Search

Abstract Background It is quite rare for breast cancer to metastasize to the kidney with a tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava. Case presentation A Japanese woman in her forties was diagnosed with cancer of the left breast and underwent left mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. The final pathological diagnosis was pT1aN0M0, stage IA (ER positive, PgR positive, HER2 negative). Thirteen years later, she presented for care with the complaint of abdominal pain. By imaging findings, right renal carcinoma with a tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava and lung metastases was suspected. However, her tumors were refractory to molecular targeted therapy. In addition, CT-guided needle biopsy of the kidney and lung lesions was done and it was revealed that lesions of the left lung and the right kidney was breast cancer metastases (ER positive, PgR positive, HER2 negative). The patient started combination therapy consisting of abemaciclib, tamoxifen and leuprorelin. Six months later, she died from progression of her metastatic disease. Conclusions It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between primary renal cancer and kidney metastases from breast cancer on imaging. Renal biopsy is recommended before commencing treatment.

Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine whether multiparametric non-contrast MR imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and amide proton transfer (APT) weighted imaging can help differentiate malignant from benign salivary gland lesions. The study population consisted of 42 patients, with 31 benign and 11 malignant salivary gland lesions. All patients were evaluated using DWI, three-dimensional pseudo-continuous ASL, and APT-weighted imaging on 3 T MR imaging before treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), tumor blood flow (TBF), and APT-related signal intensity (APTSI) values within the lesion were compared between the malignant and benign lesions by Mann–Whitney U test. For each parameter, optimal cutoff values were chosen using a threshold criterion that maximized the Youden index for predicting malignant lesions. The performance of ADC, TBF, APTSI, individually and combined, was evaluated in terms of diagnostic ability for malignant lesions. Diagnostic performance was compared by McNemar test. APTSI was significantly higher in malignant lesions (2.18 ± 0.89%) than in benign lesions (1.57 ± 1.09%, p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in ADC or TBF between benign and malignant lesions (p = 0.155 and 0.498, respectively). The accuracy of ADC, TBF, and APTSI for diagnosing malignant lesions was 47.6%, 50.0%, and 66.7%, respectively; whereas the accuracy of the three parameters combined was 85.7%, which was significantly higher than that of each parameter alone (p = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.008, respectively). Therefore, the combination of ADC, TBF, and APTSI can help differentiate malignant from benign salivary gland lesions.