Search

Objective We present prenatal diagnosis of a 15q11.2-q14 deletion of paternal origin associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT), mosaicism for de novo multiple unbalanced translocations involving 15q11-q14, 5qter, 15qter, 17pter and 3qter, and Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS). Case report A 32-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of an increased NT thickness of 5.6 mm and abnormal maternal serum screening results in the first trimester. The pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,XX,der(5)t(5;15)(q35;q14),-15 [16]/45,XX,-15,der(17)t(15;17)(q14;p13)[3]/45,XX,der(15)t(15;15)(q35;q14),-15[2]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from cultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 15q11.2q14 (22,765,628–38,651,755) × 1.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with a 15.886-Mb 15q11.2-q14 deletion encompassing TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA2, NIPA1, SNRPN, SNURF, SNORD116-1, IPW, UBE3A, ACTC1 and MEIS2. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus with facial dysmorphism was delivered. The cord blood had a karyotype of 45,XX,der(5)t(5;15)(q35;q14),-15[46]/45,XX,der(3)t(3;15) (q29;q14),-15[2]/45,XX,-15,der(17)t(15;17)(q14;p13)[2]. The placenta had a karyotype of 45,XX,der(5) t(5;15)(q35;q14),-15. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a paternal origin of the proximal 15q deletion. Conclusion Increased NT and abnormal maternal serum screening results may prenatally be associated with PWS. Chromosome 15 rearrangements in PWS include mosaicism for de novo multiple unbalanced translocations.

Objective We present prenatal diagnosis of terminal 2q deletion and distal 10q duplication of paternal origin in a fetus associated with increased nuchal translucency and abnormal maternal serum screening results. Case report A 26-year-old woman who had experienced spontaneous abortion twice underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of an increased nuchal translucency thickness of 3.5 mm at 12 weeks of gestation and abnormal maternal serum screening results of 2.573 multiples of the median (MoM) of free β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) and 1.536 MoM of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) resulting in a trisomy 21 risk of 1:64. Amniocentesis revealed a derivative chromosome 2. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr [hg19] 2q37.3 (238,294,223–242,782,258) × 1, 10q24.31q26.3 (102,018,246–135,426,386) × 3. Cytogenetic analysis of parental bloods revealed a karyotype of 46,XX in the mother and a karyotype of 46,XY,t(2;10)(q37.3;q24.3) in the father. The fetal karyotype was 46,XX,der(2)t(2;10)(q37.3;q24.3)pat. The pregnancy was terminated at 20 weeks of gestation, and a malformed fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. Postnatal analysis of the cord blood confirmed the results of prenatal diagnosis. The fetus had a 4.693-Mb deletion of 2q37.3 encompassing the genes of HDAC4, KIF1A, PASK, HDLBP, FARP2 and D2HGDH, and a 33.34-Mb duplication of 10q24.31-q26.3 encompassing the gene of NFκB2. Conclusion First-trimester ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry screening may help to identify an unexpected unbalanced familial translocation at prenatal diagnosis.

Objective We present partial monosomy 8p (8p23.2→pter) and partial trisomy 15q (15q21.2→qter) and incidental detection of a familial chromosome translocation of paternal origin in a pregnancy associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and an abnormal maternal serum screening result. Case Report A 29-year-old primigravid woman underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 13 weeks of gestation because of an increased NT thickness of 3.2 mm at 12 weeks of gestation and an abnormal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome result with a calculated risk of 1/29. Her husband was 33 years old, and there was no family history of congenital malformations. CVS revealed a derived chromosome 8 or der(8). Cytogenetic analysis of the parents revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,t(8;15)(p21.3;q13) in the father and a karyotype of 46,XX in the mother. The CVS result was 46,XY,der(8)t(8;15)(p21.3;q13)pat. The woman requested for amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed a result of arr 8p23.3p23.2 (191,530–2,625,470) × 1.0, arr 15q21.2q26.3 (50,903,432–102,338,129) × 3.0 with a 2.434-Mb deletion of 8p23.3-p23.2 including DLGAP2, CLN8 and ARHGEF10, and a 51.435-Mb duplication of 15q21.2-q26.3 including CYP19A1 and IGF1R. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed the result of 46,XY,der(8) t(8;15)(p23.2;q21.2)pat in the fetus. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic craniofacial dysmorphism. Conclusion Maternal serum screening and NT screening may incidentally detect familial unbalanced reciprocal translocations, and aCGH analysis is useful for a precise determination of the breakpoints of the translocation and the involvement of the related genes under such a circumstance.

Recently, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been implemented as a first‐tier test in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies. However, its application for pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening (AMSS) only is not widespread. This study evaluated the value of CMA compared to traditional karyotyping in pregnancies with increased risk following first‐ or second‐trimester maternal serum screening. Data from 3973 pregnancies with referral for invasive prenatal testing following AMSS were obtained from April 2016 to May 2020. Routine karyotyping was performed and single nucleotide polymorphism array was recommended. The foetuses were categorized according to the indications as AMSS only (group A) and AMSS with ultrasound anomalies (group B). CMA was performed on 713 prenatal samples. The proportion of women opting for CMA testing in both groups increased over the years. The incremental yield of clinically significant findings for pregnancies with high risk of screening results was similar to that for the foetuses with ultrasound soft markers (P > 0.05), but significantly lower than that for the foetuses with structural anomalies (P 0.05). CMA should be performed for pregnant women undergoing prenatal invasive testing due to AMSS, especially with high‐risk results, regardless of ultrasound findings.

Background: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the 18-year experience of prenatal diagnosis of fetal karyotype analysis by amniocentesis. Methods: In this study, the authors reviewed the cytogenetic results of 40,208 fetuses with indications for amniocentesis enrolled from December 1998 to December 2015. Cytogenetic analysis of amniotic fluid was performed in all these pregnancies. Eight indications for amniocentesis were included. The detection rate and distribution of abnormal karyotypes were observed in each indication. Results: Among all these samples, abnormal maternal serum screening test was the most common indication for amniocentesis (17,536, 43.67%), followed by advanced maternal age (11,734, 29.18%), abnormal ultrasound findings (5,328, 13.25%), and required by pregnant women (2,557, 6.36%). Chromosomal abnormality was detected in 1,349 (3.36%) samples, 63.01% of the abnormalities were numerical, and 36.99% were structural. The detection rates of abnormal karyotype were 55.60% in one of the couple with chromosomal abnormality, 4.43% in the pregnant women with pathological ultrasound finding, 2.83% in the pregnant women with advanced age, and 2.73% in women with abnormal maternal serum screening tests. Of the fetuses with chromosome aberrations, 680 (50.41%) had trisomy 13, trisomy 18, or trisomy 21, and 138 (10.23%) had sex chromosome disorder. The other 531 abnormal samples included translocation, mosaicism, inversion, deletion, addition, and marker chromosome. Conclusions: Cytogenetic analysis, therefore, remained an effective approach to decrease the birth defects of fetuses with indications for amniocentesis. These results could provide meaningful suggestions for clinical genetic consulting and prenatal diagnosis.

Objective We present recurrent 15q11.2 (BP1-BP2) microdeletion encompassing NIPA1 , NIPA2 , CYFIP1 , and TUBGCP5 in a family with phenotypic variability in developmental, speech, and motor delay. Case Report A 32-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of an abnormal maternal serum screening result of Down syndrome risk of 1/226. Her husband was 31 years old. She and her husband were phenotypically normal, and there was no family history of mental disorders and congenital malformations. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. A 2492-g female baby was delivered at 37 weeks of gestation uneventfully. During the subsequent pregnancy, the same woman at the age of 35 years underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, which revealed a karyotype of 46,XY. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. A 2780-g male baby was delivered at 37 weeks of gestation uneventfully. About 3 years after the birth of this boy, array comparative genomic hybridization of the family revealed 15q11.2 microdeletion encompassing NIPA1 , NIPA2 , CYFIP1 , and TUBGCP5 in the two siblings, who displayed developmental, speech, and motor delay, and in their phenotypically normal father. Conclusion Recurrent phenotypic abnormality in the family with normal karyotype at amniocentesis should include a differential diagnosis of familial pathogenic copy-number variations.

Objective To present the calculated frequencies, male to female sex-ratio, and modes of ascertainments in different levels of chromosomal mosaicism (CM) detected at amniocentesis. Materials and methods This's a 10-years retrospective study between January 2008 and December 2017 and there were 13,752 cases of amniocentesis performed in MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Eight hundred and thirty four cases of CM were collected in this study. We reviewed their types of chromosomal abnormalities of mosaicism, the modes of ascertainment (including: advanced maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, abnormal maternal serum screening result, and other reasons), maternal age, gestational age at amniocentesis, fetal gender, and perinatal findings. After amniocentesis, in situ culture was performed and the results of karyotype with CM were divided in to three levels. Results In our sample of 13,752 amniocentesis, 834 cases with all levels of CM were collected in this study. Of them, there were 562 cases (4.09%) with level I mosaicism, 207 cases (1.51%) of level II mosaicism, and 65 cases (0.47%) of level III mosaicism ( Table 1 ). In the group of advanced of maternal age (AMA), their calculated frequencies, 4.18% in level I, 1.46% in level II and 0.41% in level III, were very similar to those in total cases (p value = 0.206) without statistical significance. In the group of abnormal ultrasound findings, the calculated frequency was much higher in level III (0.87%), however, there was no statistical significance because of the small numbers of level III. In our cases of amniocentesis, the case numbers of male case (50.20%) is very similar to female (49.80%), and the male to female ratio was 1.01. But, we found more cases of male with CM (444 cases) than female (390 cases). The sex-ratio in different levels’ calculated frequencies of CM showed similar in level I, and male prevalence was found in level II and III with statistical significance (p value = 0.022). The male prevalence also revealed in both numerical and structural abnormalities in level II and level III, but no difference in the cases of level I. Conclusion In conclusion, our observation showed a novel finding of higher male prevalence of CM in level II and III, and both in numerical and structural abnormalities. It's consistent with the theory of better survival in male embryo after partial self-correction of initial chromosomal aberrations, male-specific selection against chromosomal abnormalities.

BACKGROUND Because the future application of cell-free fetal DNA screening is expected to dramatically improve the diagnostic yield and reduce unnecessary invasive procedures, it is time to summarize the indications of invasive prenatal diagnosis. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the changes and efficacies of indications of invasive procedures for detecting cytogenomic abnormalities from 2000 to 2012. MATERIAL AND METHODS From our regional obstetric unit, 7818 invasive procedures were referred by indications of advance maternal age (AMA), abnormal ultrasound findings (aUS), abnormal maternal serum screening (aMSS), and family history (FH). Chromosome, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analyses were performed on chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniotic fluid (AF) specimens at the Yale Cytogenetics Laboratory. The abnormal findings from single or combined indications were compared to evaluate the diagnostic yield. RESULTS The annual caseload declined by 57.2% but the diagnostic yield increased from 7.2% to 13.4%. Chromosomal and genomic abnormalities were detected in 752 cases (9.6%, 752/7818) and 12 cases (4%, 12/303), respectively. Significantly decreased AMA referrals and increased aUS and aMSS referrals were noted. The top 3 indications by diagnostic yield were AMA/aUS (51.4% for CVS, 24.2% for AF), aUS (34.7% for CVS, 14.5% for AF), and AMA/aMSS (17.8% for CVS, 9.9% for AF). CONCLUSIONS Over a period of 13 years, the indication of aMSS and aUS were increasing while AMA was decreasing for prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities, and there was a continuous trend of reduced invasive procedures. Prenatal evaluation using AMA/aUS was the most effective in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, but better indications for genomic abnormalities are needed.

Aim: The Objective of our study was to evaluate the chromosomal analysis results that were obtained from amniocentesis, cordocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) inpatients whom had applied to the perinatology unit of Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine gynecology and obstetrics clinic with high risk in terms of chromosome anomaly according to Ultrasonography (USG).Material and Methods: Our study was conducted as a retrospective pattern. CVS, amniocentesis and cordosentesis were performed in 1298 pregnant women whom had applied to the Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, Perinatology Unit in the date interval between 1st December 2014-31st December 2016 with the indication of abnormal maternal serum screening tests, maternal request because of advanced maternal age, history of fetal anomaly with previous pregnancies, history of relatives with Trisomy 21, fetal abnormalities or signs of trisomy which were detected by ultrasonography and only depending on maternal request without any risk factors. Data obtained in the study were assessed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 22.0 package program. The relationships between categorical variables were determined by Chi-Square test. Relationship between normal distribution-matched, numerical data were assessed by ANOVA, Independent Sample t-test, and relationship between non-normal distributions of numerical data were assessed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Test. Statistical significance level was determined as p 0.05.Results: Fetal anomalies were observed in 28.9% (n: 366) of the patients while 369 (28.4%) of the 1298 patients who had prenatal diagnosis had abnormalities in the maternal screening results. No chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 1120 (86.2%) of the 1298 patients who were taken into the study. 49 patients had Trisomy 21, 27 patients had Trisomy18 and 14 patients had Trisomy13. Turner syndrome was seen in 10 of thepatients. In our study, chromosomal abnormality rate of patients with more than one minor marker was found to be statistically significant (p: 0.01). Chromosomal anomaly was detected in 319 (8.4%) of 349 patients with combined test. Chromosomal anomaly was detected in 70 (19.1%) of the 366 patients who detected fetal anomaly. Chromosomal anomaly was detected in 27 (24.1%) of the 112 increased NT patients.Conclusion: In our study, 1298 invasive procedures are listed as follows; amniocentesis was performed in 841 (64.8%), cordocentesis in 57 patients (4.4%) and CVS in 400 patients (30.8%). As a result of karyotype analysis of the patients, nochromosomal anomaly was detected in 1120 patients (86.28%). In 178 patients, chromosomal anomaly (13.71%) was detected. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of fetal chromosomal anomaly in the Mediterranean region by determining the prevalence of invasive prenatal test indications and evaluating the results of invasive prenatal tests performed in our clinic in the 2-year period.

Objective The aim of this study is to present the incidence, prenatal and postnatal findings, and modes of ascertainment in chromosomal deletions detected at amniocentesis. Materials and methods We reviewed all the cases with chromosomal deletions, which were detected by amniocentesis in Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, between January 1987 and December 2012. Data on the locations and types of deletion, reasons for performing amniocentesis, maternal age, gestational age at amniocentesis, fetal karyotypes, inheritance of deletions, and relative prenatal findings were collected. Results Amniocentesis was performed in 33,305 cases within this period of time. Among these, 31 cases of chromosomal deletions were considered for the study. The mean gestational age at amniocentesis was 21.0 weeks (range from 15 weeks to 32 weeks) and the mean maternal age at amniocentesis was 32.1 years (range from 26 years to 37 years). Nineteen cases (61.3%) manifested fetal structural abnormalities on ultrasound, nine (29.0%) presented no ultrasound abnormalities, and three had an unknown status. The main modes of ascertainment included abnormal ultrasound findings in 10 cases (32.2%), advanced maternal age in 11 cases (35.5%), abnormal maternal serum screening results in six cases (19.6%), and other reasons in four cases (13.0%). Of the 27 cases with known inheritance, the deletion was inherited in two (6.6%) and de novo in 25 (92.6%). Males accounted for 11 (35.5%) and females for 20 (64.5%) cases. Chromosomal deletions are more often to occur in chromosomal 5(4 cases, 12.9%), chromosomal 18 (4 cases, 12.9%), chromosomal 4 (3 cases, 9.7%), chromosomal 7 (3 cases, 9.7%), chromosomal 10 (3 cases, 9.7%), chromosomal 11 (3 cases, 9.7%), and chromosomal 1 (2 cases, 6.5%). There were four cases of chromosomal mosaicism: two involved chromosome 5, one involved chromosome 10, and one involved chromosome 18. Twenty-three cases (74.2%) had terminal deletions and the other eight cases (26.7%) had interstitial-type deletions. Conclusion In summary, we have presented the results of prenatal diagnosis for chromosomal deletions using amniocentesis. Chromosomal deletions are more likely to occur in females and more often in chromosomal 5p and 18q. Prenatal diagnosis at amniocentesis is frequently associated with advanced maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, and abnormal maternal serum screening. The frequency of ascertainment in chromosome deletion seems to be directly correlated with advanced maternal age and abnormal ultrasound findings. In cases with terminal deletions, prenatal ultrasound plays a more important role for prenatal diagnosis.

Objective To present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 2. Materials and Methods A 29-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of abnormal maternal serum screening, and the cytogenetic result was 47,XY,+2[8]/46,XY[22]. She underwent repeated amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) were performed on uncultured amniocytes. Ultrasound at 22 weeks of gestation revealed severe oligohydramnios, intrauterine growth restriction, and ventricular septal defect. The pregnancy was terminated at 22 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on parental blood, cultured amniocytes, cord blood, skin, liver, lung, umbilical cord, amnion, and placenta. aCGH analysis was performed on cord blood, skin, and liver. Results In the samples of uncultured amniocytes, interphase FISH detected 11.1% (13/117) mosaicism for trisomy 2, aCGH analysis showed the result of arr [hg19] 2p25.3q37.3 (0–242,936,883)×2.46, and QF-PCR excluded uniparental disomy 2. QF-PCR on placenta revealed trisomy 2 derived from maternal meiosis I non-disjunction. Cytogenetic analysis revealed the following results: cultured amniocytes: 46,XY[21 colonies]; cord blood: 46,XY[40 cells]; skin: 46,XY[40 cells]; lung: 46,XY[40 cells]; liver: 47,XY,+2[4 cells]/46,XY[36 cells]; umbilical cord: 47,XY,+2[4 cells]/46,XY[36 cells]; amniotic membrane: 47,XY,+2[20 cells]/46,XY[20 cells]; and placenta: 47,XY,+2[40 cells]. The fetus postnatally manifested facial dysmorphism and preaxial polydactyly of the hand. Conclusion Interphase FISH and aCGH analyses on uncultured amniocytes are useful for rapid confirmation of low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis.

We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of de novo interstitial deletion of 7q (7q22.1 → q31.1) by aCGH, FISH and QF-PCR in a fetus with an abnormal maternal serum screening result and ultrasound findings of facial cleft and hypogenitalism. We discuss the genotype–phenotype correlation and the consequence of haploinsufficiency of ZKSCAN5, ARPC1A, CYP3A43, RELN, LAMB1, IMMP2L and DOCK4 in this case.

A female neonate was evaluated due to limb oedema. Her father and three older siblings were healthy. Her mother had a subclinical autoimmune hypothyroidism. Gestation was uneventful, except for an abnormal maternal serum screening for aneuploidy during the first trimester. Amniocentesis revealed a normal female karyotype. A normal vaginal delivery occurred at 39 weeks. Physical examination showed bilateral dorsum foot oedema (figures 1 and 2). Cerebral ultrasound was normal and echocardiography revealed a patent foramen ovale. She was …

Objective We present molecular cytogenetic characterization of an Xp22.32→pter deletion and an Xq26.3→qter duplication in a male fetus with congenital malformations and maternal X chromosome pericentric inversion. Materials and Methods A 22-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of an abnormal maternal serum screening result. Prenatal ultrasound revealed a hypoplastic left heart and short limbs. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,Y,der(X) t(X;?)(p22.31;?). The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with short stature and facial dysmorphism. Repeat amniocentesis was performed before termination of the pregnancy. Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed on uncultured amniocytes and maternal blood. Conventional cytogenetic analysis was performed on cultured amniocytes, cord blood, and blood from both parents. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on cultured amniocytes. Results The maternal karyotype was 46,X,inv(X)(p22.3q26.3). The fetal karyotype was 46,Y, rec(X)dup(Xq)inv(X)(p22.3q26.3) or 46,Y, rec(X)(qter→q26.3::p22.3→qter). Array comparative genomic hybridization on uncultured amniocytes revealed a 4.56-Mb deletion of Xp22.33–p22.32 encompassing SHOX , CSF2RA , and ARSE , and a 19.22-Mb duplication of Xq26.3–q28 encompassing SOX3 , FMR1 , MECP2 , RAB39B , and CLIC2 in the fetus. The mother did not have X chromosome imbalance. Conclusion Detection of X chromosome aberration in a male fetus should give suspicion of a recombinant X chromosome derived from maternal X chromosome pericentric inversion.

Objective To present perinatal findings, modes of ascertainments, and modes of segregation in unbalanced reciprocal translocations detected at amniocentesis. Materials and Methods Between January 1987 and July 2010, 40 cases with unbalanced reciprocal translocations were diagnosed by amniocentesis at Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. The 40 cases originated from 29 families; 21 families with one case, 7 families with two cases, and 1 family with five cases. Results Of 40 cases, 33 (82.5%) presented fetal ultrasound abnormalities and 7 (17.5%) presented no ultrasound abnormalities. Of 40 cases, 36 (90%) had a segregation mode of adjacent-1 2:2 segregation, 3 (7.5%) had a segregation mode of 3:1 segregation with tertiary trisomy, and 1 (2.5%) had a segregation mode of 3:1 segregation with tertiary monosomy. Of 29 families, 7 (24.1%) had de novo translocations and 22 (75.9%) had inherited translocations. In seven de novo cases, the main modes of ascertainments included abnormal ultrasound findings ( n = 5) and advanced maternal age ( n = 2). In 22 inherited families, the main modes of first ascertainment included abnormal ultrasound findings ( n = 8), a previous aneuploid child ( n = 8), advanced maternal age ( n = 4), parental carrier status ( n = 1), and abnormal maternal serum screening results ( n = 1). Among 22 inherited families, 9 (40.9%) had a known parental carrier status, but 13 (59.1%) were unaware of parental carrier status at amniocentesis. Conclusion Unbalanced reciprocal translocations detected at amniocentesis are frequently associated with abnormal ultrasound findings. Prenatal diagnosis of an unbalanced translocation may incidentally detect a balanced translocation in the family. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities should alert structural chromosome rearrangements and prompt cytogenetic analysis of the fetus and parents if necessary.

Objective: To present our experience of amniocentesis for the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome due to unbalanced homologous acrocentric rearrangements and its recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. Case Report: From January 1987 to September 2009, six cases with rea(21q21q) Down syndrome were diagnosed among 31,194 patients who underwent amniocentesis at Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Cytogenetic analysis of parental blood lymphocytes was performed in each case, and polymorphic DNA markers were used to investigate the nature of the aberrant chromosome. Three of the six cases were associated with recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. The rea(21q21q) Down syndrome was associated with advanced maternal age in three cases, a previous child with rea(21q21q) Down syndrome in three cases, an abnormal maternal serum screening result in one case, and an abnormal ultrasound finding in one case. All six cases arose de novo. Among the six cases with molecular analysis results, all had isochromosome 21, five of which were determined to be of maternal origin. Conclusion: We found a frequency of 0.019% for rea(21q21q) Down syndrome in patients undergoing amniocentesis. Down syndrome caused by the homologous rearrangement rea(21q21q) can be associated with recurrence. Prenatal diagnosis of rea(21q21q) Down syndrome should include extensive cytogenetic and molecular analyses of the parents and probands.

Serious placental insufficiency results in perinatal death or preterm birth from ischemic-thrombotic pathology, a process which has its origins in placental maldevelopment in the first trimester. A proportion of at-risk pregnancies may be identified from abnormalities in first or second trimester serum screening data, uterine artery Doppler waveforms or placental shape and texture at the time of the 18-20-week anatomical examination. In combination, these tests may be capable of recognizing a subset of at-risk pregnancies with 50% positive predictive values. Early recognition before fetal viability affords opportunities to direct women to regional perinatal care centres for enhanced maternal-fetal surveillance, corticosteroids to enhance fetal lung maturation, prophylactic measures to prevent pre-eclampsia and optimal decision making around the time of delivery. The creation of regional screening programs to use screening data with a placental focus is likely to be cost-effective, because existing patterns of care are utilized. More importantly, this strategy can direct women to participate in clinical research programs designed to reduce morbidity and mortality from this common group of conditions.

Objectives To screen women with uteroplacental insufficiency between 18 and 26 weeks' gestation for sonographic evidence of destructive placental lesions, to observe the effect of low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in these cases, and to compare the outcome with similar but untreated controls. Methods We screened 180 women at high risk for placental damage using 16-week maternal serum screening (alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin), placental shape and texture, and uterine artery Doppler waveforms at the 18–20-week level II examination. Serial gray-scale examinations of placental texture were performed at 22, 24 and 26 weeks. LMWH was offered to women with ultrasound evidence of destructive placental lesions in the absence of intrauterine growth restriction and/or pre-eclampsia. Results We prospectively identified six women (3.3%) with abnormal maternal serum screening and uterine artery Doppler in whom abnormal placental texture (echogenic cystic lesions) suggestive of destructive lesions in the placental parenchyma was found either at the 18–20-week ultrasound examination (n = 4), or by 26 weeks of gestation (n = 2). All six received LMWH and had live births (gestational age at delivery, 33–37 weeks; birth weight, 1000–3200 g). A further 14 women were referred with similar multiparameter evidence of placental damage at or after 26 weeks, outside the screening study. All had significant fetal growth restriction and were therefore not offered heparin. In 9/14 cases there was a perinatal death. Ischemic and/or thrombotic placental pathology was confirmed in each case, but no maternal thrombophilia disorders were identified in the 20 women. Conclusions Integrated biochemical and ultrasound testing of placental function at 16–20 weeks of gestation, followed by serial placental gray-scale ultrasound, may be an effective method of identifying a subset of pregnancies at high risk of adverse pregnancy outcome due to destructive lesions in the placental parenchyma. This strategy of identifying thrombo-occlusive placental lesions before the development of pregnancy complications may prove useful in the design of trials to study the effectiveness of LMWH in the prevention of clinical complications resulting from thrombo-occlusive placental disease. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Amniocentesis was carried out at 17 weeks gestation in a 27-year-old woman, following an abnormal maternal serum screening (MSS) test. MSS test was carried out primarily to estimate the risk of trisomy for chromosome 21. The maternal serum markers used were alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), and unconjugated estriol (uE3), together with maternal age. The fetus was identified as screen-positive for Edward's syndrome (trisomy 18), with low uE3, normal AFP and hCG levels. The calculated risk for trisomy 18 was more than 1:50. To identify any possible chromosomal abnormality, cytogenetic investigation was carried out on the amniotic fluid sample. The fetus's karyotype showed triploidy with 69, XXX chromosome complement in all the metaphase spreads obtained from three different cultures, using GTG banding technique. Upon termination of the fetus, gross abnormalities indicative of triploidy were present in the fetus.

We present rapid aneuploidy diagnosis of distal 9p deletion by array comparative genomic hybridization using uncultured amniocytes in a pregnancy associated with an abnormal maternal serum screening result and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in the fetus. We review the literature of prenatal diagnosis of distal 9p deletion, and add abnormal maternal serum biochemistry and fetal IUGR in the distinctive prenatal findings in pregnancy with fetal distal 9p deletion. We discuss the consequence of haploinsufficiency of DOCK8, KANK1, VLDLR and DMRT1 in this case.

Ring chromosomes are unusual abnormalities that are observed in prenatal diagnosis. A 23-year-old patient (gravida 1, para 0) referred for amniocentesis due to abnormal maternal serum screening result in the 16th week of second pregnancy. Cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniyotic fluid cells revealed out ring chromosome 4. Both maternal and paternal karyotypes were normal. Terminal deletion was observed in both 4p and 4q arms of ring chromosome 4 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However deletion was not observed in the WHS critical region of both normal and ring chromosome 4 by an additional FISH study. These results were confirmed by means of array-CGH showing terminal deletions on 4p16.3 (130 kb) and 4q35.2 (2.449 Mb). In the 21th week of pregnancy, no gross anomalia, except two weeks symmetric growth retardation, was present in the fetal ultrasonographic examination. According to our review of literature, this is the first prenatal case with 4p and 4q subtelomeric deletion of ring chromosome 4 without the involvement of WHS critical region. Our report describes the prenatal case with a ring chromosome 4 abnormality completely characterized by array-CGH which provided complementary data for genetic counseling of prenatal diagnosis.

To review the obstetrical outcomes associated with abnormally elevated or decreased level of one or more of the most frequently measured maternal serum marker analytes used in screening for aneuploidy. To provide guidance to facilitate the management of pregnancies that have abnormal levels of one of more markers and to assess the usefulness of these markers as a screening test.Perinatal outcomes associated with abnormal levels of maternal serum markers analytes are compared with the outcomes of pregnancies with normal levels of the same analytes or the general population.The Cochrane Library and Medline were searched for English-language articles published from 1966 to February 2007, relating to maternal serum markers and perinatal outcomes. Search terms included PAPP-A (pregnancy associated plasma protein A), AFP (alphafetoprotein), hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), estriol, unconjugated estriol, inhibin, inhibin-A, maternal serum screen, triple marker screen, quadruple screen, integrated prenatal screen, first trimester screen, and combined prenatal screen. All study types were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials were considered evidence of the highest quality, followed by cohort studies. Key individual studies on which the recommendations are based are referenced. Supporting data for each recommendation are summarized with evaluative comments and references. The evidence was evaluated using the guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.The evidence collected was reviewed by the Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.The benefit expected from this guideline is to facilitate early detection of potential adverse pregnancy outcomes when risks are identified at the time of a maternal serum screen. It will help further stratification of risk and provide options for pregnancy management to minimize the impact of pregnancy complications. The potential harms resulting from such practice are associated with the so called false positive (i.e., uncomplicated pregnancies labelled at increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes), the potential stress associated with such a label, and the investigations performed for surveillance in this situation. No cost-benefit analysis is available to assess costs and savings associated with this guideline. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. An unexplained level of a maternal serum marker analyte is defined as an abnormal level after confirmation of gestational age by ultrasound and exclusion of maternal, fetal, or placental causes for the abnormal level. (III) 2. Abnormally elevated levels of serum markers are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies, after correction for the number of fetuses. Spontaneous or planned mutifetal reductions may result in abnormal elevations of serum markers. (II-2) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In the first trimester, an unexplained low PAPP-A (0.4 MoM) and/or a low hCG (0.5 MoM) are associated with an increased frequency of adverse obstetrical outcomes, and, at present, no specific protocol for treatment is available. (II-2A) In the second trimester, an unexplained elevation of maternal serum AFP (2.5 MoM), hCG (3.0 MoM), and/or inhibin-A (or =2.0 MoM) or a decreased level of maternal serum AFP (0.25 MoM) and/or unconjugated estriol (0.5 MoM) are associated with an increased frequency of adverse obstetrical outcomes, and, at present, no specific protocol for treatment is available. (II-2A) 2. Pregnant woman with an unexplained elevated PAPP-A or hCG in the first trimester and an unexplained low hCG or inhibin-A and an unexplained elevated unconjugated estriol in the second trimester should receive normal antenatal care, as this pattern of analytes is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. (II-2A) 3. The combination of second or third trimester placenta previa and an unexplained elevated maternal serum AFP should increase the index of suspicion for placenta accreta, increta, or percreta. (II-2B) An assessment (ultrasound, MRI) of the placental-uterine interface should be performed. Abnormal invasion should be strongly suspected, and the planning of delivery location and technique should be done accordingly. (III-C) 4. A prenatal consultation with the medical genetics department is recommended for low unconjugated estriol levels (0.3 MoM), as this analyte pattern can be associated with genetic conditions. (II-2B) 5. The clinical management protocol for identification of potential adverse obstetrical outcomes should be guided by one or more abnormal maternal serum marker analyte value rather than the false positive screening results for the trisomy 21 and/or the trisomy 18 screen. (II-2B) 6. Pregnant woman who are undergoing renal dialysis or who have had a renal transplant should be offered maternal serum screening, but interpretation of the result is difficult as the level of serum hCG is not reliable. (II-2A) 7. Abnormal maternal uterine artery Doppler in association with elevated maternal serum AFP, hCG, or inhibin-A or decreased PAPP-A identifies a group of women at greater risk of IUGR and gestational hypertension with proteinuria. Uterine artery Doppler measurements may be used in the evaluation of an unexplained abnormal level of either of these markers. (II-2B) 8. Further research is recommended to identify the best protocol for pregnancy management and surveillance in women identified at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes based on an abnormality of a maternal serum screening analyte. (III-A) 9. In the absence of evidence supporting any specific surveillance protocol, an obstetrician should be consulted in order to establish a fetal surveillance plan specific to the increased obstetrical risks (maternal and fetal) identified. This plan may include enhanced patient education on signs and symptoms of the most common complications, increased frequency of antenatal visits, increased ultrasound (fetal growth, amniotic fluid levels), and fetal surveillance (biophysical profile, arterial and venous Doppler), and cervical length assessment. (III-A) 10. Limited information suggests that, in women with elevated hCG in the second trimester and/or abnormal uterine artery Doppler (at 22-24 weeks), low-dose aspirin (60-81 mg daily) is associated with higher birthweight and lower incidence of gestational hypertension with proteinuria. This therapy may be used in women who are at risk. (II-2B) 11. Further studies are recommended in order to assess the benefits of low-dose aspirin, low molecular weight heparin, or other therapeutic options in pregnancies determined to be at increased risk on the basis of an abnormal maternal serum screening analyte. (III-A) 12. Multiple maternal serum markers screening should not be used at present as a population-based screening method for adverse pregnancy outcomes (such as preeclampsia, placental abruption, and stillbirth) outside an established research protocol, as sensitivity is low, false positive rates are high, and no management protocol has been shown to clearly improve outcomes. (II-2D) When maternal serum screening is performed for the usual clinical indication (fetal aneuploidy and/or neural tube defect), abnormal analyte results can be utilized for the identification of pregnancies at risk and to direct their clinical management. (II-2B) Further studies are recommended to determine the optimal screening method for poor maternal and/or perinatal outcomes. (III-A).

Background : Since amniocentesis made prenatal diagnosis feasible in 1967, the method has become a popular tool in obstetric practices. In Korea, the demand for genetic counseling and prenatal tests has increased markedly because the number and proportion of pregnancies in women aged 35 yr and older have increased over a 20-yr period. Here we report clinical and cytogenetic findings on 31,615 mid-trimester amniocenteses. Methods : To investigate the changes in the annual number of amniocentesis, distribution of indications and age, and cytogenetic findings and abnormality rate according to indications, this study retrospectively analyzed 31,615 cases of mid-trimester amniocentesis performed at Seoul Clinical Laboratories, an independent medical laboratory center, during the past 13 yr (1994-2007). Results : The annual number of amniocenteses has increased substantially since 1994. Among the 31,615 amniocentesis cases, the maternal age between 30 and 34 yr was the most common age group (35.4%). Among clinical indications, abnormal maternal serum screening results have been the most common indication for amniocentesis since 1994. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 973 cases (3.1%). Down syndrome was the most common abnormality found (36.9%, 359/973). In sex chromosomal abnormalities, 53 cases of Turner syndromes, 32 cases of Klinefelter syndromes, 20 cases of triple X syndromes, and 15 cases of 47,XYY were diagnosed. Of structural rearrangements, reciprocal translocations between two autosomes were the most common (15.5%, 151/973). Abnormal ultrasonographic findings showed the highest positive predictive value (5.9%) among the clinical indications. Conclusions : The present study could be used for the establishment of a database for genetic counseling. The discovery of an abnormality provides the option of termination or continuation in the pregnancy, a more suitable obstetric management in Korea.

Summary Objective To retrospectively investigate the 10-year experience of prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome aberrations by second-trimester amniocentesis. Methods Data were collected at Taichung Veterans General Hospital between 1995 and 2004 from cytogenetic analyses of cultured amniocytes from second-trimester amniocentesis. The main indications for amniocentesis included advanced maternal age, abnormal maternal serum screening results, and abnormal ultrasound findings. Chromosome aberrations included autosomal aneuploidies, sex chromosome aneuploidies, polyploidies, and rearrangements. Variant chromosomes were considered to be normal and excluded. Results A total of 7,028 amniocenteses were performed and analyzed for chromosome aberrations. Among these, 4,026 (57.29%) were for advanced maternal age, 1,500 (21.34%) for abnormal maternal serum screening results, 553 (7.87%) for abnormal ultrasound findings, and 949 (13.50%) for other reasons. The highest detection rate of chromosome aberrations was in cases undergoing amniocentesis for abnormal ultrasound findings (8.86%), followed by other reasons (2.74%), abnormal maternal serum screening results (2.60%), and advanced maternal age (2.31%). Chromosome aberrations were detected in 207 cases (2.90%), including fetuses of 93 older mothers, 39 mothers with abnormal serum screening results, 49 mothers with abnormal ultrasound findings, and 26 mothers with other reasons for amniocentesis. Of fetuses with chromosome aberrations, 144 (69.56%) had trisomy 13, trisomy 18, trisomy 21, or sex chromosome disorder. The other 63 cases (30.44%) included balanced translocation, unbalanced abnormality, inversion, and marker chromosome. Conclusion For daily practice, our data could offer a database for proper genetic counseling, such as termination issues and future pregnancies.

Summary Objective To investigate the impact of second-trimester maternal serum screening on prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and the use of amniocentesis in the Taiwanese population. Materials and Methods From 1990 to 2000, 166,419 amniocenteses were analyzed cytogenetically in the Taiwanese population. Among these, 58.85% were for advanced maternal age, 4.5% for abnormal ultrasound findings, 26.17% for abnormal maternal serum screening results, 1.82% for a previous child with congenital anomaly, 1.02% for a family history of chromosome aberrations, and 7.63% for other purposes. Chromosome aberrations were detected in 4,217 cases (2.53%), of which 1,277 (30.28%) were Down syndrome. Of the Down syndrome cases, 65.86% were detected by amniocentesis for advanced maternal age, 5.95% for abnormal ultrasound findings, 21.14% for abnormal maternal serum screening results, 1.25% for a previous child with congenital anomaly, 1.18% for a family history of chromosome aberrations, and 4.62% for other purposes. Results There was a prominent increase in the number of women undergoing amniocentesis in the Taiwanese population between 1990 and 2000. There was an 8.9-fold increase in the number undergoing amniocentesis for advanced maternal age, a 6.3-fold increase in that for abnormal ultrasound findings, a 46.2-fold increase in that for abnormal maternal serum screening results, a 2.9-fold increase in that for a previous child with congenital anomaly, a 5.6-fold increase in that for a family history of chromosome aberrations, and a 4.4- fold increase in that for other purposes. There was also a 35.7-fold increase in the number of prenatally detected Down syndrome cases, from seven in 1990 to 250 in 2000. The highest rates of Down syndrome were found in cases with abnormal ultrasound findings (1/99 tests). Down syndrome was 0.72-fold as common in amniocenteses performed because of positive serum screening results (1/161 tests) compared with the rate seen in the advanced maternal age group (1/116 tests). The detection rates increased from 1/449 tests in 1990, through 1/198 tests, 1/203 tests, 1/158 tests, 1/215 tests, 1/229 tests, 1/169 tests, 1/143 tests, 1/90 tests, 1/92 tests, to 1/123 tests in 2000. Conclusion Both the number of women undergoing amniocentesis and the number of detected cases of Down syndrome increased during these years. Amniocentesis in this population no longer led to a significant improvement in the detection rate of Down syndrome. In view of the effective use of amniocentesis as a diagnostic procedure for Down syndrome, efforts should be made to use more efficient prenatal screening programs and to reduce the number of unnecessary amniocenteses.