Search

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) are at increased risk for severe infections. Vaccine responses and safety profiles may differ between AIIRD patients and the general population. While patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) often experience diminished humoral responses and reduced vaccine efficacy, factors such as the type of immunosuppressant medications used and the specific vaccine employed contribute to these outcomes. Notably, individuals undergoing B cell depletion therapy tend to have poor vaccine immunogenicity. However, despite these considerations, vaccine responses are generally considered clinically sufficient. Ideally, immunosuppressed AIIRD patients should receive vaccinations at least two weeks before commencing immunosuppressive treatment. However, it is common for many patients to already be on immunosuppressants during the immunization process. Vaccination rarely triggers flares in AIIRDs; if flares occur, they are typically mild. Despite the heightened infection risk, including COVID-19, among AIIRD patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, and other diseases on immunosuppressants, the vaccination rates remain suboptimal. The future directions of vaccination in the era of immunosuppression will likely involve customized vaccines with enhanced adjuvants and alternative delivery methods. By addressing the unique challenges faced by immunosuppressed individuals, we may improve vaccine efficacy, reduce the risk of infections, and ultimately enhance the health outcomes. Additionally, clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of temporarily discontinuing immunosuppressants during vaccination in various AIIRDs are crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of study: To assess and compare glaucoma knowledge between Jordanian patients with glaucoma and non-glaucoma ophthalmic patients. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was developed after an extensive literature search to investigate glaucoma-related knowledge among participants with glaucoma visiting the Jordan University Hospital clinics from October 2021 to February 2022. Responses were compared to a sample of ophthalmic participants with eye conditions other than glaucoma visiting the ophthalmology clinics at the same time frame. Results: A total of 256 participants filled out the survey, of which 53.1% were diagnosed with glaucoma while 46.9% had ophthalmic conditions other than glaucoma. Our sample of participants is characterized by a mean age of 52.2 ± 17.8 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1.04:1. Overall, participants with glaucoma were more aware of their disease than participants with other ophthalmic conditions. Compared to their ophthalmic non-glaucoma counterparts, those diagnosed with glaucoma face significantly more daily life difficulties due to their ophthalmic disease (p <0.001). Results of the independent sample t-test demonstrate that participants with glaucoma have significantly higher knowledge scores (p <0.001) and were able to recognize more glaucoma symptoms than their non-glaucoma counterparts (p = 0.002). Similarly, those with a positive family history of glaucoma displayed higher knowledge (p = 0.005). Multivariate linear regression demonstrates that family history of glaucoma, higher symptom recognition score, reliance on ophthalmologists, and the internet for glaucoma-related information are positive predictors of higher knowledge scores. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that both glaucoma and non-glaucoma ophthalmic patients display average levels of glaucoma knowledge. Raising awareness through various interventions may improve the lifestyles of patients with glaucoma and alleviate the economic burden associated with treating the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Antenatal suspicion of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) currently relies on ultrasonographic findings, color doppler, and MRI, which have rendered it operator and expertise‐dependent. No serum markers for PAS have been integrated into clinical practice yet. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to identify potential serum markers for PAS by investigating third‐trimester serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEFG), placental growth factor (PIGF), and soluble Fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) among PAS‐cases and controls. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were systematically searched for relevant articles. Random‐effects model was applied to calculate the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) for each marker. Subgroup analysis and meta‐regression were performed to assess for potential covariates. Results: Eight studies involving 366 PAS‐cases and 518 controls were included. Third trimester sFlt‐1 levels were significantly lower in PAS‐cases when compared to controls (SMD = −7.76, 95%CI = −10.42 to −5.10). This was, to a certain extent, consistent among studies though they differed in their extent of significance. Levels of VEGF (SMD = 1.59, 95%CI = −0.07 to 3.25) and PlGF (SMD = −0.49, 95%CI = −1.66 to 0.67) were not significantly different between PAS cases and controls, in which studies demonstrated conflicting results. Conclusions: Third trimester sFlt‐1 levels may be useful to predict PAS. Nonetheless, further studies are recommended to better understand conflicting results before adopting either VEGF or PlGF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been used in the treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis, infliximab being the most commonly used. We have previously reported a case of effective treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis using adalimumab. To describe our experience of using adalimumab in the treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate patients with cardiac sarcoidosis who received adalimumab treatment at the University of Illinois Health between 2011 and 2022. The outcome was evaluated by assessing safety, tolerability, and ability to taper systemic corticosteroids therapy following initiation of adalimumab. Seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Clinical responses to adalimumab were universally positive. Corticosteroid therapy was discontinued in five patients and the dose was reduced in two patients. Furthermore, adalimumab was well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. Adalimumab was safe and well-tolerated in seven patients with cardiac sarcoidosis seen at our medical center and exhibited corticosteroid-sparing effects. Our observation further warrants large prospective studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in the treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]