Search

Drip irrigation combined with split application of fertilizer nitrogen (N) dissolved in the irrigation water (i.e. drip fertigation) is commonly considered best management practice for water and nutrient efficiency. As a consequence, its use is becoming widespread. Some of the main factors (water-filled pore space, NH 4 + and NO 3 − ) regulating the emissions of greenhouse gases (i.e. N 2 O, CO 2 and CH 4 ) and NO from agroecosystems can easily be manipulated by drip fertigation without yield penalties. In this study, we tested management options to reduce these emissions in a field experiment with a melon ( Cucumis melo L.) crop. Treatments included drip irrigation frequency (weekly/daily) and type of N fertilizer (urea/calcium nitrate) applied by fertigation. Crop yield, environmental parameters, soil mineral N concentrations and fluxes of N 2 O, NO, CH 4 and CO 2 were measured during 85 days. Fertigation with urea instead of calcium nitrate increased N 2 O and NO emissions by a factor of 2.4 and 2.9, respectively ( P < 0.005). Daily irrigation reduced NO emissions by 42% ( P < 0.005) but increased CO 2 emissions by 21% ( P < 0.05) compared with weekly irrigation. We found no relation between irrigation frequency and N 2 O emissions. Based on yield-scaled Global Warming Potential as well as NO cumulative emissions, we conclude that weekly fertigation with a NO 3 − -based fertilizer is the best option to combine agronomic productivity with environmental sustainability. Our study shows that adequate management of drip fertigation, while contributing to the attainment of water and food security, may provide an opportunity for climate change mitigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]