Search

ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas El presente trabajo pretende analizar la influencia de las narrativas sobre el conflicto armado con las FARC-EP en los cambios de la política pública del sector de seguridad y defensa entre los años 2002 y 2020, teniendo en cuenta aquellas lógicas que han imperado y que han establecido una pugna por el sentido del conflicto y de las formas para solucionarlo. Ante ello, se tienen en cuenta los diferentes actores en los niveles respectivos que tienen incidencia o que han mostrado una fuerte posición al respecto, por lo que proporcionan las herramientas necesarias para realizar un análisis narrativo de política pública, bajo un enfoque Interpretativista, que da cuenta no solo de la importancia de hacer estos estudios sobre políticas desde miradas diferentes a las oficiales, sino del hecho de que las narrativas, argumentos y discursos que las sostienen tienen efectos reales y plantean constantes tensiones que se pueden identificar y precisar bajo un contexto histórico especifico como lo es el colombiano, en el que los juegos de poder y dominación han sido una constante. (Texto tomado de la fuente). This paper aims to analyze the influence of the narratives about the armed conflict with the FARC-EP on changes in public policy in the security and defense sector between 2002 and 2020, taking into account those logics that have prevailed and that have established a struggle for the meaning of the conflict and the ways to solve it. Given this, the different actors at the respective levels that have an impact or have shown a strong position in this regard are taken into account, thus providing the necessary tools to carry out a narrative analysis of public policy, under an Interpretative approach, which gives account not only of the importance of conducting these studies on policies from perspectives different from the official ones, but also of the fact that the narratives, arguments and discourses that support them have real effects and pose constant tensions that can be identified and specified in a historical context specify as it is the Colombian, in which the games of power and domination have been a constant. Incluye anexos Maestría Magíster en Políticas Públicas

The remolding of the state from an autocratic to a democratic one in postwar Japan is sometimes regarded as a successful case of external intervention for state-building. When Americans landed in Japan two weeks after Japan's acceptance of unconditional surrender, they expected to meet a fanatic and intransigent people. Instead they were surprised by the orderly and peaceful behavior of Japanese soldiers and citizens (Tamaki 2005, 13-20). Disarmament, demobilization, repatriation, and reintegration (into their home towns/villages) of millions of soldiers proceeded surprisingly smooth between 1945 and 1948. The authoritarian state gave way to a democratic one within two years of the beginning of the American occupation and democracy has persisted since1. And finally, the Japanese economy had already begun to experience high growth when the occupation ended in April 1952. In every respect, American occupation policies seem to have been successful. Against this image of the American occupation in Japan, this paper will argue that American policies were only partially helpful in the democratic remolding and economic development of postwar Japan. The prewar political and economic experiences of the Japanese themselves, and the psychological impact of the defeat, played equally important roles in the democratic rebirth of the Japanese state. Those in search of solutions to the development challenges facing fragile countries today should understand that Japan's 'success' did not begin in 1945 and was not the result of a peace settlement quickly followed by new institutions. The ground work for Japanese success was 80-90 years in the making. Analysis of state-building, economic development and democracy in Japan must start from the Meiji restoration of 1868.