Search

Showing total 2 results
2 results

1. Enduring Tensions in the 2000 Defence White Paper.

Author

O'Keefe, Michael

Subjects
*MILITARY policy, *NATIONAL security, *GOVERNMENT policy, *PRIME ministers
Abstract

In 2000 the Howard government formed a consultative committee to review defence policy and gauge public opinion on defence issues. It concentrated on the impact of budgetary stringency and dramatic strategic change and supported increased defence spending on equipment to cater for high-level threats. Was there a thorough review? Inconsistencies occurred in the reports developed from the review and statements made by senior policy-makers while it was being conducted. The way the review was undertaken points to conceptual tensions in Australia's strategic culture and serious problems with entrenched interests in the services. Unless these challenges are addressed, a thorough review of defence policy cannot be undertaken. The review process itself needs to be reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2003
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Defence white paper needed.

Author

Skotnicki, Tom

Subjects
*MILITARY policy, *GOVERNMENT policy, *NATIONAL security, *TERRORISM
Abstract

Focuses on the move of Australia's Defense Minister Robert Hill to work on a defense policy update for a comprehensive assessment of the country's strategic position and future requirements. Importance of the white paper in resolving the crucial issue surrounding the primary focus of defense capability; Details on the national security strategy of the country; Role for the country's Defense Force in counter-terrorism strategy.

Published
2005