Search

Hone your spirit... and come a step closer to the truth by breathing a sound intellectual order into all your knowing and doing. This event, chaired by Yulia Nikitenko (Institute for Philosophical Studies), is part of the activities of the 2022 International Open Seminar on Semiotics: a Tribute to John Deely on the Fifth Anniversary of His Passing, cooperatively organized by the Institute for Philosophical Studies of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, the Lyceum Institute, the Deely Project, Saint Vincent College, the Iranian Society for Phenomenology at the Iranian Political Science Association, the International Association for Semiotics of Space and Time, the Institute for Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Semiotic Society of America, the American Maritain Association, the International Association for Semiotic Studies, the International Society for Biosemiotic Studies, the International Center for Semiotics and Intercultural Dialogue, Moscow State Academic University for the Humanities and the Mansarda Acesa with the support of the FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education of the Government of Portugal under the UID/FIL/00010/2020 project. *** C. S. Morrissey studied Ancient Greek and Latin at the University of British Columbia and has also taught classical mythology, ancient history, and ancient languages at Simon Fraser University, where he wrote his Ph.D. dissertation on hominization and the mimetic theory of René Girard: “Mirror of Princes: René Girard, Aristotle, and the Rebirth of Tragedy”. At the University of British Columbia, the M.A. thesis “Studies in Aristotle’s Physics” inaugurated a series of subsequent philosophical inquiries into the philosophy of nature. Other teaching has included Greek and Latin language courses for the Faculty of Philosophy at the Seminary of Christ the King located at the Benedictine monastery of Westminster Abbey in Mission, British Columbia. Major publications include the books Hesiod: Theogony / Works and Days (Talonbooks, 2012) and The Way of Logic (Nanjing Normal University Press, 2018). *** Homepage: https://www.uc.pt/fluc/uidief/act/io2s Auditorium: https://www.uc.pt/fluc/uidief/act/io2s/auditorium *** Technical support assured by Robert Junqueira. The cover image for the video was designed by Zahra Soltani.

The article contains a detailed analysis of Lewis Carroll’s diagram method. We give a formulation of the method (including all steps and rules) according to the syllogistic theory of Carroll. In our previous work, the possibility of using this method according to statements and conclusions of Fundamental syllogistic and syllogistic of Bolzano was shown. In the present artigle we make well-founded assumptions about possibility of the modification of Lewis Carroll’s diagram method according to the traditional and Aristotelian syllogistic systems. As far as traditional syllogistic system is concerned, it is suggested that we accept an additional rule of correction of the big diagram once the joint information of the premises has been represented on it. Regarding the Aristotelian syllogistic system, we suggest the method of considering three alternative big diagrams instead of one on condition that the syllogism contains the O statement., Работа содержит подробный анализ диаграммного метода Льюиса Кэрролла. Дана четкая формулировка данного метода (включая все этапы и правила) применительно к силлогистике самого Кэрролла. Ранее нами была продемонстрирована возможность применения данного метода по отношению к суждениям и умозаключениям фундаментальной силлогистики и силлогистики Больцано. В данной статье рассматривается проблема адаптации теории Кэрролла к традиционной и аристотелевской силлогистикам. Выдвинуты обоснованные предположения о возможности модификации диаграммного метода Кэрролла применительно к данным теориям. В традиционной силлогистике предлагается принять дополнительное правило корректировки большой диаграммы после выражения на ней совместной информации посылок. В аристотелевской силлогистике предложен метод рассмотрения трех альтернативных больших диаграмм вместо одной при наличии в посылке силлогизма частноотрицательного высказывания.

El estudio de la recepción de la silogística aristotélica dentro del siglo XVI y, en particular, en la filosofía de Domingo Bañez, es un lugar muy importante para mostrar como la figura de Aristóteles fue retomada dentro del entorno cultural de la Escuela de Salamanca. En este trabajo, después de una breve presentación de la trayectoria histórica que permite la llegada de la silogística aristotélica a Bañez, se muestra como, en su Institutiones minoris dialecticae, ella es enfrentada a la problemática de la Trinidad y es valorada para su posible utilidad dentro del entendimiento del misterio divino. Study of the reception of Aristotelian syllogistic in the sixteenth century and, in particular, the phi-losophy of Domingo Bañez, is a very important for showing how Aristotle’s philosophy was taken up within the cultural environment of the School of Salamanca. This article, after a brief presentation of the historical trajectory bringing Aristotelian syllogistic to Bañez, shows how, in his Institutiones minoris dialecticae, he faces the problem of the Trinity, and how this work is valued for its usefulness in the understanding of the divine mystery.