143 results on '"Kirkham, Jamie J."'
Search Results
2. Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers
3. Using behavioral science to increase core outcome set use in trials
4. Multi-Round versus Real-Time Delphi survey approach for achieving consensus in the COHESION core outcome set: a randomised trial
5. Bridging pre-surgical endocrine therapy for breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes from the B-MaP-C study
6. Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study
7. Gynecological trials frequently exclude people based on their symptoms rather than their condition: a systematic review of Cochrane reviews and their component trials
8. Assessment highlights need for improvement in standards of development of core outcome sets for rare genetic diseases
9. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: protocol for development of a core outcome set for clinical trials
10. Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals
11. Empirical Comparison of Univariate and Multivariate Meta-Analyses in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews with Multiple Binary Outcomes
12. Patient-focused outcomes are infrequently reported in pediatric health information technology trials: a systematic review
13. RoB 2 : a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
14. Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial
15. COHESION: core outcomes in neonatal encephalopathy (protocol)
16. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
17. Industry funding was associated with increased use of core outcome sets
18. Value Assessment and Quantitative Benefit-Risk Modelling of Biosimilar Infliximab for Crohn’s Disease
19. Improvement was needed in the standards of development for cancer core outcome sets
20. COHESION: a core outcome set for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy.
21. Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake
22. Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal sepsis (NESCOS).
23. Multivariate meta-analysis helps examine the impact of outcome reporting bias in Cochrane rheumatoid arthritis reviews
24. Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies : findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
25. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews
26. How well are the ASAS/OMERACT Core Outcome Sets for Ankylosing Spondylitis implemented in randomized clinical trials? A systematic literature review
27. Evaluation of editors' abilities to predict the citation potential of research manuscripts submitted to The BMJ: a cohort study.
28. On the 12th Day of Christmas, a Statistician Sent to Me ...
29. Core outcomes for pressure ulcer prevention trials: results of an international consensus study.
30. A pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the utility of an e-learning package that trains users in adverse drug reaction causality
31. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
32. Adverse drug reactions and off-label and unlicensed medicines in children: a prospective cohort study of unplanned admissions to a paediatric hospital
33. Optimising research for neonates with encephalopathy: the role of core outcome sets.
34. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
35. Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross‐sectional international survey.
36. Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
37. Breast cancer management pathways during the COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes from the UK 'Alert Level 4' phase of the B-MaP-C study.
38. Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
39. STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies: Development of the STROPS guideline.
40. Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial.
41. Pain Measurement in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Where To Go from Here? Report from a Special Interest Group at OMERACT 2018.
42. Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets.
43. Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta‐analyses in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews with multiple binary outcomes.
44. Protocol for the development of the STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies (STROPS) guideline: checklist of items for reporting pharmacogenetic studies.
45. Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research.
46. Systematic review: outcomes and adverse events from randomised trials in Crohn's disease.
47. Development of a consensus core dataset in juvenile dermatomyositis for clinical use to inform research.
48. Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol.
49. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.
50. A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis.
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.