Search

Background and Aim: Herbal products are widely used to treat patients with disorders of gut brain interaction but clinical efficacy and safety data for treatments lasting >4 weeks are widely lacking. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with the herbal combination product STW 5‐II for patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) meeting Rome II criteria. We also conducted a post hoc analysis including patients meeting Rome IV criteria for FD and evaluated the effect of the G‐protein beta 3 (GNB3) subunit polymorphism (C825T) on therapeutic response. Methods: This multicenter, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study included 272 FD patients meeting Rome II criteria in the intention‐to‐treat cohort and 266 meeting Rome IV criteria. We used the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Score (GIS) to assess GI symptoms, defining response rate as the proportion of patients with ≥50% GIS improvement in at least three of four assessments. Results: After 8 weeks, the response rate was significantly higher in the STW 5‐II group versus placebo (61.2% vs 45.1%, P = 0.008). Mean GIS non‐significantly improved with STW 5‐II treatment (7.9 ± 4.41 vs 6.7 ± 4.91 with placebo; P = 0.07). In the Rome IV subgroup analysis, STW 5‐II yielded a better response rate (P = 0.01) versus placebo and greater postprandial distress symptom improvement (P = 0.04) versus placebo. Safety parameters did not differ between groups, and GNB3 status was not linked with therapeutic response. Conclusion: STW 5‐II is efficacious, with no observed safety signals at up to 8 weeks of treatment in patients with FD meeting Rome II or IV criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a chronic relapsing gastroduodenal disorder with limited treatment options. Herbal products, like the six-herb combination STW 5-II, can target multiple FD gastrointestinal symptoms. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of STW 5-II for overall FD, and key symptoms, based on Rome IV criteria. Methods: We systematically screened the literature for randomized controlled clinical studies testing STW 5-II in FD. Meta-analysis was performed using data from individual patients with at least one key FD symptom (fullness, early satiety, or epigastric pain) of at least moderate severity at baseline. ANCOVA-based meta-analyses were performed on improvements in the total symptom sum score, and single symptoms, after 4 and 8 weeks. Safety data were analyzed by calculating odds ratios for all adverse events. Results: Four randomized controlled trials, including 613 patients, were identified, and two were eligible for efficacy analysis. STW 5-II significantly improved the FD symptom sum score (mean difference of 1.74 after 4 weeks and 2.07 after 8 weeks) and key FD symptoms of fullness (0.28 and 0.29), early satiety (0.25 and 0.26), and epigastric/upper abdominal pain (0.26 and 0.3). Treatment-related or severe adverse events did not differ between STW 5-II and placebo. Conclusion: The results support that STW 5-II significantly improves FD symptoms after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with no difference in relation to safety signals compared to placebo. Thus, STW 5-II can be considered an effective and safe treatment option for FD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the acceptability of a medicine can significantly impact therapeutic outcomes, this study aimed to determine and compare the preferences of children, parents, and healthcare professionals for the most commonly used pediatric oral medicine formulations (syrup, mini-tablets, oblong tablets, round tablets) addressing all pediatric age groups, 0–<18 years (y). This survey study employed sex-, age-, and participant group-adapted questionnaires for eight cohorts of participants, i.e., children 6–<12 y, adolescents 12–<18 y, parents of children in four age groups (0–<2 y, 2–<6 y, 6–<12 y, and 12–<18 y), nurses, and pediatricians. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. In the age groups 0–<2 y and 2–<6 y, mini-tablets were preferred over syrup by all participants. In the age group 6–12 y, solid dosage forms were also preferred over syrup by all participants. In the age group 12–<18 y, healthcare professionals preferred solid dosage forms over syrup. Parents preferred higher amounts of mini-tablets and syrup compared to round and oblong tablets, while adolescents' preferences did not differentiate between these formulations. Based on the study results and in contrast to current practice, it is suggested to consider solid dosage forms for future age-appropriate medicinal products already for younger age groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mini-tablets are advantageous over liquid formulations in overcoming challenges related to stability, taste, and dosage. This open-label, single-dose, cross-over study investigated the acceptability and safety of drug-free, film-coated mini-tablets in children aged 1 month–6 years (stratified: 4–6 years, 2–<4 years, 1–<2 years, 6–<12 months, and 1–<6 months), and their preference for swallowing either a high quantity of 2.0 mm or a low quantity of 2.5 mm diameter mini-tablets. The primary endpoint was acceptability derived from swallowability. The secondary endpoints were investigator-observed palatability, acceptability as a composite endpoint derived from both swallowability and palatability, and safety. Of 320 children randomized, 319 completed the study. Across all tablet sizes, quantities and age groups, acceptability rates based on swallowability were high (at least 87%). Palatability was rated as "pleasant/neutral" in 96.6% of children. The acceptability rates as per the composite endpoint were at least 77% and 86% for the 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm film-coated mini-tablets, respectively. No adverse events or deaths were reported. Recruitment in the 1–<6-months group was stopped early due to coughing—evaluated as "choked on" in three children. Both 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm film-coated mini-tablets are suitable formulations for young children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) severely aggravates the clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To date, neither established heart failure therapies nor pulmonary vasodilators proved beneficial. This study investigated the efficacy of chronic treatment with the oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat in patients with PH-HFpEF. Methods and Results The phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre DYNAMIC trial assessed riociguat in PH-HFpEF. Patients were recruited at five hospitals across Austria and Germany. Key eligibility criteria were mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure >15 mmHg, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. Patients were randomized to oral treatment with riociguat or placebo (1:1). Patients started at 0.5 mg three times daily (TID) and were up-titrated to 1.5 mg TID. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in cardiac output (CO) at rest, measured by right heart catheterization. Primary efficacy analyses were performed on the full analysis set. Fifty-eight patients received riociguat and 56 patients placebo. After 26 weeks, CO increased by 0.37 ± 1.263 L/min in the riociguat group and decreased by −0.11 ± 0.921 L/min in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference: 0.54 L/min, 95% confidence interval 0.112, 0.971; P  = 0.0142). Five patients dropped out due to riociguat-related adverse events but no riociguat-related serious adverse event or death occurred. Conclusion The vasodilator riociguat improved haemodynamics in PH-HFpEF. Riociguat was safe in most patients but led to more dropouts as compared to placebo and did not change clinical symptoms within the study period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] There is limited evidence for the acceptability of various drug formulations holding the potential to improve medicines administration to children. Suitable formulations need to meet the requirements of pediatric patients. Previous studies have demonstrated the acceptance of mini-tablets. Oblong tablets may carry more active ingredient content per unit than mini-tablets and could be an important alternative when the drug substance requires administration of higher doses. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of acceptability of oblong tablets in comparison to 3 ml glucose syrup in children aged 1 to 5 years. Secondary objectives were investigation of acceptability, swallowability and palatability of mini-tablets, oblong tablets and glucose syrup in children between 1 and 5 years. An open, randomized, single dose two-way cross-over design in two parallel study arms was applied. 280 children were stratified to one of five age groups and randomized to receiving one oblong tablet (2.5 × 6 mm) in comparison either to 3 ml glucose syrup or to three mini-tablets (2 × 2 mm). Acceptability and swallowability were assessed according to pre-defined evaluation criteria. The application of the formulations was video documented to evaluate the palatability. As primary objective, non-inferiority was observed regarding acceptability of the oblong tablet compared to syrup in all age groups (84.4% vs 80.1%, difference 4,29% points with 95% CI of −3.00%,11.57%). For swallowability, superiority of the oblong tablet compared to syrup could be shown (74.5% vs. 53.2%, difference 21.26% points, 95% CI of 11.29%, 31.23%). Regarding palatability, <10% of children demonstrated unpleasant reaction after intake of the oblong tablet or mini-tablets as graded by both raters, however, in contrast up to 40% of children after intake of syrup. Oblong tablets are a promising, safe alternative to liquid drug formulations and administration of multiple mini-tablets in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was a comparative investigation of the influence of concomitant food intake on the bioavailability of two nifedipine-containing controlled-release formulations. Adalat® OROS and CORAL® were compared in a randomised, non-blind, four-way crossover design in 24 healthy, male subjects after single dose administration following a high fat American breakfast or an overnight fast of 12 h, respectively. Plasma samples were withdrawn until 48 h post-dose. In the fasted state, the bioavailability (AUC and Cmax values) was lower for CORAL® than for Adalat® OROS. Under fed conditions, differences in bioavailability between both products were markedly increased. With respect to the therapeutic use of both products, the most important finding was the significant dose-dumping effect observed after fed administration of CORAL®, resulting in nifedipine plasma concentrations of nearly three- to four-fold in 11 of 24 volunteers. The mean ratio of Cmax was 235% comparing CORAL® with Adalat® OROS under these conditions. The formulation-dependent food interaction observed in this study may be therapeutically relevant, especially in the case of changing administration conditions or switching from one product to the other. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]