Search

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis will review randomized control trials for localized bladder cancer, evaluating surgical and pathologic outcomes of ORC versus RARC., Methods: Randomized studies evaluating adults with non-metastatic bladder cancer who underwent a radical cystectomy. Randomized trials were selected for final review. Data was extracted and analyzed with Revman 5 software. The primary outcome was complication rates within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of life, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and other perioperative outcomes. Continuous variables were reported using mean difference with 95% confidence intervals, and dichotomous variables were reported using risk difference with 95% confidence intervals with RARC as the experimental group and ORC as the reference group., Results: Of 134 articles screened, six unique randomized studies were selected. For Grade I-II complications, the risk ratio (RR) was 0.92 (95% CI [0.79,1.08], p = 0.33), and for Grade III-V complications, RR 0.93 (95% CI [0.73,1.18], p = 0.59). RARC resulted in decreased blood loss (95% CI [-438.08, -158.44], p < 0.00001) and longer operative time (95% CI [55.23, 133.13], p < 0.00001). Quality of life using the EORTC-QLQ-30 global health score at 3 months post-op appeared to favor RARC with a mean difference of 4.46 points (95% CI [1.78, 7.15], p = 0.001). Pathologic outcomes neither statistically nor clinically favored one modality, as there was no significant difference between mean lymph node yield ( p = 0.49), positive lymph nodes ( p = 1.00), and positive surgical margins ( p = 0.85) between the surgical modalities., Conclusions: Although one surgical modality is not overtly superior, the choice may be decided by mitigating individual operative risk factors like intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative quality of life, as well as institutional costs and learning curve among surgeons., Competing Interests: None., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Angioedema (AE) is a condition that is frequently encountered in the emergency department (ED). It is a rare condition with localized, asymmetrical swelling of the skin and/or mucosa that is frequently nonpruritic and primarily affects locations with loose connective tissue. Physicians must have a thorough understanding of this condition since it can cause fatal airway compromise, which might be the presenting symptom. Histamine-mediated AE is the most common type of AE seen in EDs. However, ED physicians must be on the lookout for the less common bradykinin-mediated types of AE as these do not respond to the same therapy as histamine-mediated AE. Hospitals may lack specialized drugs or protocols, and many ED staff may be unable to identify or treat bradykinin-mediated AE. It is crucial to understand the pathophysiology of the various kinds of AE in order to optimize treatment. The goal of this review paper is to provide an overview of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment options for bradykinin and histamine-induced AE in the ED., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Jayasinghe et al.)