Search

Your search keyword '"Barreto, Leandro"' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Barreto, Leandro" Search Limiters Available in Library Collection
9 results on '"Barreto, Leandro"'

2. A CONSTRUÇÃO DO DIÁLOGO E DA SOLIDARIEDADE E A PROTEÇÃO DO BEM AMBIENTAL E DA NATUREZA NA CONCEPÇÃO UNIVERSAL DO HUMANO, A PARTIR DE UMA LEITURA DA ENCÍCLICA LAUDATO SI

Author

Barreto, Leandro de Marzo and Machado, Paulo Affonso Leme

Subjects
Transcendência dos direitos humanos, Transcendence human rights, Papal encyclical, Encíclica papal, Meio ambiente, Environment
Abstract

From the reading of the Papal Encyclical Laudato Si has aimed to demonstrate that the human relationship with the environment is inseparable assumption of the universal concept of human rights. Therefore, to use as a methodology, the research of the principles of environmental law and dichotomous discussion between anthropocentrism and biocentrism, in order to determine the limits (and actually there) solidarity and fraternity, as rights-guarantees for an effective and essential protection of the ecologically balanced environment and a healthy quality of life for present and future generations. At this point, it has been collate methodology and reference the principles of environmental law, especially the principle of an ecologically balanced environment and sustainable development, beginning the cosmopolitan vision of human rights from the design of multigenerational rights, in order to show the objective of this article, there is real relationship between environmental protection and development and meeting the spiritual being (this is not in the religious sense, but of existential quest for dignified life or abundance) and protection of fundamental rights, regardless of biocentric or anthropocentric view that wants to provide the environmental law. A partir da leitura da Encíclica Papal Laudato Si, este estudo objetiva demonstrar que a relação do humano com o meio ambiente é pressuposto indissociável da concepção universal dos direitos humanos. Para tanto, utiliza-se como metodologia a pesquisa dos princípios do Direito Ambiental e da discussão dicotômica entre antropocentrismo e biocentrismo, com o objetivo de apurar os limites (e se realmente os há) da solidariedade e fraternidade, como direitos-garantias para uma proteção efetiva e primordial do meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado e da sadia qualidade de vida para as presentes e as futuras gerações. Nessa perspectiva, tem-se como metodologia cotejar e referenciar os princípios do Direito Ambiental, especialmente o princípio do meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado e do desenvolvimento sustentável, principiando a visão cosmopolita dos direitos humanos a partir da concepção de direitos multigeracionais, com o intuito de demonstrar que existe verdadeira relação entre a proteção do meio ambiente e o desenvolvimento e encontro do ser espiritual (este não na acepção religiosa do termo, mas na acepção de busca existencial pela vida digna ou em abundância) e da proteção dos direitos fundamentais, independentemente da visão biocêntrica ou antropocêntrica que se queira fornecer ao Direito Ambiental.

Published
2016

3. A construção do diálogo e da solidariedade e a proteção do bem ambiental e da natureza na concepção universal do humano, a partir de uma leitura da Encíclica Laudato Si = The construction of dialogue and solidarity and the environmental health and nature protection at the universal conception of human based on a reading of the Encyclical Laudato Si

Author

Barreto, Leandro de Marzo and Machado, Paulo Affonso Leme

Subjects
Encíclica, Proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana, Desenvolvimento auto-sustentado, Princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana, Degradação ambiental, prevenção, Direitos do homem, Solidariedade, Direitos civis, Direitos humanos (direito constitucional), Desenvolvimento sustentável, Desenvolvimento sustentado, Proteção ambiental, Recursos naturais, proteção, Sustentabilidade ambiental, Meio ambiente, proteção, Direitos humanos
Abstract

Submitted by betanial@stj.jus.br (betanial@stj.jus.br) on 2018-06-06T14:31:55Z No. of bitstreams: 2 construcao_dialogo_solidariedade_barreto.pdf: 400848 bytes, checksum: 4ff1d69a5192b4dd546da60ef0f3ba79 (MD5) license.txt: 1239 bytes, checksum: c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 (MD5) Approved for entry into archive by Patrícia Rabello (rabello@stj.jus.br) on 2018-06-20T19:48:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 construcao_dialogo_solidariedade_barreto.pdf: 400848 bytes, checksum: 4ff1d69a5192b4dd546da60ef0f3ba79 (MD5) license.txt: 1239 bytes, checksum: c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-20T19:48:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 construcao_dialogo_solidariedade_barreto.pdf: 400848 bytes, checksum: 4ff1d69a5192b4dd546da60ef0f3ba79 (MD5) license.txt: 1239 bytes, checksum: c9b4c351324448672315a00808efb725 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016

Published
2016

5. The Concept of Interlacing Participatory and Theory Discursive in Habermans and the Conciliacion and Mediation as Positivization of Solution Efficient Conflict

Author

Barreto, Leandro de Marzo, Pontes, Carolina de Moraes, Barreto, Leandro de Marzo, and Pontes, Carolina de Moraes

Abstract

The aim is to support the use of appropriate conflict resolution methods recently positivado the Civil Procedure Code 2015 - conciliation, mediation and other forms - as a stage in the judgment of acertamento in discourse theory developed by jusfilósofo Habermas , especially , about his concept of public space and democratic development , where it is exposed to the idea that democracy and conflict resolution are resolved from the discourse or rational narrative speeches , using , therefore, the communicative action as the foundation democratic construction decisions, aiming the efficiency of judicial services., Busca-se fundamentar a utilização dos métodos adequados de solução de conflitos, recentemente positivado no Código de Processo Civil de 2015 – a conciliação, mediação e outras formas – como etapa para o juízo de acertamento, na teoria discursiva desenvolvida pelo jusfilósofo Habermas, especialmente, acerca de seu conceito de espaço público e desenvolvimento democrático, onde é exposta a ideia de que a democracia e as soluções de conflitos se resolvem a partir do discurso ou da narrativa racional dos discursos, utilizandose, para tanto, do agir comunicativo como fundamento da construção democrática das decisões, visando a eficiência da prestação jurisdicional.

Published
2016

7. Strategic alliance in technological development and innovation: Performance evaluation of co-creation between companies and their supply chain

Author

Monteiro, Luiz Otavio, Filho, Jose Rodrigues Faria, Barreto, Leandro, Correa, Alessandro, Argolo, Alberto, Gramacho, Jose Marcio, Monteiro, Luiz Otavio, Filho, Jose Rodrigues Faria, Barreto, Leandro, Correa, Alessandro, Argolo, Alberto, and Gramacho, Jose Marcio

Abstract

Purpose: The Brazilian oil and gas market presents a perspective of growth in the next decades. Considering this scenario, the increasing number of participants in this supply chain is foreseen to supply the demand of goods and services, especially in the technological development area. The paper intends to evaluate the collaborative development capacity and respective measurements of performance on these partnerships established between customer and suppliers, through qualitative research with a sample of Brazilian oil and gas market representative. Design/methodology/approach: This paper intends to verify if the co-creation performance is measured after an implementation, specific in a restricted industry. The methodology consists in a bibliographical research to support the study, and it also had a questionnaire sent to Brazilian companies that take part of the oil and natural gas industry supply chain, to analyze if the results of co-creation activities are measured by this group of companies, to verify its attractiveness to develop the co-creation usage or change the type of partnership with the market. Findings and Originality/value: The misunderstanding of co-creation and technical partnership was noticed. The usage of teams working together from two or more organizations cannot be considered as a co-creation, because the relationship and obligations are different between these two ways of workgroup. But the companies of oil and gas industry, when questioned, were able to distinguish it, avoiding risks of incorrect results motivated by wrong interpretation of the paper content. Research limitations/implications: As related in the paper, eight companies were invited to take part on the questionnaire about co-creation, but only 50% answered it. The research should have a better result of this subject if it had been developed with more answers of Brazilian oil and gas industry companies. Originality/value: Even this kind of partnership is used in oil and natural, Peer Reviewed

Published
2013

9. Strategic alliance in technological development and innovation: Performance evaluation of co-creation between companies and their supply chain.

Author

Otavio Monteiro, Luiz, Rodrigues Faria Filho, Jose, Barreto, Leandro, Correa, Alessandro, Argolo, Alberto, and Marcio Gramacho, Jose

Subjects
PETROLEUM industry, SUPPLY chains, TECHNOLOGICAL innovations, STRATEGIC alliances (Business), RESEARCH & development
Abstract

Purpose: The Brazilian oil and gas market presents a perspective of growth in the next decades. Considering this scenario, the increasing number of participants in this supply chain is foreseen to supply the demand of goods and services, especially in the technological development area. The paper intends to evaluate the collaborative development capacity and respective measurements of performance on these partnerships established between customer and suppliers, through qualitative research with a sample of Brazilian oil and gas market representative. Design/methodology/approach: This paper intends to verify if the co-creation performance is measured after an implementation, specific in a restricted industry. The methodology consists in a bibliographical research to support the study, and it also had a questionnaire sent to Brazilian companies that take part of the oil and natural gas industry supply chain, to analyze if the results of co-creation activities are measured by this group of companies, to verify its attractiveness to develop the co-creation usage or change the type of partnership with the market. Findings: The misunderstanding of co-creation and technical partnership was noticed. The usage of teams working together from two or more organizations cannot be considered as a co-creation, because the relationship and obligations are different between these two ways of workgroup. But the companies of oil and gas industry, when questioned, were able to distinguish it, avoiding risks of incorrect results motivated by wrong interpretation of the paper content. Research limitations/implications: As related in the paper, eight companies were invited to take part on the questionnaire about co-creation, but only 50% answered it. The research should have a better result of this subject if it had been developed with more answers of Brazilian oil and gas industry companies. Originality/value: Even this kind of partnership is used in oil and natural gas industrial segment, the measurement isn't correct used. The value of this paper is to show that companies that are using co-creation could detect the best opportunities to apply it, due to the attractiveness that each situation can generate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results