Search

The purpose of this article, part of the Thoracic Surgery Worldwide series, is to provide a descriptive review of how thoracic surgery is organized in the Netherlands. General information is provided on the Dutch healthcare system, as well as on how Dutch thoracic surgeons are organized and trained. Additionally, this study provides information on our national quality surveillance system, an overview of the most common thoracic surgeries performed in our country, and details of academic research conducted by Dutch medical specialists. Furthermore, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives. In the Netherlands general thoracic surgical procedures are performed by approximately 110 general thoracic surgeons and 25 of the 135 cardiothoracic surgeons. Dutch thoracic surgeons provide minimally invasive lung surgery, chest wall surgery, thymic and mediastinal surgery, and surgical diagnosis and treatment of pleural disorders. Some recently published data on hospital mortality and postoperative adverse events of thoracic surgeries are reported. Furthermore, the structure of the thoracic surgical education and training program is discussed, highlighting the particular structure of two educational programs for thoracic surgery via a general thoracic and cardiothoracic surgery program. To assure high-quality surgical care, the Netherlands has a well-structured national quality surveillance system, involving frequent site visits and mandatory participation in the national lung cancer surgery registry for all hospitals. In terms of academic research, the Netherlands ranked 14th worldwide on number of clinical trials conducted across all medical disciplines in 2021. Furthermore, several thoracic-related (inter-)national multicenter randomized trials which are currently performed and initiated by Dutch hospital research groups are mentioned. Finally, future challenges and advances of Dutch thoracic surgery are addressed, including the implementation of lung cancer screening, imbalanced labor market, and centralization of care.

After spinal cord injury, macrophages can exert either beneficial or detrimental effects depending on their phenotype. Aside from their critical role in inflammatory responses, macrophages are also specialized in the recognition, engulfment, and degradation of pathogens, apoptotic cells, and tissue debris. They promote remyelination and axonal regeneration by removing inhibitory myelin components and cellular debris. However, excessive intracellular presence of lipids and dysregulated intracellular lipid homeostasis result in the formation of foamy macrophages. These develop a pro-inflammatory phenotype that may contribute to further neurological decline. Additionally, myelin-activated macrophages play a crucial role in axonal dieback and retraction.Here, we review the opposing functional consequences of phagocytosis by macrophages in spinal cord injury, including remyelination and regeneration versus demyelination, degeneration, and axonal dieback. Furthermore, we discuss how targeting the phagocytic ability of macrophages may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of spinal cord injury.