro-apoptotic transgene for TNFR1/Fas under the control of a modified murine promoter to pre-proendothelin 1. The transgene is expressed only in angiogenic endothelial cells, and therefore VB-111 results in targeted apoptosis of neovascular vessels. The current study characterizes the quantitative radiographic results and impact on OS in phase 2 and 3 trials of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated with VB-111 with or without bevacizumab (BV) or BV monotherapy. Methods: MRI data from a phase 2 (NCT01260506) and randomized, double arm, controlled phase 3 (GLOBE; NCT02511405) trial of VB-111 in recurrent GBM were used in current study: Arm A) VB-111 monotherapy until progression followed by combination VB-111 and bevacizumab (BV) (“Primed Combination”; Phase 2; N = 24); Arm B) VB-111 in combination with BV (“Unprimed Combination”; Phase 3; N = 124) and Arm C) BV monotherapy (“Control”; Phase 3; N = 120). Contrast enhanced T1-weighted digital subtraction was used to quantify tumor volume at all time points. Results: Baseline tumor volume was not significantly different between patient cohorts (Kruskal-Wallis; P = 0.1482; median~20mL). Continuous measures of baseline tumor volume were prognostic for OS in all treatment groups when controlling for therapy and age (Cox, P < 0.001, HR = 1.02). In patients with small tumors ( < 25mL), the “primed combination” cohort (Arm A) from the phase 2 trial had a significant OS advantage compared to both upfront combination of VB-111 and BV (Arm B; P = 0.0094, HR = 0.5328; median OS = 7mo vs. 15mo) as well as BV alone (Arm C; P = 0.0248, HR = 0.5776; median OS = 8.5mo vs. 15mo). Patients with a radiographic response ( > 65% reduction) had a significant survival difference from non-responders when controlling for age, baseline tumor volume, and treatment arm ( P = 0.0014, HR = 0.5822). Notably, in responders to VB-111 monotherapy or combination therapy after priming with VB-111 exhibited characteristic, expansive areas of necrosis in areas of initial disease. Conclusions: Small recurrent tumors have a significant OS advantage when “priming” with VB-111 monotherapy prior to combination VB-111 and BV at recurrence. Patients responding to VB-111 exhibit specific imaging characteristics related to the drug mechanism of action. Clinical trial information: NCT02511405; NCT01260506.