Search

While socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a variety of health outcomes, the literature on the association between SES and traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes has not been formally summarized. This study aims to review existing literature to ascertain whether patients with low SES pre-injury have worse clinical outcomes after TBI compared with those with high SES, in high-income countries. A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and PsychINFO databases. Observational studies addressing the association between SES and TBI outcomes (mortality, functional, cognitive, and vocational outcomes) were included (published from 2000, written in English). Both pediatric and adult TBI groups were included. Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Measures of SES varied across studies. Mortality was assessed in seven studies; five reported an association between low SES and higher mortality. Five of eight studies showed an association between low SES and worse functional outcomes; results for cognitive (n = 13) and vocational outcomes (n = 10) were mixed. The results of this review suggest that SES is a variable of interest in the context of TBI outcomes and should be assessed at time of admission to assist in social work discharge planning and early mobilization of available community resources. Further work is required to better understand the impact of SES on TBI outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Optimal material and timing of cranioplasty in the pediatric population continue to be debated. Autologous and alloplastic materials have various indications for use and risk factors for complications. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all pediatric patients who underwent cranioplasty with any material from 1991–2021. Results: 149 cranioplasty implants were included. Younger age (6 years old or under), a diagnosis of craniosynostosis as reason for implant, use of autologous bone, and shorter times to cranioplasty were predictive of need for revision surgery. No factors studied had a statistically significant impact on rate of removal of implant at time of revision surgery. Conclusion: Autologous and alloplastic cranioplasty materials both have good outcomes with low rates of revision surgery in the pediatric population. Alloplastic implants may be considered in the setting of infection as reason for craniectomy given the lower rate of revision surgery and need for removal. Patients with craniosynostosis as reason for cranioplasty have a higher risk of requiring revision or additional surgeries, regardless of implant used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is major contributor to the global burden of disease, especially in low- and middle- income countries, where most TBIs are traffic-related. Evidence shows that helmets protect against severe TBI. Cambodia continues to have the greatest motorcycle fatality rate in Southeast Asia. We investigated whether the National Motorcycle Helmet Law introduced in January 2016 had an impact on the epidemiology of motorcycle-related TBI in a neurosurgical referral center in Phnom Penh. This is a cross-sectional study of all patients admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at Preah Kossamak Hospital with TBI following motorcycle accidents between January 2014 and December 2017. TBI admissions increased (from 234 in 2014 to 768 in 2017). The median age was 26 years, and most patients were male. The percentage of helmeted patients was 9% in 2014 and 13% in 2015; this increased to 18% in 2016, but dropped to 9% in 2017. Most TBIs occurred during the evening rush hour. Since 2016, more patients wore helmets in the daytime (up to 23%) than at night (5% between 1:00 and 5:00 am). Skull fracture, the most common pathology pre-law, decreased by 25% post-law (P < 0.001). With growing urbanization and motorization, TBI is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Cambodia. Two years after helmets became compulsory, most patients with TBI are still unhelmeted. Likely contributing factors are low penalty for noncompliance and inconsistent law enforcement. TBI is a major public health problem warranting further efforts to understand how to improve prevention strategies and advocate for change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Spine pathology is a common reason for admission to neurosurgical units in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and can have high morbidity rates from lack of specialized institutes. However, good surgical outcomes and quality-of-life scores have been reported in LMICs. This study details the complication rates and predictive factors from spine surgery at a large hospital in Cambodia, aiming to identify high-risk patients to improve surgeon understanding of these complications for improved pre-operative planning and patient counseling. Methods This is a retrospective review of patients admitted for spine conditions to Preah Kossamak Hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia (2013-2017). Univariate analysis was conducted on potential predictive factors; variables with P < 0.1 were entered into multivariate logistic regression models. Results Seven hundred seventy-three patients were included. Forty-six patients had complications including wrong level surgery, hardware failure, and infection. On multivariate analysis, patients from the provinces of Kratie (P = 0.009) or Sihanoukville (P = 0.036), and those that delayed seeking care for more than 1 year after injury (P = 0.027), were significant predictive factors of postoperative complications, and American Spinal Injury Association grade A injury (P = 0.020) was a predictive factor of poor outcome. Conclusions Many factors play a role in spine surgery complications in LMICs, including limited access to intra-operative technology, low follow-up rates, and minimal physiotherapy and rehabilitation capabilities. Patients with long delays in presentation, American Spinal Injury Association grade A injuries, and lumbar-level surgery may be especially susceptible to complications and postoperative morbidity. Despite this, institutions have reported encouraging spine trauma outcomes, and spine surgeries are becoming more accepted and safe operations in many LMICs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Like many low- and-middle-income countries in Africa, documented assessment of the neurosurgical workforce, equipment, infrastructure, and scope of service delivery in Nigeria is lacking. This study aimed to assess the capacity for the delivery of neurosurgical services in Nigeria. An 83-question survey was disseminated to neurosurgeons and residents in Nigeria. We report the findings from the capacity assessment section of the survey, which used the modified neurological-PIPES (personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment, and supplies) (MN-PIPES) tool to evaluate the availability of neurosurgical personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment, and supplies. A comparative analysis was done using the domain and total MN-PIPES scores and MN-PIPES index. The national average MN-PIPES score and index were 176.4 and 9.8, respectively. Overall, the southwest and northwest regions had the highest scores and frequently had high subscores. The survey respondents reported that the main challenges impeding neurosurgery service delivery were a lack of adjunctive supplies (75.2%), a dearth of diagnostic and interventional equipment (72.4%), and an absence of a dedicated intensive care unit (72.4%). The availability of workforce, infrastructure, equipment, and supplies needed to provide optimal neurosurgical care is uneven in many institutions in Nigeria. Although major strides have been made in recent years, targeted collaborative interventions at local, national, regional, and international levels will further improve neurosurgical service delivery in Nigeria and will have positive ripple effects on the rest of the healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]