1. Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease
- Author
-
Jessica L. Snyder, Jeff Boyle, Prasad Rao, Susan J. Wong, Bernard M. Branson, Michael A. Lewinski, Martin E. Schriefer, Barbara A. Body, Allen C. Steere, Andrew E. Levin, Segaran P. Pillai, Noel J. Gerald, Lance A. Liotta, Raymond J. Dattwyler, Adriana Marques, Erol Fikrig, Thomas R. Slezak, Jan A. Witkowski, Paul S. Mead, Kristian M Roth, Maria Gomes-Solecki, Steven E. Schutzer, William H. Robinson, Michel Ledizet, John A. Branda, Emmanuel F. Mongodin, and Martin Kintrup
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,030106 microbiology ,Polymerase Chain Reaction ,law.invention ,Serology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Lyme disease ,Antigen ,law ,Emerging infections ,medicine ,Humans ,Serologic Tests ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Borrelia burgdorferi ,Polymerase chain reaction ,Lyme Disease ,biology ,Diagnostic Tests, Routine ,business.industry ,Diagnostic test ,Genomics ,bacterial infections and mycoses ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,Virology ,High-Throughput Screening Assays ,Viewpoints ,Infectious Diseases ,business - Abstract
Borrelia burgdorferi was discovered to be the cause of Lyme disease in 1983, leading to seroassays. The 1994 serodiagnostic testing guidelines predated a full understanding of key B. burgdorferi antigens and have a number of shortcomings. These serologic tests cannot distinguish active infection, past infection, or reinfection. Reliable direct-detection methods for active B. burgdorferi infection have been lacking in the past but are needed and appear achievable. New approaches have effectively been applied to other emerging infections and show promise in direct detection of B. burgdorferi infections.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF