Search

High-risk relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is associated with poor outcomes after conventional salvage therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Post-AHCT consolidation with brentuximab vedotin (BV) improves progression-free survival (PFS), but with increasing use of BV early in the treatment course, the utility of consolidation is unclear. CD25 is often expressed on Reed-Sternberg cells and in the tumor microenvironment in HL, and we hypothesized that the addition of 90Y-antiCD25 (aTac) to carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM) AHCT would be safe and result in a transplantation platform that is agnostic to prior HL-directed therapy. Twenty-five patients with high-risk R/R HL were enrolled in this phase 1 dose-escalation trial of aTac-BEAM. Following an imaging dose of 111In-antiCD25, 2 patients had altered biodistribution, and a third developed an unrelated catheter-associated bacteremia; therefore, 22 patients ultimately received therapeutic 90Y-aTac-BEAM AHCT. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and 0.6 mCi/kg was deemed the recommended phase 2 dose, the dose at which the heart wall would not receive >2500 cGy. Toxicities and time to engraftment were similar to those observed with standard AHCT, though 95% of patients developed stomatitis (all grade 1-2 per Bearman toxicity scale). Seven relapses (32%) were observed, most commonly in patients with ≥3 risk factors. The estimated 5-year PFS and overall survival probabilities among 22 evaluable patients were 68% and 95%, respectively, and non-relapse mortality was 0%. aTac-BEAM AHCT was tolerable in patients with high-risk R/R HL, and we are further evaluating the efficacy of this approach in a phase 2 trial. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01476839.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective treatments are needed for these patients, who often have no other donor options and/or are in need to proceed urgently to transplantation. We studied a multimodality treatment with alternate-day plasma exchange (PE), rituximab, intravenous γ globulin (IVIg) and an irradiated donor buffy coat for patients with DSAs at 2 institutions. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 51 years were treated with this desensitization protocol. Treatment outcomes were compared with a control group of HaploSCT patients without DSAs (n = 345). The majority of patients in the DSA group were female (83.8% vs 37.1% in controls, P < .001) and received stem cells from a child as the donor (67.6% vs 44.1%, P = .002). Mean DSA level before and after desensitization was 10 198 and 5937 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), respectively, with mean differences of 4030 MFI. Fourteen of 30 tested patients (46.7%) had C1q positivity, while 8 of 29 tested patients (27.6%) remained positive after desensitization. In multivariable analysis, patients with initial DSA > 20 000 MFI and persistent positive C1q after desensitization had a significantly lower engraftment rate, which resulted in significantly higher non-relapse mortality and worse overall survival (OS) than controls, whereas graft outcome and survival of patients with initial DSA < 20 000 MFI and those with negative C1q after treatment were comparable with controls. In conclusion, treatment with PE, rituximab, IVIg, and donor buffy coat is effective in promoting engraftment in patients with DSAs ≤20 000 MFI.

Background: In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the presence of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 translocations, so-called double-hit lymphoma (DH), has been associated with an aggressive clinical course. Recently, it was reported that gene expression profiling (GEP) could also identify cases with the biological and clinical characteristics of DH lymphoma, including some without the requisite translocations (DHITsig-positive cases)1. The purpose of this study was to develop a molecular subtyping schema for germinal center B-cell type (GCB) DLBCL using genomic studies such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cytogenetic analysis, GEP, and mutation analysis to risk-stratify patients with GCB DLBCL. Method and Results: We performed a detailed genomic analysis of 87 cases of de novo GCB DLBCL to identify characteristics that are associated with survival in those treated with R-CHOP. The cases were extensively characterized by combining the results of immunohistochemistry, cell-of-origin GEP (Nanostring), DH GEP (DLBCL90)1, FISH cytogenetic analysis for DH lymphoma, copy number analysis (CNA), and targeted deep sequencing using a custom mutation panel of 334 genes. These studies were used to divide the cases into four groups. GCB1: DHITsig-positive with TP53 inactivation (DHIT+TP53): DLBCL with TP53 mutations and/or deletions has a poor prognosis in patients treated with R-CHOP. We found 7 cases (8% of all cases) of GCB DLBCL that were DHITsig-pos with TP53 abnormalities. By FISH analysis, two cases had a triple-hit (TH), one was DH with MYC/BCL2, and 2 cases had a MYC translocation only. Cases in GCB1 had the worst overall survival (OS; Hazard Ratio (HR)=9.2, P=0.0018) and shortest progression-free survival (PFS; HR=6.1, P=0.002) compared to other groups (Figures 1 A/B). However, cases with TP53 abnormalities that were DHITsig-neg did not have the same poor survival. GCB2: DHITsig-positive (DHITsig-pos): The other 8 cases (9%) who were DHITsig-pos from the DBLCL90 GEP but lacked TP53 abnormalities showed a predilection (88%) for having an EZH2 mutation and/or BCL2 translocation (EZB of Schmitz et al2). These cases also had a high frequency of MYC mutations (63%) but lacked mutations in SGK1 and had a low frequency of mutations in linker histone genes (e.g. HIST1H1E). By FISH analysis, 3 cases were DH lymphoma with MYC/BCL2, 2 cases were TH lymphoma, and 1 case had a MYC translocation only. Typically DHITsig-pos cases have a poor OS when compared to DHITsig-neg cases1, however this group demonstrated good survival in our study, after removing the cases with TP53 abnormalities. GCB3: DHITsig-negative and EZH2 mutation and/or BCL2 translocation (EZB-like): We had 28 cases (32%) that were DHITsig-neg and had an EZH2 mutation and/or BCL2 translocation. These were categorized as EZB-like with some overlapping features with the DLBCL in Cluster 3 of Chapuy et al3. The survival of this group was intermediate compared to the other groups (Figures 1A/B). GCB4: DHITsig-negative and not EZB-like (GCB Other): The largest group of cases (51%) were DHITsig-neg and lacked EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations. These cases had frequent mutations in SGK1 (16%) and histone modifying genes (50%), as well as TET2 mutations (25%). These cases have similarities to Cluster 4 of Chapuy et al3 and the ST2 group from Wright et al4. The survival of this group was excellent (Figures 1 A/B). These groups were validated in an independent cohort of 188 cases of GCB DLBCL4 (Figures 1 C/D). Conclusions: We have identified four distinct biologic subgroups of GCB DLBCL with different survival rates, and with similarities to the genomic classifications from recent large retrospective studies of DLBCL. Patients with the DH signature but no abnormalities of TP53 (GCB2), and those lacking EZH2 mutation and BCL2 translocation (GCB4), had an excellent prognosis. However, patients with an EZB-like profile (GCB3) had an intermediate prognosis, whereas those with TP53 inactivation combined with the DH signature (GCB1) had an extremely poor prognosis. We propose this as a practical schema to risk-stratify patients with GCB DLBCL. This schema provides a promising new approach to identify high-risk patients for new and innovative therapies. Figure 1 Disclosures Herrera: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Zain:Kyowa Kirlin: Research Funding; Mundai Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Popplewell:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Kwak:Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CJ Healthcare: Consultancy; Sellas Life Sciences Grp: Consultancy; Enzychem Life Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Antigenics: Other: equity; InnoLifes, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xeme Biopharma/Theratest: Other: equity; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy. Scott:NIH: Consultancy, Other: Co-inventor on a patent related to the MCL35 assay filed at the National Institutes of Health, United States of America.; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoString, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV), a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, is US FDA approved for treatment of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after progression or relapse of at least two prior lines of chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation, as consolidation therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk patients and as a front-line therapy for previously untreated, advanced-stage cHL in combination with chemotherapy. BV is a well-tolerated treatment in previously heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory cHL and in treatment-naive patients. BV use, in combination with other antineoplastic agents for cHL, is under investigation in multiple prospective clinical trials.

This phase 2 trial evaluated PET-adapted nivolumab alone or in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (NICE) as first salvage therapy and bridge to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients with RR cHL received 240 mg nivolumab every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). Patients in complete response (CR) after C6 proceeded to AHCT, whereas patients with progressive disease at any point or not in CR after C6 received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR rate per the 2014 Lugano classification at completion of protocol therapy. Forty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity; 42 were evaluable for response. Thirty-four patients received nivolumab alone, and 9 patients received nivolumab+NICE. No unexpected toxicities were observed after nivolumab or NICE. After nivolumab, the overall response rate (ORR) was 81%, and the CR rate was 71%. Among 9 patients who received NICE, all responded, with 8 (89%) achieving CR. At the end of protocol therapy, the ORR and CR rates were 93% and 91%. Thirty-three patients were bridged directly to AHCT, including 26 after Nivo alone. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in all treated patients (n = 43) were 72% and 95%, respectively. Among 33 patients who bridged directly to AHCT, the 2-year PFS was 94% (95% CI: 78-98). PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with nivolumab/nivolumab+NICE was well tolerated and effective, resulting in a high CR rate and bridging most patients to AHCT without chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03016871.

Background: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a subset of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) with distinct biological and clinical features. Although most patients are cured with frontline chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT), relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) PMBCL is much harder to control. Standard treatment of rel/ref PMBCL is similar to other aggressive B-NHLs, including salvage therapy and autologous (auto) stem cell transplantation (SCT) in chemosensitive patients. Recently, immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade and chimeric antigen receptor modified T-cells has proven to be effective in rel/ref PMBCL. Despite this, allogeneic (allo) SCT retains an important potential role as it has curative potential for patients with advanced aggressive B-NHLs. However, there are scant modern data on alloSCT outcomes in patients with PMBCL, limited to case reports or small series. We therefore performed a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate alloSCT outcomes in patients with rel/ref PMBCL. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with rel/ref PMBCL who underwent alloSCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, or City of Hope between 1/2000 and 5/2014. Baseline and transplant characteristics are reported descriptively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality were calculated using competing risks methods. Results: 28 patients with rel/ref PMBCL underwent alloSCT at participating institutions during the study period. Among these patients, median age at SCT was 36 years, 54% were female, median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-7), 57% were refractory to frontline therapy, 86% received prior RT, and 71% had prior autoSCT. At alloSCT, 1 (4%) patient was in complete response (CR), 21 (75%) were in partial response (PR), and 6 (21%) were refractory to pre-alloSCT therapy (18 patients were assessed with PET). Most patients (86%) received reduced intensity conditioning, most commonly fludarabine/melphalan +/- ATG or Zevalin (25%), fludarabine/TBI200 (21%), or fludarabine/busulfan (14%). GVHD prophylaxis most frequently consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) with mycophenolate mofetil (12, 43%), CNI with sirolimus +/- methotrexate (8, 29%), or CNI with MTX (4, 14%). 15 (54%) patients had a matched (8/8) related donor, 8 (29%) had a matched unrelated donor, 2 had a mismatched unrelated donor (7/8), and 3 had umbilical cord donors. All patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts except for the 3 cord recipients. The median follow-up time in survivors was 5.0 (range 0.5-14.0) years. The 2 year PFS and OS in the cohort were 39% and 45%, respectively, while non-relapse mortality (NRM) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were 32% and 29%, respectively. The 5-year PFS, OS, NRM, and CIR were 34%, 45%, 32%, and 33%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 39% and 4% at day 100, while the incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 21% (18% extensive). Among patients in CR/PR at the time of alloSCT, the 2-year PFS and OS were 50% and 58%, respectively, as compared to a 2-year PFS and OS of 0% in patients who were refractory at the time of alloSCT (p=0.046 for PFS, p=0.014 for OS). One patient received post-alloSCT lenalidomide as maintenance therapy and remained in ongoing CR. Of the 9 patients who relapsed after alloSCT, 3 out of 4 patients exhibited a response to immunosuppression taper, while 4 out of 5 patients responded to subsequent systemic therapy. 2 patients underwent a donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and both developed subsequent GVHD - 1 patient had a CR documented 64 days after DLI while the other had continued disease progression. In the 9 patients who relapsed after alloSCT, the 2-year OS was 33%. Conclusions: AlloSCT can produce durable remissions in a subset of patients with heavily treated, rel/ref PMBCL. Patients with refractory disease at alloSCT had dismal outcomes. Despite the expanding treatment options available for these patients, alloSCT should be considered in the management of patients with rel/ref PMBCL who are sensitive to salvage therapy. Figure 1A PFS and OS After AlloSCT in Patients with Rel/Ref PMBCL Figure 1B PFS in Patients with Sensitive versus Refractory PMBCL at AlloSCT Disclosures Herrera: Merck, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; KiTE Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Maloney:Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Chen:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; REGiMMUNE: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Armand:Otsuka: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding. Shadman:Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy.

A mismatch at HLA-DPB1 locus is associated with higher acute GVHD and lower relapse rate after myeloablative (MAC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Also, in MAC setting, mismatch permissiveness and expression level impact alloHCT outcomes. However, in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), DP mismatch effect on transplant outcomes is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated DP mismatch influence (number, permissiveness, and expression) on HCT outcomes in 310 patients with high-resolution typing (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1, and -DPB1), who underwent RIC HCT. By multivariable analysis, 11/12 had better overall survival (OS) and relapse vs. 12/12 (HR = 1.61 and 2.02; p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively) and better OS vs. 10/12 (HR = 1.68; p = 0.02). Within the 11/12, nonpermissive (NoPR) mismatch was associated with higher risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR = 1.97; p = 0.005) and nonrelapse mortality (HR = 2.13; p = 0.02) vs. permissive (PR). Grouping 11/12 based on the DP expression conferred higher mortality (HR = 3.78; p = 0.003) when low expressers received a graft from high expressers (AG) vs. low expressers (AA). Better OS was achieved in PR 11/12, when expression was low in patient and donor (AA) vs. all other combinations. Therefore, in RIC HCT, a single-DP mismatch has a protective role, especially in permissive setting, when donor and recipient are low expressers.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) and follicular lymphoma (FL) are the most common subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in adults. Histologic transformation of FL to DLBCL (TFL) occurs in approximately 15% of patients and is generally associated with a poor clinical outcome. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors have shown promising results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory FL. CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel) has emerged as a novel treatment option for relapsed/refractory DLBCL and TFL. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight important updates to the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas regarding the treatment of TFL and relapsed/refractory FL and DLBCL.

The phase 3 AETHERA trial established brentuximab vedotin (BV) as a consolidative treatment option for adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) at high risk of relapse or progression after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Results showed that BV significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo plus best supportive care alone. At 5-year follow-up, BV continued to provide patients with sustained PFS benefit; 5-year PFS was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51-66) with BV vs 41% (95% CI, 33-49) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.521; 95% CI, 0.379-0.717). Similarly, patients with ≥2 risk factors in the BV arm experienced significantly higher PFS at 5 years than patients in the placebo arm (HR, 0.424; 95% CI, 0.302-0.596). Upfront consolidation with BV significantly delayed time to second subsequent therapy, an indicator of ongoing disease control, vs placebo. Peripheral neuropathy, the most common adverse event in patients receiving BV, continued to improve and/or resolve in 90% of patients. In summary, consolidation with BV in adult patients with cHL at high risk of relapse or progression after auto-HSCT confers a sustained PFS benefit and is safe and well tolerated. Physicians should consider each patient's HL risk factor profile when making treatment decisions. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01100502.

The negative impact of iron overload (IO) on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is well recognized, but its impact on umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplant outcome is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 150 patients who received UCB-HCT at our institution, stratified by pre-HCT serum ferritin (SF) level of 2000 ng/mL. Two-year overall survival rate among patients with SF >2000 and ≤2000 ng/mL was 26.1% (95% CI, 10.6% to 44.7%) and 52.1% (95% CI, 40.1% to 62.8%), respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.26 (95% CI, 1.28 to 4.00, P = .005). Two-year nonrelapse mortality rate was higher among patients with SF >2000 ng/mL (56.5%; 95% CI, 33.3% to 74.4%) compared to SF ≤2000 ng/mL (30.1%; 95% CI, 20.0% to 40.9%); HR = 2.18 (95% CI, 1.10 to 4.31, P = .025). Neutrophil engraftment at 42 days was 78.3% (95% CI, 53.5% to 90.8%) in patients with SF >2000 ng/mL versus 91.8% (95% CI, 82.1% to 96.4%) in patients with SF ≤2000 ng/mL; HR = 0.58 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.96, P = .034). A significant difference in platelet engraftment at 3 months was also observed: 52.2% (95% CI, 29.4% to 70.8%) for SF >2000 ng/mL versus 80.8% (95% CI, 69.5% to 88.3%) for SF ≤2000 ng/mL; HR = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.98, P = .044). In conclusion, IO defined by SF of 2000 ng/mL is a strong adverse prognostic factor for UCB-HCT and should be considered when UCB is chosen as the graft source for patients without a fully matched donor.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is offered increasingly to elderly patients with hematologic malignancies. However, outcome data in those who are 70 years or older are limited, and no standard conditioning regimen has been established for this population. In this retrospective study we evaluated the outcome of 53 consecutive patients aged 70 years and older who underwent alloHCT with melphalan-based reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) at City of Hope. Engraftment was prompt, with median time to neutrophil engraftment of 15 days. More than 95% of patients achieved complete donor chimerism within 6 weeks from HCT, consistent with the "semiablative" nature of this regimen. With a median follow-up of 31.1 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 68.9%, 63.8%, and 17.0%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 and 2 years was 17.0% and 19.3%, respectively. One hundred–day cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 37.7% (grades III to IV, 18.9%), and 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was 61.9% (extensive, 45.9%). The only significant predictor for poor OS was high/very high disease risk index. Transplant-related complications and morbidities observed here did not differ from the commonly expected in younger patients treated with RIC. In conclusion, alloHCT with a melphalan-based conditioning regimen is associated with acceptable toxicities and NRM, lower incidence of relapse, and favorable OS and PFS in patients aged 70 years or older.

The purpose of this report is to analyze long-term clinical outcomes of patients exposed to plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilization. This was a study of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; n = 167) and multiple myeloma (MM; n = 163) who were enrolled in the long-term follow-up of 2 pivotal phase III studies (NCT00741325 and NCT00741780) of 240 µg/kg plerixafor plus 10 µg/kg G-CSF, or placebo plus 10 µg/kg G-CSF to mobilize and collect CD34+ cells for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated over a 5-year period following the first dose of plerixafor or placebo. The probability of OS was not significantly different in patients with NHL or MM treated with plerixafor or placebo (NHL: 64%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 56% to 71% versus 56%; 95% CI, 44% to 67%, respectively; MM: 64%; 95% CI, 54% to 72% versus 64%; 95% CI, 53% to 73%, respectively). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of PFS over 5 years between treatment groups in patients with NHL (50%; 95% CI, 44% to 67% for plerixafor versus 43%; 95% CI, 31% to 54% for placebo) or those with MM (17%; 95% CI, 10% to 24% for plerixafor versus 30%; 95% CI, 21% to 40% for placebo). In this long-term follow-up study, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF for stem cell mobilization did not affect 5-year survival in patients with NHL or patients with MM.

Double-hit lymphomas (DHLs) and double-expressor lymphomas (DELs) are associated with resistance to frontline and salvage immunochemotherapy, as well as autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). We hypothesized that allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) could overcome the chemoresistance associated with DEL/DHL. We retrospectively studied the impact of DEL/DHL status in a multicenter cohort of patients who underwent alloSCT for relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Seventy-eight patients transplanted at 3 centers in whom tumor tissue was available for immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were enrolled; 47% had DEL and 13% had DHL. There were no significant differences in 4-year progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with DEL compared with patients without DEL (PFS 30% versus 39%, P = .24; OS 31% versus 49%, P = .17) or between patients with DHL compared with patients without DHL (PFS 40% versus 34%, P = .62; OS 50% versus 38%, P = .46). The lack of association between DEL or DHL and outcome was confirmed in multivariable models, although inadequate sample size may have limited our ability to detect significant differences. In our cohort alloSCT produced durable remissions in patients with rel/ref aggressive B-NHL irrespective of DEL and DHL status, justifying its consideration in the treatment of patients with rel/ref DEL/DHL.

Recognizing the significant biological and clinical heterogeneity of mature T cell and natural killer (NK)/T cell lymphomas, the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation invited experts to develop clinical practice recommendations related to the role of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) and allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) for specific histological subtypes. We used the GRADE methodology to aid in moving from evidence to decision making and ultimately to generating final recommendations. Auto-HCT in front-line consolidation is recommended in peripheral T cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL), anaplastic large cell lymphoma–anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALCL-ALK)-negative, NK/T cell (disseminated), enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma (EATL), and hepatosplenic lymphomas. Auto-HCT in relapsed-sensitive disease is recommended for NK/T cell (localized and disseminated), EATL, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell, and ALCL-ALK–positive lymphomas. Auto-HCT is also recommended for PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCL-ALK–negative lymphomas if not performed as front-line therapy. Auto-HCT in refractory (primary or relapsed) disease is not recommended for any of the histological subtypes discussed. Allo-HCT in front-line consolidation is recommended for NK/T cell (disseminated), adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL; acute and lymphoma type), and hepatosplenic lymphomas. Allo-HCT for relapsed-sensitive disease is recommended for PTCL-NOS, AITL, ALCL-ALK–negative, ALCL-ALK–positive, NK/T cell (localized and disseminated), ATLL (acute, lymphoma type, smoldering/chronic), mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome (advanced stage IIB-IVB or tumor stage/extracutaneous), EATL, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell, and hepatosplenic lymphoma. Allo-HCT in refractory (primary or relapsed refractory) disease is recommended for any aforementioned histological subtypes. Emerging novel therapies will likely be incorporated into the pretransplantation, peritransplantation, and post-transplantation algorithms (auto-HCT or allo-HCT) with the goals of optimizing efficacy and improving outcomes. We acknowledge that there are unique clinical scenarios not covered by these recommendations that may require individualized decisions.

Standard-dose 90yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan (.4 mci/kg) together with high-dose BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) (Z-BEAM) has been shown to be a well-tolerated autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation preparative regimen for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We report the outcomes of a single-center, single-arm phase II trial of Z-BEAM conditioning in high-risk CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma histologic strata: diffuse large B cell (DLBCL), mantle cell, follicular, and transformed. Robust overall survival and notably low nonrelapse mortality rates (.9% at day +100 for the entire cohort), with few short- and long-term toxicities, confirm the safety and tolerability of the regimen. In addition, despite a high proportion of induction failure patients (46%), the promising response and progression-free survival (PFS) rates seen in DLBCL (3-year PFS: 71%; 95% confidence interval, 55 to 82%), support the premise that the Z-BEAM regimen is particularly effective in this histologic subtype. The role of Z-BEAM in other strata is less clear in the context of the emergence of novel agents.

Daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds CD25 and blocks formation of the IL-2 receptor on T cells. A study of daclizumab as acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after unrelated bone marrow transplantation was conducted before the importance of CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) was recognized. Tregs can abrogate the onset of GVHD. The relation between Tregs and a graft-versus-malignancy effect is not fully understood. An international, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial randomized 210 adult or pediatric patients to receive 5 weekly doses of daclizumab at 0.3 mg/kg (n = 69) or 1.2 mg/kg (n = 76) or placebo (n = 65) after unrelated marrow transplantation for treatment of hematologic malignancies or severe aplastic anemia. The risk of acute GVHD did not differ among the groups (P = .68). Long-term follow-up of clinical outcomes and correlative analysis of peripheral blood T cell phenotype suggested that the patients treated with daclizumab had an increased risk of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 2.3; P = .08) and a decreased risk of relapse (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.0; P = .05), but similar survival (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.3; P = .53). T cells from a subset of patients (n = 107) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Compared with placebo, treatment with daclizumab decreased the proportion of Tregs among CD4 T cells at days 11-35 and increased the proportion of central memory cells among CD4 T cells at 1 year. Prophylactic administration of daclizumab does not prevent acute GVHD, but may increase the risk of chronic GVHD and decrease the risk of relapse. By delaying Treg reconstitution and promoting immunologic memory, anti-CD25 therapy may augment alloreactivity and antitumor immunity.

Haploidentical transplantation performed with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has been associated with favorable outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and lymphomas. However, it remains unclear if such approach is effective for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We analyzed outcomes of 109 consecutively treated ALL patients 18 years of age and older at 5 institutions. The median age was 32 years and the median follow-up for survivors was 13 months. Thirty-two patients were in first complete remission (CR1), while the rest were beyond CR1. Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 95% of the patients. The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and III and IV acute GVHD at day 100 after transplantation were 32% and 11%, respectively, whereas chronic GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, relapse rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year after transplantation were 32%, 21%, 27%, and 51%, respectively. Patients in CR1 had 52% DFS at 3 years. These results suggest that haploidentical transplants performed with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis provide a very suitable alternative to HLA-matched transplantations for patients with ALL.

Purpose Double-hit lymphomas (DHLs) and double-expressor lymphomas (DELs) are subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) associated with poor outcomes after standard chemoimmunotherapy. Data are limited regarding outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) DEL or DHL who undergo autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). We retrospectively studied the prognostic impact of DEL and DHL status on ASCT outcomes in patients with rel/ref DLBCL. Methods Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive rel/ref DLBCL who underwent ASCT at two institutions and in whom archival tumor material was available were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC were performed. In cases with MYC rearrangement or copy gain, FISH for BCL2 and BCL6 was also performed. Results A total of 117 patients were included; 44% had DEL and 10% had DHL. DEL and DHL were associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS), and DHL was associated with poorer overall survival (OS). The 4-year PFS in patients with DEL compared with those with non-DEL was 48% versus 59% ( P = .049), and the 4-year OS was 56% versus 67% ( P = .10); 4-year PFS in patients with DHL compared with those with non-DHL was 28% versus 57% ( P = .013), and 4-year OS was 25% versus 61% ( P = .002). The few patients with concurrent DEL and DHL had a poor outcome (4-year PFS, 0%). In multivariable models, DEL and DHL were independently associated with inferior PFS, whereas DHL and partial response ( v complete response) at transplant were associated with inferior OS. Conclusion DEL and DHL are both associated with inferior outcomes after ASCT in patients with rel/ref DLBCL. Although ASCT remains a potentially curative approach, these patients, particularly those with DHL, are a high-risk subset who should be targeted for investigational strategies other than standard ASCT.

Background: Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) have a poor prognosis with current treatment regimens. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been used as a consolidation strategy in remission states (CR1 or above) endorsed by the NCCN guidelines in appropriate patients. 5-year DFS is reported at 70% for alk -ve anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and 30-40% for most other histologies (D'Amore et al, 2012, JCO). It is also performed in the relapsed settings if no previous ASCT performed and allogeneic transplant is not an option. CD25 is a targetable protein expressed differentially in PTCL and antibody based anti-CD25 therapies are efficacious in PTCL i.e denileukin diftitox (Foss et al Blood 2006, Dang et al, BJH 2006) , monoclonal antibody dacluzimab (Waldman et al 1995 Blood). Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled chimeric antiCD25 antibody basiliximab emits beta particles and has been shown to inhibit the growth of human ALCL tumors and increase survival in SUDHL-1 xenograft mice (Zhang et al 2009 Cancer Biother Radiopharm). Previous investigations at COH by Raubitschek, Colcher et al established a safe does of Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled basiliximab at 0.4mCi/kg in combination with BEAM. This is a phase 1 clinical trial of a novel conditioning regimen that includes the use of Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled basiliximab with BEAM chemotherapy for PTCL patients eligible for ASCT. The trial utilizes a modified version of the rolling 6 design (Skolnik et al) to test 3 dose levels of Yttrium-90 (90Y) Basiliximab i.e 0.4mCi/kg, 0.5miC/kg and 0.6mCi/kg with the primary objective of evaluating the safety and tolerability of this combination and to establish the MTD. Secondary objectives include estimating incidence of relapse, OS, PFS, NRM at day 100, 1 year and 2 years post-transplant. Patients and Methods: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined according to the Bearman and CTCAE 4.03 scales, the latter for hematologic toxicity. The study/treatment schema is shown in Figure 1. Results: From 07/29/2015 to 06/10/2020, 20 patients underwent ASCT on this trial; n=4 at 0.4mCi/kg n=4 at 0.5mCi/kg and n=12 at 0.6mCi/kg. Median age at ASCT was 51 years (range: 18-76), and histologies included; PTCL-nos (n=10); alk-ve ALCL (n=5); angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=3); and intestinal T-cell lymphoma (n=2). Disease status at ASCT were CR1 in18, CR2 in 2 patients. Median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-4). At a median follow-up of 17.1 months (range: 0.9-26.2), 12 patients remain in remission, 8 have relapsed out of which 5 have died of progressive lymphoma. OS was 100% (95% CI: N/A) at 100-days, and 83% (95% CI: 57-94) at 1 year. Non-relapse Mortality was 0% at both 100-days and 1-year. All patients successfully engrafted with the median days to ANC >= 500/ul was 10 (range: 10 - 21), and days to PLT >= 20,000/ul: 13 (12 - 92). Overall, no dose limiting toxicities were experienced. The most common/highest grade toxicity experienced (per Bearman Scale) was grade 2 stomatitis, which was seen in 3 patients at 0.4mCi/kg; 4 patients at 0.5 mCi/kg, and 7 at0.6mCi/kg. The only other toxicities seen were grade 2 GI in 2 patients at 0.4mCi/kg, and grade 2 bladder in one patient at 0.6mCi/kg dose.. Toxicities >grade 2 were not seen. Conclusion: aTac- BEAM appears to be safe as an ASCT conditioning regimen for PTCL with no increased toxicity as compared to the historical toxicities seen with BEAM alone in this patient population (D'Amore 2012 J of Clin Onc). The dose level 0.6mCi/kg will likely be the recommended phase II dose. An expanded phase is planned to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen followed by a randomized trial of BEAM alone plus a combination of aTac- BEAM. Figure 1 Disclosures Zain: Mundi Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding. Herrera:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Salhotra:Kadmon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Nakamura:NapaJen Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Support on seminar; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board meeting; Viracor: Consultancy; Merck: Other: advisory board meeting; Alexion: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Kyowa-Kirin: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Advisory board meeting. OffLabel Disclosure: Yittrium labelled Basiliximab

BACKGROUND While tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis has been effective in preventing acute GvHD post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), its efficacy and long-term outcome in matched (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (mMUD) setting is not well defined. METHODS Herein, we evaluated a consecutive case-series of 482 patients who underwent unrelated donor HCT (2005-2013) with T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range = 2.4-11.3), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse/progression-free survival were 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.0-52.0) and 43.6% (95% CI: 39.1-48.1), respectively; and the 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 24.9%, and 31.5%, respectively. In this cohort, mMUD was associated with worse OS (39.0% versus 50.7% at 5 y; P = 0.034), primarily due to greater risk of NRM (33.5% versus 21.7%; P = 0.038). While rates of relapse, acute (II-IV or III-IV) or chronic GvHD (limited or extensive) were not different, death caused by chronic GvHD (20.8% versus 12.8%; P = 0.022) and infection (33.0% versus 18.1%; P < 0.01) were significantly greater in mMUD. In multivariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.16-4.23; P < 0.01) and mMUD (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.08; P = 0.004) were independent predictive factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis is an effective and acceptable GvHD prophylactic regimen. However, survival after mMUD remained poor, possibly related to the severity of chronic GvHD.

Summary Brentuximab vedotin (BV) significantly improved progression-free survival in a phase 3 study in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RR-HL) post-autologous-haematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT); we report the impact of BV on quality of life (QOL) from this trial. The European Quality of Life five dimensions questionnaire was administered at the beginning of each cycle, end of treatment, and every 3 months during follow-up; index value scores were calculated using the time trade-off (TTO) method for UK-weighted value sets. Questionnaire adherence during the trial was 87·5% (N = 329). In an intent-to-treat analysis, compared with placebo, TTO scores in the BV arm did not exceed the minimally important difference (MID) of 0·08 except at month 15 (−0·084; 95% confidence interval, −0·143 to −0·025). On-treatment index scores were similar between arms and did not reach the MID at any time point; mixed-effect modelling showed that BV treatment effect was not significant (P = 0·2127). BV-associated peripheral neuropathy did not meaningfully impact QOL. Utility scores for patients who progressed declined compared with those who did not; TTO scores between these patients exceeded the MID beginning at month 15. In conclusion, QOL decreased modestly with BV consolidation treatment in patients with RR-HL at high risk of relapse after auto-HSCT.

Introduction Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) comprise 15-20% of adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma and have a poor prognosis; 5-year survival is less than 30% for the most aggressive subtypes. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) is offered to eligible patients as a potentially curative modality in the salvage setting or in high risk patients to consolidate an initial response to frontline therapy. Objective To report clinical outcomes derived from large sample size and long-term follow up data. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 87 consecutive patients with PTCL who underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope from January 2000 to June 2018. Baseline patient demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics were summarized by descriptive statistics. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Cumulative incidences of time to relapse and time to non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated with relapse and NRM as competing risks. Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were calculated as time to onset of GVHD with relapse and death as competing events for GVHD. Results Median age at allo-HCT was 49 (range 2-70) years. Histologies were PTCL-NOS (n=21); transformed CTCL (n=19); NK TCL (n=17); AITL (n=15), ALCL (n=7); γδTCL (n=6) and other rare subtypes (n=2). No patients had a prior auto transplant. 42 patients (48%) had myeloablative conditioning; FTBI-based (n=39), or BEAM regimen (n=3). 45 patients (52%) had reduced intensity conditioning with a fludarabine/melphalan based regimen in 39. Sibling HCT was done in 47 (54%) patients. MUD HCT was done in 36 (41%); donors were fully HLA matched for 15 (17%) patients and mismatched in 21 (24%); 4 (5%) got haploidentical HCT. The most common GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=54). Stem cell source was PBSC in 77 (88%), bone marrow in 5 (6%), and cord blood in 5 (6%) patients. At allo-HCT 25 (29%) patients were in complete remission, 25 (29%) in partial remission, 22 (25%) with induction failure and 14 (16%) with relapsed disease. The median follow-up among survivors was 6.9 years (range 1.1-15.5). The 5- and 10-year PFS was 47% (95% CI: 36%-58%) and 38% (95% CI: 26%-50%), respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS was 53% (95% CI: 41%-63%) and 42% (95% CI: 29%-54%), respectively (Fig.1). At day 100 after allo-HCT, the rate of acute GVHD grade II-IV was 41% (95% CI: 30%-51). Chronic GVHD rates at 3 years were 62% (95% CI: 51%-72%), with extensive GVHD of 55% (95% CI: 44%-65%). On univariate analysis, age (> 60 or not), sex, TBI-based conditioning, donor type, stem cell source or remission status prior to allo-HCT did not predict for OS. Conclusions This large single-institution series with a long-term follow-up on allo-HCT outcomes in patients with high-risk, aggressive T-cell NHL shows encouraging survival outcomes for these patients with limited treatment options.

Despite of the continuous increase in the number of volunteer donors available through the registry, many patients who require an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cannot find a fully-matched donor. While a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is frequently available, it is associated with inferior outcomes and increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been effective in haploidentical HCT, and increasingly used in matched donor HCTs. However, limited data exist in MMUD setting. We conducted a prospective single center trial (NCT 03128359) of PTCy for MMUD HCT with the primary objective of estimating 1-year GvHD-free relapse/progression-free survival (GRFS). As of October 2019, all planned 39 patients have been enrolled with a median follow up of 11 months (range: 1-23). Here we present the preliminary estimate of 1-year GRFS and other HCT outcomes in two strata; myeloablative conditioning (n=19) using Fludarabine (90 mg/m2) and FTBI (1200 cGy) or reduced intensity conditioning (n=19) using Fludarabine (100 mg/m2) and Melphalan (140 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 if >60 years old). Patients between 0 to 75 years of age and KPS of ≥70% with hematologic malignancies undergoing HCT from a 7/8 HLA-matched (A-, B-, C-, and DR-) donor were eligible. Patients with donor specific antibodies to the mismatched HLA-locus were excluded. All patient received PBMCs (3-5 × 106/kg) followed by GVHD prophylaxis consisting of PTCy (50 mg/kg for 2 days), Tacrolimus (1 mg), and mycophenolate mofetil (1 gr 3 × a day). Median age at the time of HCT was 53 years (range: 21-72), and 50% of patients were male. Disease risk was low in 47% (n=18), intermediate in 37% (n=14), and high in 16% of the patients (n=6). At transplant, 29 patients were in complete remission, and 9 had active disease. HCT-CI was 0 in six (16%) and 1-2 in 15 (39%) and >2 in 17 (45%) patients. Donors' median age was 32 years (range: 19-53) and donors were mismatched at HLA-A (n=14), -B (n=12), -C (n=8), or DR-loci (n=5). Median number of mismatches was 2 of 12 (range: 1-4). Female to male donor HCT was in 11% of recipients. Neutrophil engraftment occurred in all patients (median time to engraft: 16 days; range 13-35). One-year overall survival (OS) and GRFS were 92% (95% CI: 70-98) and 70% (95% CI: 51-83), respectively. Non-relapse mortality and relapse rate at 1 year were at 8% (95% CI: 2-29) and 13% (95% CI: 5-34), respectively. Cumulative incidence of day 100 acute GvHD grade 2-4 was 50% (95% CI: 35-71) and 1-year chronic GvHD was 56% (95% CI: 39-81). No severe chronic GvHD by the NIH criteria was observed. In conclusion, the data from our phase II trial of PTCy showed highly promising OS/GRFS in patients receiving 7/8 MMUD HCT, and that PTCy in MMUD setting offers an alternative and effective HCT approach for patients who do not have an available matched donor.

The current standard of care for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is high-dose conditioning followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). For some patients (ie, those with highest-risk disease, insufficient stem cell numbers after mobilization, or bone marrow involvement) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers the potential for cure. However, the majority of patients undergoing alloHCT receive reduced-intensity conditioning as a preparative regimen, and studies assessing outcomes of patients after alloHCT with myeloablative conditioning are limited. In this retrospective study, we reviewed outcomes of 22 patients with recurrent and refractory NHL who underwent alloHCT with myeloablative BEAM conditioning and received tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis at City of Hope between 2005 and 2018. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 1.0 to 11.2 years), the probabilities of 2-year overall survival and event-free survival were 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.0% to 75.8%) and 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4% to 64.3%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was 45.5% (95% CI, 23.8% to 64.9%), with only 1 patient developing grade IV acute GVHD. However, chronic GVHD was seen in 55% of the patients (n = 12). Of the 22 eligible patients, 2 had undergone previous ASCT and 2 had undergone previous alloHCT. Both patients with previous ASCT developed severe regimen-related toxicity. Patients who underwent alloHCT with chemorefractory disease had lower survival rates, with 1-year OS and EFS of 44.4% and 33.0%, respectively. In conclusion, alloHCT with a BEAM preparative regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD should be considered as an alternative option for patients with highest-risk lymphoma whose outcomes are expectedly poor after ASCT.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive and incurable lymphoma. Standard of care for younger patients with MCL is induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Rituximab maintenance after auto-HCT has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MCL. Bortezomib maintenance therapy has also been shown to be tolerable and feasible in this setting. However, the combination of bortezomib and rituximab as maintenance therapy post-auto-HCT has not been studied. We conducted a multicenter, phase II trial of bortezomib given in combination with rituximab as maintenance in MCL patients after consolidative auto-HCT. Enrolled patients (n = 23) received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously weekly for 4 weeks every 3 months (up to 24 months) and rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 4 weeks every 6 months (up to 24 months) for a total duration of 2 years. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, the 2-year DFS probability was 90.2% (95% CI 66–97), and 2-year OS was 94.7% (95% CI 68–99). The most frequent grade 3/4 toxic events were neutropenia (in 74% of patients) and lymphopenia (in 35%). The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 48% for grade 1, 9% for grade 2, and 0% for grade 3/4. We also examined the role of quantitative cyclin D1 (CCND1) mRNA in monitoring minimal residual disease. Combined bortezomib and rituximab as maintenance therapy in MCL patients following auto-HCT is an active and well-tolerated regimen. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01267812 , registered Dec 29, 2010.

The phase III AETHERA trial demonstrated the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin (BV) as consolidation therapy in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at high risk of relapse or progression after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT; hazard ratio, .57; P .001). The objective of this analysis is to provide further detail on the most common and clinically important treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in the AETHERA BV arm including their occurrence and management. AEs of clinical importance occurring in patients who participated in AETHERA (BV + best supportive care [BSC], n = 165; placebo + BSC, n = 164) were evaluated for time to onset, manageability through dose modification, and resolution. As previously reported, peripheral neuropathy (PN; 67%), infections (60%), and neutropenia (35%) were the most common BV-associated treatment-emergent AEs. Neutropenia was managed with dose delays and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; no dose reductions or discontinuations were required. Most PN cases (57%) were managed with dose delays and reductions. The median time to PN onset was 13.7 weeks (range, .1 to 47.4). After the end of treatment, PN continued to resolve; symptom resolution was similar to that in the placebo arm at 3 years, demonstrating reversibility. BV had no significant impact on pre-existing PN. Patients with PN-related dose modifications had progression-free survival (PFS) comparable with patients without. Other less common but serious AEs, including pulmonary toxicities, hepatotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity, were rare in both arms and were managed with BV dose modifications or discontinuations. Secondary malignancies were rare and reported in patients with comorbidities or other risk factors. Consolidation therapy with BV for patients with HL at high risk of relapse after auto-HSCT is associated with sustained PFS. The most common AEs in the BV arm were manageable and reversible. Awareness of these AEs and management approaches will enable healthcare providers and patients to plan the safest and most effective treatment plan.

This study examines the activity and tolerability of a regimen combining vorinostat and rituximab in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A total of 28 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory follicular, marginal zone, or mantle cell lymphoma, with 4 or less prior therapies were eligible for this open-label phase II study. Oral vorinostat 200 mg was administered twice daily on days 1-14 along with 375 mg/m(2) of intravenous rituximab on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, continuing until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was objective response rate, with secondary end points of progression-free survival, time to progression, duration of response, safety, and tolerability. Median follow up was 25.6 months and median number of vorinostat cycles was 11.5. Overall response rate was 46% for all patients, 67% for previously untreated, and 41% for relapsed/refractory patients. Median progression-free survival was 29.2 months for all patients, 18.8 months for previously treated patients, and not reached for untreated patients. The regimen was well tolerated over long treatment periods with the most common grade 3/4 adverse events being asymptomatic thrombosis, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and fatigue. The vorinostat/rituximab combination exhibits activity in indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with an acceptable safety profile and durable responses. Re-treatment was effective in 2 of 3 relapsing responders. This phase II clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00720876.

BACKGROUND The role of consolidation radiotherapy was examined for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were treated at institutions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network during the rituximab era. METHODS Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Potential associations were investigated with univariate and multivariate survival analysis and matched pair analysis. RESULTS There were 841 patients, and most (710 or 84%) received 6 to 8 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP); 293 (35%) received consolidation radiation therapy (RT). Failure occurred for 181 patients: 126 patients (70%) who did not receive RT and 55 patients (30%) who did. At 5 years, both OS and FFS rates were better for patients who had received RT versus those who did not (OS, 91% vs 83% [P = .01]; FFS, 83% vs 76% [P = .05]). A matched pair analysis (217 pairs matched by age, stage, International Prognostic Index [IPI] score, B symptoms, disease bulk, and response to chemotherapy) showed that the receipt of RT improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53 [P = .07]) and FFS (HR, 0.77 [P = .34]) for patients with stage III/IV disease, but too few events took place among those with stage I/II disease for meaningful comparisons (HR for OS, 0.94 [P = .89]; HR for FFS, 1.81 [P = .15]). A multivariate analysis suggested that the IPI score and the response to chemotherapy had the greatest influence on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS There was a trend of higher OS and FFS rates for patients who had received consolidation RT after R-CHOP (especially for patients with stage III/IV disease), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Cancer 2014. © 2014 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2015;121:1032–1039. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Transformation from indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has historically been associated with a poor prognosis. A small series of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) studies using conventional conditioning regimens has demonstrated durable progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 25% to 47%, but data in the rituximab era are lacking. Here we report the results of a multicenter retrospective trial evaluating ASCT in patients with transformed lymphoma using the Z-BEAM conditioning regimen, which combines yttrium-90–labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) with high-dose BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy. Sixty-three patients from 4 institutions were treated between 2003 and 2011. Histological confirmation of transformation was required and defined as a diagnosis of DLBCL in patients with either a prior history or concomitant diagnosis of low-grade B cell NHL. Median patient age at ASCT was 59.5 years, median number of prior regimens was 2, and all patients were exposed to rituximab. Disease status at ASCT was as follows: first complete remission (CR) (n = 30), first partial remission (n = 11), first relapse (n = 14), and at least second CR (n = 8). The median time from diagnosis of histological transformation to ASCT was 7.5 months (range, 2.8 to 116). Two-year nonrelapse mortality was 0%. Median follow-up for living patients was 28 months (range, 5 to 103). Two-year PFS was 68% (95% confidence interval, 58% to 75%), and overall survival was 90% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 95%). In conclusion, the Z-BEAM conditioning regimen for ASCT is well tolerated by patients with transformed lymphoma and demonstrates encouraging clinical outcomes.

We previously reported that brentuximab vedotin (BV) enabled successful reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT) in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma, after a median follow-up of 14.4 months. We now provide an updated report on 21 patients who were treated from 2009 to 2012 with BV before RIC-alloHCT with a uniform fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimen and donor source after a median follow-up of 29.9 months. We have also retrospectively compared the patient characteristics and outcomes of these BV-pretreated patients to 23 patients who received fludarabine/melphalan RIC-alloHCT without prior BV, in the time period before the drug was available (2003 to 2009). Patients who were treated with BV before RIC-alloHCT had a lower median hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index and a reduced number of peri-transplantation toxicities. There were also improvements in 2-year progression-free survival (59.3% versus 26.1%) and cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (23.8% versus 56.5%).

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders originating in B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, or natural killer cells. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for approximately 6% of all newly diagnosed NHL cases. Radiation therapy with or without systemic therapy is a reasonable approach for the few patients who present with early-stage disease. Rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDT/ASCR) is recommended for patients presenting with advanced-stage disease. Induction therapy followed by rituximab maintenance may provide extended disease control for those who are not candidates for HDT/ASCR. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory disease. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for NHL regarding the diagnosis and management of patients with MCL.

BACKGROUND T-cell lymphomas (TCLs) are uncommon in the United States. The accurate diagnosis of TCL is challenging and requires morphologic interpretation, immunophenotyping, and molecular techniques. The authors compared pathologic diagnoses at referring centers with diagnoses from expert hematopathology review to determine concordance rates and to characterize the usefulness of second-opinion pathology review for TCL. METHODS Patients in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network non-Hodgkin lymphoma database with peripheral TCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic TCL (AITL), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) were eligible if they had prior tissue specimens examined at a referring institution. Pathologic concordance was evaluated using available pathology and diagnostic testing reports and provider progress notes. The etiology of discordance and the potential impact on treatment were examined. RESULTS Among 131 eligible patients, 57 (44%) had concordant results, totaling 64% of the 89 patients who were referred with a final diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (24%) had discordant results, representing 36% of those who were referred with a final diagnosis. The rates of discordance among patients with of PTCL-NOS, AITL, ALK-negative ALCL, and ALK-positive ALCL were 19%, 33%, 34%, and 6%, respectively. In 14 patients (44% of discordant results), pathologic reclassification could have resulted in a different therapeutic strategy. Forty-two patients (32%) were referred for classification with a provisional diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS In a large cohort of patients with TCL who were referred to National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers, the likelihood of a concordant final diagnosis at a referring institution was low. As current and future therapies target TCL subsets, these data suggest that patients with suspected TCLs would benefit from evaluation by an expert hematopathologist. Cancer 2014;120:1993–1999. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Background: T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma seen in young adults that usually presents with a mediastinal mass and less than 20% bone marrow involvement with neoplastic cells. T-LBL and T-cell ALL are morphologically and immmunophenoytpically similar and are thus frequently grouped together. However there are differences in clinical presentation, cytogenetic features and molecular pathogenesis indicating biologic differences. Patients with relapsed refractory T-LBL have poor prognosis and there is a paucity of data on allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) outcomes in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 25 consecutive patients with T lymphoblastic lymphoma without prior auto-HCT who underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope from January 2000 to June 2018 after IRB approval was obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline patient demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cumulative incidences of time to relapse and time to non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated with relapse and NRM as competing risks. Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were calculated as time to onset of GVHD with relapse and death as competing events for GVHD. Results: 25 patients were included for the analysis. Median age at the time of allo-HCT was 25 years (range 7-70 years). 21 patients (80%) received myeloablative conditioning: FTBI containing regimens (n=20) with FTBI/VP-16 being most commonly used(n=16) and one patient received Bu/Cy based conditioning; 4 patients received reduced intensity conditioning with Flu/Mel. Sibling HCT was performed in 12 patients (48%), while MUD HCT was performed in 13 patients (52%) with fully matched HLA unrelated donor in 9 (36%) and HLA mismatched in 4 (16%) patients. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=10), tacrolimus or cyclosporine/MTX (n=7), tacrolimus/sirolimus/MTX (n=4) and others (n=4) Source of stem cells was PBSC in 19 (76%), bone marrow in 5 (20%), and cord blood in 1 (4%) patients. At the time of allo-HCT, there were a total of 11 (44%) patients in complete remission (CR1 n=4, CR2+ n=7), 9 (36%) patients in partial remission and unknown remission status (n=5). The median follow-up among survivors was 8.9 years (range 2.3-12.1). The 5- and 10-year PFS was 31% (95% CI: 14%-50%). The 5- and 10-year OS was 31% (95% CI: 14%-49%) (Fig.1). Cumulative incidence of relapses at 5 and 10 years were both 36% (95% CI: 18%-55%) while NRM at 5 and 10 years was 33% (95% CI: 15%-52%). At day 100 after allo-HCT, the rates of acute GVHD grade II-IV were 63% (95% CI: 39%-79%) and grade III-IV of 25% (95%CI: 10%-44%). Chronic GVHD rates at 3 years were 60% (95% CI: 37%-77%). In univariate analysis, preHCT remission status did not improve PFS on long term follow up. Conclusions: Our results in patients with T-LBL shows 5-year PFS and OS of 31%, respectively, indicating that a subset of patients can be cured with allo-HCT in the high-risk setting. Disclosures Salhotra: Celgene: Other: Research Support; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Non paid consultant. Popplewell:City of Hope: Employment. Herrera:Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mei:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Aldoss:AUTO1: Consultancy; Helocyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zain:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; spectrum: Honoraria.

Introduction: Nivolumab (nivo) is an anti-PD-1 antibody that restores effective anti-tumor immune responses and is tolerable and effective in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Nivo combined with brentuximab vedotin (BV) as first salvage therapy (tx) yields high response rates and favorable progression-free survival (PFS) as a bridge to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in pts with RR HL. With the frontline approval of BV, it is necessary to evaluate the role of nivo as salvage tx separate from BV. We report interim results of a phase 2 trial evaluating PET-adapted nivo or nivo + ICE (NICE) chemotherapy as first salvage tx in RR HL. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter trial, pts with biopsy-proven RR HL after frontline tx received 3 mg/kg nivo every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). PET-CT was performed after C3 and C6. After C6, pts in CR proceeded to ASCT while pts not in CR received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was complete response rate according to 2014 Lugano classification. PFS and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: 39 pts were evaluable for toxicity; 37 were evaluable for response. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. 32 pts received nivo alone and 7 pts received nivo/NICE. 32 pts completed study tx, 2 pts continue on protocol tx, 1 pt discontinued early in CR to undergo ASCT, 2 pts discontinued nivo early due to nivo-related adverse events (AE, 1 pt = Gr 4 altered mental status, 1 pt = Gr 2 pneumonitis), 1 pt discontinued due to unrelated death during nivo (Gr 5 sepsis due to untreated dental abscess), 1 pt withdrew due to refusal to receive NICE following nivo. After C3 of nivo, the overall response rate (ORR) was 89% (33/37), with a CR rate of 59% (22/37), partial response (PR) rate of 30% (11/37), and 2 pts each had stable disease (SD) and PD. After C6 of nivo (n=31), the ORR was 90%, with 24 CR (77%), 4 PR (13%), and 3 PD. Thus, including pts who stopped nivo early (due to toxicity or insufficient response and switch to NICE), at the end of nivo (n=37, not including 2 pts with ongoing tx) the ORR was 78%, with 26 CR (70%), 3 PR (8%), 1 pt with SD and 5 with PD. 7 pts were treated with NICE and all responded (100% ORR) with 6 CR (86%) and 1 PR (14%). At the end of protocol tx (nivo or nivo/NICE) including all pts (n=37) except the 2 who remain on ongoing tx, the ORR was 89% with 32 CR (86%) and 1 PR (3%). Among 35 evaluable pts, the ORR was 94% and CR rate was 91% (Figure). 27 pts proceeded to ASCT directly after protocol tx, 1 pt is awaiting ASCT, and 4 pts in CR refused ASCT. One pt with PR after NICE responded to subsequent salvage tx and underwent ASCT. In pts who had ASCT, a median of 2 (range 1-4) stem cell collections were required, a median of 4.7x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 3.12 - 16.23) were collected, and the median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 and 12 days, respectively. The median follow-up time in all pts (n=39) was 10.5 months (range 1.6-24.5 mo). The 1-year PFS was 79% (95 CI, 63-98%) and 1-year OS was 97% (95 CI, 92-100%). Two PD events occurred in pts who had CR but refused ASCT. There were 2 PD events in pts who completed therapy and proceeded to ASCT - both were in pts who required NICE. The most common AEs related to nivo alone (n=39) were fatigue (28%), rash (18%), fever (15%), thrombocytopenia (10%), and dyspnea (10%), and all were grade (gr) 1-2. Only 2 pts had gr 3-4 nivo-related AE, 1 pt had gr 3 thrombocytopenia and another pt had gr 4 altered mental status and gr 3 tumor lysis syndrome. Among 7 pts who received NICE, the most common AEs were nausea (71%), vomiting (57%), anemia (43%), fatigue (43%), hypertension (43%), and hyponatremia (29%) - all were gr 1-2. The only Gr 3-4 NICE-related AE was gr 4 neutropenia in 1 pt. Conclusion: PET-adapted nivo followed by NICE in patients without CR is a well-tolerated and effective first salvage approach in pts with RR HL. In our cohort, nivo alone was an effective bridge to ASCT in a majority of pts, sparing them the toxicity of traditional salvage chemotherapy. Pts who did not achieve CR with nivo were effectively salvaged by NIVO+ICE Disclosures Herrera: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chen:Autolus Therapeutics: Employment. Palmer:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy. Mei:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Popplewell:City of Hope: Employment. Kwak:Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; InnoLifes: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Xeme BioPharma, Inc: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Enzychem LifeSciences: Consultancy; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy; Celltrion Healthcare: Consultancy. Lee:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Background: Mature T cell and NK cell neoplasms collectively known as peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) comprise 15-20% of Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in adults and have a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival of less than 30% for the most aggressive subtypes. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) is offered to eligible patients as a potentially curative modality in the salvage setting or in high risk patients to consolidate an initial response to frontline therapy. There are few studies that report clinical outcomes derived from large sample size and long-term follow up data. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 87 consecutive patients with PTCL including transformed mycosis fungoides and NK/T-cell lymphoma without prior autologous transplant who underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope from January 2000 to June 2018 after IRB approval was obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline patient demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cumulative incidences of time to relapse and time to non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated with relapse and NRM as competing risks. Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were calculated as time to onset of GVHD with relapse and death as competing events for GVHD. Results: 87 patients were included for the analysis. Median age at the time of allo-HCT was 49 years (range 2-70 years). Histologies were PTCL-NOS (n=21); transformed CTCL (n=19); NK T-cell lymphoma (n=17); AITL (n=15), ALCL (n=7); gamma delta T-cell lymphoma (n=6) and other rare subtypes (n=2). None of the patients had a prior auto transplant. 42 patients (48%) received myeloablative conditioning, with the majority of patients receiving FTBI based conditioning (n=39) and three patients received BEAM regimen for conditioning. 45 patients (52%) received reduced intensity conditioning; fludarabine/melphalan based-conditioning was the most common regimen used (n=39). Sibling HCT was performed in 47 patients (54%), while MUD HCT was performed in 36 patients (41%) with fully matched HLA unrelated donor in 15 (17%) and HLA mismatched in 21 (24%) patients; 4 (5%) received haploidentical HCT. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=54), tacrolimus/sirolimus/MTX (n=11), tacrolimus or cyclosporine/MTX (n=7), tacrolimus or cyclosporine/MMF (n=7), post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/MMF (n=5) and other (n=3). Source of stem cells was PBSC in 77 (88%), bone marrow in 5 (6%), and cord blood in 5 (6%) patients. At the time of allo-HCT, there were a total of 25 (29%) patients in complete remission (CR1 n=15, CR2+ n=10), 25 (29%) patients in partial remission 22 (25%) with induction failure and 14 (16%) with relapsed disease. The median follow-up among survivors was 6.9 years (range 1.1-15.5). The 5- and 10-year PFS was 47% (95% CI: 36%-58%) and 38% (95% CI: 26%-50%), respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS was 53% (95% CI: 41%-63%) and 42% (95% CI: 29%-54%), respectively (Fig.1). Relapses at 5 and 10 years were both 24% (95% CI: 16%-34%), while NRM at 5 and 10 years was 28% (95% CI: 19%-39%) and 37% (95% CI: 25%-50%), respectively. At day 100 after allo-HCT, the rates of acute GVHD grade II-IV were 41% (95% CI: 30%-51%) and grade III-IV of 16% (95%CI: 9%-25%). Chronic GVHD rates at 3 years were 62% (95% CI: 51%-72%), with extensive GVHD of 55% (95% CI: 44%-65%). On univariate analysis, age (> 60 or not), sex, TBI-based conditioning, donor type (MSD vs MUD), stem cell source or remission status prior to allo-HCT did not predict for overall survival in our study. Conclusions: Our results constitute the largest reported single-institution series with a long-term follow-up on allo-HCT outcomes in patients with aggressive T-cell NHL. The 5-year PFS and OS of 47 and 53%, respectively, are encouraging for the high-risk T-cell NHL patients with limited treatment options. Disclosures Salhotra: Celgene: Other: Research Support; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Non paid consultant. Popplewell:City of Hope: Employment. Herrera:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mei:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Zain:spectrum: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

CMVi leads to significant morbidity in R+ HCT and preemptive therapy (PET) has been the standard of care. LTV was FDA-approved in Nov. 2017 for CMVi prevention in R+ HCT. Besides the clinical trials, there is are real world data on LTV. Upon IRB approval, we retrospectively studied consecutive R+ HCT pts with their first HCT between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/2018. LTV group included pts with HCT between 2/20/18 and 6/30/2018, who had LTV Px started within 28 days of HCT (n=59), and R+ HCT between 1/1/2017 and 2/19/2018 (n=307) served as control (ctrl). We compared CMVi rates in first 100 days of HCT, and time to engraftment between the 2 groups. Risk stratification: high risk - haplo/cord HCT & ATG use, low risk - all others. CMVi was defined as viral load (VL) of 625 IU/ml to 1250 IU/ml or higher (CMV assay conversion factor of 1 genomic copy/ml = 2.5 IU/ml). CMV VL less than 625 IU/ml is reported negative, VL between 625 and 1250 IU/ml is qualitative positive but numeric value is provided only for VL ≥ 1250 IU/ml. PET was recommended for VL >1250 IU/ml (500 copies/ml) in high risk and > 3750 IU/ml (1500 copies/ml) in low risk HCT (including those on LTV requiring PET). Descriptive statistics was done for baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence curves were generated for CMVi within 100 days post-HCT and Gray's test was used to compare the difference between the 2 groups. In both groups, median age was 54 years and HCT indications were similar. Donor type in LTV/ Ctrl groups: MRD (27 vs 36%), MUD (44 vs 47%), haplo (27 vs 15%), cord (1.7 vs 1.6%). PBMC was graft source in 90% of both groups. Myeloablative conditioning: 40.7% in LTV and 35% in Ctrl. GVHD Px: Cellcept (32 vs 25%), methotrexate (7 vs 9%), tacro/siro (58 vs 65), and others (3.4 vs 0.3%) in LTV & Ctrl respectively. A majority (n=36) received both intravenous & oral LTV formulation while 23 received oral only. Median time from HCT to LTV start was 13 days (range: 4-26). LTV group had significant reduction in CMVi rate (22.4% [95%CI: 12.7-34.0]) compared with ctrl group (41.1% [95%CI: 35.4-46.7], p=0.008, Fig 1). In a subgroup of high-risk HCT LTV was significantly reduced CMVi rate (22.2%) compared with ctrl (62.8%, p=0.004, Fig 2) while statistical difference was not reached in low-risk HCT pts (22.8% vs. 35.6%, p=0.11). In the LTV Px, clinically significant (CS)-CMVi requiring PET occurred in 8.4% (n=5) and on excluding 2 pts who were not on LTV at the time of CMVi, the rate was 5% (Fig 1). CMVi cleared without PET in 8/13 LTV pts and LTV was continued; all pts had VL LTV use in a real world setting is associated with significant reduction of CMVi and CS-CMVi without any discernible myelosuppression. The low level CMVi resolved spontaneously in majority with continued LTV Px and PET was not necessary. The high-risk HCT had most benefit with LTV Px.

Histological transformation (HT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The multicentre National Cancer Comprehensive Network database for NHL provides a unique opportunity to investigate the natural history of HT in the rituximab era. 118 patients with biopsy-confirmed indolent lymphoma and subsequent biopsy-confirmed HT were identified. Treatments for HT included autologous stem-cell transplant (auto-SCT) (n = 50), allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) (n = 18), and treatment without transplant (n = 50). The 2-year overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 68%. For auto-SCT patients aged ≤ 60 years (n = 24), the 2-year OS was 74%. For non-transplanted patients aged ≤ 60 years (n = 19), the 2-year OS was 59%. The 2-year OS of patients naïve to chemotherapy prior to HT was superior to patients who were exposed to chemotherapy prior to HT (100% vs. 35%, P = 0.03). In this largest prospective cohort of patients of strictly defined HT in the rituximab era, the natural history of HT appears more favourable than historical studies. Younger patients who were not exposed to chemotherapy prior to HT experienced a prolonged survival even without transplantation. This study serves as a benchmark for future trials of novel approaches for HT in the Rituximab era.

Many institutions have adopted algorithms based on preapheresis circulating CD34+ cell counts to optimize the use of plerixafor. However, a circulating peripheral blood CD34+ cell threshold that predicts mobilization failure has not been defined. The superiority of plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) over placebo + G-CSF for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection was shown for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a phase III, prospective, randomized, controlled study. The question remains as to which patients may benefit most from the use of plerixafor. In this post hoc retrospective analysis, mobilization outcomes were compared between the 2 treatment arms in patients stratified by peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) represent a relatively uncommon heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) with an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Anthracycline-based multiagent chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy followed by first-line consolidation with high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue (HDT/ASCR) is the standard approach to most of the patients with newly diagnosed PTCL. Relapsed or refractory disease is managed with second-line systemic therapy followed by HDT/ASCR or allogeneic stem cell transplant, based on the patient's eligibility for transplant. In recent years, several newer agents have shown significant activity in patients with relapsed or refractory disease across all 4 subtypes of PTCL. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the important updates to the NCCN Guidelines for NHL, specific to the management of patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are now considered a heterogeneous group of distinct molecular subtypes (germinal center B-cell DLBCL, activated B-cell DLBCL, and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) with varied natural history and response to therapy. In addition, a subset of patients with DLBCL have concurrent MYC and/or BCL2 gene rearrangements (double-hit lymphomas; DHL) and others have a dual expression of both MYC and BCL2 proteins (double-expressing DLBCL; DEL). The standard of care for the treatment of patients with PMBL, DHL, or DEL has not been established. Adequate immunophenotyping and molecular testing (in selected circumstances) are necessary for the accurate diagnosis of different subtypes of DLBCL. The NCCN Guidelines included in this issue, part of the NCCN Guidelines for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, address the diagnosis and management of DLBCL and its subtypes.

Allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can induce long-term remissions in chemosensitive relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL). The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to examine the efficacy of alloHCT using reduced-intensity conditioning with rituximab (RTX) in multiply relapsed, chemosensitive FL. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose RTX (FCR), in which 3 of the 4 doses of RTX were administered at a dose of 1 gm/m2. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was with tacrolimus and methotrexate. Sixty-five patients were enrolled and 62 were evaluable. Median age was 55 years (range, 29 to 74). This group was heavily pretreated: 77% had received ≥ 3 prior regimens, 32% had received ≥ 5 prior regimens, and 11% had received prior autologous HCT. Donors were HLA-matched siblings (n = 33) or HLA-matched unrelated adults (n = 29). No graft failures occurred. The overall response rate after HCT was 94% with 90% in complete remission (CR), including 24 patients not in CR before alloHCT. With a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 30 to 73), 3-year PFS and overall survival rates were 71% (95% confidence interval, 58% to 81%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 90%), respectively. Three-year cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality were 13% and 16%, respectively. Two-year cumulative incidences of grades 2 to 4 and grades 3 or 4 acute GVHD were 27% and 10%, respectively, and extensive chronic GVHD incidence was 55%. Serum RTX concentrations peaked at day +28 and remained detectable as late as 1 year in 59% of patients with available data. In conclusion, alloHCT with FCR conditioning confers high CR rates, a low incidence of relapse/progression, and excellent survival probabilities in heavily pretreated FL patients.

Preapheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34(+) cell count is a strong predictor of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and is routinely used to optimize the timing, cost, and success of HSC collection in patients with multiple myeloma. However, a uniform PB CD34(+) cell count that predicts mobilization failure has not been defined, resulting in the development of institute-specific algorithms for mobilization, particularly regarding the decision of when to use the novel stem cell mobilization agent plerixafor. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the mobilization efficacy of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus placebo plus G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma, stratified by preapheresis PB CD34(+) cell count:10,15,20, and ≥20 cells/μL. Regardless of the PB CD34(+) cell count, the total yield of CD34(+) cells from apheresis was significantly higher in the plerixafor group than in the placebo group, and significantly more patients in the plerixafor group collected the minimum (≥2 × 10(6) cells/kg) and optimum (≥6 × 10(6) cells/kg) stem cell yields on each day of apheresis. As a corollary, the greater stem cell collection in plerixafor-treated patients resulted in the need for significantly fewer days of apheresis to reach minimum and optimum cell doses across all cell count groups. For all CD34(+) cell count groups, the proportion of patients proceeding to transplantation and the median time to platelet and neutrophil engraftment were similar in the plerixafor and placebo groups. Our findings demonstrate that in patients with multiple myeloma who might be predicted to fail mobilization based on low PB CD34(+) cell count, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF allows for collection of the minimal and optimal cell doses in a greater proportion of patients compared with G-CSF alone. In addition, plerixafor plus G-CSF significantly improves the likelihood of optimal HSC collection in patients with higher preapheresis PB CD34(+) cell counts (≥20 cells/μL) compared with placebo plus G-CSF. Collectively, this analysis of predicted poor mobilizers validates the superiority of plerixafor plus G-CSF compared with G-CSF alone, which had been demonstrated previously in the overall patient population.

We conducted a matched-cohort analysis of autologous transplant conditioning regimens for diffuse large cell lymphoma in 92 patients treated with either radioimmunotherapy (RIT) or total body irradiation (TBI)–based conditioning regimens. The RIT regimen consisted of 0.4 mCi/kg of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan plus BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). The TBI-based regimen combined fractionated TBI at 1200 cGy, with etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Five factors were matched between 46 patient pairs: age at transplant ±5 years, disease status at salvage, number of prior regimens, year of diagnosis ±5 years, and year of transplantation ±5 years. Patients in the TBI group had higher rates of cardiac toxicity and mucositis, whereas Z-BEAM patients had a higher incidence of pulmonary toxicity. Overall survival at 4 years was 81.0% for the Z-BEAM and 52.7% for the TBI group (P = .01). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was 40.4% and 42.1% for Z-BEAM and TBI, respectively (P = .63). Nonrelapse mortality was superior in the Z-BEAM group: 0% compared with 15.8% for TBI at 4 years (P < .01). Our data demonstrate that RIT-based conditioning had a similar relapse incidence to TBI, with lower toxicity, resulting in improved overall survival, particularly in patients with ≥2 prior regimens.

Clofarabine is a novel purine nucleoside analog with immunosuppressive and antileukemia activity. We performed a phase I study of the combination of clofarabine plus melphalan as a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. Patients over age 18 in complete remission or with active disease (up to 50% marrow blasts) who had a matched related or unrelated donor were eligible. The conditioning regimen consisted of escalating doses of clofarabine plus melphalan, followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Sixteen patients (median age, 63 years) were treated at 3 dose levels; 4 of these patients had primary induction failure, and 3 were in first relapse. One patient at dose level 2 and 1 patient at dose level 3 died of multiorgan toxicity; no other dose-limiting toxicities were seen. All other patients at both doses of clofarabine studied demonstrated complete engraftment by day 30, with a median time to absolute neutrophil count recovery of 14 days, and 16 days for platelet recovery. With a median follow-up of 17 months, only 2 patients relapsed, and 4 patients died. Clofarabine plus melphalan at dose level 2 is a well-tolerated conditioning regimen with activity in patients with advanced acute myelogenous leukemia.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an established treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies, yet the impact of transplanted CD34(+) cell dose on clinical outcomes is unresolved. We conducted post hoc analyses of transplanted CD34(+) cell dose and hematopoietic recovery following ASCT in 438 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM), using data from 2 multicenter phase 3 clinical studies that compared plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus placebo plus G-CSF as stem cell mobilization regimens. Days to engraftment and the proportion of patients who reached predetermined blood count thresholds were compared across 3 CD34(+) cell dose levels: 2-4 × 10(6) cells/kg, 4-6 × 10(6) cells/kg, and6 × 10(6) cells/kg, regardless of mobilization treatment. Short-term neutrophil and platelet engraftment times were similar regardless of cell dose. A significant linear trend was observed between transplanted CD34(+) cell dose and the proportion of patients with platelet count150 × 10(9)/L at 100 days (P.001), 6 months (P = .026), and 12 months (P = .020) in patients with NHL, and at 100 days in patients with MM (P = .004). A linear trend was also observed between transplanted cell dose and the proportion of patients with platelet count100 × 10(9)/L at 100 days (P.001) and 6 months (P = .023) in patients with NHL. A higher cell dose was associated with a lower percentage of NHL patients requiring red blood cell transfusions (P = .006). Our analyses confirm previous findings that transplanted CD34(+) cell dose may be associated with better long-term platelet recovery after ASCT.

Purpose We performed a phase II study of oral vorinostat, a histone and protein deacetylase inhibitor, to examine its efficacy and tolerability in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent lymphoma. Patients and Methods In this open label phase II study (NCT00253630), patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with ≤ 4 prior therapies were eligible. Oral vorinostat was administered at a dose of 200 mg twice daily on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end points of progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, duration of response, safety, and tolerability. Results All 35 eligible patients were evaluable for response. The median number of vorinostat cycles received was nine. ORR was 29% (five complete responses [CR] and five partial responses [PR]). For 17 patients with FL, ORR was 47% (four CR, four PR). There were two of nine responders with MZL (one CR, one PR), and no formal responders among the nine patients with MCL, although one patient maintained stable disease for 26 months. Median PFS was 15.6 months for patients with FL, 5.9 months for MCL, and 18.8 months for MZL. The drug was well-tolerated over long periods of treatment, with the most common grade 3 adverse events being thrombocytopenia, anemia, leucopenia, and fatigue. Conclusion Oral vorinostat is a promising agent in FL and MZL, with an acceptable safety profile. Further studies in combination with other active agents in this setting are warranted.