Search

ObjectiveJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) are efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with variable reported rates of adverse events, potentially related to differential JAK family member selectivity. Filgotinib was compared with baricitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib to elucidate the pharmacological basis underlying its clinical efficacy and safety.MethodsIn vitro JAKinib inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription phosphorylation (pSTAT) was measured by flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood from healthy donors and patients with RA following cytokine stimulation of distinct JAK/STAT pathways. The average daily pSTAT and time above 50% inhibition were calculated at clinical plasma drug exposures in immune cells. The translation of these measures was evaluated in ex vivo-stimulated assays in phase 1 healthy volunteers.ResultsJAKinib potencies depended on cytokine stimulus, pSTAT readout and cell type. JAK1-dependent pathways (interferon (IFN)α/pSTAT5, interleukin (IL)-6/pSTAT1) were among the most potently inhibited by all JAKinibs in healthy and RA blood, with filgotinib exhibiting the greatest selectivity for JAK1 pathways. Filgotinib (200 mg once daily) had calculated average daily target inhibition for IFNα/pSTAT5 and IL-6/pSTAT1 that was equivalent to tofacitinib (5 mg two times per day), upadacitinib (15 mg once daily) and baricitinib (4 mg once daily), with the least average daily inhibition for the JAK2-dependent and JAK3-dependent pathways including IL-2, IL-15, IL-4 (JAK1/JAK3), IFNγ (JAK1/JAK2), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, IL-12, IL-23 (JAK2/tyrosine kinase 2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (JAK2/JAK2). Ex vivo pharmacodynamic data from phase 1 healthy volunteers clinically confirmed JAK1 selectivity of filgotinib.ConclusionFilgotinib inhibited JAK1-mediated signalling similarly to other JAKinibs, but with less inhibition of JAK2-dependent and JAK3-dependent pathways, providing a mechanistic rationale for its apparently differentiated efficacy:safety profile.

Aims:Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1-preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure-response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three Phase 3 and two Phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. Methods:The PK exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The relationship between filgotinib exposures and various efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) was assessed over octile groups of exposures by using combined exposures of filgotinib and GS-829845 (major, active metabolite). For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS-829845. Results:Exposure efficacy relationships consistently revealed high response rates across the exposure range for filgotinib 200 mg once daily dose. A trend of increasing response with increasing exposure was observed over the exposure range for the primary and multiple secondary efficacy endpoints, with exposures associated with the 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. For exposure-safety analyses, filgotinib and GS-829845 exposures were similar irrespective of presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure-safety relationship for common TEAEs, common laboratory abnormalities, serious TEAEs, or serious infections. Conclusions:ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses. The positive exposure-efficacy relationship and a lack of exposure-safety relationship on the evaluated safety endpoints supported the 200 mg once daily dose for commercialization.

Tirabrutinib is an irreversible, small-molecule Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, which was approved in Japan (VELEXBRU) to treat B-cell malignancies and is in clinical development for inflammatory diseases. As an application of model-informed drug development, a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for irreversible BTK inhibition of tirabrutinib was developed to support dose selection in clinical development, based on clinical PK and BTK occupancy data from two phase I studies with a wide range of PK exposures in healthy volunteers and in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. The developed model adequately described and predicted the PK and PD data. Overall, the model-based simulation supported a total daily dose of at least 40 mg, either q.d. or b.i.d., with adequate BTK occupancy (> 90%) for further development in inflammatory diseases. Following the PK/PD modeling and simulation, the relationship between model-predicted BTK occupancy and preliminary clinical efficacy data was also explored and a positive trend was identified between the increasing time above adequate BTK occupancy and better efficacy in treatment for RA by linear regression.

[Background & Aims] Although off-label use of sofosbuvir-containing regimens occurs regularly in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection undergoing dialysis for severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), these regimens are not licensed for this indication, and there is an absence of dosing recommendations in this population. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in patients with HCV infection with ESRD undergoing dialysis., [Methods] In this phase II, single-arm study, 59 patients with genotype 1–6 HCV infection with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis received open-label sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (400 mg/100 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients were HCV treatment naive or treatment experienced without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. Patients previously treated with any HCV NS5A inhibitor were not eligible. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after discontinuation of treatment (SVR12). The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of patients who discontinued study drug due to adverse events., [Results] Overall, 56 of 59 patients achieved SVR12 (95%; 95% CI 86–99%). Of the 3 patients who did not achieve SVR12, 2 patients had virologic relapse determined at post-treatment Week 4 (including 1 who prematurely discontinued study treatment), and 1 patient died from suicide after achieving SVR through post-treatment Week 4. The most common adverse events were headache (17%), fatigue (14%), nausea (14%), and vomiting (14%). Serious adverse events were reported for 11 patients (19%), and all were deemed to be unrelated to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir., [Conclusions] Treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks was safe and effective in patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis., [Lay summary] Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is a combination direct-acting antiviral that is approved for treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite the lack of dosing recommendations, sofosbuvir-containing regimens (including sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) are frequently used for HCV-infected patients undergoing dialysis. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in patients with HCV infection who were undergoing dialysis. Treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir was safe and well tolerated, resulting in a cure rate of 95% in patients with HCV infection and end-stage renal disease., Clinical Trial Number: NCT03036852.

Background Inhibition of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway has demonstrated efficacy in immune-mediated diseases and has been identified as a therapeutic target for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Differences in JAK inhibitor specificity for JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2 may influence their safety profiles, but the mechanism is not known. Selective JAK1 inhibition by filgotinib (FIL) may modulate a subset of proinflammatory cytokines associated with RA pathogenesis and improve the risk-benefit profile by minimizing other non–JAK1-related adverse events. JAK2 inhibition is associated with cytopenias, while JAK3 inhibition has been associated with increased risk for opportunistic infections (eg, tuberculosis and herpes zoster) and chronic low-grade inflammation. In clinical trials, FIL did not negatively impact hemoglobin, LDL/HDL ratios, or natural killer (NK) cell counts.1-3 Objectives To compare the in vitro profile of JAK inhibitors with different JAK selectivity profiles, for effects on erythroid progenitor cell expansion, NK cell proliferation, and liver X receptor (LXR) agonist-induced cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) expression, an enzyme responsible for the conversion of HDL to LDL. Methods JAK inhibitors (FIL, FIL metabolite [GS-829845], baricitinib [BARI], tofacitinib [TOFA], and upadacitinib [UPA]) were evaluated in vitro in human cell-based assays: growth of erythroid progenitors from human cord blood CD34+ cells using a HemaTox™ liquid expansion assay, IL-15–induced NK cell proliferation, and LXR agonist-induced CETP expression in the hepatic cell line (HepG2). Using IC50s generated from these assays and the reported human plasma concentrations of the JAK inhibitors from clinical studies,4-6 we calculated the target coverage for each compound at clinically relevant doses. The activity of FIL in humans was based on a PK-PD modeling algorithm7 of FIL + GS-829845. Results In vitro assay results are described in the table. Based on these results, human exposure data, and modeled PK-PD relationships, FIL 100 mg and FIL 200 mg result in lower calculated cellular inhibition than the other JAK inhibitors at clinical exposures. Notably, FIL 100 mg and FIL 200 mg, but not the other inhibitors, are calculated to reduce CETP expression by 17% and 27%, respectively, while BARI, TOFA, and UPA are not expected to alter CETP levels. a Weak stimulation of LXR agonist-induced CETP expression. Conclusion JAK1 selectivity of FIL and GS-829845 resulted in less inhibition of erythroid progenitor expansion and NK cell proliferation compared with BARI, TOFA, and UPA. FIL also reduced LXR agonist-induced CETP expression, while the other inhibitors did not alter these levels. These results provide a potential mechanistic link to the observed reduction of CETP concentration and activity following FIL treatment, and the observed reduction in LDL:HDL in RA patients.8 References [1] Kavanaugh A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1009-1019. [2] Westhovens R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:998-1008. [3] MC Genovese, et al. ACR 2018. Abstract L06. [4] Shi JG. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54:1354-1361. [5] Lamba M. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56:1362-1371. [6] Mohamed MF, et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1547-1558. [7] Tuk B. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;289:1067-1074. [8] Galien R. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(suppl 10). Disclosure of Interests Pei Han Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Amy Meng Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Nevena Mollova Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Yuanjiang Yu Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Julie A. Di Paolo Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Background SOF 400 mg and LDV/SOF 90/400 mg are approved HCV treatment in adults and adolescents. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data indicates that SOF 200 mg and LDV/SOF 45/200 mg are appropriate doses in children 6 to Methods HCV-infected children (3 to Results All but 1subject completed IPK assessments. At baseline, median age and weight for subjects was 5 y and 17 kg in SOF+RBV PK lead-in (N=11) and 5 y and 20 kg in LDV/SOF subjects (N=14). The predefined PK criteria were met as GS-331007 and LDV AUCtau were within the 50–200% boundaries as compared with the adult Phase 2/3 population (table 1). The GS-331007 Cmax (SOF+RBV) was modestly higher; these increases are not considered clinically relevant based on established exposure-safety analyses. SOF concentrations were within the range of those observed in the SOF and LDV/SOF adult Phase 2/3 population (data not shown). Conclusions SOF 200 or 150 mg or LDV/SOF 45/200 or 33.75/150 mg, for subjects ≥17 kg or

Background:Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKinibs) show similar efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, in vitro studies have shown differences in JAK selectivity profiles for baricitinib (BARI), tofacitinib (TOFA), upadacitinib (UPA) and filgotinib (FIL).1,2 These lead to distinct pharmacologic profiles in cellular signaling assays that may impact clinical efficacy or safety1. NK cells are innate lymphocytes important in anti-pathogen responses and immune surveillance, which function via production of cytokines and cell killing3. NK cell proliferation and IFNγ production are JAK-dependent pathways and may be modulated by JAKinibs. Clinical findings show transient decreases in NK cell numbers in patients treated with JAKinibs, but the link to safety is unclear4Objectives:To extend upon findings in proximal cell signaling assays, we compared the selectivity and potency of clinical JAKinibs on NK cell function by assessing proliferation mediated by IL-15 (JAK1/3) and IFN-γ production driven by IL-12 (JAK2/TYK2)+IL-18.Methods:NK cells were isolated from healthy donor PBMC, incubated in vitro with 8 concentrations of each evaluated JAKinib (TOFA, BARI, FIL, FIL metabolite, UPA) and stimulated with IL-15 for proliferation or IL-12/18 for IFNγ production. Proliferation was assessed by Cell Trace dye dilution after 6 days and IFNγ production by intracellular flow cytometry 4hrs post-stimulation. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated for CD56bright, CD56dim, and total NK cells. Steady-state pharmacologic profile over a clinical dosing interval was modeled using concentration-time profiles from JAKinib population pharmacokinetic data in RA subjects under the therapeutic dose5-7. For each JAKinib, the time above IC50 and average daily inhibition of IFNγ or proliferation were calculated for each NK cell population in each donor.Results:Cellular assays in purified NK cells showed dose-dependent inhibition of IL-15-induced proliferation by all JAKinibs with TOFA showing the highest average inhibition and time above IC50 (35-60% inhibition for 8-15 hrs; TOFA>UPA>BARI≈FIL). The differences between JAKinibs are in line with differences in pSTAT inhibition downstream of IL-151. Interestingly, IL-12/18-induced production of IFNγ, which is mediated via JAK2/TYK2 (IL-12) and non-JAK dependent pathways (IL-18), showed weaker inhibition for all compounds. Moreover, all JAKinibs showed 50 for IFNγ production or pSTAT4 inhibition at clinical doses. CD56dim and CD56bright sub-populations of NK cells are proposed to have distinct functions and unique expression of surface receptors. Analysis of the IC50 for pSTAT4 and IFNγ production showed ~2-10-fold weaker inhibition by JAKinibs in CD56bright NK cells, suggesting less dependence on JAK-dependent signals in CD56bright NK cells than CD56dim NK cells.Conclusion:NK cell proliferation depends on JAK1 and JAK3-mediated signaling and is differentially inhibited at clinical doses of distinct JAKinibs. In contrast, functional responses downstream of JAK2/TYK2-dependent IL-12/18 were not substantially inhibited by any of the JAKinibs studied. Inhibition of functional and proliferative responses in purified NK cells aligned well with proximal pSTAT inhibition. JAKinib modulation of NK cell proliferation, but not response to IL-12, reflects unique pharmacologic profiles of the drugs studied and could be one component underlying clinical safety observations, including increased risk of viral infections or malignancy4.References:[1]Traves PG et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021 (in press)[2]McInnes IB, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21:183.[3]Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. Trends Immunol 2001 Nov;22(11):633-40.[4]Winthrop KL. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017; 13(4):234-243[5]Zhang X, et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2017;6(12):804-13.[6]CDER. Application Number: 203214Orig1s000. NDA 203214: Tofacitinib.[7]Klunder B et al. Clin Pharmacokinet 2019;58(8):1045-58.Disclosure of Interests:Paqui Gonzalez-Traves Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Laura Simpson Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Bernard Murray Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Amy Meng Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Julie A. Di Paolo Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Ethan Grant Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Gundula Min-Oo Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead Sciences

Background:Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitors are efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite having similar efficacy, in vitro studies have shown differences in JAK selectivity profiles for the small-molecule JAK inhibitors (JAKi) baricitinib (BARI), tofacitinib (TOFA), and upadacitinib (UPA).1For example, BARI and UPA are JAK1/JAK2 selective, while TOFA is JAK1/JAK3 selective, but each JAKi has some activity against other JAKs. As JAKs form signaling pairs, differences in selectivity could lead to distinct pharmacologic profiles that may impact clinical efficacy and safety.Objectives:As a first step to understand the basis of potential differences at therapeutic doses, we compared the selectivity and potency of filgotinib (FIL) and its major metabolite (MET) to those of BARI, TOFA, and UPA in cytokine-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and whole blood (WB).Methods:PBMCs and WB from healthy donors were incubated in vitro with 8 doses of each JAKi, and levels of signal transducer and activator of transcription phosphorylation (pSTAT) were measured following cytokine stimulation. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated in phenotypically sorted leukocyte populations by flow cytometry. Therapeutic dose relevance of the in vitro analyses was assessed using calculated mean concentration-time profiles from JAKi population pharmacokinetic data in RA subjects. For each JAKi, the time above IC50and average daily pSTAT inhibition were calculated for each cytokine/STAT pair in B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, and/or NK cells.Results:Cellular assays in PBMCs and WB showed dose-dependent inhibition of cytokine-induced pSTATs with all JAKi (correlation between the protein-adjusted IC50values from PBMCs and IC50values from WB, r2=0.98). Among the most potently inhibited pathways were JAK1/TYK2-dependent cytokine, interferon alpha (IFNα), and the JAK1/2-dependent cytokine, interleukin (IL)-6. FIL and MET had weaker potencies against JAK2/TYK2 (G-CSF/pSTAT3), JAK1/2 (IFNƴ/pSTAT1), and JAK2/2 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF])-dependent pathways compared to JAK1/TYK2 (IFNα/pSTAT5). FIL and MET showed the greatest selectivity vs the JAK2/2 pathway (GM-CSF/pSTAT3) in monocytes.The mean concentration-time profiles and time above IC50over 24 hr for each cytokine/STAT pathway showed that JAK1/2 (IL-6/pSTAT1) and JAK1/TYK2 (IFNα/pSTAT1) pathways were strongly modulated with all tested JAKi. FIL (200 mg) showed similar activity in average target coverage and time above IC50to the approved low doses of TOFA (5 mg) and UPA (15 mg); conversely, FIL had reduced mean average inhibition and time above IC50levels against JAK1/2 (IFNƴ/pSTAT1), JAK1/3-dependent cytokines (IL-2, -4, and -15), JAK2/TYK2 (G-CSF/pSTAT3), and JAK2/2 (GM-CSF/pSTAT5)-dependent pathways compared to TOFA and UPA, and in certain cases to BARI (2 mg).Conclusion:Different JAKi modulate distinct cytokine pathways to varying degrees, and no agent potently and continuously inhibited an individual cytokine signaling pathway throughout the dosing interval. FIL (200 mg) showed a similar inhibition profile to TOFA, BARI, and UPA against the JAK1/TYK2- (IFNα/pSTAT1) or JAK1/2-dependent (IL-6/pSTAT1) responses, consistent with the role of these pathways in clinical efficacy.2However, FIL displayed a differentiated pharmacologic profile from the other JAKi, showing biologically reduced activity on the JAK1/2 (IFNγ)-, JAK1/3 (IL-2, -4 and -15)-, JAK2/TYK2 (G-CSF)-, and JAK2/2 (GM-CSF)-dependent pathways, which play important roles in hematopoiesis and immune function. These data suggest that FIL (200 mg) may have less impact on a subset of homeostatic immune functions signaling via JAK2 and JAK3 than those observed at the clinically approved doses of TOFA (5 mg and 10 mg), UPA (15 mg), and BARI (4 mg).References:[1]McInnes IB, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:183.[2]Banerjee S, et al. Drugs. 2017;77:521-546.Disclosure of Interests:Paqui Gonzalez-Traves Employee of: Gilead, Bernard Murray Employee of: Gilead, Federico Campigotto Employee of: Gilead, Amy Meng Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Employee of: Gilead, Julie A. Di Paolo Employee of: Gilead

Background Inhibitors of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Differences in selectivity of JAK inhibitors for JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2 may influence their respective safety profiles, and the mechanisms responsible are not currently known. Filgotinib (FIL), a JAK1 inhibitor, did not negatively impact haemoglobin, LDL:HDL ratios or natural killer (NK) cell counts in clinical trials. Here, we compare the in vitro mechanistic profiles of four JAK inhibitors at clinically relevant doses. Methods JAK inhibitors (FIL, FIL metabolite [GS-829845], baricitinib [BARI], tofacitinib [TOFA], and upadacitinib [UPA]) were evaluated in vitro in human-cell-based assays. Growth of erythroid progenitors from human cord blood CD34+ cells was assessed using a HemaTox™ liquid expansion assay, NK cell proliferation was induced by IL-15 and LXR agonist-induced cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) expression was assessed in the hepatic cell line, HepG2. Using assay-generated IC50 values and the reported human plasma concentrations from clinical studies, we calculated the target coverage for each JAK inhibitor at clinically relevant doses. The activity of FIL in humans was based on PK/PD modelling of FIL + GS-829845. Results Inhibition of cellular activity was calculated for each JAK inhibitor based on in vitro dose-response data, human exposure data and modelled PK/PD relationships. At clinically relevant doses, FIL resulted in lower calculated inhibition of NK cell proliferation compared with other JAK inhibitors. FIL 100 mg and 200 mg also reduced CETP expression, whereas other JAK inhibitors had no effect. There was no difference in the effect of FIL vs. other JAK inhibitors on erythroid progenitor cell differentiation or maturation. Conclusion FIL, a JAK1 inhibitor, resulted in less inhibition of NK cell proliferation compared with BARI, TOFA, and UPA. FIL also reduced LXR agonist-induced CETP expression, while the other inhibitors did not alter these levels. These results provide a potential mechanistic link between the observed reduction of CETP concentration following FIL treatment and the previously observed reduction in the LDL:HDL ratio in RA patients.