Search

The article titled "Geometric Construction of Video Stereo Grid Space" has been retracted by the Remote Sensing Editorial Office. The authors raised concerns about the ownership of the data presented in the article, prompting an investigation by the Editorial Office and Editorial Board. It was confirmed that the data were subject to a confidentiality agreement with a third party and appropriate permission had not been obtained. As a result, the article has been retracted in accordance with MDPI's retraction policy and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s retraction guidelines. The retraction was approved by the Editor-in-Chief of Remote Sensing, and the authors agreed to the retraction. [Extracted from the article]

Summary: Despite decades of studies meant to analyse the bacterial response to carbon limitation, we still miss a high‐resolution overview of the situation. All gene expression changes observed in such conditions cannot solely be accounted for by the global regulator Crp either free or bound to its effector, cyclic AMP. Here, for the first time, we evaluated the response of both CDS (protein‐coding sequence) and ncRNA (non‐coding RNA) genes to carbon limitation, revealed cellular functions of differentially expressed genes systematically, quantified the contribution of Crp‐cAMP and other factors to regulation and deciphered regulation strategies at a genomewide scale. Approximately one‐third of the differentially expressed genes we identified responded to Crp‐cAMP via its direct or indirect control, while the remaining genes were subject to growth rate‐dependent control or were controlled by other regulators, especially RpoS. Importantly, gene regulation mechanisms can be established by expression pattern studies. Here, we propose a comprehensive picture of how cells respond to carbon scarcity. The global regulation strategies thus exposed illustrate that the response of cell to carbon scarcity is not limited to maintaining sufficient carbon metabolism via cAMP signalling while the main response is to adjust metabolism to cope with a slow growth rate. Despite decades of studies meant to analyze the bacterial response to carbon limitation we still miss a high resolution overview of the situation. Here, for the first time, we evaluated the response of both CDS (protein‐coding sequence) and ncRNA (non‐coding RNA) genes to carbon limitation, revealed cellular functions of differentially expressed genes systematically, quantified the contribution of Crp‐cAMP and other factors to regulation and deciphered regulation strategies at a genomewide scale. The global regulation strategies thus exposed illustrate that the response of cell to carbon scarcity is not limited to maintaining sufficient carbon metabolism via cAMP signaling while the main response is to adjust metabolism to cope with a slow growth rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]